Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Green Bay Packers Thread

1697072747593

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The Packers were one game away from the Superbowl last season. They should definitely roll the dice and go "win now" this season, its probably the last chance for 5 years.

    I don't think they will win because of the weaknesses elsewhere in the team, but even if the win now attempt this season doesn't work out, and the team fails badly, at least in that scenario the 1st round pick for next season will likely be much higher than this years. So it wouldn't cost quite as much to trade up to get an actual top QB prospect.

    He'd still have a season to learn and mature under AR, and possibly a second season if AR could be negotiated into a reasonable "final year" deal after the current break clause.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,369 ✭✭✭UnitedIrishman


    Blut2 wrote: »
    The Packers were one game away from the Superbowl last season. They should definitely roll the dice and go "win now" this season, its probably the last chance for 5 years.

    I don't think they will win because of the weaknesses elsewhere in the team, but even if the win now attempt this season doesn't work out, and the team fails badly, at least in that scenario the 1st round pick for next season will likely be much higher than this years. So it wouldn't cost quite as much to trade up to get an actual top QB prospect.

    He'd still have a season to learn and mature under AR, and possibly a second season if AR could be negotiated into a reasonable "final year" deal after the current break clause.

    Unless they have a phenomenal rest of draft, Packers have once again pissed away an opportunity to give Rodgers the tools he needs.

    Really really don't get the choice of Love. They are basically saying Rodgers is done in 3 years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    No upside in the short term at all and just brings drama into the team


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    I'm actually happy enough with that. I always prefer when a team looks to the future sensibly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Unless they have a phenomenal rest of draft, Packers have once again pissed away an opportunity to give Rodgers the tools he needs.

    Really really don't get the choice of Love. They are basically saying Rodgers is done in 3 years.

    How do you know that?

    How do you know a high ranked, let’s say receiver, will be a success?

    For me, planning for QB future is prudent, you have to pull the QB trigger at some stage, not when Rogers is on his last legs.

    Doing it now gives the team a chance evaluate, check what they have and plan for whatever that outcome is.

    While it may not be a popular pick I think it’s a good one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 870 ✭✭✭pedatron


    p9l9b20r1pu41.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    pedatron wrote: »
    p9l9b20r1pu41.jpg

    ha, the funny thing about this, considering all the great receivers we've had, we haven't drafted a wide receiver in the first round since 2002, hard to believe. So maybe the ron wolf/ted Thompson school of thought don't value wide recievers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,049 ✭✭✭digzy


    I really don’t get this ‘ packers don’t value line backers’.
    Our corners ain’t exactly world class either & we’ve drafted enough over the years!

    Our lb group even if Kirksey stays fit looks very underwhelming.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    digzy wrote: »
    I really don’t get this ‘ packers don’t value line backers’.
    Our corners ain’t exactly world class either & we’ve drafted enough over the years!

    Our lb group even if Kirksey stays fit looks very underwhelming.

    when watching the draft this morning and seen the trade I was full sure it was for Queen but then they had love's house on the screen and his girlfriend or sister was wiping a tear from her eye and knew then they were drafting him. Still allot of good value today, hoping for a linebacker and wide receiver


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭D9Male


    Bucky Brooks said it. Don't go shopping when you're hungry. It worked for Favre -> Brady so I find it hard to be too critical.

    Love is definitely "toolsy" given all I have read about him. But "boom or bust" written all over him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    D9Male wrote: »
    Bucky Brooks said it. Don't go shopping when you're hungry. It worked for Favre -> Brady so I find it hard to be too critical.

    Love is definitely "toolsy" given all I have read about him. But "boom or bust" written all over him.

    Boom or bust is written over everyone,as far a I can see it.

    Ok, Rogers isn’t going to last forever, nobody is.

    He has to be replaced at some stage and there has to be some kind of plan for a permanent replacement, not a temporary stand in.

    Given the Packers have been solid as a rock at QB since at least the the Favre era and have been a winning season(more and less) why not continue the strategy.

    Short of tanking a season the Packers won’t get a top of the range QB, so stop the fchurrke expecting that.

    I feel the receiving corps is very good. There will be offloads but it’s well populated with big good( not great) players. apart from 17.

    So... I’m good with that ......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,369 ✭✭✭UnitedIrishman


    I get the whole Rodgers isn't going to last forever thing. But any chance we could give him something to work with whilst we do have him? We were good last season but the 49ers game showed some glaring holes that we need to fill. Getting a backup QB, and now a RB when we have Aaron Jones and Jamaal Williams?

