Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

having wet hair is good for your health

Options
  • 17-07-2019 11:42pm
    #1
    s7ryf3925pivug
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭


    the pm2.5 level went up to over 200 micrograms per cubic metre after my wife used her dyson hair dryer. The level is usually lower than 5 in the same room. 200 is well into the hazardous category


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    Danzy
    Registered Users Posts: 13,255 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Zahir Icy Hailstone wrote: »
    the pm2.5 levels went up to over 200 micrograms per cubic metre after my wife used her dyson hair dried. They're usually less than 5 in the same room. 200 is well into the hazardous category

    Do go on.


  • Options
    #3
    yaguhu cloud
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20 ✭yaguhu cloud


    tell her to use the hair dryer in the shower, that way it won't get too dry


  • Options
    #4
    kneemos
    Registered Users Posts: 20,409 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    I'd be more concerned her spending four hundred on a bloody hair dryer.


  • Options
    #5
    bobbyss
    Registered Users Posts: 5,190 ✭✭✭bobbyss


    Zahir Icy Hailstone wrote:
    the pm2.5 levels went up to over 200 micrograms per cubic metre after my wife used her dyson hair dryer. They're usually less than 5 in the same room. 200 is well into the hazardous category


    Can you put that in simple English?


  • Options
    #6
    Former Observer
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    crazy


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    Birneybau
    Registered Users Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    Well, there's a cure for my insomnia


  • Options
    #8
    Duckworth_Luas
    Registered Users Posts: 5,733 ✭✭✭Duckworth_Luas


    having wet hair is good for your health
    It may be in small doses, but everyone knows that going to bed with wet hair results in instant death.


  • Options
    #9
    s7ryf3925pivug
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    bobbyss wrote: »
    Can you put that in simple English?
    You're outing yourself as not being a regular follower of my threads, Bobby of the SS. But this is ok.

    PM2.5 is very small particulate matter that has a very bad effect on human health. It's usually generated by activities
    that generate lots of dust or smoke.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/17/cooking-sunday-roast-causes-indoor-pollution-worse-than-delhi?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard


  • Options
    #10
    Alf Veedersane
    Registered Users Posts: 24,552 ✭✭✭✭Alf Veedersane


    Zahir Icy Hailstone wrote: »
    the pm2.5 levels went up to over 200 micrograms per cubic metre after my wife used her dyson hair dryer. They're usually less than 5 in the same room. 200 is well into the hazardous category

    That doesn't mean the PM2.5 levels increased. The concentration increased at the monitor, which is not particularly accurate anyway.

    Also, your wife needs to drop the heat setting to stop burning her hair. Your wife is bad for your health.


  • Options
    #11
    Witcher
    Registered Users Posts: 14,439 ✭✭✭✭Witcher


    Kowalski, analysis


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #12
    s7ryf3925pivug
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    Alf Veedersane wrote: »
    That doesn't mean the PM2.5 levels increased. The concentration increased at the monitor, which is not particularly accurate anyway.

    Also, your wife needs to drop the heat setting to stop burning her hair. Your wife is bad for your health.
    24 hour monitoring in place. It spiked when the hairdryer was on and remained high for some time, going down slowly as the air purifier worked. The air purifier circulated the air a lot. The increase was from 1 to over 200. It has not gone above 5 without a clear cause. This is all consistent with an actual increase in levels and not that there were more at the monitor at a given moment.

    From what I've read the monitor's values match official figures released for the same places and times. It also is consistent in showing increases when there is something to cause them and only when there is. This is evidence that it is pretty accurate.

    Burning hair - yes for sure.


  • Options
    #13
    Badly Drunk Boy
    Registered Users Posts: 6,452 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    You jumped to the statement that having wet hair is good for your health, instead of saying using a Dyson hair-dryer is bad for your health.


  • Options
    #14
    ytpe2r5bxkn0c1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Sad. That's it really...just sad...pm2.5...sad...


  • Options
    #15
    s7ryf3925pivug
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    Badly Drunk Boy wrote: »
    You jumped to the statement that having wet hair is good for your health, instead of saying using a Dyson hair-dryer is bad for your health.
    That's not intended to be taken too seriously.


  • Options
    #16
    topper75
    Registered Users Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Seems to me that humans just like having problems. Even when they have no real problems, they'll make up some.


  • Options
    #17
    Alf Veedersane
    Registered Users Posts: 24,552 ✭✭✭✭Alf Veedersane


    Zahir Icy Hailstone wrote: »
    24 hour monitoring in place. It spiked when the hairdryer was on and remained high for some time, going down slowly as the air purifier worked. The air purifier circulated the air a lot. The increase was from 1 to over 200. It has not gone above 5 without a clear cause. This is all consistent with an actual increase in levels and not that there were more at the monitor at a given moment.

    From what I've read the monitor's values match official figures released for the same places and times. It also is consistent in showing increases when there is something to cause them and only when there is. This is evidence that it is pretty accurate.

    Burning hair - yes for sure.

    Not an off-the-shelf kit so.

    The fundamental issue is you need to get rid of your wife or hair-drying. Is she worth more than a Dyson?


  • Options
    #18
    sdraobs
    Registered Users Posts: 224 ✭✭sdraobs


    forget worrying about wife spending money on a hairdryer. how much did you spend on a pm2.5 monitor?


  • Options
    #19
    kneemos
    Registered Users Posts: 20,409 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Maybe steam from the shower was dickering the meter.


  • Options
    #20
    s7ryf3925pivug
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    sitting room


  • Options
    #21
    Franz Von Peppercorn II
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    Zahir Icy Hailstone wrote: »
    That's not intended to be taken too seriously.

    I for one am not taking any of this seriously.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #22
    branie2
    Registered Users Posts: 10,292 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    Are you sure?


  • Options
    #23
    cnocbui
    Registered Users Posts: 19,684 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    How have I managed to live so many decades without constant monitoring of Pm2.5 levels or having an air purifier?

    Given the dryer, I think you should substitute the word wealth for health in the title. Aldi recently had petrol driven lawnmowers for around €230 - made in Austria.


  • Options
    #24
    s7ryf3925pivug
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    sdraobs wrote: »
    forget worrying about wife spending money on a hairdryer. how much did you spend on a pm2.5 monitor?
    same line of argument she used to justify getting the hairdryer :D


  • Options
    #25
    mad muffin
    Registered Users Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?


    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?
    Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut? Wat? Wut?


  • Options
    #26
    yeppydeppy
    Registered Users Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭yeppydeppy


    Don't say what, say pardon.


  • Options
    #27
    Bobblehats
    Registered Users Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    Sometimes we just need to crop that head and absolve ourselves


Advertisement