Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Limerick-Foynes Rail Line

12357

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 486 ✭✭Treepole


    marno21 wrote: »
    The Robertstown viaduct near Foynes?

    I wouldn't call that three-arch, but then again I wouldn't be that au-fait with bridge construction lingo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭flyingsnail


    pigtown wrote: »
    I don't know, I just saw a notice in the Limerick Post.
    What page is that on ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭pigtown


    What page is that on ?

    Near the back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭Mango Joe


    Hi All,

    Just curious to get an overview of this as it stands right now. I've read through the thread but given the length of time its run for there's been a lot of speculation as people tried to guess how things might pan out etc. So just wondering what the likely situation is now after the passage of time?

    As of now is IEs application to carry out this work on the bridge a good indicator something may happen?

    Is this service likely to carry commuters, freight or both?

    At a guess when might trains actually run? Would it be in 5-10 years time etc?

    I may have missed it but could someone post a link to the likely route with stations marked on it?

    Thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,542 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Freight, it's an existing but unmaintained route and there won't be any intermediate stations.


  • Registered Users Posts: 486 ✭✭Treepole


    Mango Joe wrote: »
    Hi All,

    Just curious to get an overview of this as it stands right now. I've read through the thread but given the length of time its run for there's been a lot of speculation as people tried to guess how things might pan out etc. So just wondering what the likely situation is now after the passage of time?

    As of now is IEs application to carry out this work on the bridge a good indicator something may happen?

    Is this service likely to carry commuters, freight or both?

    At a guess when might trains actually run? Would it be in 5-10 years time etc?

    I may have missed it but could someone post a link to the likely route with stations marked on it?

    Thanks!

    If you look at Foynes on Google Maps you can follow the route from there. It's a bit circuitous but it's actually close enough to the route that the new M20 Spur to Foynes will eventually take.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 Fsxlover2


    Mango Joe wrote: »
    Hi All,

    Just curious to get an overview of this as it stands right now. I've read through the thread but given the length of time its run for there's been a lot of speculation as people tried to guess how things might pan out etc. So just wondering what the likely situation is now after the passage of time?

    As of now is IEs application to carry out this work on the bridge a good indicator something may happen?

    Is this service likely to carry commuters, freight or both?

    At a guess when might trains actually run? Would it be in 5-10 years time etc?

    I may have missed it but could someone post a link to the likely route with stations marked on it?

    Thanks!

    1. Well no trains can run if the old bridge remains, so i assume its one step further to reopening the line.

    2.Its going to be freight.

    3.Depends, you could have inspection cars and weed sprayers on the line soon enough but normal freight trains might be in a while (if ever).

    4. Google: Foynes railway map


  • Registered Users Posts: 38 Oscar1978


    Any work done on Robertstown viaduct or any work in general?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 290 ✭✭Pete2k


    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/transport-and-tourism/reopening-limerick-foynes-rail-freight-line-makes-sense-says-minister-1.4369536

    I would imagine this involves relaying the entire line and bringing it up to suitable level for passenger traffic at least as far as Adare given the recent comments from the minister. Relaying the castlemungret adjacent line as far as the turnoff and using it as a double track as far as here would also help.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,186 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Quote from the article.
    The move would cut truck journeys between the city and port by 800 a year
    That's 2.2 trucks a day, or 3 trucks a day if you only count Monday to Friday. That's not even a dent in the truck numbers. Would it even lead to one full train a week?

    Surely you need a much stronger business case than that to spend €45m to open a line for 1-2 trains a week.
    Pete2k wrote: »
    I would imagine this involves relaying the entire line and bringing it up to suitable level for passenger traffic at least as far as Adare given the recent comments from the minister. Relaying the castlemungret adjacent line as far as the turnoff and using it as a double track as far as here would also help.

    A passenger line would need the reinstatement of the bridge across Careys Road (which was removed 50 years ago with the alignment built on) to allow access to Colbert Station. That would be very very expensive and would most definitely not be covered by the mooted €45m.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,174 ✭✭✭1huge1



    A passenger line would need the reinstatement of the bridge across Careys Road (which was removed 50 years ago with the alignment built on) to allow access to Colbert Station. That would be very very expensive and would most definitely not be covered by the mooted €45m.

