Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

NPPR charges over €7000

  • 11-03-2019 9:08pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭


    I am enquiring about NPPR, what is it and does it have to be paid? Can it be disputed? Any advice at all.


    Selling a house and she was told that she needed to pay NPPR charges of around €7500 (I don't know the exact figure).

    When she queried what it was she was told that it is a charge for €200 per year between the years of 2009 - 2013, so she pointed out the obvious, which is that, that totals to €800.
    She was then told that there is a fee for those that didn't pay it on time. So she then told them that had never heard of it, to pay it.

    They said that she couldn't have not known about it if she was living in Ireland, as they ran a campaign on the radio, TV, magazines, newspapers, internet and door to door with flyers.

    So she is now wondering what options are (house is not sold). Can it be disputed, would they agree to installments, can she pay the €800, could she go to court taking oath that she never heard of it, is it worth the hassle etc.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 152 ✭✭Simple_Simone


    Suckit wrote: »
    I am enquiring about NPPR, what is it and does it have to be paid? Can it be disputed? Any advice at all.

    Selling a house and she was told that she needed to pay NPPR charges of around €7500 (I don't know the exact figure).

    When she queried what it was she was told that it is a charge for €200 per year between the years of 2009 - 2013, so she pointed out the obvious, which is that, that totals to €800.
    She was then told that there is a fee for those that didn't pay it on time. So she then told them that had never heard of it, to pay it.

    They said that she couldn't have not known about it if she was living in Ireland, as they ran a campaign on the radio, TV, magazines, newspapers, internet and door to door with flyers.

    So she is now wondering what options are (house is not sold). Can it be disputed, would they agree to installments, can she pay the €800, could she go to court taking oath that she never heard of it, is it worth the hassle etc.

    Why not start by searching Boards.ie for NPPR - you'll find loads of threads.


    Bottom line is that the Bart Simpson defence won't save her! The best thing for her to do is to contact the Local Authority involved and haggle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Ignorance is no defense, there is no option to dispute payment on that basis. Full payment will be required to release for sale.

    The house was a non-principal residence the entire time (e.g. rental, holiday home) definitely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,427 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Why not start by searching Boards.ie for NPPR - you'll find loads of threads.


    Bottom line is that the Bart Simpson defence won't save her! The best thing for her to do is to contact the Local Authority involved and haggle.

    Enforcement is now with Revenue. Passed there in 2014, there is no scope for haggling unless the house was demonstrably uninhabitable. The solicitor will not release the funds until proof of payment or clearance is delivered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,649 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Ignorance is no excuse, as a person charging for services she should of know her liabilities.

    Also it’s 1,000

    2009 200
    2010 200
    2011 200
    2012 200
    2013 200

    Total = 1000


    Late payments fees here : https://www.nppr.ie/faq.aspx#fk1


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ted1 wrote: »
    Ignorance is no excuse, as a person charging for services she should of know her liabilities.

    Also it’s 1,000

    2009 200
    2010 200
    2011 200
    2012 200
    2013 200

    Total = 1000

    the penalty fees rise up to 7200 as i recall

    the line used at the time for people calling and claiming they didnt know about it was "if it was on fire in the morning youd know about it"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,649 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    the penalty fees rise up to 7200 as i recall

    the line used at the time for people calling and claiming they didnt know about it was "if it was on fire in the morning youd know about it"

    I know it’s that I was getting at the op for trying to be smart and saying it’s 800


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Suckit wrote: »
    I am enquiring about NPPR, what is it and does it have to be paid? Can it be disputed? Any advice at all.


    Selling a house and she was told that she needed to pay NPPR charges of around €7500 (I don't know the exact figure).

    When she queried what it was she was told that it is a charge for €200 per year between the years of 2009 - 2013, so she pointed out the obvious, which is that, that totals to €800.
    She was then told that there is a fee for those that didn't pay it on time. So she then told them that had never heard of it, to pay it.

