Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Abbey Creative Quarter Unveiled

  • 07-10-2013 3:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭


    They've unveiled the future plans for the Brewery site and it's apparently being called the Abbey Creative Quarter. Possible creation of 1,000 jobs. Haven't heard much else other than that. Anyone else get the low down on this?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    No but there's been snippets on the local papers. Something about an R&D innovation centre with incubation units and also Diageo/Smithwicks developing a large visitors centre like the Guinness Storehouse which would be a boon. I'm going to miss the smell of brewing in Kilkenny, was part of the city.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭redtelephone




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭odin_ie


    Looks pretty impressive....I wonder will they get funding for it all. Would be pretty cool if they could get some big companies in there too, there are a lot of cloud and tech companies out there who see Ireland as a good location, so who knows.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    odin_ie wrote: »
    Looks pretty impressive....I wonder will they get funding for it all. Would be pretty cool if they could get some big companies in there too, there are a lot of cloud and tech companies out there who see Ireland as a good location, so who knows.

    Seems to be mainly private sector with local authority services. I think Kilkenny is a great location now and should be a reasonably easy sell. Anyone who visits ravesa bout Kilkenny.
    Diageo are definitely investing a lot in a new visitor centre so that's one aspect sorted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 572 ✭✭✭linny


    wont happen without the new road, wont get planning


  • Registered Users Posts: 3 convex02l




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    linny wrote: »
    wont happen without the new road, wont get planning

    Hmm i'd take the new road personally. Too big an oppurtunity to pass up. The past is important and needs to eb protected. But we can't live in it either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Sky King


    It looks like the project is in good hands based on that video. There seems to be an awful lot of buildings in the new development though. Would more green space not be better? You always have the option to build more if you need to then. Will it be possible to fill all those buildings shown in the models?

    One thing I would hate to see is another McDonagh Junction affair with rows of large stone buildings full of nothing which create a general feeling of dispair when you stand near them.

    McD J looked good on paper too, and to be fair they did a nice job preserving the old buildings. But the place is a black hole for positive emotions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭catbear


    road_high wrote: »
    Hmm i'd take the new road personally. Too big an oppurtunity to pass up. The past is important and needs to eb protected. But we can't live in it either.
    That's bull**** and you know it. The CAS is wrong because there's a better alternative.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    catbear wrote: »
    That's bull**** and you know it. The CAS is wrong because there's a better alternative.

    ...A few old (and very non descript/ugly) houses nobody even knew about or gave one sh1t til now...it's no wonder it's so hard to make any progress in this country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭odin_ie


    One question, what about the second new quarter that was proposed for the mart all those years ago, has that been shelved forever? I think between the brewery and mart areas, there is some real opportunity to make Kilkenny a proper city with some great chances for big business to come in.

    I also notice they've marked a skate park in the plans!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 572 ✭✭✭linny


    road_high wrote: »
    ...A few old (and very non descript/ugly) houses nobody even knew about or gave one sh1t til now...it's no wonder it's so hard to make any progress in this country.

    100% agree with everything you say, old mart site was turned down because of a fear the road network would not handle the traffic it brought, it will be the very same for the brewery site it will sit there for years unless this road is built to service both sites


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    Say it's absolutely necessary to have a new entrance to the Brewery Site (which using a bit of common sense, it seems like it is) and say the Vicar Street houses get demolished to create a new entrance for this area, that seems like something that is a necessary development for the city to move forward.

    But a bridge that goes across the river and intersects Wolfe Tone Street to serve a site that is lying derelict for 7 years and will most likely to continue to do so? Where is there any logic in that? Especially when a completed ring road would solve that problem.

    Anyway, to veer slightly more onto topic. Yes, the brewery site will need another entrance and while it's valid that this can happen from the Vicar Street side of the brewery, integration with the Market Yard and existant riverside is also going to be part of the development.


  • Registered Users Posts: 612 ✭✭✭Rantan


    road_high wrote: »
    ...A few old (and very non descript/ugly) houses nobody even knew about or gave one sh1t til now...it's no wonder it's so hard to make any progress in this country.

    not true...just because you dont give a s**te doenst mean that the rest of the town feels the same -anyway its not just about the houses - theres more to the CAS than just " a few non descript/ugly houses"...it has been discussed in detail why people object...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 572 ✭✭✭linny


    Threadhead wrote: »
    Say it's absolutely necessary to have a new entrance to the Brewery Site (which using a bit of common sense, it seems like it is) and say the Vicar Street houses get demolished to create a new entrance for this area, that seems like something that is a necessary development for the city to move forward.

    But a bridge that goes across the river and intersects Wolfe Tone Street to serve a site that is lying derelict for 7 years and will most likely to continue to do so? Where is there any logic in that? Especially when a completed ring road would solve that problem.

    Anyway, to veer slightly more onto topic. Yes, the brewery site will need another entrance and while it's valid that this can happen from the Vicar Street side of the brewery, integration with the Market Yard and existant riverside is also going to be part of the development.

    our city needs this bridge, johns bridge and greens bridge are old and just cant take much more aint johns bridge due to close for major re do when we get the new bridge, so make a new entrance from vicar street to the brewery and the what all cars are jammed on the same old road that cant handle the traffic of today, as for the mart site it will sit for another fifty years without a new link, the CAS is not the answer to all our problems but it will help some and complement the ring road when it is finished


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    linny wrote: »
    100% agree with everything you say, old mart site was turned down because of a fear the road network would not handle the traffic it brought, it will be the very same for the brewery site it will sit there for years unless this road is built to service both sites

    And Kilkenny will allowed to stagnate and the investments will go elsewhere where they will welcome it with open arms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    Short sighted, short term solution to a long term problem, all the more exacerbated by big money interests, ie. Tesco.

    The reason those bridges can't take much more is because they have a stupid amount of trucks driving over them for the past four decades. That doesn't mean we need another bridge that can be banjaxed in four decades to come. The problem is that we need to get trucks and other large vehicles away from the city centre. A ring road is the only solution to this problem. The CAS will still drive heavy duty vehicles into the city centre, the exact reason why most people are against it.

    Do we envisage a Kilkenny of the future where the river is covered in knackered bridges just so we can accomodate trucks into the city centre? God forbid that the trucks that have damaged our two city centre bridges would have to drive around the city.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 572 ✭✭✭linny


    road_high wrote: »
    And Kilkenny will allowed to stagnate and the investments will go elsewhere where they will welcome it with open arms.

    but hey we will have 3 lovely house's no one even notice's :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    linny wrote: »
    100% agree with everything you say, old mart site was turned down because of a fear the road network would not handle the traffic it brought, it will be the very same for the brewery site it will sit there for years unless this road is built to service both sites

    Sorry mate but this is absolute bull, the old mart site was never turned down, it was in development and then the arse fell out of the economy and they put it on the long finger where it still lies.

    The road had nothing to do with it. If they had the money and were sure the investment was still valid, that redeveloped site would have been open three years ago.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    linny wrote: »
    but hey we will have 3 lovely house's no one even notice's :mad:

    ...with some medieval chinmey or something, the tourists will be pouring in ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    Also, while another entrance would be ideal for the brewery site this idea that the project will be held over a barrel because of the CAS is also bull. There's already two existant entrances to the brewery (one more suited to pedestrians) and the entire Market Yard side will be opened up too.

    Fine, get rid of the houses, build an entrance off Vicar Street, job done. Why do we still need a bridge?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 572 ✭✭✭linny


    Threadhead wrote: »
    Short sighted, short term solution to a long term problem, all the more exacerbated by big money interests, ie. Tesco.



    I don't think Tesco have anything to do with either site banks own the mart site now, and council own brewery, but would be great to see Tesco in mart site, and third level and students in brewery site and new bridge be handy for students to get to Tesco


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    Kilkenny needs a Tesco like it needs a new bridge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 572 ✭✭✭linny


    Threadhead wrote: »
    Sorry mate but this is absolute bull, the old mart site was never turned down, it was in development and then the arse fell out of the economy and they put it on the long finger where it still lies.

    The road had nothing to do with it. If they had the money and were sure the investment was still valid, that redeveloped site would have been open three years ago.

    no they were granted permission to remove to old mart buildings and the new development was separate planning app that got refused

    sorry but you wrong it was refused because of road network
    http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/226853.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    Believe me, there was a lot more to that than issues with the road network.

    Also, that only underlines the fact that the CAS is being built to serve what is now a derelict site.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 572 ✭✭✭linny


    yes and will remain a derelict site without this new bridge


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Threadhead wrote: »
    Short sighted, short term solution to a long term problem, all the more exacerbated by big money interests, ie. Tesco.

    The reason those bridges can't take much more is because they have a stupid amount of trucks driving over them for the past four decades. That doesn't mean we need another bridge that can be banjaxed in four decades to come. The problem is that we need to get trucks and other large vehicles away from the city centre. A ring road is the only solution to this problem. The CAS will still drive heavy duty vehicles into the city centre, the exact reason why most people are against it.

    Do we envisage a Kilkenny of the future where the river is covered in knackered bridges just so we can accomodate trucks into the city centre? God forbid that the trucks that have damaged our two city centre bridges would have to drive around the city.


    How are Tesco involved in this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    Tesco wanted to be the anchor supermarket on the site. This would have been the ideal site for their Kilkenny outlet. Previous to that, they had tried to get in to MacDonagh Junction but that slot was given to Dunnes Stores.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,231 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    From what I've seen in the plans (and I've only seen what was in the Indo) Tesco have no place in the proposals and given that the CoCo own the site are unlikely to be allowed on the site.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    godtabh wrote: »
    From what I've seen in the plans (and I've only seen what was in the Indo) Tesco have no place in the proposals and given that the CoCo own the site are unlikely to be allowed on the site.

    Yeah, that's certainly the case now but back in 2006 they were actively being courted as anchor tenants. At least it wasn't Dunnes. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭odin_ie


    What, the CoCo own the mart site too??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Threadhead wrote: »
    Tesco wanted to be the anchor supermarket on the site. This would have been the ideal site for their Kilkenny outlet. Previous to that, they had tried to get in to MacDonagh Junction but that slot was given to Dunnes Stores.

    I hear constant rumours that Tesco want to go solo on the mart site. Don't know how true that is though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,390 ✭✭✭Bowlardo


    The potential of this is absolutely crazy .The worry is will it be done right.
    When you look at what they did with the market yard it really is atrocious.
    If someone back then had the foresight to have an underground car park and and park /shops/restaurants along the bank of the river instead of a big pile of dog **** of a car park it would have made some difference to the new developement....
    I think the bridge has to go ahead now (I was against it)...but it should be done in old stone.
    Ring road has to be complete too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Bowlardo wrote: »
    The potential of this is absolutely crazy .The worry is will it be done right.
    When you look at what they did with the market yard it really is atrocious.
    If someone back then had the foresight to have an underground car park and and park /shops/restaurants along the bank of the river instead of a big pile of dog **** of a car park it would have made some difference to the new developement....
    I think the bridge has to go ahead now (I was against it)...but it should be done in old stone.
    Ring road has to be complete too

    Something like this needs infrastructure and access so it's obvious the road is an integral part of the development.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Thank god it's not another shopping centre planed all the same. Dare I ask is there any shopping/leisure/residential aspect planned? There is a lack of high quality apartments to rent in kilkenny.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭Threadhead


    I reckon apartments will definitely be part of it. In fairness, it looks like it's going to be a lovely place to live.

    It doesn't seem like they're trying to attract much retail either. With Dunnes so close there probably isn't a huge need for it. Focus seems to be on business and heritage. That being said, I'd imagine it would be quite like the IFSC in Dublin with small shops/cafés dotted about.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭catbear


    Who'll pay for theses apartments if demand isn't doesn't cover costs? Another lump of debt for taxpayer I imagine.

    I'm in favour of better apartment construction if buyers stump up 20% before construction even starts. The "build it and they will come" bullsh*te has this country with too many empties as is and a bailout to boot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭hi5


    Where are the 1000 people going to park, and how are they going to get to this parking, drive down the High Street?
    Jobs for 1000 people should be confined to outside the city centre,somewhere along the ring road would be best.
    The brewery site should be left for tourism, thats where the money is for kilkenny, just leave it as a park beside the river, would cost next to nothing.

