Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1100101103105106716

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,288 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It shouldnt yet. ROG doesnt want it yet and i think we need someone with far more head coaching experience.

    I wouldnt pick Leo unless you get Lancaster as well and does Lancaster even want to go back to international coaching? Seems very happy where he is right now and would be surprised he would want to change whats working well for him

    Regardless of whether ROG would be an option, he wouldn't take it. You only get to coach Ireland once and he clearly wants to build up to that role.


  • Registered Users Posts: 367 ✭✭OneLungDavy


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Regardless of whether ROG would be an option, he wouldn't take it. You only get to coach Ireland once and he clearly wants to build up to that role.
    He'd be stupid to turn it down if it's his dream job. The chance may not come around again(if hypothetically he was offered the job after the 6 Nations).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,722 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    He'd be stupid to turn it down if it's his dream job. The chance may not come around again(if hypothetically he was offered the job after the 6 Nations).

    He'd be far from stupid. He's only 44, if he takes on the head coach role with a squad that he feels is in a bit of a transition period and it goes wrong, that's a fairly bad mark on his CV. Especially given he's witnessing what life would be like as a national head coach with little HC experience.

    There's no problem with him building up experience elsewhere for a few more years until he feels like he might be in a better position for it.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    IRFU seems to pick from the provinces or from within the setup. With that in mind the only names I can think of is Dan McFarland or VanGrann.

    Don't think Friend has done enough with Connacht to be in contention and Leo won't get the job solo without Lancaster. No indication that Lancaster has interest in that kind of job as he seems settled into his role at Leinster and has a lot of coaching and leadership stuff going on outside of Leinster.

    Dan has done a pretty good job with Ulster and I rate him higher than VanGrann personally. I reckon you could list a bunch of top coaches from around the world and Easterby would be more likely than most of them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 367 ✭✭OneLungDavy


    He'd be far from stupid. He's only 44, if he takes on the head coach role with a squad that he feels is in a bit of a transition period and it goes wrong, that's a fairly bad mark on his CV. Especially given he's witnessing what life would be like as a national head coach with little HC experience.

    There's no problem with him building up experience elsewhere for a few more years until he feels like he might be in a better position for it.
    It sounds good in theory. In a perfect world he builds up to the Ireland job, but he's only as good as his latest job. His career could spiral downwards at any point then the IRFU won't fancy him. Assuming he will get the job further down the line is a dangerous move.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,288 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He'd be stupid to turn it down if it's his dream job. The chance may not come around again(if hypothetically he was offered the job after the 6 Nations).

    He could almost definitely be in charge of Munster by now if that is what he wanted. He will be all too aware of the post playing career of e.g. Martin Johnson and steer well clear of the Ireland job until he thinks himself ready for it. It does, after all, have a good chance of being his last coaching job.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,233 ✭✭✭ClanofLams


    IRFU seems to pick from the provinces or from within the setup. With that in mind the only names I can think of is Dan McFarland or VanGrann.

    Don't think Friend has done enough with Connacht to be in contention and Leo won't get the job solo without Lancaster. No indication that Lancaster has interest in that kind of job as he seems settled into his role at Leinster and has a lot of coaching and leadership stuff going on outside of Leinster.

    Dan has done a pretty good job with Ulster and I rate him higher than VanGrann personally. I reckon you could list a bunch of top coaches from around the world and Easterby would be more likely than most of them.

    True and may well turn out to be accurate again but the last two coaches also had won multiple Heineken cups, no one of that calibre currently at provincial level although achievements of Cullen & Lancaster obviously close and combo would be strong contenders.

    It’s a small enough sample of head coaches appointed in the professional era and I would be pretty surprised/disappointed if IRFU limited their options in such a way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,814 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    IRFU seems to pick from the provinces or from within the setup. With that in mind the only names I can think of is Dan McFarland or VanGrann.

    Don't think Friend has done enough with Connacht to be in contention and Leo won't get the job solo without Lancaster. No indication that Lancaster has interest in that kind of job as he seems settled into his role at Leinster and has a lot of coaching and leadership stuff going on outside of Leinster.

    Dan has done a pretty good job with Ulster and I rate him higher than VanGrann personally. I reckon you could list a bunch of top coaches from around the world and Easterby would be more likely than most of them.

    Dan could be very a very good coach with (as much as it pains me to say it) better players. Ulster seem to play high risk rugby at times, that leads to errors. With better players it would lead to fewer errors and more return. It would be interesting alright.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,332 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    I've mentioned before that I'd love to see Larkham get his hands on the back line


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    It's possible that Lancaster, who felt badly treated for being sacked from the England job and has said he prefers things at club level, might not be falling over himself to take an international job replacing a coach who has been just been sacked.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,427 ✭✭✭dublin49


    I agree that ROGs hunger for the top job might be tempered by Eddie O sullivans experience.has hardly worked since in coaching .I wud imagine he wud prefer a good stint with Munster and then the top Job.No mention of Pat Lam.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,024 ✭✭✭bayern


    ClanofLams wrote: »
    Wouldn’t agree with O’Gara to be honest, think he has done everything right and very likely to be head coach of Ireland one day but eighteen months into his first head coaching gig doesn’t strike me as the right time.

    Scott Robertson’s contract expires at end of 2021 super rugby season and no announcement of new deal yet, would top my short list if deal hasn’t been signed.

    Cullen and Lancaster worthy candidates too.

    they'd mad to take it the calls of bias would be immediate and consistent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,705 ✭✭✭The Inbetween is mine


    It's a shame that Mark Mcall wil never enter into the equation,


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,233 ✭✭✭ClanofLams


    bayern wrote: »
    they'd mad to take it the calls of bias would be immediate and consistent.

    Yep but being successful would make the calls irrelevant. Although do think Irish rugby would benefit from an injection of fresh ideas and foreign appointment of top name would renew interest., ultimately though success regardless of coach is quickest way to renew interest.

    McFarland has done fine job at Ulster but not enough to warrant Irish job. Not have Van Graan or Friend or anyone connected with the current coaching set up. So I think it’s Cullen and Lancaster or someone unconnected to Irish rugby, former obviously logical and strong candidates but hoping for the latter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Both those are accurate i think but world cup wins get so much beyond prize money alone that the prize money doesnt need to be that big.

    In a monetary sense, do you mean?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,618 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I suppose 2 losses could spell the end for this coaching team. But, a win could keep them in situ. I reckon that we will probably win one of the remaining fixtures. If Farrell is canned, who comes on board? I would think that Razzie would be ideal! But, could he be plied away from S.A?
    If not Razzie, it must be Jackman and M.O.C!!! FYP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 341 ✭✭john9876


    M.O.C ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 891 ✭✭✭sebdavis


    It's a shame that Mark Mcall wil never enter into the equation,

    Why?
    His style of rugby is worse than anything Joe ever served up.

    Plus he is been paid incredible money which the IRFU would never pay for him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 61 ✭✭jp101



    I wouldnt pick Leo unless you get Lancaster as well and does Lancaster even want to go back to international coaching? Seems very happy where he is right now and would be surprised he would want to change whats working well for him

    Why the no Leo without Lancaster? Who else has the success rate he has.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,722 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    jp101 wrote: »
    Why the no Leo without Lancaster? Who else has the success rate he has.

    Leo doesn't have that success rate without Lancaster though. His first year in charge with Leinster wasn't great at all. Finished bottom of our pool in the Champions Cup, and lost the final to Connacht in a year where we were a game away from finishing 4th in the table, lost two interpros and barely scraped a win against Munster too.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 891 ✭✭✭sebdavis


    Leo doesn't have that success rate without Lancaster though. His first year in charge with Leinster wasn't great at all. Finished bottom of our pool in the Champions Cup, and lost the final to Connacht in a year where we were a game away from finishing 4th in the table, lost two interpros and barely scraped a win against Munster too.

    Leo took over a disaster. He wasn't confirmed as coach till late in the day. Majority of his squad was away playing a World Cup, when they came back it was straight into Europe and players hadn't even worked with the new team, didn't know calls etc.

    Remember the season before Dragons beat Leinster home & away. Getting to a final was a massive change to the previous season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,157 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    jp101 wrote: »
    Why the no Leo without Lancaster? Who else has the success rate he has.
    Look at how Leinster did when Cullen didnt have Lancaster beside him and leading the coaching etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,233 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Leo doesn't have that success rate without Lancaster though. His first year in charge with Leinster wasn't great at all. Finished bottom of our pool in the Champions Cup, and lost the final to Connacht in a year where we were a game away from finishing 4th in the table, lost two interpros and barely scraped a win against Munster too.

    In his first ever season as a head coach?? That's unbelievably harsh. We topped the league a year after not even making the semis.

    Flip it around. What did Lancaster achieve without Leo? Crashed out of the pool stages of a home RWC, England's worst ever result. Never won a 6N title.

    But everyone chooses to believe that Leo is the sham and Lancaster is the genius.

    Pretty unfair tbh.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In defence of Leo - before Lancaster came on board I felt we'd definitely turned a corner. We were playing at a higher tempo and our passing had improved dramatically. We actively went backwards under MOC (albeit he lost a lot of good players too) but we almost certainly were on the up under Leo.

    Lancaster brought it to another level but I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss Leo's coaching credentials. His self awareness alone (actively seeking to bring in Lancaster) is a good measure but I was happy enough with him in charge after that first season given how we performed the following year and the clear progression that got us there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,320 ✭✭✭Teferi


    I think Leo would be mad to take the Irish job. He has everything set up for him to give him very long term success in Leinster and a secure coaching job in rugby can be hard enough to come by. With Ireland you're getting 1 or 2 WC cycles maximum before you'd be on the job hunt again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ujjjjjjjjj


    In his first ever season as a head coach?? That's unbelievably harsh. We topped the league a year after not even making the semis.

    Flip it around. What did Lancaster achieve without Leo? Crashed out of the pool stages of a home RWC, England's worst ever result. Never won a 6N title.

    But everyone chooses to believe that Leo is the sham and Lancaster is the genius.

    Pretty unfair tbh.

    Excellent post....

    Considering Leo's track record and his obvious management ability in bulidng a coaching team it is amazing people try to denigrate him.

    Leo is everything you could want in a head coach. Long may he continue and I have the height of respect for him.

    Building a coaching team that works is his job and he is getting results, one HCUP and one runner up and he has turned the PRO 14 into the Leinster Cup and is feeding so many quality players through to the Ireland team that right now you could easily start an all Leinster Ireland 15 and it wouldn't be amiss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    bayern wrote: »
    Stockdale over Lowe for me.

    Lowe hasn’t set the world alight in test footie but Stockdale this season has been, wait for it, poison

    Lowe will get there. Right now he makes silly yardage and beats the 1st defender every time. His defense has been poor but his kicking game has been brilliant.

    I’d take that from a bloke who’s never played test rugby until last November, he’ll get better too,


  • Registered Users Posts: 303 ✭✭cantwbr1


    ujjjjjjjjj wrote: »
    Excellent post....

    Considering Leo's track record and his obvious management ability in bulidng a coaching team it is amazing people try to denigrate him.
    .

    The ability to recognise his limitations and willingness to bring in coaches who are better than him is Leo’s key strength.

    A comparable coach is Warren Gatland, one of the most successful coaches in the last 15 years. As a coach himself he’s fairly limited (remember the 15 man line out) but his ability to put together a brilliant coaching team is second to none.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I don't understand the calls for Stockdale to come straight back into the XV. If he was playing well and scoring tries I'd say yeah, but he's not and hasnt been for a while. I'd have Earls and Larmour starting v Scotland personally.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    In his first ever season as a head coach?? That's unbelievably harsh. We topped the league a year after not even making the semis.

    Flip it around. What did Lancaster achieve without Leo? Crashed out of the pool stages of a home RWC, England's worst ever result. Never won a 6N title.

    But everyone chooses to believe that Leo is the sham and Lancaster is the genius.

    Pretty unfair tbh.

    Who has said that?

    I think people are just recognising that there is a good combination there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Who has said that?

    I think people are just recognising that there is a good combination there.

    Nobody said that explicitly. But there were a lot of posts suggesting that Leo isn't a good head coach without Lancaster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Bernard Jackman and Buer for Leinster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,722 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    In his first ever season as a head coach?? That's unbelievably harsh. We topped the league a year after not even making the semis.

    Flip it around. What did Lancaster achieve without Leo? Crashed out of the pool stages of a home RWC, England's worst ever result. Never won a 6N title.

    But everyone chooses to believe that Leo is the sham and Lancaster is the genius.

    Pretty unfair tbh.

    That's not what I'm saying at all. The point was that the success is a result of the duo working together and taking on different parts of the job, and that Leo doesn't have the track record of a winning success rate as a standalone head coach.

    Much like how Andy Farrell has a pretty successful history as an assistant coach but hasn't fared well in the top gig on his own.

    It's not a slight on Leo, and it certainly isn't saying the Lancaster is the sole reason for Leinster's success, I just don't believe that Leo is the next messiah for Irish rugby on his own.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,005 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I don't see the need to changing the coaching ticket, this is the first full year in charge of the squad so it'll take some time. For the past few World Cup cycles we've had a great show leading up to the Lions tour, loads of players go on tour, then come the World Cup everyone else has caught up/passed us out, hopefully this time around we'll be building nicely for the world Cup.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Leo doesn't have the track record of a winning success rate as a standalone head coach.

    What do you mean by "standalone head coach". Leo Cullen is the head coach. Lancaster is part of his coaching staff. This is how every coaching set up works. Every head coach has coaching staff. So using your own logic. Nobody has ever won anything as a "standalone head coach".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I just don't believe that Leo is the next messiah for Irish rugby on his own.

    Nobody is saying he is. And neither was any coach in history. Joe Schmidt had guys like John Plumtree and Andy Farrell who were key to his success. Gatland had Shaun Edwards. Sir Graham Henry had Sir Steve Hansen. I'm not sure what you're getting at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,530 ✭✭✭dub_skav


    I don't think Farrell should be replaced and I also do not think that Leo or O'Gara are ready.

    But, it seems odd that O'Gara is "on the right track" while he has Jonno Gibbes as DoR at la Rochelle, but Leo "will never be able to do it on his own" because of Lancaster.

    I'm not saying it's a Munster v Leinster thing either. Plenty of Leinster fans belittle Leo's input and success.

    It's just really weird, I think people respect O'Gara for heading abroad and think that the way Leo got the job on MOC's exit somehow sullies him forever.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    dub_skav wrote: »
    It's just really weird, I think people respect O'Gara for heading abroad and think that the way Leo got the job on MOC's exit somehow sullies him forever.

    I respect ROG for going abroad.

    But to be honest I think taking over as head coach of one of the biggest club teams in the world just a year after retiring as a player, and then winning a Heineken cup (and getting to another final) and 3 (possibly 4) consecutive Pro14s is just as admirable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,332 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Is the ROC article on central contracts any way interesting?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,024 ✭✭✭bayern


    Is the ROC article on central contracts any way interesting?

    not really.
    In late January, 2016, Saracens made Keith Earls an offer he almost couldn’t refuse. In the end, Joe Schmidt and David Nucifora got the Moyross man in a room and convinced him that his future was better served by remaining at Munster and he signed a two-year central contract until the end of the 2019 World Cup.

    At 28, Earls was rightly in demand. A key figure for province and country and allowing him leave the Irish system would have damaged both.

    He went on to star in Ireland’s epic 2018 campaign and was rewarded with another two-year central deal as a result.

    Yesterday, Earls signed his third central contract with the IRFU, becoming the fourth player over 30 to do so in the last seven days.

    Now 33, the winger is an experienced performer and consummate professional, still capable of exciting moments as he demonstrated in Ireland’s win over Italy when he took Johnny Sexton’s pass to score the final try.

    Yet, it is doubtful that he’d have commanded anything like the same sort of interest he did five years ago if he’d gone to the market this time around.

    Thus, the logic in handing him one of Irish rugby’s most valuable contracts must be queried.

    Unlike Sexton, his pre-eminence in his position is no longer clear-cut and it is doubtful that he will be first choice at the 2023 World Cup.

    Earls is super-fit and looks after himself very well, so there’s no doubt he has a chance of proving the doubters wrong and making it a fourth tournament in a row. However, there won’t be many Tier One countries with 36-year-old wingers in France.

    Speaking last week, head coach Andy Farrell said a player must demonstrate consistency at the top level to become one of Irish rugby’s made men.

    “To get a central contract, if you look at the history, you show continuity at this level to be a top-class international player,” he said. “That’s the remit that everyone understands.

    “Just because somebody pops up and plays four or five games that are really good … as far as international rugby is concerned it’s about consistency at this level to prove your worth.

    “I suppose that’s how we’ve always worked and how we’ll continue to.”

    The central deal, therefore, is a reward for past performances and, as anyone who has listened to the fast bit at the end of a radio advertisement knows, that is no guarantee of future results. Since that glorious 2018 campaign, Ireland’s stars have failed to deliver and yet they continue to be rewarded.

    For three successive years, the team has failed to achieve its goals at major tournaments but those main players remain the key figures in the team who are paid the most money.

    More than half of Ireland’s centrally contracted players are over 30 and there is no expectation that any new players will join that crew in these straitened times.

    Of the seven players whose IRFU deals expired this season, five have signed on but of those only Iain Henderson looks like being a guaranteed starter in France. New deals for the two men other than Henderson likely to attract interest on the open market, CJ Stander and Tadhg Furlong, have yet to be announced. Both are expected to sign two-year deals.

    By and large, those players on central deals have been picked to play when they are fit.

    Farrell has talked about creating competition throughout his squad and, in fairness, he put Caelan Doris in ahead of Peter O’Mahony for his first match in charge and benched Conor Murray for the Autumn Nations Cup trip to Twickenham last year.

    Bundee Aki is currently out of favour, but with three centrally contracted centres fit and available for once the head coach has to leave one out of his squad and the Connacht man came into the Six Nations on the back of a knee injury.

    Last weekend’s interprovincial derbies were a showcase of the potential within Irish rugby and many of the top performers are players who are not in the Irish squad.

    On Saturday night at the Kingspan Stadium, the uncapped Robert Baloucoune reminded everyone in Irish rugby why he is considered a future Ireland international, while his fellow 23-year-old Jordan Larmour is capable of stepping up to another level after winning 27 caps already.

    At the 2019 World Cup, Larmour and Andrew Conway were the form wings, Rhys Ruddock was the form back-row, Seán Cronin was the form hooker and Luke McGrath was the form scrum-half, yet when the quarter-final came around Schmidt went back to his struggling, cosy cabal of out-of-form leaders on central contracts.

    Given that tournament ended with the same failure of all of the previous editions of the World Cup for Ireland, the entire model should have come up for review.

    None of which is to write Earls off. If he is the best player to play for Munster and also Ireland, then it doesn’t matter what age he is – he should be picked.

    However, there’s no reason why he, Cian Healy and O’Mahony could have stepped back on to provincial deals where they can still fight for their spots.

    Central contracts are excellent tools for retaining big names, but are they optimum in terms of getting the best out of the top players who can become comfortable once they’ve signed?

    Successive World Cup failures would suggest otherwise.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,233 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Well, he's wrong about "three centrally contracted centres" anyway, Ringrose doesn't have one.

    That's just full of inaccuracies tbh. Sean Cronin was the form hooker and should have been picked for the RWC quarter final?? Despite having gone home injured and been replaced by Herring?


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,838 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Well, he's wrong about "three centrally contracted centres" anyway, Ringrose doesn't have one.

    That's just full of inaccuracies tbh. Sean Cronin was the form hooker and should have been picked for the RWC quarter final?? Despite having gone home injured and been replaced by Herring?

    https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/shaft-of-light-amid-covid-19-gloom-as-ringrose-signs-leinster-deal-1.4217151

    According to thornley Ringrose is on a central contract since last year


  • Administrators Posts: 54,091 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    TRC10 wrote: »
    What do you mean by "standalone head coach". Leo Cullen is the head coach. Lancaster is part of his coaching staff. This is how every coaching set up works. Every head coach has coaching staff. So using your own logic. Nobody has ever won anything as a "standalone head coach".

    You're being disingenuous.

    How many teams have a recent tier 1 test head coach as their number 2 in a "Senior Coach" position?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,823 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    dub_skav wrote: »
    I don't think Farrell should be replaced and I also do not think that Leo or O'Gara are ready.

    But, it seems odd that O'Gara is "on the right track" while he has Jonno Gibbes as DoR at la Rochelle, but Leo "will never be able to do it on his own" because of Lancaster.

    I'm not saying it's a Munster v Leinster thing either. Plenty of Leinster fans belittle Leo's input and success.

    It's just really weird, I think people respect O'Gara for heading abroad and think that the way Leo got the job on MOC's exit somehow sullies him forever.

    If the 2 choices were ROG or Cullen now and only them I dont know how anyone would say ROG over Cullen tbh.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,838 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Eod100 wrote: »
    If the 2 choices were ROG or Cullen now and only them I dont know how anyone would say ROG over Cullen tbh.

    I'd 100% say ROG over Cullen right now, if it was a single choice between the two at this very moment.

    More experience in different ethos of playing the game. More experience coaching different aspects of the game... And more experience working with groups of people with different strengths and personalities


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,616 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    More experience in different ethos of playing the game. More experience coaching different aspects of the game... And more experience working with groups of people with different strengths and personalities

    This goes both ways right? Leo has more experience working with the lads with the strengths and personalities of Irish players!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,823 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    I'd 100% say ROG over Cullen right now, if it was a single choice between the two at this very moment.

    More experience in different ethos of playing the game. More experience coaching different aspects of the game... And more experience working with groups of people with different strengths and personalities

    ROG is definitely building up experience and with time at Racing, Crusaders and La Rochelle no doubt learned a fair bit but as head coach I think it would be too early imo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 891 ✭✭✭sebdavis


    awec wrote: »
    You're being disingenuous.

    How many teams have a recent tier 1 test head coach as their number 2 in a "Senior Coach" position?

    England for one


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 891 ✭✭✭sebdavis


    Eod100 wrote: »
    ROG is definitely building up experience and with time at Racing, Crusaders and La Rochelle no doubt learned a fair bit but as head coach I think it would be too early imo.

    ROG has said he wants to coach Munster. He gets thrown in to coach Ireland, goes ok and then at some stage it will turns. He leave what does he do then? we have no history of reintegrating these coachs back into the Irish system so he is back to traveling the World.

    ROG would be crazy to take on the Irish job now, especially when he said he wants to coach Munster at some stage


  • Administrators Posts: 54,091 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    sebdavis wrote: »
    England for one

    Which of England's assistant coaches do you believe is a former tier 1 test head coach?

    Are you mixing up Ed Robinson and Andy Robinson?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement