Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gillette | Toxic masculinity advert.

2456739

Comments

  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    It's just a sh*t ad really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Who are the snowflakes, those that made the video, or those who have polluted the internet in recent days to voice their outrage over it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Plopsu


    batgoat wrote: »
    I'm not insulted, bit odd to be.

    If you don't find the portrayal of men in that ad insulting, I'd find that far more odd (unless you actually are a mansplaining sexual harasser).


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,939 ✭✭✭20Cent


    It's the new marketing method. Basically trolling right wing reactionaries and they make your ad go viral. PETA did it recently with an ad about stopping meat based slogans, the right went nuts, hadn't heard anything about PETA in years suddenly they are everywhere. Same with Greggs vegan sausage roll. The folks being triggered by this advertising style are the same people who call those fighting for basic human rights snowflakes. Think it's great promotions, coke and hookers all round for the marketing department.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,297 ✭✭✭Ri_Nollaig


    Bit of a stupid ad but whats new there.
    Doubt it will hurt Procter & Gamble and their $50 billion in annual revenue, considering they make just about all cosmetic and cleaning products!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,476 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Where's the ad for toxic femininity?

    The trauma of poorly made sandwiches, badly ironed shirts and being nagged at that time of the month.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,939 ✭✭✭20Cent


    Doesn't every ad for women basically say you are ugly, fat, lazy, your house/family are a mess and you eat crap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I think it's a bit weird in places. Like preventing a man from speaking to a woman he doesn't know in public is something that the self-appointed sharia police in Saudi would do. Is that carry on to now be tolerated in the western popular media?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭chalkitdown1


    Imagine getting upset over an ad for razor blades.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    20Cent wrote: »
    Doesn't every ad for women basically say you are ugly, fat, lazy, your house/family are a mess and you eat crap.

    It sells though, maybe men are just less open to criticism from advertisers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    tedpan wrote: »
    Any publicity is good publicity, especially if you're Gillette. It's not going to stop me buying razors, blades and foam from them. It's just another way to get into people's heads...


    Yeah, no.

    Gillette I suspect are about to learn what the phrase 'get woke, go broke' means. They could ask EA who's wokening of Battlefield 5 lead to a stock price slump. All publicity isn't good publicity, especially when you attack your core audience.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭0cp71eyxkb94qf


    "Triggered", "snowflake" etc etc. The same people who leap to the defence of women whenever ads that dont fit into their ridiculous ideology are shown (club Orange anyone?). I'm not surprised at the hypocrisy tbh.

    Regarding the ad, I dont think its worthy of outrage but it deserves to be criticised for jumping on the latest "all men are bastards unless they become more like women" bandwagon. I can only imagine the fat, purple haired, black rimmed glasses wearing marketing team behind it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Ush1 wrote: »
    Where's the ad for toxic femininity?

    The trauma of poorly made sandwiches, badly ironed shirts and being nagged at that time of the month.

    Probably more about women calling each other sluts and whores and making fun of each other for being fat and not wearing something nice/different everyday.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,758 ✭✭✭Pelvis


    I'm really not seeing the problem.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,939 ✭✭✭20Cent




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Regarding the ad, I dont think its worthy of outrage but it deserves to be criticised for jumping on the latest "all men are bastards unless they become more like women" bandwagon. I can inly imagine the fat, purple haired, black rimmed glasses wearing marketing team behind it.

    So what you're saying is that the ad triggered you to come on here and criticise the appearance of the person you imagine made it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,813 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    Quick question regarding Gillette products. Are the one's aimed at women still a lot more expensive because there pink?
    Several women in the past have said this to me and they used buy the male razors!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭lbc2019




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    20Cent wrote: »
    It's the new marketing method. Basically trolling right wing reactionaries and they make your ad go viral. PETA did it recently with an ad about stopping meat based slogans, the right went nuts, hadn't heard anything about PETA in years suddenly they are everywhere. Same with Greggs vegan sausage roll. The folks being triggered by this advertising style are the same people who call those fighting for basic human rights snowflakes. Think it's great promotions, coke and hookers all round for the marketing department.


    I'm not too sure about the callout about all encompassing right wing reaction.
    I'm left of centre and it has bugged me.
    I'm not foaming at the mouth about it and I comprehend it's about profits not any bull about corporate responsibility. Which makes it even more nauseating IMO.

    Won't hold my breath waiting on a tampon ad signalling "toxic" femininity


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Ciaran_B wrote: »
    If they're winding up the losers of AH they must be onto a winner.


    With who?


    I put it to you that intersectional feminists might be happy, but they probably won't buy their razors either...... because shaving is patriarchy!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Mrsmum


    Why do men need to be told this? Is the implication that we're already that way and need fixing? I sincerely doubt you'd take such a stance if a similar ad was aimed at women. It's situations like this that shine a light on the every growing hypocrisy of "progressives".

    Maybe the message is supposed to be that boys and men have been very badly served and often damaged not by who they really are but by old fashioned, outdated views of certain aspects of masculinity and it's time to retire these views so that tomorrow's men can thrive better without dragging these toxic messages around with them ?? As a mum of boys that's my best interpretation of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Plopsu wrote: »
    If you don't find the portrayal of men in that ad insulting, I'd find that far more odd (unless you actually are a mansplaining sexual harasser).

    Not really, I know that I wouldn't sexually harass anyone. So I'm not gonna get offended by an effort to reduce sexual harassment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭lbc2019


    cgcsb wrote: »
    It sells though, maybe men are just less open to criticism from advertisers.

    me aren't open to criticism full stop. What u saying? Fight you!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭0cp71eyxkb94qf


    Hurrache wrote: »
    So what you're saying is that the ad triggered you to come on here and criticise the appearance of the person you imagine made it?

    And there's my point proven. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Pelvis wrote: »
    I'm really not seeing the problem.
    That's because there is no problem.

    Just a group of people whose entire sense of identity is based on "manliness" and who foam at the mouth whenever anyone would dare to question whether traditional notions of manliness such as "boys will be boys" are actually a reasonable way to raise children who can be functional members of society that treat everyone else with respect.

    Realistically the people who get worked up about this so-called "attack on men" are only one step removed from the same psychopath who kidnapped that 13 year old girl and kept her trapped for months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    And there's my point proven. :)

    You like to think so, but read back over your contradictory post in which you fit right into the stereotype.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Mrsmum wrote: »
    Maybe the message is supposed to be that boys and men have been very badly served and often damaged not by who they really are but by old fashioned, outdated views of certain aspects of masculinity and it's time to retire these views so that tomorrow's men can thrive better without dragging these toxic messages around with them ?? As a mum of boys that's my best interpretation of it.

    The application of Sharia law in the ad is a bit alarming, no?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭0cp71eyxkb94qf


    lbc2019 wrote: »

    "Art, games, noise". A stand up member of society alright. He's also makes out that anyone criticising the ad is a basement dwelling incel which is the extent of his limited intelligence. It wouldn't surprise me if this idiot lives with his parents which further adds to the hypocrisy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    seamus wrote: »
    Realistically the people who get worked up about this so-called "attack on men" are only one step removed from the same psychopath who kidnapped that 13 year old girl and kept her trapped for months.

    wow


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Zorya


    I think it's bullcrap, saw it yesterday. This group guilt thing is going too far. The faces of the men - serious, then with dawning awareness - are supposed to convey some sort of awakening from a shared past as marauders, bullies, rapists, aggressors. All the scenarios are completely cliché, not to mention poorly acted. Imagine if there was an advert for a product targeting young women that implied they are all potential mean girls, or bitchy, or gold diggers, or vain, or gossipy, and that they should start calling each other out. Bullcrap.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭lbc2019


    Ciaran_B wrote: »
    If they're winding up the losers of AH they must be onto a winner.

    I doubt the loser incels even use Gilette, with their neckbeards and spotty oily skin


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭lbc2019


    "Art, games, noise". A stand up member of society alright. He's also makes out that anyone criticising the ad is a basement dwelling incel which is the extent of his limited intelligence. It wouldn't surprise me if this idiot lives with his parents which further adds to the hypocrisy.

    Hit a raw nerve???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    lbc2019 wrote: »

    The guy is wearing a beanie hat, indoors, with a short sleeve t-shirt.
    That's all you need to know about that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Plopsu


    batgoat wrote: »
    Not really, I know that I wouldn't sexually harass anyone. So I'm not gonna get offended by an effort to reduce sexual harassment.

    Riiiiggghhht. So, if I called you a wife beating, pedo (and I'm not), you'd be okay with that because you know it's not true? I think not. The ad portrays men (of which I am one) in a very negative way. I find it insulting precisely because I am nothing like that portrayal.
    And if you think an ad is an effort to reduce sexual harassment, well now that really is odd.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭lbc2019


    Plopsu wrote: »
    Riiiiggghhht. So, if I called you a wife beating, pedo (and I'm not), you'd be okay with that because you know it's not true? I think not. The ad portrays men (of which I am one) in a very negative way. I find it insulting precisely because I am nothing like that portrayal.
    And if you think an ad is an effort to reduce sexual harassment, well now that really is odd.