    They said that she couldn't have not known about it if she was living in Ireland, as they ran a campaign on the radio, TV, magazines, newspapers, internet and door to door with flyers.

    So she is now wondering what options are (house is not sold). Can it be disputed, would they agree to installments, can she pay the €800, could she go to court taking oath that she never heard of it, is it worth the hassle etc.

    She won’t be able to sell the house till she’s paid the €800 plus late fees and penalties €7500. Legally the sale can’t be completed unless Revenue clear the way. Don’t waste any more money on a solicitor trying to fight it. If you're speculating in property in any way you need to get legal advice about your obligations as well as your rights and entitlements. If you don’t these are the consequences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,459 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    No sympathy. I see this catching alot of people however it was heavily advertised at the time but people just didn't bother.
    The 200 or 250 per year was a small amount. What they then did was added 20 per month penalty. When this went to second year unpaid, you were paying 40 per month penalty etc.
    There was then a period when people were allowed to pay 4k or so to completely discharge the debt and at that stage if you contacted the council there were option for part payment or instalments etc. If you still ignored all, it went to 7k plus and was to be recovered by revenue on sale or transfer of the property.
    I believe that it will no longer be collected after a certain date so if you hold the property long enough it will be ok, otherwise it's owed and no way out if selling today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    Thanks everyone, will pass on the information. I personally had never heard of it either, but I wouldn't have had cause to pay attention to those adverts.
    ted1 wrote: »
    I know it’s that I was getting at the op for trying to be smart and saying it’s 800

    I wasn't trying to be smart saying €800. Not even sure how asking in a forum and mentioning €200 less would even be considered trying to be smart.
    I had just repeated what she said. It seemed correct to me without thinking too much about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,245 ✭✭✭myshirt


    Jesus Christ.

    Is this a f*cking wind up?

    Get rid of that property and never ever own one again. Ever.

    If you haven't a clue what you are doing take professional advice. There's no point even saying anything to you on here. Sweet suffering Jesus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    L1011 wrote: »
    Ignorance is no defense, there is no option to dispute payment on that basis. Full payment will be required to release for sale.

    The house was a non-principal residence the entire time (e.g. rental, holiday home) definitely?
    I'm not sure about the last bit. I don't think anybody at all was living in it for a while, and I believe she was living in it for around 1½ years during those years, but I would need to double check with her. But almost certain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Any years for which you can prove it was the owners PPR can be discounted. However, if they owned other properties at the time that they will later need to claim as their PPR - just don't. CGT liabilities could be generated.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    Suckit wrote: »
    I am enquiring about NPPR, what is it and does it have to be paid? Can it be disputed? Any advice at all.


    Selling a house and she was told that she needed to pay NPPR charges of around €7500 (I don't know the exact figure).

    When she queried what it was she was told that it is a charge for €200 per year between the years of 2009 - 2013, so she pointed out the obvious, which is that, that totals to €800.
    She was then told that there is a fee for those that didn't pay it on time. So she then told them that had never heard of it, to pay it.

    They said that she couldn't have not known about it if she was living in Ireland, as they ran a campaign on the radio, TV, magazines, newspapers, internet and door to door with flyers.

    So she is now wondering what options are (house is not sold). Can it be disputed, would they agree to installments, can she pay the €800, could she go to court taking oath that she never heard of it, is it worth the hassle etc.
    She could challenge the constitutionality of the penalty. If she succeeds it would only mean paying €800


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    4ensic15 wrote: »
    She could challenge the constitutionality of the penalty. If she succeeds it would only mean paying €800

    And if she fails, be down many more tens of thousands from the process. And have an unsellable house for years.

    Useful suggestions are what were wanted I think!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    L1011 wrote: »
    And if she fails, be down many more tens of thousands from the process.

    Win some, lose some.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    L1011 wrote: »
    Any years for which you can prove it was the owners PPR can be discounted. However, if they owned other properties at the time that they will later need to claim as their PPR - just don't. CGT liabilities could be generated.
    I'm not sure about her owning another property at the time, I don't want to give too much information about her, but I think she became a named owner on another property for a while. I don't really know the ins and outs of that.

    4ensic15 wrote: »
    She could challenge the constitutionality of the penalty. If she succeeds it would only mean paying €800
    Thanks, I will mention it to her, but I'd guess she'll find a way to pay it, as that doesn't seem all that straightforward for her to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 417 ✭✭Coyler


    Contact Eirgrid and they can tell you who was billed during those years for the electricity. That'll knock a few quid off the top for each year you can produce a bill with the occupiers (your's, your wife) name on it

    If the property was vacant most of the time you could argue for a exception. If the bills were still in the occupiers name then all well and good.

    By the sounds of your description, you'd be exempt from some of the years. The earlier ones are the more expensive. 2009 alone is €2K so work from there and see what you can cut down.

    Worst comes to the worst a good solicitor will pay it out of the proceeds of the sale so you don't have to come up with it upfront. The other party just has to accept the undertaking which any decent solicitor would.

    The charges for 2009 are set to expire in March 2021 and every year after that if you want to hold on till then but that's your call as you might loose more than €7K.

    And forget about legal challenge. The fine is almost certainly unsound but you're up against the state and they will always have deeper pockets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    L1011 wrote: »
    And if she fails, be down many more tens of thousands from the process. And have an unsellable house for years.
    Useful suggestions are what were wanted I think!
    4ensic15 wrote: »
    Win some, lose some.




    Ahh.. Doubt she'll go for that :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 50 ✭✭janedoe007


    Section 7 of the Local Government (Charges) Act 2009 provides that if the property is sold without paying off outstanding charges, the new owner could be liable for the outstanding charges. Any such liability would end 12 years after the charge was due.

    this is from Citizens info - not sure when liability ends - 2025 ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 417 ✭✭Coyler


    It's 12 years from the due date of that year. So March 2021 for 2009, March 2022 for 2010 and so on.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,841 ✭✭✭Squatter


    Probably worth reminding those who have forgotten that the NPPR was the brainchild of the Green Party's loathsome ex-leader John Gormless. (And to think that I once voted for Trevor Sargent! :o )


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    Coyler wrote: »
    It's 12 years from the due date of that year. So March 2021 for 2009, March 2022 for 2010 and so on.

    Is it not the original penalties with a cap of €7,200 so if it was owned for the 4 years the €7,200 will be owed until 2025 regardless?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,649 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Suckit wrote: »


    I wasn't trying to be smart saying €800.

    Your post says otherwise:

    “so she pointed out the obvious, which is that, that totals to €800.“


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭Askthe EA


    Coyler wrote: »
    Contact Eirgrid and they can tell you who was billed during those years for the electricity. T

    Doubt that. GDPR.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 417 ✭✭Coyler


    Squatter wrote: »
    Probably worth reminding those who have forgotten that the NPPR was the brainchild of the Green Party's loathsome ex-leader John Gormless. (And to think that I once voted for Trevor Sargent! :o )

    The charge was. I'll think you'll find that the fine was Noonan's brain child but I don't blame you thinking otherwise. FG not entirely keen to stand over it now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    Thanks everyone, some great advice here (I don't have any dealings in property, so any advice seems good to me), I passed it on to her and hopefully she can get a clearer understanding of what's in front of her. I think it was just the unexpected notice more than anything. At a guess, I'd say she will probably just go with the solicitor option and paying it off the proceeds of the sale, and probably try to discount any of the time that nobody lived there, or she did.
    Thanks again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭daddy pig


    The charges for NPPR are broke down below. They total €7230
    2009 - €2070
    2010 - €1830
    2011 - €1470
    2012 - €1110
    2013 - €750

    NPPR was a self declaration charge and there was a huge amount of advertising at the time so the excuse that you didn't know will not wash. As far as taking legal action on this I can guarantee you that it is a complete waste of time and money.

    You only ability to get out of any charges would be through a cert of exemption. Did your friend live at the property on any of the liability dates? If so a sworn declaration to confirm same witnessed by solicitor along with property folio would mean you can waive the charges for that year.

    Edit:
    Liability dates were 31st July 09, 31st March 10&11&12&13
    Feel free to PM me with any questions as I used to work in NPPR a few years ago


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 616 ✭✭✭iluvfatfrogs


    daddy pig wrote: »
    The charges for NPPR are broke down below. They total €7230
    2009 - €2070
    2010 - €1830
    2011 - €1470
    2012 - €1110
    2013 - €750

    NPPR was a self declaration charge and there was a huge amount of advertising at the time so the excuse that you didn't know will not wash. As far as taking legal action on this I can guarantee you that it is a complete waste of time and money.

    You only ability to get out of any charges would be through a cert of exemption. Did your friend live at the property on any of the liability dates? If so a sworn declaration to confirm same witnessed by solicitor along with property folio would mean you can waive the charges for that year.

    Edit:
    Liability dates were 31st July 09, 31st March 10&11&12&13
    Feel free to PM me with any questions as I used to work in NPPR a few years ago

    If the property was held was a trading asset for a self employed builder, is there any from of relief / exemption do you know?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 152 ✭✭Simple_Simone


    Coyler wrote: »
    The charge was. I'll think you'll find that the fine was Noonan's brain child but I don't blame you thinking otherwise. FG not entirely keen to stand over it now.

    Yep, as I wrote, the NPPR was ex Green Party leader John Gormley's brainchild.

    The fine for non-payment was introduced by the then Minister for Environment and Local Government, Phil Hogan.

    Now, wipe that rabid foam off your mouth, make your self a nice mug of tea and stop being nasty about cuddly Mick Noonan!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 417 ✭✭Coyler


    Yep, as I wrote, the NPPR was ex Green Party leader John Gormley's brainchild.

    The fine for non-payment was introduced by the then Minister for Environment and Local Government, Phil Hogan.

    Now, wipe that rabid foam off your mouth, make your self a nice mug of tea and stop being nasty about cuddly Mick Noonan!

    May I wash my mouth out and say three Hail Mary's :)

    Seriously, though, thanks for the correction. Always good to have things clarified.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 417 ✭✭Coyler


    Askthe EA wrote: »
    Doubt that. GDPR.

    You are indeed correct. Wasn't clear. They will tell you if you were paying the bill or not at the very least. Best place to start. The years they can't tell you about are still useful.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    Askthe EA wrote: »
    Doubt that. GDPR.

    You can ask for your own data from EIRGRID, which if you were the registered user would mean they have details of your bills. If you were not the registered owner the information is useless anyway.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    daddy pig wrote: »

    NPPR was a self declaration charge and there was a huge amount of advertising at the time so the excuse that you didn't know will not wash. As far as taking legal action on this I can guarantee you that it is a complete waste of time and money.

    The legal action would not be on the basis of not knowing about it. the legal action would be on the basis of the constitutionality of the Oireachtas imposing penalties and not the courts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    We're considering selling a site in Dublin if we get the right offer. There is a dwelling house on the site but it was in our opinion uninhabitable during the entire time the NPPR applied. It was last occupied ca. 2000 and in 2008 after my father passed away we gutted it completely (even removing kitchen units and all bathroom fittings leaving it completely bare). The windows had already been boarded up around 2000.

    If we have to swallow the 7.2k we will but does anyone think we have genuine grounds to claim an exemption?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    murphaph wrote: »
    We're considering selling a site in Dublin if we get the right offer. There is a dwelling house on the site but it was in our opinion uninhabitable during the entire time the NPPR applied. It was last occupied ca. 2000 and in 2008 after my father passed away we gutted it completely (even removing kitchen units and all bathroom fittings leaving it completely bare). The windows had already been boarded up around 2000.

    If we have to swallow the 7.2k we will but does anyone think we have genuine grounds to claim an exemption?

    the definition of dwelling for NPPR purposes is very wide. Did it have a roof?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    4ensic15 wrote: »
    the definition of dwelling for NPPR purposes is very wide. Did it have a roof?
    Yes.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    murphaph wrote: »
    Yes.

