Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FG shills on boards.

Options
  • 21-11-2019 10:57pm
    #1
    McMurphy
    Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭


    What if I said I was in receipt of a pm obviously meant for a few other boards members, with detailed instructions on what to say and do in reference to both Verona Murphy and Maria Bailey?

    Goes on to mention in fairly specific details, a press officer, and that Maria Bailey reached an "engineered agreement" with the executive so she "could take legal action" and Leo could "save face":D

    I nearly wet my jocks laughing at the stupidity of the worst shill in the world who was so careless as to send it to my Inbox, and the names included of the two intended recipients.

    You better believe I've it screenshot just in case.:D



    **Alarms going off in the Frape Room now no doubt** :pac:


«1

Comments

  • Options
    #2
    Sonny noggs
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭Sonny noggs


    Strewth!


  • Options
    #3
    banie01
    Registered Users Posts: 16,585 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Hold up...
    Did someone really just send their alter-egos a pm?

    Dammit!
    So many theories just went up in smoke! :pac:


  • Options
    #4
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 67,410 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    giz us a goo Johnny?


  • Options
    #5
    McMurphy
    Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    giz us a goo Johnny?

    Can anyone confirm that posting heavily redacted PM's are ok?


  • Options
    #6
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Haha love it


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 67,410 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Johnny Dogs wrote: »
    Can anyone confirm that posting heavily redacted PM's are ok?

    Send a PM.

    James Reilly and Colin Brophy are probably in your garden now! Quick!

    SWAT1-300x225.jpg


  • Options
    #8
    Sleeper12
    Registered Users Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    I always assumed that all of the parties had teams like this


  • Options
    #9
    Fr_Dougal
    Registered Users Posts: 9,167 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    Johnny Dogs wrote: »
    Can anyone confirm that posting heavily redacted PM's are ok?

    Yeah, it’s ok.


  • Options
    #10
    Sir Oxman
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    Johnny Dogs wrote: »
    Can anyone confirm that posting heavily redacted PM's are ok?
    I can't confirm it but I'd love to see the names :)


  • Options
    #11
    KaneToad
    Registered Users Posts: 3,248 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    I always assumed that all of the parties had teams like this

    Me too.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #12
    McMurphy
    Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    Send a PM.

    James Reilly and Colin Brophy are probably in your garden now! Quick!

    SWAT1-300x225.jpg

    If you can give it any credence whatsoever, it's fairly damming stuff tbh especially the "engineered agreement" bit with Bailey, and leo saving face - making her fate as dubious as the claim itself if true.

    Goes on to emphasise about talking up how their still the biggest party, and how Leo has proven he's willing to listen to people blah blah blah.

    I know the sender probably has realised the fcuk up they just made by now, but if you're reading this,

    No I didn't get the email, and yeah, please get your woman to "shoot it on":D


  • Options
    #13
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Yeah Johnny I want to know who sent it and to whom. I also want to know who wasn’t it sent to and was that the mix up in you getting it.


  • Options
    #14
    BENDYBINN
    Registered Users Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭BENDYBINN


    Anyone that votes FG seriously needs their head examined....


  • Options
    #15
    SaintLeibowitz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 163 ✭✭SaintLeibowitz


    Speaking of shills.. Where did that fella banjo string end up?


  • Options
    #16
    dubrov
    Registered Users Posts: 3,559 ✭✭✭dubrov


    This thread has stolen 5 minutes of my life


  • Options
    #17
    Sonny noggs
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭Sonny noggs


    SaintLeibowitz wrote: »
    Speaking of shills.. Where did that fella banjo string end up?

    Think he pissed off to Aus. Ended up in Summer Bay if you can believe it.


  • Options
    #18
    JeffKenna
    Registered Users Posts: 4,535 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Will you send it onto me if you don't mind?


  • Options
    #19
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,347 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Sonny noggs wrote: »
    Think he pissed off to Aus. Ended up in Summer Bay if you can believe it.


    Nah, I would guess he is still here in spirit.


  • Options
    #20
    Pedro K
    Registered Users Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭Pedro K


    Ah come on. Post it for all to see!


  • Options
    #21
    Sonny noggs
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭Sonny noggs


    A not so elaborate hoax?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #22
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,347 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Unless we see some evidence, I would guess the OP is either being played or he is making it up. Probably the former as he tends to fall for the most outlandish conspiracy theories.


  • Options
    #23
    Muahahaha
    Registered Users Posts: 19,619 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    I always assumed that all of the parties had teams like this

    Same here but I thought the general idea is that they're not supposed to get caught red handed ;)

    Comes as no surprise to me that lads are actively on here spinning for Fine Gael, you can spot the similarities in the arguments easily enough. Its very low brow, utter scutter one might say.


  • Options
    #24
    McMurphy
    Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    Are people here aware that you can close accounts and open new ones?

    I myself am on my 3rd account in 13 years, as I'm perfectly entitled to do?

    Why do people think they're masterminds for speculating on old account's, don't get it myself.

    In saying that, as deflections go, in comparison with what I got sent to me its not in the same ballpark lads is it? :D


  • Options
    #25
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    SPILL THE TEA!!!!


  • Options
    #26
    McMurphy
    Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    For the posters asking for screenshots, I will be providing them once cleared to do so, though the sender's and the intended recipients names will be redacted.

    What an absolute dopey move if ever there was one.


  • Options
    #27
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 67,410 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Unless we see some evidence, I would guess the OP is either being played or he is making it up. Probably the former as he tends to fall for the most outlandish conspiracy theories.

    What's your methodology for proving it's a hoax/false?


  • Options
    #28
    dubrov
    Registered Users Posts: 3,559 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Johnny Dogs wrote: »
    For the posters asking for screenshots, I will be providing them once cleared to do so, though the sender's and the intended recipients names will be redacted.

    What an absolute dopey move if ever there was one.

    Without being able to verify the sender's posting history, don't waste your time.


  • Options
    #29
    McMurphy
    Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    dubrov wrote: »
    Without being able to verify the sender's posting history, don't waste your time.

    I'm able to verify it. And I will provide unedited screenshots to admin if requested.

    That's all that matters.


  • Options
    #30
    MeMen2_MoRi_
    Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭MeMen2_MoRi_


    Johnny Dogs wrote: »
    Can anyone confirm that posting heavily redacted PM's are ok?

    Don't be going the heavily redacted route, remove the sender and the other receivers of the PM. everything else should be fair game.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #31
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,347 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    What's your methodology for proving it's a hoax/false?


    I’ll put it to you like this, if I put up a similar thread about SF, you would be first to ask me to prove it, and you would end up being top poster on the thread as well.

    I’ll tell you what, if Johnny sends it to me, I’ll be happy to confirm if it’s genuine, after all you all believe me to be a FG shill.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement