Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Funny/Unusual records

  • 18-08-2017 12:13pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭


    Can we have a thread for funny or unusual records that we come across during our research?

    For instance this entry where the priest was transferred to a new parish in such a hurry that he left without his breakfast!

    6cba83af46.jpeg


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    I haven't come across anything too funny as far as I can remember. I did come across this record though that made me smile where a priest seemed to have been practicing his box drawing skills in the left corner.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Dublin Weekly Register, November 24, 1849: "Beheaded himself"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭BigCon


    Here's another one, Rev Peter Blake was transferred to Roscrea and the parish of Bournea got a new priest (Rev Peter Cleary). When Fr Cleary died 3/4 of the parish transferred to Roscrea (maybe they didn't like the new priest or were very fond of Fr. Blake)!


    8b0b3abbe9.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    I thought this census record was funny: http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/reels/nai003312648/

    The father was a staunch nationalist. The mother... perhaps not so much?

    On a more sobering note, the oldest son was executed by Tans in 1921.


  • Registered Users Posts: 46 paumurp


    Not funny, but I was surprised to find a Golf Professional whilst looking for someone else in the Little Bray part of Bray in the 1911 census (William Hanna)

    http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Wicklow/Bray_No_1/Donnellans_Cottages/891257/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    I came across a record of a relative's death in America. It's definitely him but the strange thing is that his race is recorded as black. Do you think that it's an error in transcription or an error in recording? They'd hardly be using a term like 'black Irish' in an official document.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Hmm, I'd get the actual record rather than rely on the transcript. While it's very unlikely, it's not impossible he was black.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    Hmm, I'd get the actual record rather than rely on the transcript. While it's very unlikely, it's not impossible he was black.

    Yeah you're right. It's hard to make any judgement calls without seeing the actual record since it could be a simple error in transcription.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,587 ✭✭✭DunnoKidz


    srmf5 wrote: »
    I came across a record of a relative's death in America. It's definitely him but the strange thing is that his race is recorded as black. Do you think that it's an error in transcription or an error in recording? They'd hardly be using a term like 'black Irish' in an official document.

    I don't know about death records or if this even applies, but... on stateside census records, a few of my ancestors were listed anywhere from white, mulatto or black on different censuses. I questioned a genealogist, who suggested census takers (at the time) determined race through their own perception (if a farmers skin appeared darkened by the sun, etc), community assumption, or living/working circumstances, rather than asking a person's race directly. This article tends to corroborate the idea. Even present day census takers fail to properly ask racial identification questions, according to CNN............. But on a death record, I've no idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    DunnoKidz wrote: »
    I don't know about death records or if this even applies, but... on stateside census records, a few of my ancestors were listed anywhere from white, mulatto or black on different censuses. I questioned a genealogist, who suggested census takers (at the time) determined race through their own perception (if a farmers skin appeared darkened by the sun, etc), community assumption, or living/working circumstances, rather than asking a person's race directly. This article tends to corroborate the idea. Even present day census takers fail to properly ask racial identification questions, according to CNN............. But on a death record, I've no idea.

    Thank you for the reply and links. That could be it. He was a retired farmer so he may have been weather-beaten giving him a darker complexion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    srmf5 wrote: »
    He was a retired farmer so he may have been weather-beaten giving him a darker complexion.

    There is more to race than complexion; afro-hair for example.

    I would say either a mistake, ticking the wrong box or a tick straddling two boxes, or else, he was the result of mixed race parentage. With an Irish surname that would imply white father + black mother. I still think an error is more likely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    tabbey wrote: »
    With an Irish surname that would imply white father + black mother.

    Not in America, it wouldn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭kildarejohn


    Unusual inscription on a stone in Kildare Cathedral-
    "Underneath lie the remains of the body of John Smith ...erected by his son Dennis Molony in memory of him"
    Was Dennis an illegitimate son, if so seems strange to be declaring it publicly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    tabbey wrote: »
    There is more to race than complexion; afro-hair for example.

    I would say either a mistake, ticking the wrong box or a tick straddling two boxes, or else, he was the result of mixed race parentage. With an Irish surname that would imply white father + black mother. I still think an error is more likely.

    Well I'm fairly certain that neither of his parents were black since he and both of his parents were born in Ireland. I descend from his mother's brother and I have very pale skin that doesn't tan, or burn actually. My grandmother and her siblings were pale too and Anne Greene would have been their grandaunt. Unless it was on the father's side but I know the people that descend from both of John Flynn's parents and they're not dark either.

    Now some members of Patrick Flynn's and Anne Greene's descendants do have very dark curly hair so that could have come from the Flynn side who knows. Maybe that could have been why he was recorded as black.

    I didn't realise it would be just ticking boxes so if that's the case, then more than likely the wrong box was ticked.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    Probably an error. RGM is correct above, an Irish surname could denote an Irish father e.g. a slave owner who recognised an illig. child which took the paternal name.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭srmf5


    Probably an error. RGM is correct above, an Irish surname could denote an Irish father e.g. a slave owner who recognised an illig. child which took the paternal name.