    Wouldnt that only be the case if the destination for these cargo trains would be Colbert St. Does it make sense that cargo trains would terminate in the middle of the city or continue on to another destination which it can do at present?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,186 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    1huge1 wrote: »
    Wouldnt that only be the case if the destination for these cargo trains would be Colbert St. Does it make sense that cargo trains would terminate in the middle of the city or continue on to another destination which is can do at present?
    I was referring to Pete2k saying that the line could be reopened to passengers as far a Adare as part of this. That's why the first words of the bit that you quoted are 'A passenger line'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,174 ✭✭✭1huge1


    My mistake, should really take that "attention to detail" line off my CV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,140 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Quote from the article.

    That's 2.2 trucks a day, or 3 trucks a day if you only count Monday to Friday. That's not even a dent in the truck numbers. Would it even lead to one full train a week?

    Surely you need a much stronger business case than that to spend €45m to open a line for 1-2 trains a week.



    A passenger line would need the reinstatement of the bridge across Careys Road (which was removed 50 years ago with the alignment built on) to allow access to Colbert Station. That would be very very expensive and would most definitely not be covered by the mooted €45m.




    trucks off the road is trucks off the road.
    baby steps, you can't expect a dent to be made from day one.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    trucks off the road is trucks off the road.
    baby steps, you can't expect a dent to be made from day one.

    To be honest, you would need to reinstate a large amount of the freight facilities all over the country and move away from JIT logistics for rail freight to return in any major way.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,140 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    To be honest, you would need to reinstate a large amount of the freight facilities all over the country and move away from JIT logistics for rail freight to return in any major way.




    agreed, but that's something that goes way way beyond reopening the foynes branch.
    i'm assuming if the branch was to reopen and i'm not holding my breath, i would imagine it would be on the basis that there would be potential for growth from the base load usage over a long term.
    but as i said, i'm not holding my breath for a reopening, i will believe it when i hear of track relaying taking place.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭Paddico


    Theres an old strip line about 2km long leading off the line into Rathkeale.

    Could be the starting point for limerick commuter services


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    Paddico wrote: »
    Theres an old strip line about 2km long leading off the line into Rathkeale.

    Could be the starting point for limerick commuter services

    That's the old line to Newcastle West and onto to Kerry.

    I think a branch to Newcastle West would justify the cost of reopening for passenger services.

    Where SFPC willing to put money towards this as well


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    To be honest, you would need to reinstate a large amount of the freight facilities all over the country and move away from JIT logistics for rail freight to return in any major way.

    Foynes is bulk loads of loose materials. JIT isn't an issue with this and it isn't operated anywhere near the scale it is in the UK. JIT is mainly ro/ro traffic and IE won't be targeting this traffic as they can't transport it. Freight facilities are not overly complicated and rather cheap once you have the yard space. Ballina is literally just a reach stacker and space.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭andrewfaulk


    IE 222 wrote: »
    Foynes is bulk loads of loose materials. JIT isn't an issue with this and it isn't operated anywhere near the scale it is in the UK. JIT is mainly ro/ro traffic and IE won't be targeting this traffic as they can't transport it. Freight facilities are not overly complicated and rather cheap once you have the yard space. Ballina is literally just a reach stacker and space.

    Agree whole heartedly with this.. JIT is massively over hyped on this forum, and irrelevant to container or bulk traffic which is what rail freight does


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    IE 222 wrote: »
    Foynes is bulk loads of loose materials. JIT isn't an issue with this and it isn't operated anywhere near the scale it is in the UK. JIT is mainly ro/ro traffic and IE won't be targeting this traffic as they can't transport it. Freight facilities are not overly complicated and rather cheap once you have the yard space. Ballina is literally just a reach stacker and space.
    In relation to JIT, I was thinking of freight in general, as opposed to this particular port and bulk material transfer, but I do take your point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭andrewfaulk


    In relation to JIT, I was thinking of freight in general, as opposed to this particular port and bulk material transfer, but I do take your point.

    In general freight even, JIT isn’t that common.. cheaper is better is the rule more often than not


  • Registered Users Posts: 38 Oscar1978


    Quote from the article.

    That's 2.2 trucks a day, or 3 trucks a day if you only count Monday to Friday. That's not even a dent in the truck numbers. Would it even lead to one full train a week?

    Surely you need a much stronger business case than that to spend €45m to open a line for 1-2 trains a week.



    A passenger line would need the reinstatement of the bridge across Careys Road (which was removed 50 years ago with the alignment built on) to allow access to Colbert Station. That would be very very expensive and would most definitely not be covered by the mooted €45m.

    In fairness in relation to the passenger line you wouldn't need the bridge at Carey's road as the set up would be something similar to Limerick Galway at Athenry. It'd be a case of rolling on towards Limerick check and reversing the short distance back into Colbert. The passenger trains would probably be two unit diesels similar to Limerick Ballybrophy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,964 ✭✭✭trellheim


    In fairness as well the alignment is clear to build if you wanted to go left or
    right of the old CIE club see https://www.google.com/maps/@52.6561534,-8.6212154,3a,51.2y,170.2h,79.44t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snnB63_TL_udmI5E5s2MpJA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,186 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    trellheim wrote: »
    In fairness as well the alignment is clear to build if you wanted to go left or
    right of the old CIE club see https://www.google.com/maps/@52.6561534,-8.6212154,3a,51.2y,170.2h,79.44t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snnB63_TL_udmI5E5s2MpJA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656


    The alignment was a bridge crossing Careys Road of which the stone wall was was one embankment. On top of the embankment there are houses either side of the old track bed. You would need to reinstate the embankment on where the CIE club is and build a new bridge.

    There's a photo of it during its removal in 1975 here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    The alignment was a bridge crossing Careys Road of which the stone wall was was one embankment. On top of the embankment there are houses either side of the old track bed. You would need to reinstate the embankment on where the CIE club is and build a new bridge.

    There's a photo of it during its removal in 1975 here.

    The housing shouldn't cause any problems. They were there when the line was last in service. The club would need to be demolished and reinstate the embankment. The embankment is still in place at the rare of the club.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,186 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    IE 222 wrote: »
    The housing shouldn't cause any problems. They were there when the line was last in service. The club would need to be demolished and reinstate the embankment. The embankment is still in place at the rare of the club.

    I mentioned the housing because the poster prosposed moving the route of the line around the CIE club which would impact the housing. I don't think they took the height differentials into account either.

    I'm well aware that it could be reinstated. I never said it couldn't be


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,964 ✭✭✭trellheim


    I was there when the embankment was demolished.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Apparently likely to be included in the new National Development Plan to be published in early next year

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/climate-change-projects-make-waves-in-new-national-development-plan-wnzw67mh9


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,964 ✭✭✭trellheim


    This keeps cropping up - is it because of TEN-T funding or something ? I saw a note in Modern Railways.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    trellheim wrote: »
    This keeps cropping up - is it because of TEN-T funding or something ? I saw a note in Modern Railways.

    It's eligible for it, but also cause Eamon Ryan is pushing it hard.


  • Registered Users Posts: 270 ✭✭ncounties


    marno21 wrote: »
    Apparently likely to be included in the new National Development Plan to be published in early next year

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/climate-change-projects-make-waves-in-new-national-development-plan-wnzw67mh9

    Just read the article. A bit late to the party I know. But what do they mean that the line could be used for "Renewable Energy Exports"? Also, veering momentarily off thread, does anyone with a subscription know if the article refers to the Navan line too?


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    ncounties wrote: »
    Just read the article. A bit late to the party I know. But what do they mean that the line could be used for "Renewable Energy Exports"? Also, veering momentarily off thread, does anyone with a subscription know if the article refers to the Navan line too?

    I think Eamon has a notion of creating a cluster of industry in Mayo either relating to emerging renewable technologies or else heavy industry powered by offshore wind. Either renewable energy related goods or goods produced by renewable energy in Mayo could be transported to Foynes via the railway.

    Pie in the sky stuff.

    Nothing about Navan in that article.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Only two projects mentioned specifically in the article were Galway - Athenry and Limerick to Foynes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,038 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If it is mentioned in the revised NDP, I'd say it will be along the lines of how further sections of the WRC were mentioned in the previous one; assess its feasibility and fund if viable or something like that. The recently published reports on WRC should see it omitted in the revision, Limerick - Foynes could slot in in its place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭Paddico


    Was the study to re-open this ever published



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    what on earth will the railway actually carry ?

    From what I see Foynes specialises in bulk cargo, which on paper lends itsself perfectly to a rail link, except that any recipient of bulk cargo would need to be connected to the rail network, if they are even anywhere near a rail line in the first place.

    Their new strategy for growth is importing windmills, so great, but not something for the irish railways with its low bridges and whatnot

    Theres mentioning of Hydrogen production there but thats far in the future still.

    They dont do containers in Foynes so the trains wouldnt carry those, so what will they carry ? Its a very large investment for a very hidden if not non-existant use case . It seems to be a case of "build it and they will come", but is there literally nothing more in the reopening than that ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,107 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    it's mentioned on the first page of this thread (11 years ago!) that there's a Zinc mine opening in Pallas East near the Limerick Junction line - is that still a potential customer?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    reading a bit more, the locals are not dreaming of any job creation in logistics or industry, its about having a train to bring people to the Ryder cup.

    In the Dail, Eamonn Ryan even says the same. So, its a 104million euro railway to a "strategic" port as a front to get cash for a rail link for the Ryder cup.

    https://www.kildarestreet.com/debate/?id=2022-03-03a.65

    In fairness, Eamonn Ryan does mention "Ore" so maybe thats the initial business case, but jesus, can someone not say this explicitly or are they in typical dept of transport mode that they are petrified of getting sued over anti competitive behaviour.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 326 ✭✭MyLove4Satan


    The line is actually being reopened - the plant and equiptment has already arrived on site.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Is there a longer term plan to open the Waterford to Rosslare section?

    There would then be a line to bring freight from Rosslare to Foynes, which would help building up windpower, transporting LNG and moving freight off the motorways. It would also take huge pressure off Dublin Port which is definitely needed in the longterm



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,542 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    No. Also, Rosslare didn't do railfreight anyway, it isn't that type of port.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,722 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    As part of the re-opening, are all LC to be eliminated?

    What will the max speed be? 160kph? 120 kph?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    aside from the fact that offloading freight in one port, and shipping it by land a few 100km to another port to send it back out to sea, doesnt seem to be a sensible thing to do even if it were possible.

    I did a bit of searching and there seems to be the possibility of Zinc and lead mining in a stretch of land from Kildare to Tipp with test drilling and decisions being made at the moment, so if that works out there might be one or more potential customers from those mines.

    You'd wonder too would Tara then send their shipments through Foynes if it becomes a major Ore handing port.

    A fair few "ifs" in there though, and who is to know whether the mines simply send their ORE to Dublin and ignore Foynes. Sure, Foynes had a rail line until relatively recently and it didnt seem to get much use so why should that change now ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It would be great to see passenger services and a Limerick commuter rail service. 4 lines starting at Cobert and serving Foynes(with doradoyle spur), Limerick Junction, Ennis and Neenagh with a proper usable schedule and more stations in Limerick City. Do more to remove cars from the city centre as much as possible.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,186 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Limerick needs proper bus service that goes to the places that people need to go to, not a rail service that doesn't. Most people live and work on the outskirts of the city. Very few live or work in the city center, so a service on 1800s single track rail alignments that don't serve places like UL, Castletroy or Plassey or the majority of the North side of the river and terminates at Colbert isn't going to be used. Having to change at Colbert and then walk 2-3 km is not going to take people out of their cars.

    Build proper bus lanes, put park and rides along the major entry points into the city at the N18, N24, M7 and M20 and increase bus services and it will go a lot further to reduce traffic in the city center.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I said as much in the thread in the Train and Rail Systems forum. The N7 Naas Road was built to a high standard specifically because of the Ryder Cup in 2006. So this wouldn't surprise me at all; if you want to get something done in this country, just get a major sporting event involved somehow. But there are rumours about that zinc mine going around too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Can do both. It doesn't have to be single track either. Limerick Junction line is being doubled in any case



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,777 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    It's to small to get any kind of good scalable public transport like light rail or diverse bus service. There's less than 100,000 people living there.

    That being said, a direct rail link to Shannon Airport would be very beneficial to the city.

    It would however mean CPO'ing a heap of stuff above on the North East of Mallow St all the way river and then the same again out to the R445

    Elevated Rail could potentially reduce the CPO'ing burden OR just cut west and hug the coast to the Airport

    The only REAL way to make money on Rail is to move freight.

    A rail freight hub at the airport would certainly make the process a bit more appealing.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,186 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Have a look at google maps. It's not possible to double track the line from Moyross to the city. It has housing backing onto the line on both sides from Corbally in. There isn't room to double track the Foynes line between the M20 and Dooradoyle/Raheen either.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement