Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Spring 2020..... 1.5m Dairy calves.... discuss.

Options
1101113151659

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,265 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Who2 wrote: »
    I’m going on that notion and could be completely wrong but the way things are panning out I’m of the belief there will have to be some sort of sub brought in and it will suit the government if we are restocked before any reference year or even use the mass exodus from suckling as an excuse to bring in something.

    I have considered that but there are a few issues. It would first need EU approval and I am not so sure about that. there are a issue's first it would be considered a market support while the EU might turn a blind eye WTO might not. If it was bought in would have to be EU wide. The next issue is the structure, to encourage calf producers it first payment would have to be at 6-12 months. You would need to not allow support for Fr heifers. Would it be on Dairy bred bulls only, IMO you would need to include all beef crosses, this would discourage dairy farmers from selecting commercial quality bulls.

    Finally you have the financing of it. At present we have over 1.4 million cows. Allow this to max out at 1.5 million. We assume a replacement rate of 300K Fr heifers is need every year.If the funding is on all 1.2 million dairy calves at 100/head it is 120 million. However that may not be enough to future proof the system 150/head ( 75 at 10 months and 75 at 22 months) it costs 180 million.

    If you want to reduce suckler numbers from 900K cows to 500k at a sub rate of 150/head for 3 years for every cow reduced in a herd, it costs 60 million/year. It would take a 10-15% reduction in BPS to fund if it came from that direction, it would swallow a all of pillar two funding and need to be co-funded as well.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭Who2


    I have considered that but there are a few issues. It would first need EU approval and I am not so sure about that. there are a issue's first it would be considered a market support while the EU might turn a blind eye WTO might not. If it was bought in would have to be EU wide. The next issue is the structure, to encourage calf producers it first payment would have to be at 6-12 months. You would need to not allow support for Fr heifers. Would it be on Dairy bred bulls only, IMO you would need to include all beef crosses, this would discourage dairy farmers from selecting commercial quality bulls.

    Finally you have the financing of it. At present we have over 1.4 million cows. Allow this to max out at 1.5 million. We assume a replacement rate of 300K Fr heifers is need every year.If the funding is on all 1.2 million dairy calves at 100/head it is 120 million. However that may not be enough to future proof the system 150/head ( 75 at 10 months and 75 at 22 months) it costs 180 million.

    If you want to reduce suckler numbers from 900K cows to 500k at a sub rate of 150/head for 3 years for every cow reduced in a herd, it costs 60 million/year. It would take a 10-15% reduction in BPS to fund if it came from that direction, it would swallow a all of pillar two funding and need to be co-funded as well.
    I wouldn’t be thinking it’s a sub on production but more a sub on reduction. I still have a lot of this years weanlings and have most of last years heifers. While I’m stocked out to the limit, I’ll be able to Carry into June of next year before I start to sweat. My idea is I’m either going to loose even more or gain well but I’m more confident of a reasonably strong rise by next April . I’m using this year also as year to upgrade all the cows that I’m not overly fond of.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    I dont think there is any sub coming.if you didnt get a suckler sub under enda you are never going to get one.whats alot more likely is stocking limits and reductions.one way or another the number of heads are going to be reduced either by calves born ,export or life span of animals


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,819 ✭✭✭amacca


    K.G. wrote: »
    life span of animals

    If lifespan is dictated by lowering age limits at slaughter then I'm of the opinion that increases the number of heads.....

    if they relax that 30 month limit then my numbers would go down quite substantially


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,265 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    K.G. wrote: »
    I dont think there is any sub coming.if you didnt get a suckler sub under enda you are never going to get one.whats alot more likely is stocking limits and reductions.one way or another the number of heads are going to be reduced either by calves born ,export or life span of animals

    I be the same opinion regarding subs on dairy bred cattle. I think we will need a Suckler reduction sub on next 12-18 months.

    However reduction in lifespan equal faster finishing and higher levels of ration. This is incompatible with present beef prices. Even Teagasc are now pointing with there costings that 28 months 3nd summer finishing is the best option with Fr bullicks

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,819 ✭✭✭amacca


    Even Teagasc are now pointing with there costings that 28 months 3nd summer finishing is the best option with Fr bullicks

    leaving you holding the bag with a significant number of heads that are not ready in may, june and might not be so even with pumping......trying to limit losses offloading in the autumn

    theres no winning at any game as far as I can see unless you have everything perfect and no need to invest in facilities + you have free grain from somewhere


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,265 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    amacca wrote: »
    leaving you holding the bag with a significant number of heads that are not ready in may, june and might not be so even with pumping......trying to limit losses offloading in the autumn

    theres no winning at any game as far as I can see unless you have everything perfect and no need to invest in facilities + you have free grain from somewhere

    I have always found that cattle killed from Kate May to late July off grass leave the highest margin 4 years out if 5