    Definitely not in this case though since John and both parents were Irish and he was from Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    A cure for rheumatism here . It does not state if it is to be used topically or orally, so be careful before you try it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭KildareFan


    Someone doodling on the memorial of deeds here http://bit.ly/2eSSjx5 wonder who Bill Snooks was?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 568 ✭✭✭mikeymouse


    srmf5 wrote: »
    I came across a record of a relative's death in America. It's definitely him but the strange thing is that his race is recorded as black. Do you think that it's an error in transcription or an error in recording? They'd hardly be using a term like 'black Irish' in an official document.

    Watched this film again last night and remembered this post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    A cure for rheumatism here . It does not state if it is to be used topically or orally, so be careful before you try it!
    "Bill Snooks" used to be one of those names like "John Smith" or "Sean Citizen" who represented an ordinary, unremarkable person although Bill, for some reason, was usually an unremarkable person in a faintly ridiculous situation. He used to turn up occasionally in law textbooks where he would, e.g., suffer some injury or indignity in the street and the student was then invited to consider whether he could recover in nuisance, or he would leave his umbrella at his club and somebody else would take it and the possibility of actions for trover, detinue and conversion would be discussed at length. (The student who made the point that buying a new umbrella would be cheaper would receive a failing grade.)

    But Bill turned up other than in law books. If a young gentleman in high spirits was arrested for being drunk and disorderly in London, and was brought up before the magistrates, if he wished to avoid being expelled from his Oxford or Cambridge college it was prudent to exercise a certain latitude when giving his name and address to the court, and "Bill Snooks" was one of the names occasionally employed in this context.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭RGM


    Probably an error. RGM is correct above, an Irish surname could denote an Irish father e.g. a slave owner who recognised an illig. child which took the paternal name.

    I don't think that's what I said. In America, an Irish surname does not necessarily denote anything, especially not in the context of black Americans. Irish surnames were taken on by black American families for a number of different reasons. Biological descent from an Irishman, or line of Irish origin, could not be assumed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    "Bill Snooks" used to be one of those names like "John Smith" or "Sean Citizen" who represented an ordinary, unremarkable person .....
    Poor old Bill, he died with the coming of the motor and was replaced by the man on the Clapham omnibus!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Mossy


    Jeremiah Sullivan, who was 30 in 1901, aged 25 years between then and 1911, probably in an attempt to get the pension early. Fortunately for him his wife only aged 13 years in the same length of time.

    You can see in the Household Return form that he wrote "50" to start with, and then crossed out the "0" and replaced it with a "5". No point in doing things by halves.

    http://census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Limerick/Feenagh/Feenagh__Village_/1510284/

    http://census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Limerick/Feenagh/Feenagh/638910/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Mossy


    The baptism of a child of John Frost and Catherine Frieze

    https://search.findmypast.ie/record?id=ire%2fprs%2fbap%2f4810153


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Mossy wrote: »
    Jeremiah Sullivan, who was 30 in 1901, aged 25 years between then and 1911, probably in an attempt to get the pension early. Fortunately for him his wife only aged 13 years in the same length of time.

    You can see in the Household Return form that he wrote "50" to start with, and then crossed out the "0" and replaced it with a "5". No point in doing things by halves.

    http://census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Limerick/Feenagh/Feenagh__Village_/1510284/

    http://census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Limerick/Feenagh/Feenagh/638910/

    Jeremiah Sullivan also almost forgot how many children he had! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Mossy wrote: »
    The baptism of a child of John Frost and Catherine Frieze

    https://search.findmypast.ie/record?id=ire%2fprs%2fbap%2f4810153

    Can't access - no sub!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    No need for a sub - just consider how apt if Mr. Frost and Ms. Frieze had been from Birr.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭KildareFan


    Jellybaby1 wrote: »
    Can't access - no sub!

    Here it is on the NLI site:
    https://registers.nli.ie//registers/vtls000635018#page/63/mode/1up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Mossy


    Jellybaby1 wrote: »
    Can't access - no sub!

    Sorry. No sub required, but you do need to register.
    First name(s)	Anne
    Last name	Frost
    Birth year	-
    Baptism year	1819
    Baptism date	06 Sep 1819
    Parish	St. Mary's, Limerick City
    Alternative parish names	St. Mary's, Limerick
    Diocese	Limerick
    County	Limerick
    Country	Ireland
    Father's first name(s)	John
    Father's last name	[b]Frost[/b]
    Mother's first name(s)	Catharine
    Mother's last name	[b]Frieze[/b]
    Repository	National Library of Ireland
    National Library of Ireland link	[URL="https://registers.nli.ie//registers/vtls000635018#page/63/mode/1up"]https://registers.nli.ie//registers/vtls000635018#page/63/mode/1up[/URL]
    


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭KildareFan


    Hi Mossy

    Just to point out that the registers are freely accessible at https://registers.nli.ie/, but not searchable.