    To me it's as if they're saying they are moving on from Rodgers in a couple of seasons.

    Edit - and now just drafted a TE that most had as a late round prospect. I hate to be negative, and I sincerely hope I'm wrong but I think this draft may end up being a disaster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    I get the whole Rodgers isn't going to last forever thing. But any chance we could give him something to work with whilst we do have him? We were good last season but the 49ers game showed some glaring holes that we need to fill. Getting a backup QB, and now a RB when we have Aaron Jones and Jamaal Williams?

    To me it's as if they're saying they are moving on from Rodgers in a couple of seasons.

    Edit - and now just drafted a TE that most had as a late round prospect. I hate to be negative, and I sincerely hope I'm wrong but I think this draft may end up being a disaster.

    Rodgers will be 40 in a few seasons. You want to move on from them. And Jones or Williams will be gone once their contract is up, hard to see us holding onto both, my brai says williams


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Why do people treat the draft like it's make or break for a team? Fair enough you can get some talent out of it but you can also pick up some very good players in free agency and trades. There are also a lot of duds that come out of the draft.

    Last season Rodgers stayed healthy but the previous 2 seasons he has been very injury prone. All it takes is one hit and his season could be over. They need to be looking at cover here also.

    If we could pick up another solid receiver and maybe an experienced TE before the season starts then I don't think we will have done too bad. Certainly not as bad as some are making out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Jofspring wrote: »
    Why do people treat the draft like it's make or break for a team? Fair enough you can get some talent out of it but you can also pick up some very good players in free agency and trades. There are also a lot of duds that come out of the draft.

    Last season Rodgers stayed healthy but the previous 2 seasons he has been very injury prone. All it takes is one hit and his season could be over. They need to be looking at cover here also.

    If we could pick up another solid receiver and maybe an experienced TE before the season starts then I don't think we will have done too bad. Certainly not as bad as some are making out.

    I'd also like another lb. We're a bit meh there. Te I can live without for another season see if one if ours can step up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Pretty bizarre day one and two so far. I can see the logic behind getting a QB, but as I posted before I think next year would have been better timing-wise. If Rodgers is still playing well in 2 years time when we hit the break clause in his contract its going to create a huge Favre-saga esque headache: do you let Rodgers go despite him still playing well? Do you keep Rodgers, and waste the value years of Love's rookie contract?

    I know Rodgers will be 38 at that stage, but thats no longer a guarantee that he'll be a goner with top tier QBs - so many of them are still playing well at that age these days.

    But then last night taking a RB to be 3rd string when there are plenty of positions in far more need of players...and taking both him and a TE way ahead of where they were projected to go in every analysis?

    In two years time we'll either look back on it as a masterful draft that completely surprised everyone's expectations. Or else a complete failure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Reading reports on it they are saying Packers were extremely keen on getting Love in and didn't want to let him pass. Obviously they weighed up QB's coming through in the next two years and felt Love was worth the pick now rather than wait and see.

    As mentioned it's either a genius move long term or will seriously backfire. At the end of the day the coach and GM are putting their necks on the line so you have to trust they think it's worth it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Surely a trade on the cards now for a WR? You'd have to imagine they are looking at someone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Has to be. Has to be a trade.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    I'd love to see a gamble taken on Dez Bryant. If they could get him on a mostly performance based/pay-to-play contract he'd be worth it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Blut2 wrote: »
    I'd love to see a gamble taken on Dez Bryant. If they could get him on a mostly performance based/pay-to-play contract he'd be worth it.

    Possibly...but fairly clear they expect more production from the about 6 receivers they have for next season.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    Possibly...but fairly clear they expect more production from the about 6 receivers they have for next season.

    I think this is it. They expect more from Lazard, mvs and with st brown coming back and fuchess added, funnily enough the patriots with a similar wide receiver group didn’t draft any wide receiver either, so maybe this group is deep but not as highly touted. In terms of the draft, I think we will be leaning more in the run game and use allot more play action. I like the guard from Michigan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    cosatron wrote: »
    I think this is it. They expect more from Lazard, mvs and with st brown coming back and fuchess added, funnily enough the patriots with a similar wide receiver group didn’t draft any wide receiver either, so maybe this group is deep but not as highly touted. In terms of the draft, I think we will be leaning more in the run game and use allot more play action. I like the guard from Michigan

    Don’t forget Kumerow TE Sternberger, the punt return guy, and AaaronJones can catch too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    [img][/img]https://i.imgur.com/5wDsazo.jpg


    I guess Funchess won't be making much of an impact this season anyway...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭peejay1986


    Understandable from his point of view, but a big shame. Was looking forward to seeing how he fit into our system.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yes, but not the worst guy who could opt out

    Respect his decision, but really not a season changing event.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Oooooooookaaay

    Almost ready to rumble

    Let’s look at the O-Line

    As I see it

    Bachtiari....Jenkins....Linsley....Taylor....Turner.

    Wagner seems injured but how does that look.

    Now moving on..... any ‘big names’ likely to be cut tomorrow Sat.

    Go Packers....


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,672 ✭✭✭ScummyMan


    Oooooooookaaay

    Almost ready to rumble

    Let’s look at the O-Line

    As I see it

    Bachtiari....Jenkins....Linsley....Taylor....Turner.

    Wagner seems injured but how does that look.

    Now moving on..... any ‘big names’ likely to be cut tomorrow Sat.

    Go Packers....

    Turner has a knee injury, likely to miss at least some of the season

    Right side of the line looking very ropey to me, especially playing Minnesota week 1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    ScummyMan wrote: »
    Turner has a knee injury, likely to miss at least some of the season

    Right side of the line looking very ropey to me, especially playing Minnesota week 1

    Me too, looks like Lane Taylor at RG .its the RT spot that worries me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    WTF!!!!

    ESB inactive again......what’s wrong with that tool.


    FFS!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Looks like Jenkins starting at RT

    Bak-Lucas-Corey-Lane-Elgton

    Fcukkker ‘ell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Not good so far..... should be 14 - 7 up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Should be 21-7 up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Rodgers last 2 mins saved that half


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    They think it’s all over.......


    No yet..... need a score on this drive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Very good win. I didn't think we would go to Minnesota and come away with the win to be honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    Jofspring wrote: »
    Very good win. I didn't think we would go to Minnesota and come away with the win to be honest.

    I did, no matter what we own that division until rodgers retired and stays injury free


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,049 ✭✭✭digzy


    Run defence was sh1t again. D kept coughing up scores too. Great to see the offence rolling like that.
    A win on the road against a divisional rival....I’ll take that!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    good performance from the offence, a bit of everything which is nice to see. i don't want to tempt faith but Aaron looks back to his old self, the throw to Adams for the first td was a beaut, vintage Rodgers. the defence held the vikings to 10 points over 3 quarters and im hoping they just took there foot of the gas for the final quarter. go pack go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    cosatron wrote: »
    good performance from the offence, a bit of everything which is nice to see. i don't want to tempt faith but Aaron looks back to his old self, the throw to Adams for the first td was a beaut, vintage Rodgers. the defence held the vikings to 10 points over 3 quarters and im hoping they just took there foot of the gas for the final quarter. go pack go.

    Yes, as I saw it too, Kenny Clarke injury was a factor I’m sure.

    However, how the Vikes carved thru the Packers D in quarter four was concerning.

    Thielen roasted Jaire big and I mean big... so let’s not get too cocky.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Lane Taylor out for the season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭peejay1986


    I'm going with the "no news is good news" for Kenny Clark at the minute. Hopefully that's the case!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Luckily we are hitting the Lions when their injury list in the secondary is fairly long.

    Would expect a fairly routine win.

    Then the boy Thomas for the Saints is out for several weeks..........


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Anyone think this could be like last season when the Packers racked up a pretty impressive record without being particularly impressive or ever really looking like contenders...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Anyone think this could be like last season when the Packers racked up a pretty impressive record without being particularly impressive or ever really looking like contenders...

    No, meeting a lot more top tier QBs this year.

    11-5 would be good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭peejay1986


    No, meeting a lot more top tier QBs this year.

    11-5 would be good.

    I'd agree with this. It's a tougher schedule this year so I wouldn't expect the record to be as impressive as last year. In saying that, I think we're in better shape than previous.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    Anyone think this could be like last season when the Packers racked up a pretty impressive record without being particularly impressive or ever really looking like contenders...

    No I’m completely on Rodgers is back hype train and I’m going to ride that train all the way to the Super Bowl


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Kenny Clark out for Lions.......hopefully won’t make a huge difference.

    What the Packers have to do

    1....Get to Stafford

    2... Stop Peterson.

    Would make it much easier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Terrible Quarter 1

    Stafford un touched..... getting gouged down the middle again.......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,731 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Good win in the end, but those drops........

    Lot of work to do...


Advertisement