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 604 ✭✭✭TooOldBoots


    The man that bred the Calf will have to raise him.
    The suckler farmer shouldn't bother with the dairy calves as their is absolutely no money to be made from them at any price above zero as a calf.
    The dairy industry will have to sort this out themselves. The idea of killing bobby calves is horrific, it would damage the Beef industry here not alone the dairy, and I don't think other farmers let alone the public would stomach that carry on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,527 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Glanbia pulling out of Greenfields and the sudden interest and press releases by other co-ops re the bull calf issue is making alot of sense now, Chinese whispers that rte have some pretty bad footage from farms last spring that would make a not so pleasant prime time special for the dairy industry


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    K.G. wrote: »
    Good calves will still move,the trick is to have them good.the days of lamping the calf off at 10 days maybe disappearing.some of the steam for work is going out of lads a d you might see more hd/aa calves.rather than fr jex as fellas come near their potential herd size

    I sold 3 for bull calves during the disaster last spring. Almost 6 weeks old 6lL whole milk a day since birth no scour or setbacks got €6/head.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,527 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    You"d know the chap in the latest article on agriland was heading for a new employer, he could of at least told a few white lies re bull calves and facilities/labour on farm, reading between the lines it doesn't paint a good picture


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,874 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    You"d know the chap in the latest article on agriland was heading for a new employer, he could of at least told a few white lies re bull calves and facilities/labour on farm, reading between the lines it doesn't paint a good picture

    He was heading for a share milking job..
    Not e everyone has a farm to go home to


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    You"d know the chap in the latest article on agriland was heading for a new employer, he could of at least told a few white lies re bull calves and facilities/labour on farm, reading between the lines it doesn't paint a good picture

    7 hours a day milking 450 cows probably got to him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,265 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Dakota Dan wrote: »
    7 hours a day milking 450 cows probably got to him.

    Turnover of labour seems high, this lad was managing it for a year and is leaving, the other farm worker is now taking over management of the farm. One Student counted as half a labour unit as well running the place. The owner was on sight there as well. The rota is 6 on 1 off for the spring and 11 on and three off for the summer. Even if only 8 hour days its 48/weeks for the spring and 44 hour weeks for rest of milking season. I cannot under stand this part

    “At the weekends, we operate a one man show – one man is off and the other man does the relief milking on another farm,” said Cian.


    Is one lad milking two farms the weekends. However it was no fun milking the weekends on this farm by yourself and it taking 7 hours/day. You be fair fed up looking at the rear end of cows. Owner intends to push it to the max 250 kgs of N/HA by going above 3 cows/HA. There will be plenty of fun if they have to start keeping calves to 5-6 weeks of age

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,527 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Turnover of labour seems high, this lad was managing it for a year and is leaving, the other farm worker is now taking over management of the farm. One Student counted as half a labour unit as well running the place. The owner was on sight there as well. The rota is 6 on 1 off for the spring and 11 on and three off for the summer. Even if only 8 hour days its 48/weeks for the spring and 44 hour weeks for rest of milking season. I cannot under stand this part

    “At the weekends, we operate a one man show – one man is off and the other man does the relief milking on another farm,” said Cian.


    Is one lad milking two farms the weekends. However it was no fun milking the weekends on this farm by yourself and it taking 7 hours/day. You be fair fed up looking at the rear end of cows. Owner intends to push it to the max 250 kgs of N/HA by going above 3 cows/HA. There will be plenty of fun if they have to start keeping calves to 5-6 weeks of age

    When the cows dont even get the luxury of a roof doesn't take a genius to work out how low down the pecking order the bull calf is, the student been tasked with rearing a few hundred calves really stood out not a single f**k is given in a set-up like that everything is disposable


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭older by the day


    In fairness it will be a good day for farmer's when they get rid of derogation.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    In fairness it will be a good day for farmer's when they get rid of derogation.

    The way things are going theres no shortage of land anyway


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭older by the day


    K.G. wrote: »
    The way things are going theres no shortage of land anyway

    Bad land is making 5k for trees down here,


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭Keepgrowing


    What I see happening is the majority of dairy farmers will synch and sex semen their heifers. They will AI dairy to cows bred in first 3 weeks then mop up with He/AA BULLS or AI.

    Great plan but the cute ones will continue to breed all their stock to dairy as they’re going to get very scarce, just try buying in calf heifers at the moment. They’re making London


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,874 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    What I see happening is the majority of dairy farmers will synch and sex semen their heifers. They will AI dairy to cows bred in first 3 weeks then mop up with He/AA BULLS or AI.

    Great plan but the cute ones will continue to breed all their stock to dairy as they’re going to get very scarce, just try buying in calf heifers at the moment. They’re making London

    Dont be telling everyone!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,265 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    He was heading for a share milking job..
    Not e everyone has a farm to go home to

    Not quite correct he hopes to go share milking there in the long term. IMO it is highly unlikely, farm owners will string along lads like him. Even if he goes share milking it is unlikely he will have the finance to lease farm in the medium term. If stocking rates are reduced to 2-2.5 cows/HA it will change the finance of all these outfits and it will also cubicles have to be roofed by 2028 it seems.

    The big lads are grand as long as they can string lads along like him for another 4-5 years working 60 hour weeks to build up ''experience'' so they can share milk or set up a lease. IMO the dairy expansion is coming to its end there si a limit to the white gold.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,394 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    The big lads are grand as long as they can string lads along like him for another 4-5 years working 60 hour weeks to build up ''experience'' so they can share milk or set up a lease. IMO the dairy expansion is coming to its end there si a limit to the white gold.

    Certainly no end to expansion around here, I could easily have doubled or tripled the milking herd here if only I was that bit more driven ha.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,874 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    Not quite correct he hopes to go share milking there in the long term. IMO it is highly unlikely, farm owners will string along lads like him. Even if he goes share milking it is unlikely he will have the finance to lease farm in the medium term. If stocking rates are reduced to 2-2.5 cows/HA it will change the finance of all these outfits and it will also cubicles have to be roofed by 2028 it seems.

    The big lads are grand as long as they can string lads along like him for another 4-5 years working 60 hour weeks to build up ''experience'' so they can share milk or set up a lease. IMO the dairy expansion is coming to its end there si a limit to the white gold.

    Hod forbid anyone did a bit of hard work to get anywhere!

    Seems to me that beef men want dairy farmers to subsidize there already subsidised farms now because they've let Larry away for so long, they realised after the 'no plan, beef plan' protests that they were never going to be able to change things there so now the dairy man has to pay because they actually do turn profit.
    Theres very few guys in my locality that are actually full time beef farmers, it's an after work hobby for most


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    When the cows dont even get the luxury of a roof doesn't take a genius to work out how low down the pecking order the bull calf is, the student been tasked with rearing a few hundred calves really stood out not a single f**k is given in a set-up like that everything is disposable

    Did you miss the part where the only cow not entering the parlour is waiting for a scratch? A sure sign of disposable cows alright.

    And he stated that there was family labour on the farm in spring when needed and said nowhere that only the student was the only one looking after the calves.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,145 ✭✭✭visatorro


    What I see happening is the majority of dairy farmers will synch and sex semen their heifers. They will AI dairy to cows bred in first 3 weeks then mop up with He/AA BULLS or AI.

    Great plan but the cute ones will continue to breed all their stock to dairy as they’re going to get very scarce, just try buying in calf heifers at the moment. They’re making London

    Alot of stock heading north apparently. They must have faith in boris.

    Although previous year's fodder was relatively tight looking at this time of the year and there was serious value in spring calving stock. Not looking like it this year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,527 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Timmaay wrote: »
    Certainly no end to expansion around here, I could easily have doubled or tripled the milking herd here if only I was that bit more driven ha.

    You"d of been ponying up the deeds of the homeplace to do it though, their is to many balls up in the air between derogation likely to be scrapped. bull calf issue and a new cap bringing in some wacky environmental measures and capping of stocking rates that would mean a crazy amount of land on "paper" would be needed to keep the sfp been paid out to landlords on rented ground to faciliate extra cows and keep your stocking rates right....
    Their is no template at the minute that a solid business plan could be made that wouldn't be blown apart by Europe our co-ops doing a Arla on the calf issue


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,265 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Hod forbid anyone did a bit of hard work to get anywhere!

    Seems to me that beef men want dairy farmers to subsidize there already subsidised farms now because they've let Larry away for so long, they realised after the 'no plan, beef plan' protests that they were never going to be able to change things there so now the dairy man has to pay because they actually do turn profit.
    Theres very few guys in my locality that are actually full time beef farmers, it's an after work hobby for most

    What I posted has nothing to do with the beef side of the argument. He may work as hard as he likes I cannot see share milking happening in Ireland to any great extent. If it was going to happen it would have started already.

    First off we are not NZ with a large number of farms capable of milking 300+ cows. The second hurdle is finance. Let's say he finds a farmer that will let him sharemilk 100 cows on a 300 cow farm. It's either one of two options he buys the 100 cows costing say 150 k or he tears them from calves. Even if it's a grow option where he starts with 40 and is allowed to breed them all for a few years to get to 100 cows. Remember in share milking he will have no wage the cows provide that.

    Remember as well unless there is room for expansion the present owner must drop cow numbers for him to share milk. Then what is the goal to get to 100 cows and lease a farm? He has to get to finance this as well. But farmers leasing will steer towards established outfits. As well he will need to rent a farm that is set up. While in theory Greenfields showed it could be done try walking into a bank manager looking for even s 100k loan for to fund such a venture.

    And even if you cross all them hurdles you better hope you pass the TB test that happens before you move to your leased farm.

    I am not saying it cannot be done but it's not just a matter of hard work it about access to capital as well

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,851 ✭✭✭mf240


    Are we calling 60 hours a long week now


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,851 ✭✭✭mf240


    Bit of the old green eyed monster appearing in this thread me thinks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,117 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    Hod forbid anyone did a bit of hard work to get anywhere!

    Seems to me that beef men want dairy farmers to subsidize there already subsidised farms now because they've let Larry away for so long, they realised after the 'no plan, beef plan' protests that they were never going to be able to change things there so now the dairy man has to pay because they actually do turn profit.
    Theres very few guys in my locality that are actually full time beef farmers, it's an after work hobby for most
    Ffs what a naive comment


Advertisement