Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

3 New Navy Vessels for Irish Naval Service

1505153555686

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Thanks for clarifying that point Sparky. Much appreciated!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Seems the RNZN have been having some manpower issues of their own of late.

    I'd hope our Government can finalise this deal pretty quickly and get the reorientation of the fleet completed.

    The bullet should then be bitten and Eithne and the Peacocks retired forthwith, the two Lake Class will provide essentially the same capability as the latter with half the crew anyway. Then focus on running an 8 vessel flotilla in home waters until manpower issues can be addressed in some way and the MRV specified and ordered.

    Personally I'd love to see one of the 3 retired vessels retained for training and reserve and public relations use, specifically by a strengthed NSR, probably a Peacock. If we don't have a national sail training vessel, lets teach reserves and students and kids about modern seamanship in a relatively modern powered ship.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Not sure about that. Sail Training vessel best option imo. Wasn't the asgard 2 insured? Build another and give some work to an irish firm to do the job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    Agree, there's people that already have a bit of money behind them that would love to do 5 years with the DF, the age limit should be raised to maybe 45.


    Same for the IAC, I am 38 & would gladly join the PDF for a 5 yr stint.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Not sure about that. Sail Training vessel best option imo. Wasn't the asgard 2 insured? Build another and give some work to an irish firm to do the job.

    Any money for that is long gone. There was some comments a few years ago about a “all island” ship since NI lost theirs as well but nothing came from it (and given current North-South relations not going to happen). The suggestion was something like the NZ steel hull ship I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,404 ✭✭✭1874


    sparky42 wrote: »
    Any money for that is long gone. There was some comments a few years ago about a “all island” ship since NI lost theirs as well but nothing came from it (and given current North-South relations not going to happen). The suggestion was something like the NZ steel hull ship I think.


    The problem is, there is never the money, in the good or the bad times Ireland needs an effective Naval service (just as it needs an air contingent and an armed military force).
    There wasn't the money before the crash in the Celtic tiger, there certainly wasn't the money after the crash and there isn't the money since recovery and up till COVID and the money wont be there after, there is simply no interest or will (except for some instances for Officers, but limited or nothing for enlisted). It is not a political topic.
    There is no interest in reforming or paying people in the PDF or helping retain people, and limited option in terms of training, especially for enlisted people.
    Every resource (I mean people and equipment) has to be accounted for and made useful, until the defence forces has a comprehensive means to manage its resources and people capable and qualified to do so, little progress can be made. Capable and qualified people aren't going to be interested in staying or joining if conditions and pay arent good.
    The PDF is not managed by the State well or seem like it is considered as a trusted resource. The PDF direct management doesnt seem to have any comprehensive long term plan other than day to day, week to week, year to year.


    Not being able to retain people to crew a ship or maintain or fly aircraft shows there are systemic problems at a high level and this filters down to lower management levels.


    Formerly served in the PDF, somewhat of a rant over


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    1874 wrote: »
    The problem is, there is never the money, in the good or the bad times Ireland needs an effective Naval service (just as it needs an air contingent and an armed military force).
    There wasn't the money before the crash in the Celtic tiger, there certainly wasn't the money after the crash and there isn't the money since recovery and up till COVID and the money wont be there after, there is simply no interest or will (except for some instances for Officers, but limited or nothing for enlisted). It is not a political topic.
    There is no interest in reforming or paying people in the PDF or helping retain people, and limited option in terms of training, especially for enlisted people.
    Every resource (I mean people and equipment) has to be accounted for and made useful, until the defence forces has a comprehensive means to manage its resources and people capable and qualified to do so, little progress can be made. Capable and qualified people aren't going to be interested in staying or joining if conditions and pay arent good.
    The PDF is not managed by the State well or seem like it is considered as a trusted resource. The PDF direct management doesnt seem to have any comprehensive long term plan other than day to day, week to week, year to year.


    Not being able to retain people to crew a ship or maintain or fly aircraft shows there are systemic problems at a high level and this filters down to lower management levels.


    Formerly served in the PDF, somewhat of a rant over

    Nail on the head, and now there’s talk of giving back this disfunctional, under resourced and underfunded organisation SAR responsibilities- the mind boggles!

    The tokenism of “something is better than nothing”
    The capability “on paper”, all of this needs to go away


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Theres more to it than the practical application of a sail training vessel (and I don't wish to sound like JonnyBW here) but a mainly maritime nation like ours should have a sea going totem, a representative among the sailing ships of the World, a symbol of pride and ancient maritime heritage and bearer of the flag. Such a vessel can be a great asset to overseas promotion, trade and tourism, a place to host and exchange young mariners to teach and to learn.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Larbre and me are on the same page about this one. Great minds think alike!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    I totally agree . Asgard II was a fantastic ship, a great training vessel and a credit to the nation and a great ambassador for all of us. It was run by an office of four paid staff and the rest of the people who manned it were all volunteers. I might be biased because I did one of the week long tours on her and it was brilliant. The whole operation was run for relatively small money,out of the DoD budget and it functioned SO well. It should have been replaced within months, even if they bought a replacement vessel from abroad.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Stovepipe wrote: »
    I totally agree . Asgard II was a fantastic ship, a great training vessel and a credit to the nation and a great ambassador for all of us. It was run by an office of four paid staff and the rest of the people who manned it were all volunteers. I might be biased because I did one of the week long tours on her and it was brilliant. The whole operation was run for relatively small money,out of the DoD budget and it functioned SO well. It should have been replaced within months, even if they bought a replacement vessel from abroad.


    To be fair, given the time she went down, I could see every langer on the Left kicking off even for the small monies we are talking about. I mean it was around the same time we had TDs asking why the P60 class had to be ordered, wasn't it cheaper just to keep the old hulls in service.


    To be clear, I agree that she was a very good asset for the nation for little money and should be replaced but as ever DOD/Finance/TDs/public are going to each be stumbling blocks to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    sparky42 wrote: »
    To be fair, given the time she went down, I could see every langer on the Left kicking off even for the small monies we are talking about. I mean it was around the same time we had TDs asking why the P60 class had to be ordered, wasn't it cheaper just to keep the old hulls in service.


    To be clear, I agree that she was a very good asset for the nation for little money and should be replaced but as ever DOD/Finance/TDs/public are going to each be stumbling blocks to it.

    But was she not insured?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,653 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    Theres more to it than the practical application of a sail training vessel (and I don't wish to sound like JonnyBW here) but a mainly maritime nation like ours should have a sea going totem, a representative among the sailing ships of the World, a symbol of pride and ancient maritime heritage and bearer of the flag. Such a vessel can be a great asset to overseas promotion, trade and tourism, a place to host and exchange young mariners to teach and to learn.
    Yep and to think we built the Jamie Johnson and Dunbrody and have just tied them up, it’s beyond a joke


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,511 ✭✭✭Purgative


    But was she not insured?


    My experience in the UK, government departments usually "self insure" if that's not too much of an oxymoron.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Jeannie Johnson is not regarded as a good ship to sail,in the fashion of a camel being a horse designed by a committee. The professional sailors that I talked to about it had sailed her and disliked it very much. The Asgard II was regarded as a delight to sail by them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,653 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    Neither are designed to sail, both were designed as floating museums, and that's where they should be left. Dunbrody can only be towed from a to b, her sails are for display only.
    Jeannie Johnson is only slightly better, but is not a pretty ship, with a pointlessly undersized engine.

    The JJ WAS designed to sail and indeed the JJ did sail between 2002 snd 2008.

    She enjoyed an illustrious sailing career from 2002 to 2008, retracing the Famine-era voyages from Blennerville to Qubec. She has sailed all around Ireland and Europe, as well as visiting several American ports like Washington DC, New York, Boston, Baltimore and Philadelphia and has even taken part in the Tall Ships Race in 2005. She has been moored at Custom House Quay since 2008.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    She was designed by a naval architect, who had built one other sailing vessel before that(Which also ended up as a museum ship), and built by apprentices with no experience of building sailing vessels. It took 6 years to build it. The ship it was based on would have been built in a fraction of the time using no modern tools or methods. It was sitting complete, except for masts in Blennerville in 1998 but did not make it to the water until 2000. They had to add a steel keel for stability midway through her building and this makes her quite "stiff" in response.
    Perhaps the designer was so focused on the design of the original he neglected to remember that these ships in their time never travelled empty. Many buildings in New England are built with stone quarried in Cork, brought over as ballast by ships bringing Grain and cotton back from the Americas to Europe.

    The Captain who had sailed the Asgard II and the JJ and many others said to me, " the JJ can't get out of it's own way",meaning that it was unpleasant to sail as it would not steer straight and constantly weaved about/would not hold a heading. Now,I know that sailing ships need constant minor adjustment, like driving a car, but he said that it was tiring to steer the whole time and it was not correctly trimmed and was too heavy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Hilarious headline on The Guardian tonight.

    'Irish Battleship to fly flag of Munster in Bloomsday celebration.'

    Apparently it references a line in Ulysses where the character 'Citizen' (a xenophobe and anti-semite) desires to see precisely that, to annoy the thicklugged English.

    I would have thought it slightly sketchy territory for the DF to get involved in, however in any case, the 'Joyce' will indeed fly the Three Castles as it traverses Scotsman's Bay in Dun Laoghaire tomorrow, passing the 40 ft and the Joyce Museum.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    Hilarious headline on The Guardian tonight.

    'Irish Battleship to fly flag of Munster in Bloomsday celebration.'

    Apparently it references a line in Ulysses where the character 'Citizen' (a xenophobe and anti-semite) desires to see precisely that, to annoy the thicklugged English.

    I would have thought it slightly sketchy territory for the DF to get involved in, however in any case, the 'Joyce' will indeed fly the Three Castles as it traverses Scotsman's Bay in Dun Laoghaire tomorrow, passing the 40 ft and the Joyce Museum.
    Here she is already:
    https://www.facebook.com/irishnavalservice/photos/a.524540657628835/4028753270540872/?__cft__%5B0%5D=AZXuGSQeWY61KI4MGYuWWuKxbAjuIpk1KXWXeKuXU5RqIxArWU_ZCB6LlQd2fcyp2D4PmsAbPN4uc4ncAN51F10jb3UiOh1eLwnERDQqPHzqIyubSqXRWlXvIyBMX2MK0TygTCuAgTW7rfCQf-G6AFIH&__tn__=EH-R


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    All just an excuse for trinners types to wear boaters and pretend it's 1904 again.

    I think you're being a little harsh. Yes, Joycean scholars do have that image, but Ulysses is an everyman story and its being made more accessible all the time. If nothing else it's always been a great excuse for a big piss up and some great publicity for the City and the seaside suburbs. Literary heritage and tourism is a massive market.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I haven't read it either, just snippets. But read the interpretations of it, it's great fun.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    I prefer it in its original form, by Homer.

    Simpson?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I see the RN have just retired one of their type 23 frigates. Might be an opportunity there to pick up a nice bit of kit at a decent price. Maybe have to spend a few bob on a quick refurb to get it "fighting fit"



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    "A few bob"... Try a significant chunk of the Defence Budget, not too mention finding a couple of hundred crew for her... I doubt she will see anything other than the breakers yard.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I see the Royal Hellenic Navy have bagged it along with another "auld one"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,401 ✭✭✭thomil


    So they're transporting them back in time? Would certainly give the Ottomans another headache in addition to Georgios Averoff.

    Greece hasn't been a monarchy for decades. What's more, they have a well-established shipbuilding industry and defence industry. They can do any required maintenance and refits "in-house", a capability that Ireland can only dream of.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    If the Greeks pick the Type 31 as their new frigates, that competition is still open though and given the state of one of them the Greeks would be nuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I love the way the Brits are chucking Monmouth and Montrose to the Greeks to "assist them in the face of Turkish aggression", yet nobody seems to be addressing the fact that these tensions are between two NATO members!

    Anyway, I'd be shocked if EU/Brexit considerations didn't eventually see Greece end up with the next gen Meko 200 after the AN. They've a long history with the basic hull and suppliers and I'm sure the deal will be sweetened beyond anything British suppliers can match.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The tensions between Greece and Turkey have been going on for decades at this point, Ewing part of NATO hasn’t and won’t stop that. Given the recent Rafale deal I wouldn’t be hugely surprised if France might get the contract tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    What have France to offer? I thought it'd be Type 31 and Arrowhead (British) V Meko 200+ (German)?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Nah, the Italians are in the running with the FREMM, the French are offering the FDI (their light Frigate design), there's also the Dutch Singma design.

    https://www.navalnews.com/event-news/defea-2021/2021/06/new-developments-in-greece-a-shortlist-for-the-fleet-modernization-program/



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    That Meko 200 is a powerful bit of kit. It'd be a struggle to man it though. Not to mention the fact that a fully tooled up one would be a bit pricey!

    Have to put it on the bucket list! Would love to see one or two of these moored up at Haulbowline.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    🙄🙄🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The DOD have confirmed that they are looking at the two Lake class from New Zealand for the Peacocks:

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40357757.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    So are we looking at

    Naval Station Arklow, Dún Laoghaire or Drogheda?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    DL is a nice easy one for the politicians to come out and visit...



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Maybe they got the idea from this thread?! 😄

    Hope they got a job-lot and the crew are included in the purchase price?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Yeah they would probably request the ERU or rangers to escort them if they had to visit drogheda and they are probably not sure where arklow is. So DL would not be to far and yet they could claim some nice travel allowences It will be interesting to see will we have TDs coming out saying why there town should host a new naval base. I presume between Military and Civilans you could be looking at up to 100 personal



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Don’t think the kiwis have an abundance of crew themselves, though might be a nice shot in the arm for the NS if they got to go down and work up in New Zealand waters and then sail them home, though I’d imagine they will be sealifted back…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I bet you they'll flog off one of the 4 P90's to cover the purchase price of the 2 Lakes and maybe put some cash in the kitty towards a future MRV. Seeing as they can't muster the crews for all 4 of them at the moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The Peacocks are already going away if these hulls get bought, the Government is not going to flog the newest hulls in the fleet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Would Dundalk Port be capable of supporting the lake class vessels or would the tide be an issue? I am just thinking from a support base point of view Aiken Barracks is very close and you could have sharing of alot of services and facilities which would help.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I have it on reasonable authority that that the Lake Class boats will be based in Dun Laoghaire once secured.

    The recent abolition, by the previous Govt, of a number of Harbour Companies, including DL, left the County Council there holding the baby somewhat, being saddled with significant debt, all while investment dried up and major remedial works were required to the main Piers and other berths and facilities.

    I understand that unwritten commitments by the current Govt to an international standard marine leisure and training facility, as well as the location of a small Irish Sea naval station, to accommodate these two vessels and their active crew, in order to redress the balance somewhat, have been made.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    So will they take over the old ferry building? They will have to have room for Accomadation, Mess halls, Offices, Stores and a guard room. It will be no small operation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No, that has been let by the Council to a private investor for use as an innovation hub and shared working space, delayed until the pandemic situation improves.

    I have heard talk of renovating and repurposing the old Coastguard Station building, just to the west of the Irish Lights facility. But as you say, a minimum of standard facilities will be needed and that site may not be up to the job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Thanks for educating me Dohville. I'll run the auld measuring tape over me own mega yacht tonight to check the draft (that's in a couple of hours time when we berth in Monaco). God Bless.

    Your auld buddy JBW



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Interesting, didn’t realise that Shaw had it fitted already, wonder how long each will be in the yard for?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Imagine my shock when I clicked the link and the upgrade isn't a Sylver 48 cell Vertical Launch System and Selex fire control suite.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    If you can find space on the hull let alone the budget you can run the DOD… I was hoping it might have been for the secondaries though…



  • Advertisement
Advertisement