Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Local Property Tax Increases

Options
«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 16,435 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    That'll hurt when we have to update property values, when it was first introduced the market had collapsed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,837 ✭✭✭daheff


    disgraceful. This is what was always going to happen with lpt.

    expect it to get more expensive over time.

    Also i think its disgraceful that 13 councillors abstained from the vote. In votes like this an abstention is as good as voting for it. at least have the courage of your convictions to vote.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,869 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    Given that both Dublin City Council and South Dublin Council have reduced by 15% it’s a bitter pill, especially as you say with the increased valuations.

    Pure cop out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,435 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    daheff wrote: »
    Also i think its disgraceful that 13 councillors abstained from the vote. In votes like this an abstention is as good as voting for it. at least have the courage of your convictions to vote.

    This is the galling part, no doubt thinking ahead to the next local election when they can wring their hands and try to distance themselves from the decision.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    I'm looking at the 2018 figures here and it seems €21 million was collected but €4 million was transferred to other counties, leaving €17 million. Since the council is collecting such a surplus of LPT, why do they need to increase it by 7.5%? Why not just keep more of what's collected in the county?

    I also don't know why counties that are running at a loss (i.e. the recipients of cash from other counties) are allowed vary at all, especially down.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,837 ✭✭✭daheff


    n97 mini wrote: »
    Since the council is collecting such a surplus of LPT, why do they need to increase it by 7.5%? Why not just keep more of what's collected in the county?.

    its to fairly redistribute whats collected across the country..... Otherwise Dublin would collect millions, have all the services and Leitrim would be a poor slum.


    but it does raise a point about fairness.... if other counties are raising the minimum, they are also redistributing at the minimum too.... so disadvantaging the poorer counties.

    Not to mind the taxpayers whose councils charge more.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,436 ✭✭✭ixus


    This is the galling part, no doubt thinking ahead to the next local election when they can wring their hands and try to distance themselves from the decision.

    They wouldn't have voted for it a few months ago at the elections for sure.

    More housing, higher valuations plus an increase. It will be well spent.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    daheff wrote: »
    its to fairly redistribute whats collected across the country..... Otherwise Dublin would collect millions, have all the services and Leitrim would be a poor slum.


    but it does raise a point about fairness.... if other counties are raising the minimum, they are also redistributing at the minimum too.... so disadvantaging the poorer counties.

    Not to mind the taxpayers whose councils charge more.

    I get the redistribution thing. 10 local authorities are collecting surplus LPT, but 21 are in the red. Tipperary and Donegal last year both received €16 million from other areas... Tipperary varied their LPT up by 10%, but Donegal did not. Makes no sense to me.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 271 ✭✭lleti


    A lot of whinging about LPT being increased.

    You're benefitting from the house prices increasing so you can't be complaining.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    anewme wrote: »
    Given that both Dublin City Council and South Dublin Council have reduced by 15% it’s a bitter pill, especially as you say with the increased valuations.

    Pure cop out.
    Dublin doesn't need LPT as much, because of huge commercial rates. It's an annual "solidarity" show that puts other councils under pressure to follow suit.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,309 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    anewme wrote: »
    Given that both Dublin City Council and South Dublin Council have reduced by 15% it’s a bitter pill, especially as you say with the increased valuations.

    Pure cop out.

    Both have higher property densities and higher value houses = in take much more than Kildare council

    Dublin councils take in so much they give 20% to poorer councils. They can’t justify charging more if they give it away.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,309 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    lleti wrote: »
    A lot of whinging about LPT being increased.

    You're benefitting from the house prices increasing so you can't be complaining.

    You only benefit if you sell, many have no intention of selling. It’s a tax based on speculation


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,309 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    n97 mini wrote: »
    I'm looking at the 2018 figures here and it seems €21 million was collected but €4 million was transferred to other counties, leaving €17 million. Since the council is collecting such a surplus of LPT, why do they need to increase it by 7.5%? Why not just keep more of what's collected in the county?

    I also don't know why counties that are running at a loss (i.e. the recipients of cash from other counties) are allowed vary at all, especially down.

    Scroll across. Did They not give 4 million into the fund but took more than that out if it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 564 ✭✭✭Checkmate19


    Lpt like yahzoo hit the only way is up. This country is banjaxed.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 271 ✭✭lleti


    ted1 wrote: »
    You only benefit if you sell, many have no intention of selling. It’s a tax based on speculation

    If you don't want to pay, you're free to sell and move to another jurastiction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭NinjaTruncs


    ted1 wrote: »
    Scroll across. Did They not give 4 million into the fund but took more than that out if it.

    No, "2018 Distribution of Equalisation funding" is how much they took out, which for Kildare was nothing.

    4.3kWp South facing PV System. South Dublin



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭NinjaTruncs


    lleti wrote: »
    A lot of whinging about LPT being increased.

    You're benefitting from the house prices increasing so you can't be complaining.

    You mean people who bought or still own the property when the valuations were set. I bought three years ago, my LPT will close to double next year but my house price, since I bought, hasn't nor will it double.

    This is simply a Dublin tax ( and surrounding area). I get that not all councils have the economies of scale that Dublin has so they could do with assistance, but it doesn't explain why a lot of councils who take from the fund take more from it than their own residents pay towards their own council costs.

    4.3kWp South facing PV System. South Dublin



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 271 ✭✭lleti


    You mean people who bought or still own the property when the valuations were set. I bought three years ago, my LPT will close to double next year but my house price, since I bought, hasn't nor will it double.

    This is simply a Dublin tax ( and surrounding area). I get that not all councils have the economies of scale that Dublin has so they could do with assistance, but it doesn't explain why a lot of councils who take from the fund take more from it than their own residents pay towards their own council costs.

    You didn't think about LPT when you were buying? It was always going to be reviewed at the 5th year. So, you're lucky your house hasn't increased in value then and it's only doubling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,778 ✭✭✭Joe Public


    lleti wrote: »
    If you don't want to pay, you're free to sell and move to another jurastiction.

    I think the vast majority of people want to stay where they are but not pay extra LPT due to a controversial vote.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,807 ✭✭✭✭Orion


    lleti wrote: »
    A lot of whinging about LPT being increased.

    You're benefitting from the house prices increasing so you can't be complaining.

    How exactly? I'm not planning on selling my house so how is the house price increase benefiting me?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,807 ✭✭✭✭Orion


    lleti wrote: »
    You didn't think about LPT when you were buying? It was always going to be reviewed at the 5th year. So, you're lucky your house hasn't increased in value then and it's only doubling.

    I bought in 2001. And the vast majority of people have their homes in Kildare long before LPT was even an idea.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,869 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    ted1 wrote: »
    Both have higher property densities and higher value houses = in take much more than Kildare council

    Dublin councils take in so much they give 20% to poorer councils. They can’t justify charging more if they give it away.

    The exact same applies to Kildare.

    They give away 20 percent too.

    So that argument dues not stand up at all.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 271 ✭✭lleti


    Orion wrote: »
    How exactly? I'm not planning on selling my house so how is the house price increase benefiting me?

    You own an asset that's increased by X amount, your net worth has increased by X amount.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 271 ✭✭lleti


    Orion wrote: »
    I bought in 2001. And the vast majority of people have their homes in Kildare long before LPT was even an idea.

    Lucky you then, you've had a massive increase in net worth.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,907 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    daheff wrote: »
    disgraceful. This is what was always going to happen with lpt.

    expect it to get more expensive over time.

    Also i think its disgraceful that 13 councillors abstained from the vote. In votes like this an abstention is as good as voting for it. at least have the courage of your convictions to vote.




    There's another thread slagging off Dublin councilors because they reduced the rate, in the county that pays the most.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 23,063 ✭✭✭✭beertons


    I've always said it should have been on the size/sq foot of the house, rather than the value.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,823 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    anewme wrote: »
    The exact same applies to Kildare.

    They give away 20 percent too.

    So that argument dues nit stand up at all.

    Calling it "give away" implies its voluntary. It isn't.

    It isn't just the GDA councils that are in surplus - Clare has managed to be every single year.

    That councils in deficit are allowed discounted rates is nuts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,907 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    beertons wrote: »
    I've always said it should have been on the size/sq foot of the house, rather than the value.




    Totally agree here. OAPs in ex council mid terrace tiny homes in Dublin can pay more than a family in six bed rambling, detached house in Cavan on a plot of land.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 271 ✭✭lleti


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    Totally agree here. OAPs in ex council mid terrace tiny homes in Dublin can pay more than a family in six bed rambling, detached house in Cavan on a plot of land.

    Which is the way it should be. People in towns have way more services.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,309 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    lleti wrote: »
    You own an asset that's increased by X amount, your net worth has increased by X amount.

    No it hasn’t. Not until you sell it. It may be heavily mortgaged.


    It’s speculative tax, any other form of accounting assets are valued at the lower or their purchase price or net realisable value.


Advertisement