    I am a man, why am I not offended??? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭0cp71eyxkb94qf


    seamus wrote: »



    Realistically the people who get worked up about this so-called "attack on men" are only one step removed from the same psychopath who kidnapped that 13 year old girl and kept her trapped for months.

    Wow. So criticising what is clearly an idelogues wet dream of an ad is close to being a psycho? Did you get your psychiatry licence in gender studies class?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,183 ✭✭✭jobless


    Zorya wrote: »
    I think it's bullcrap, saw it yesterday. This group guilt thing is going too far. The faces of the men - serious, then with dawning awareness - are supposed to convey some sort of awakening from a shared past as marauders, bullies, rapists, aggressors. All the scenarios are completely cliché, not to mention poorly acted. Imagine if there was an advert for a product targeting young women that implied they are all potential mean girls, or bitchy, or gold diggers, or vain, or gossipy, and that they should start calling each other out. Bullcrap.

    here here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Plopsu


    seamus wrote: »
    Realistically the people who get worked up about this so-called "attack on men" are only one step removed from the same psychopath who kidnapped that 13 year old girl and kept her trapped for months.

    Bwahaha. Well done. People who criticise an ad are more or less child abductors. Superb! Now let's see if you can make it over two sharks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Mrsmum


    cgcsb wrote: »
    The application of Sharia law in the ad is a bit alarming, no?

    I see what you mean but maybe we don't see his actions as too bad because in the video from my memory he is quite dishy and good looking people get away with anything but women get followed by all sorts of guys and unless Brad Pitt is following you down the street, it's not really such a good experience imho.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭lbc2019


    jobless wrote: »
    here here

    hear, hear! (fyp)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Wow. So criticising what is clearly an idelogues wet dream of an ad is close to being a psycho? Did you get your psychiatry licence in gender studies class?
    No, I got it at my homeopathy college.

    I can guarantee you this guy was a redpiller, incel and all over 4chan.

    The same kind of fragile egos that are crying about a Gillette ad with a responsible message.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Zorya wrote: »
    This group guilt thing is going too far.

    You're being made feel guilty by an ad for shaving products? Excuse the term here, but man up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,751 ✭✭✭✭degrassinoel


    i liked that ad tbh, bit long but it has a really good message
    The "girls of tomorrow" part must have been removed or something, coz it deffo says "men of tomorrow" at the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Plopsu


    lbc2019 wrote: »
    I am a man, why am I not offended??? :confused:

    You want me to offer an opinion on your thought process? Seriously? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    razorblunt wrote: »
    The guy is wearing a beanie hat, indoors, with a short sleeve t-shirt.
    That's all you need to know about that.

    "fragile masculinity pfft, I'm definitely learning to knit this year. Looking forward to coding myself a jumper, and who knows what" :pac:

    "We got my 2yo son a toy dog for crimbo, and my partner's brother accused us of emasculating my son just because the dog happens to be pink. When we challenged him he was all "err... I was only joking." **** off. Toxic masculinity is both real and so ****ing pathetic."


    This soy boy's twitter feed is a delight! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭lbc2019


    I love the irony of the username of the op


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Mrsmum wrote: »
    I see what you mean but maybe we don't see his actions as too bad because in the video from my memory he is quite dishy and good looking people get away with anything but women get followed by all sorts of guys and unless Brad Pitt is following you down the street, it's not really such a good experience imho.

    The person stopping him had no idea what the guy was going to say to her, and it would be fundamentally not his business anyway. Imagine being so presumptuous in western society that you would stop a free individual from approaching another, regardless of their gender.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭0cp71eyxkb94qf


    seamus wrote: »
    No, I got it at my homeopathy college.

    I can guarantee you this guy was a redpiller, incel and all over 4chan.

    The same kind of fragile egos that are crying about a Gillette ad with a responsible message.


    Nah. No fragile ego here mate just a mild amusement at the hypocrisy of people on boards when it comes to these types of issues.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭jooksavage


    Jesus the state of some of these comments. Lot of insecurity here. Anyone who doesn't think toxic masculinity is a thing should spend some time at the factory I worked at for 5 years or sit in with the taxi driver I was unfortunate enough to catch over the Christmas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    The only clear thing to come from this ad and resulting thread, is that there's an entire generation of "men" who are anything but.

    God be the days of real men using a blunt steak knife to shave and splashed the Brut on immediately afterwards for that bracing refreshing feeling to wake you up in the morning.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement