Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Anyone else worried about the sexualisation of black bodies?

  • 14-06-2019 12:16pm
    #1
    Former Observer
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭


    Anybody else worried about the sexualisation of black bodies in the media? Booties? Wangs? etc? It's only a matter of time before they do the same to us.


«13

Comments

  • #2
    Doctor Zhivago
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 26 ✭Doctor Zhivago


    Yeah, I hate when people sexualize my wootie.


  • #3
    Deebles McBeebles
    Registered Users Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    Love a black hole myself.









    I'm into astronomy.


  • #4
    randd1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭randd1


    Deebles McBeebles wrote: »
    Love a black hole myself.









    I'm into ass-tronomy.

    Fixed that for you.


  • #5
    EmmetSpiceland
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,016 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    Deebles McBeebles wrote: »
    Love a black hole myself.

    I'm into astronomy.

    Super massive?

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • #6
    How Soon Is Now
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,136 ✭✭✭✭How Soon Is Now


    Well here's a thread I didn't think I'd be seeing today!


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Deebles McBeebles
    Registered Users Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    EmmetSpiceland wrote: »
    Super massive?

    The bigger the better, E!


  • #8
    Feisar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,698 ✭✭✭Feisar


    EmmetSpiceland wrote: »
    Super massive?

    I've a video mix I compiled to that song somewhere.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • #9
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Its a phase nothing else. Not sure what there is to get worked up about.


  • #10
    Stovepipe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Have a Robert Mapplethorpe while you are waiting...


  • #11
    Feisar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,698 ✭✭✭Feisar


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    Its a phase nothing else. Not sure what there is to get worked up about.

    Bit like queer!...:pac:

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Advertisement
  • #12
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Feisar wrote: »
    Bit like queer!...:pac:

    that is definitely not a phase. Or if it is its a bloody long one.


  • #13
    Former Observer
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    A lot of joking in this thread (lighthearted objectification of black bodies, booties & wangs) but I bet there would be less laughing if it was sexualisation of your own kind. Food for thought.


  • #14
    Sonics2k
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,253 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pIYdH6xHqw


  • #15
    Dravokivich
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    Former Observer wrote: »
    A lot of joking in this thread (lighthearted objectification of black bodies, booties & wangs) but I bet there would be less laughing if it was sexualisation of your own kind. Food for thought.

    Why is sexualisation a problem?


  • #16
    Birneybau
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,357 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    Feisar wrote: »
    Bit like queer!...:pac:

    :confused:


  • #17
    RWCNT
    Registered Users Posts: 1,430 ✭✭✭RWCNT


    Former Observer wrote: »
    Anybody else worried about the sexualisation of black bodies in the media? Booties? Wangs? etc? It's only a matter of time before they do the same to us.

    Some examples for us to discuss?


  • #18
    Sky King
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Sky King


    Former Observer wrote: »
    A lot of joking in this thread (lighthearted objectification of black bodies, booties & wangs) but I bet there would be less laughing if it was sexualisation of your own kind. Food for thought.

    Oh look it's Johnny Wreck-the-buzz. Welcome to the thread. Welcome.


  • #19
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Former Observer wrote: »
    A lot of joking in this thread (lighthearted objectification of black bodies, booties & wangs) but I bet there would be less laughing if it was sexualisation of your own kind. Food for thought.

    Sexualise me all you want mate.


  • #20
    Former Observer
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    Dravokivich wrote: »
    Why is sexualisation a problem?

    Astonishingly, not everyone is looking to be objectified along racial, consumerist lines. You are probably ugly so it's hard for you to understand?


  • #21
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Sky King wrote: »
    Oh look it's Johnny Wreck-the-buzz. Welcome to the thread. Welcome.

    in fairness they did start the thread.


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    s7ryf3925pivug
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    Exoticisation is a thing, and it contributes to other forms of racism.

    I was not aware that wang or booty were race-specific terms.


  • #23
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Blacks don't do it for me, OP.

    Happy?


  • #24
    Grayson
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,311 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Madilyn Itchy Raceway wrote: »
    Exoticisation is a thing, and it contributes to other forms of racism.

    I was not aware that wang or booty were race-specific terms.

    TASKMASTER_PHIL_WANG_043---Phil-Wang-WEBSITE.jpg?format=1500w


  • #25
    Former Observer
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Blacks don't do it for me, OP.

    Happy?

    I think you've missed the point. This thread is about the mass media.

    Ironically, I think that it is the very sexualisation of black bodies (booties & wangs) in the media which has turned you against blacks.


  • #26
    Deebles McBeebles
    Registered Users Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    All you crackers get your flat asses back to work. Honkies.


  • #27
    RWCNT
    Registered Users Posts: 1,430 ✭✭✭RWCNT


    Madilyn Itchy Raceway wrote: »
    Exoticisation is a thing, and it contributes to other forms of racism.

    I was not aware that wang or booty were race-specific terms.

    I've heard some talk of exoticisation/fetishism around race before and I've never really known where the boundaries sit. I find dark skin to be an attractive feature but it's not like I fancy every black person by virtue of their race. Where does personal preference end and exotisation/fetishism begin?


  • #28
    Gimme A Pound
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,482 ✭✭✭Gimme A Pound


    Former Observer wrote: »
    Astonishingly, not everyone is looking to be objectified along racial, consumerist lines. You are probably ugly so it's hard for you to understand?
    Former Observer, it's not even 24 hours since your thread espousing a viewpoint that's the polar opposite.

    When you troll you gotta be more stealthy.


  • #29
    Former Observer
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    Sexualise me all you want mate.

    There is a strong correspondence between ugliness and low IQ. Your use of the word "mate" is therefore a big turn off for me.


  • #30
    Chips Lovell
    Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    White lads have wangs too you know.

    At least I do.


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    Former Observer
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    Ronan Purple Jeans wrote: »
    Former Observer, it's not even 24 hours since your thread espousing a viewpoint that's the polar opposite.

    When you troll you gotta be more stealthy.

    What? The Amanda Knox thread? She is both intelligent and good looking. Case in point. No conflict in my thesis at all.


Advertisement