    Findmypast, RootIreland, Ancestry have searchable access to the registers, with transcriptions - not all transcriptions reliable. If you find links to your ancestors you can check the image on NLI without having to register with any of the paid up sites.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭Mossy


    Yup, that's where I got the image in my last post ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭BottleOfSmoke


    Note on a Catholic Church baptism record in 1901 in Cavan. Hope there was no further stigma as the century moved on.
    FATHER A PROTESTANT, MOTHER A CATHOLIC, BAPTISM PERFORMED IN KILSARAN CHURCH, BY REV. F MURTAGH, SPONSORS ENCOURAGED TO REAR THE CHILD CATHOLIC, THIS IS UNLIKELY.


  • Registered Users Posts: 228 ✭✭Leeside


    Section of Birth Cert giving reason for father's address - " Co Cork Gaol - undergoing punishment for bigamy"

    https://imgur.com/a/zvFKN


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭BigCon


    Here's two marriages from Dunleer in the 1770/1780s.
    The first is a sad one:

    11c9ohs.jpg
    (I married William Ward a vagabond hawker and Nelly Ryan Ditto as she was dying in Merchards Town before two witnesses).

    The second one:

    14bt190.jpg

    (witnesses Patt Kinnegan and young Kinnegan with the gob, or Bill any many more from Pains Town).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭shar01


    Came across this one: https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1900/10356/5770028.pdf

    The officiating clergyman refused to sign certificate.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    I wonder why?

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭shar01


    Hermy wrote: »
    I wonder why?

    Maybe he wasn't happy with his payment :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Both of full age and unmarried according to that record. Well he married them anyway but he didn't want to be seen as responsible for doing that. I'd love to know what it was, surely it couldn't have just been a mixed marriage?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,263 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    Maybe they didn't pay up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Two votes now about the payment. Looks like a possible reason, I wouldn't have thought of that myself.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭shar01


    I just came across it looking for a different Patrick Cunningham in Granard.

    I looked up the witnesses - Hugh Doyle (could be brother of Eliza?) - his mother's surnames appears to be Balasty. Agnes Wilson's mother also appears to be a Balasty.

    Wilson would strike me as a Protestant name...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Don't tell me I may have been right after all!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭shar01


    Or he was just a cranky fceker having a bad day :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    The clergyman had a legal obligation to register the marriage, but may have felt that it was the limit of his duty, thus far and no more.

    Remember in 1845 the RC heirarchy refused to co-operate with civil registration of marriages, on the grounds that matrimony was a sacrament and no business of the state.

    this priest may have been from a religious order who previously had no experience of civil registration. His lift may not have reached the top floor, as one might say today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    shar01 wrote: »

    Wilson would strike me as a Protestant name...

    Looking at the census, you are right. In 1911, of 14,123 Wilsons, only 2,008 were RC.
    The biggest was Presbyterian at 5,447 (+26 Church of Scotland), then Church of Ireland 4,435 (+238 Church of England). Methodists made up 735.

    No Jews, 60 Baptists, 14 Quakers, 11 Independents and 11 Plymouth Brethren. 966 other came as a surprise, and just 25 refused.

    Agnes funnily enough was almost evenly divided between RC and the other denominations.
    7 Agnes entries were info refused. One was a suffragette, the others had religions refused as a family. One HoH was a solicitor in the inland revenue commissioners, another was perhaps a catholic working in the shipyard in Belfast, possibly fearful of his religion being leaked to his workmates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭shar01


    In relation to the civil registration of marriages - I was up in Werburgh St a couple of years ago looking for the civil marriage of my 2nd great aunt (I had the church record). I was told that in one case a priest arrived in to the GRO with 40 years worth of records to be registered :eek:

    Have not found the above civil marriage nor my great grandfather's marriage (same parish).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    shar01 wrote: »
    In relation to the civil registration of marriages - I was up in Werburgh St a couple of years ago looking for the civil marriage of my 2nd great aunt (I had the church record). I was told that in one case a priest arrived in to the GRO with 40 years worth of records to be registered :eek:

    The priest would have been required to register the marriages with the local registrar. Even though the Registrar General would have to authorise the seriously late registration of marriages, the idea of going directly to the GRO sounds implausable.

    Has the whiff of an urban myth, but maybe some truth also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭shar01


    It did seem a bit far fetched. Surely some of those with unregistered births and marriages would've run into problems down the line when applying for passports / state benefits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭KildareFan


    I've been cross checking the marriage record in a parish with the civil register and I'm finding some strange discrepancies - some marriages which are on the civil record and which state the marriage took place in the parish church, but don't appear on the church register, and some marriages on the church record which don't have civil records to match.....


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    KildareFan wrote: »
    ...some marriages which are on the civil record and which state the marriage took place in the parish church, but don't appear on the church register, and some marriages on the church record which don't have civil records to match.....

    Yeah, I'm finding something similar with a midlands parish I'm researching.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
Advertisement