    The county council should make a deal with Dunnes stores, give them the mart site in exchange for their market yard store, they could then re-develope the complete site from Greens bridge to Johns Bridge, this would do a lot to get rid of traffic congestion in that area.
    Dunnes stores could have a much larger store in the Mart site, they could close the McDonagh Junction store allowing someone like Marks and Spencers in.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭catbear


    @ hi5

    smiley-clapping.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Sky King


    The county council should make a deal with Dunnes stores, give them the mart site in exchange for their market yard store,

    Very nice idea - except the Mart is beside McDonagh Junction, where they already have one.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 11,393 Mod ✭✭✭✭Captain Havoc


    Sky King wrote: »
    Very nice idea - except the Mart is beside McDonagh Junction, where they already have one.

    He did say, close MacDonagh.

    https://ormondelanguagetours.com

    Walking Tours of Kilkenny in English, French or German.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 11,393 Mod ✭✭✭✭Captain Havoc


    Anyone who has a problem with modern architecture going into the brewery surely must realise the brewery is not a medieval building. With the new development, we may get to see what medieval buildings are in there.

    https://ormondelanguagetours.com

    Walking Tours of Kilkenny in English, French or German.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Anyone who has a problem with modern architecture going into the brewery surely must realise the brewery is not a medieval building. With the new development, we may get to see what medieval buildings are in there.

    Most of it is a monstrosity to be fair. Anything would be an improvement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,778 ✭✭✭up for anything


    Sky King wrote: »
    McD J looked good on paper too, and to be fair they did a nice job preserving the old buildings. But the place is a black hole for positive emotions.

    I'm glad I'm not the only one to feel that. From the very first visit I swore that if there was such a thing as reincarnation I must have been an inmate in the poorhouse at one time as I always feel an enveloped in depression when I walk in and around there which disappears as soon as I get out.
    linny wrote: »
    and new bridge be handy for students to get to Tesco

    That's a brilliant reason for a new bridge. :rolleyes:

    I can't understand why they didn't wait a bit and put in a pedestrian bridge from the brewery site across the river, rather than where it is being built now. If the students found it a bit tiring to walk round by Green's bridge or John's bridge a special travelator could installed.

    I can't remember where I saw it but someone suggested that they attach an enclosed pedestrian bridge to one side of Green's bridge, then take out the current pavement on the bridge to widen the road which would allow two lorries/buses pass each other without having to wait which causes traffic build up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 27 green jay


    I would agree with a Vicar St/St. Canice's Pl. entrance to the site but don't see any need for new road or new bridge, it will completely ruin Wolfe Tone St. which is mainly residential. A foot bridge connecting both sides of the river OK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    5 years later it shows how slow these things progress!
    In any case two good announcements for the Abbey quarter in recent weeks. National Innovation Hub (in conjunction with Carlow IT) to be based there in addition to €6 million funding a few weeks ago;
    https://www.facebook.com/146296768437/posts/10158287561183438/

    Really positive for Kilkenny and where we need to be headed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 27 green jay


    I'm pleased to see it going ahead, the Brewery site was in danger of becoming an eyesore. Hope the work proceeds quickly as promised. BTW, I have just seen my post from five years ago, its being going on that long!. I've changed my mind re: the bridge. It's very handy and also gives a new perspective on the river.


  • Registered Users Posts: 815 ✭✭✭Jesper


    road_high wrote: »
    5 years later it shows how slow these things progress!
    In any case two good announcements for the Abbey quarter in recent weeks. National Innovation Hub (in conjunction with Carlow IT) to be based there in addition to €6 million funding a few weeks ago;
    https://www.facebook.com/146296768437/posts/10158287561183438/

    Really positive for Kilkenny and where we need to be headed.

    Great news! Hopefully some more self sustaining organisations and small/medium enterprises will also rent space down there. A greenfield space of that size in the middle of the town is a fantastic opportunity to invigorate the city.
    Unfortunately though there doesn't seem to be any direction or leadership promoting this space to a wide variety of industry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,390 ✭✭✭Bowlardo


    I think a bus park where they proposed the car park would be a good idea to raise money and ensure tourist actually get to see kilkenny instead of just the castle.
    Can completely understand the concerns that if it went in it would be there for good. I think that probably would be the case.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement