Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bride and groom getting fired on Monday

18910111214»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    I wonder what the "shure it's grand" posters here reaction would be if there was a wedding video of the couple and the guests doing nazi salutes? (Not going to search, but I'm sure there is one out there...)

    In their own private time, at a function centred around them and their family and friends? Absolutely. None of their employers' or indeed anyone else's business.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20 MondayBlues


    I don't get the big deal to be honest. There singing a sectarian song.

    No different than "come out ye black and tans" or go on "home brutish soldiers".

    These are played around the republic every night of the week. Just because it was a wedding people are making a big deal of it.

    youtube.com/watch?v=qv7Z41VQlbc

    Complete overreaction. Go to a country pub and rebel songs are played every weekend.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,841 ✭✭✭buried


    blanch152 wrote: »
    My post was deliberately ambiguous to allow both sides take the bait and criticise the other. Nice to see who moved first.

    Well done eating your own "bait" blanch.

    "Bait" flol

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,912 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I don't get the big deal to be honest. There singing a sectarian song.

    No different than "come out ye black and tans" or go on "home brutish soldiers".

    These are played around the republic every night of the week. Just because it was a wedding people are making a big deal of it.

    youtube.com/watch?v=qv7Z41VQlbc

    Complete overreaction. Go to a country pub and rebel songs are played every weekend.
    I don't get the big deal to be honest. There singing a sectarian song.

    No different than "come out ye black and tans" or go on "home brutish soldiers".

    These are played around the republic every night of the week. Just because it was a wedding people are making a big deal of it.

    youtube.com/watch?v=qv7Z41VQlbc

    Complete overreaction. Go to a country pub and rebel songs are played every weekend.


    There are some football chants as well that are fairly catchy.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    I don't get the big deal to be honest. There singing a sectarian song.

    No different than "come out ye black and tans" or go on "home brutish soldiers".

    These are played around the republic every night of the week. Just because it was a wedding people are making a big deal of it.

    youtube.com/watch?v=qv7Z41VQlbc

    Complete overreaction. Go to a country pub and rebel songs are played every weekend.

    Go on home British Soldiers isn't a sectarian song, it's a song that's opposed to an occupying army, not a dislike of Protestants.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20 MondayBlues


    FTA69 wrote: »
    Go on home British Soldiers isn't a sectarian song, it's a song that's opposed to an occupying army, not a dislike of Protestants.

    “So get out British Bastards leave us be”


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    blanch152 wrote: »
    The faux outrage on here is extraordinary.

    Posters who can’t bring themselves to condemn a councillor who knocked out his love rival’s front teeth in a premeditated attack are climbing over themselves to get ordinary people fired from their job for singing a song.

    You couldn’t make it up.

    You're the biggest hypocrite on Boards as regards this and other issues relating to the north.

    People giving out or criticising them are 'outraged' are they? Pretending to be 'outraged'? Can't people not just say they thought they were ignorant idiots? No need to exaggerate to help your bias. So we should ignore them being a teacher and a nurse as an irrelevance, but a completely unrelated incident involving a SF Councillor is relevant how exactly? Can you give one credible link?
    Can you quote one poster who condoned that violence in your FG TD's/Senators on the make again distraction thread, (which backfired hilariously)?

    You know the Pope and the IRA related to Catholics/nationalists. I don't think it's uncommon, it's just these arseholes were viral on social media, hard luck. Being out in public, public going to comment. The real question is why are you bending over backwards to dismiss their behaviour?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,942 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    . Being out in public, public going to comment. The real question is why are you bending over backwards to dismiss their behaviour?

    I'm gonna take a punt that it's because Blanch is a Jaffa or a TCD grad ;):D

    Or just plain auld contrarian.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    “So get out British Bastards leave us be”

    Yeah they’re referring to an army of occupation, not Protestants. The song is about the British Army hence the song title.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,103 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    FTA69 wrote: »
    Yeah they’re referring to an army of occupation, not Protestants. The song is about the British Army hence the song title.

    I love go on home British soldiers song. There is a great version of it from a busker singing it on Henry street. https://youtu.be/4W5Z2qL4CQ0

    My favourite song is snipers promise. It's an amazing Melody and a lovely story especially the fact that he showed mercy.

    Now if I understood your post you have differentiated go on home British soldiers with the wedding song because British soldiers song is in protest of a foreign military occupancy as opposed to anti Catholic.

    We are in the year 2019. Do you honestly believe northern Irish define themselves by Catholicism. Is an attack on religion an attack on their country. I raise it because you argue an anti army song wasn't an anti Protestant song which was strange.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You're the biggest hypocrite on Boards as regards this and other issues relating to the north.

    People giving out or criticising them are 'outraged' are they? Pretending to be 'outraged'? Can't people not just say they thought they were ignorant idiots? No need to exaggerate to help your bias. So we should ignore them being a teacher and a nurse as an irrelevance, but a completely unrelated incident involving a SF Councillor is relevant how exactly? Can you give one credible link?
    Can you quote one poster who condoned that violence in your FG TD's/Senators on the make again distraction thread, (which backfired hilariously)?

    You know the Pope and the IRA related to Catholics/nationalists. I don't think it's uncommon, it's just these arseholes were viral on social media, hard luck. Being out in public, public going to comment. The real question is why are you bending over backwards to dismiss their behaviour?


    Just the usual Matt nonsense and misrepresentation.

    I never condoned the couple, I just didn’t join the mob wanting to hang them, but why would you ever actually read what another poster says. I am clear that they should be disciplined, but also clear that they shouldn’t be fired.

    Once again, I am sorry that I couldn’t join the usual republican joyous celebration on this issue but there you go.

    14% in the latest poll must be hurting you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    joeguevara wrote: »
    I love go on home British soldiers song. There is a great version of it from a busker singing it on Henry street. https://youtu.be/4W5Z2qL4CQ0

    My favourite song is snipers promise. It's an amazing Melody and a lovely story especially the fact that he showed mercy.

    Now if I understood your post you have differentiated go on home British soldiers with the wedding song because British soldiers song is in protest of a foreign military occupancy as opposed to anti Catholic.

    We are in the year 2019. Do you honestly believe northern Irish define themselves by Catholicism. Is an attack on religion an attack on their country. I raise it because you argue an anti army song wasn't an anti Protestant song which was strange.

    No I don’t think that people define themselves solely by religion but when you call something “sectarian” then by definition in Ireland that means you’re engaging in behaviour designed to be prejudicial to either Catholics or Protestants for being from that particular community.

    A desire for Irish unity or a dislike for the British Army is not inherently anti-Protestant; it’s a political statement not a religious or a sectarian one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Just the usual Matt nonsense and misrepresentation.

    I never condoned the couple, I just didn’t join the mob wanting to hang them, but why would you ever actually read what another poster says. I am clear that they should be disciplined, but also clear that they shouldn’t be fired.

    Once again, I am sorry that I couldn’t join the usual republican joyous celebration on this issue but there you go.

    14% in the latest poll must be hurting you.

    The irony is your last comment describes yourself.
    Posters who can’t bring themselves to condemn

    You gave no proof of course. But throw enough mud as they say...you'll be citing it as fact in a few weeks.
    'The mob' and 'faux outrage'. Yep, sounds like you've only a passing interest ;)
    You've put a worrying amount of energy into ridiculing anyone who didn't like what the couple did. I certainly hope it's renewable energy Blanch.

    Last parties I heavily supported were Labour and Fine Gael. I know right, what an ejit.
    I ain't got a team Blanch. It's very liberating. You get to hold valid genuine opinion instead of tripping over yourself with sh*te talk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The irony is your last comment describes yourself.



    You gave no proof of course. But throw enough mud as they say...you'll be citing it as fact in a few weeks.
    'The mob' and 'faux outrage'. Yep, sounds like you've only a passing interest ;)
    You've put a worrying amount of energy into ridiculing anyone who didn't like what the couple did. I certainly hope it's renewable energy Blanch.

    Last parties I heavily supported were Labour and Fine Gael. I know right, what an ejit.
    I ain't got a team Blanch. It's very liberating. You get to hold valid genuine opinion instead of tripping over yourself with sh*te talk.


    I am willing to take you at face value on the not having a team, but only for the moment.

    I fully expect that whenever an election takes place you will join the long list of boards posters who have never voted for Sinn Fein but because of the mess that FF/FG (delete as appropriate) have made of things, have been forced into casting a vote for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,813 ✭✭✭Wesser


    so what happened did they get fired in the end?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,715 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    blanch152 wrote: »
    I am willing to take you at face value on the not having a team, but only for the moment.

    I fully expect that whenever an election takes place you will join the long list of boards posters who have never voted for Sinn Fein but because of the mess that FF/FG (delete as appropriate) have made of things, have been forced into casting a vote for them.

    aw poor wee blanch152. you really cant let the oul Sinn Fein thing go - especially in threads that have nothing to do with the subject of SF. a bit of a SF superfan by the looks of it - I bet your one of those boards posters you mention.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    Wesser wrote: »
    so what happened did they get fired in the end?

    Was wondering the same myself


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    blanch152 wrote: »
    I am willing to take you at face value on the not having a team, but only for the moment.

    I fully expect that whenever an election takes place you will join the long list of boards posters who have never voted for Sinn Fein but because of the mess that FF/FG (delete as appropriate) have made of things, have been forced into casting a vote for them.

    As I've said before I'd vote for Sinn Fein over and above FF/FG any day. Now does that make me a SF team member who can't criticise? I don't think so Blanch.
    I note you've suddenly turned a thread about a sad and ignorant couple into a SF thread. Kudos.

    I would vote for Michael Healy-Rae giving fellatio to a donkey before I'd vote FF/FG.
    It's not about your team winning Blanch, it's about the right team winning. If less voters thought like you we might see some progress.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,624 ✭✭✭votecounts


    .


Advertisement