    You will have problems so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,427 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    murphaph wrote: »
    We're considering selling a site in Dublin if we get the right offer. There is a dwelling house on the site but it was in our opinion uninhabitable during the entire time the NPPR applied. It was last occupied ca. 2000 and in 2008 after my father passed away we gutted it completely (even removing kitchen units and all bathroom fittings leaving it completely bare). The windows had already been boarded up around 2000.

    If we have to swallow the 7.2k we will but does anyone think we have genuine grounds to claim an exemption?

    You have genuine grounds for claiming an exemption if it had neither a kitchen nor a bathroom.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 617 ✭✭✭Drifter50


    mickdw wrote: »
    No sympathy. I see this catching alot of people however it was heavily advertised at the time but people just didn't bother.
    The 200 or 250 per year was a small amount. What they then did was added 20 per month penalty. When this went to second year unpaid, you were paying 40 per month penalty etc.
    There was then a period when people were allowed to pay 4k or so to completely discharge the debt and at that stage if you contacted the council there were option for part payment or instalments etc. If you still ignored all, it went to 7k plus and was to be recovered by revenue on sale or transfer of the property.
    I believe that it will no longer be collected after a certain date so if you hold the property long enough it will be ok, otherwise it's owed and no way out if selling today.

    Some interesting advice here. Am I right to understand that this charge becomes "dead, not collectable etc " after 2023 ?

    I have a holiday home, purchased in 2007, did`nt pay the NPPR, was told by the County Council that I have to pay the €7200.

    Property tax paid up to date by the way


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    Drifter50 wrote: »
    Some interesting advice here. Am I right to understand that this charge becomes "dead, not collectable etc " after 2023 ?

    I have a holiday home, purchased in 2007, did`nt pay the NPPR, was told by the County Council that I have to pay the €7200.

    Property tax paid up to date by the way

    Wait until either you sell, the council issue proceedings, or 2025.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    I've done a spot of googling. Donegal CC have a cheat sheet in PDF form. it says the following:

    .3 UNINHABITABLE
    An exemption is being sought on the basis that the property was
    uninhabitable. Copy of Land Registry Folio for the property, to be provided in
    all cases.
     Photographs of the property and a declaration of the condition of the property,
    including details of when it was last occupied, should be submitted as part of
    a covering letter.
     Details of the planning reference number if the property is a new build.
     Alternatively, if the property is for sale, details of the estate agent who is
    selling the property or a property brochure should be submitted.
     The following criteria is referenced in determining if a property is
    uninhabitable:
     Does the property have a sound roof?
     Is it so affected by dampness as to make it unsuitable for habitation?
     Does it have toilet / bathroom facilities?
     Does it have a heating system?
     Does it have a water supply? (a supply that is disconnected only would
    not deem a property uninhabitable).
     Does it have windows and doors?
     Does it have an electricity supply connected? (a supply that is
    disconnected only would not deem a property uninhabitable)
     Is the house dilapidated and run down?
     Does it require major repairs to make it habitable?
    A number of the above criteria will have to be met to deem the property
    uninhabitable. If necessary, an inspection can be carried out following receipt of
    the above information. If the property was undergoing renovations during the
    years 2009 – 2013, evidence to support this, in the form of receipts, photographs,
    etc, should be submitted.
    The Council reserves the right to seek further clarification should the need
    arise.

    We'd have no issue with them inspecting it. In fact we applied for PP for a change of use in 2009 with photographs of the outside all boarded up. This might help. It would all be on record with SDCC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    murphaph wrote: »
    We're considering selling a site in Dublin if we get the right offer. There is a dwelling house on the site but it was in our opinion uninhabitable during the entire time the NPPR applied. It was last occupied ca. 2000 and in 2008 after my father passed away we gutted it completely (even removing kitchen units and all bathroom fittings leaving it completely bare). The windows had already been boarded up around 2000.

    If we have to swallow the 7.2k we will but does anyone think we have genuine grounds to claim an exemption?

    If it had a roof and a water supply and had the capability to be reconnected to electricity then it was habitable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    splinter65 wrote: »
    If it had a roof and a water supply and had the capability to be reconnected to electricity then it was habitable.
    Are you familiar with the process? It does seem a little at odds with that Donegal CC memo, which us not as black and white.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,016 ✭✭✭JJJackal


    murphaph wrote: »
    Are you familiar with the process? It does seem a little at odds with that Donegal CC memo, which us not as black and white.

    I would go to a solicitor with your information and ask them how best to proceed - will set you back a few hundred but could save you a few thousand.

    If you go to the solicitor who will be involved in the sale it may not cost anything extra


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭JustMe,K


    Suckit wrote: »
    I am enquiring about NPPR, what is it and does it have to be paid? Can it be disputed? Any advice at all.


    Selling a house and she was told that she needed to pay NPPR charges of around €7500 (I don't know the exact figure).

    When she queried what it was she was told that it is a charge for €200 per year between the years of 2009 - 2013, so she pointed out the obvious, which is that, that totals to €800.
    She was then told that there is a fee for those that didn't pay it on time. So she then told them that had never heard of it, to pay it.

    They said that she couldn't have not known about it if she was living in Ireland, as they ran a campaign on the radio, TV, magazines, newspapers, internet and door to door with flyers.

    So she is now wondering what options are (house is not sold). Can it be disputed, would they agree to installments, can she pay the €800, could she go to court taking oath that she never heard of it, is it worth the hassle etc.

    From what I remember, the campaign referenced this as 'the holiday home tax' which may have gone over the head of people who didn't have a holiday home, or didnt class their NPPR as a holiday home for whatever reason. I had some dealings with this for a friend recently who came across the same issue when trying to sell, and we applied for exemption for the years they lived there, and paid it for the rest of the years.

    If the property was rented out though, surely whoever was responsible for doing the tax returns for those periods should have brought this to the attention of whoever this post is about, in a similar way to the property tax.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 417 ✭✭Coyler


    kcdiom wrote: »
    If the property was rented out though, surely whoever was responsible for doing the tax returns for those periods should have brought this to the attention of whoever this post is about, in a similar way to the property tax.

    In the vast majority of cases people do their own tax return and at that point revenue wasn't over it and registering with the RTB didn't help either. You either knew about it or you didn't.

    And as for property tax, I completely agree with you, revenue made sure it knew who the owner was of every property in the country to the point that tenants had to clarify with revenue that they weren't the owners of the property they were occupying. Had that lovely back and forth with them :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭JustMe,K


    Coyler wrote: »
    In the vast majority of cases people do their own tax return and at that point revenue wasn't over it and registering with the RTB didn't help either. You either knew about it or you didn't.

    And as for property tax, I completely agree with you, revenue made sure it knew who the owner was of every property in the country to the point that tenants had to clarify with revenue that they weren't the owners of the property they were occupying. Had that lovely back and forth with them :)

    I guess going from my experience people with rental properties tended to have a professional do the taxes as their fees were deductible anyway - but as you say things were different then in regards to who was overseeing things, and in lots of other ways as well!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    JJJackal wrote: »
    I would go to a solicitor with your information and ask them how best to proceed - will set you back a few hundred but could save you a few thousand.

    If you go to the solicitor who will be involved in the sale it may not cost anything extra
    Yeah we have a solicitor who will deal with the sale if it proceeds. It's a bit speculative at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭theguzman


    I myself am in a sort of similar situation except unlike the OP I am not selling the property. It was inherited in 2008 and is an old farmhouse type but is in a generally very poor condition and no-one has lived there since my late grandmother passed away in 2005, she moved out of the house, three years prior to her death and lived with my parents.

    I am thinking of now renovating this house as it is in a very scenic location, at the time I didn't pay any property tax or NPPR on the house and haven't since. However I am wondering what is the next move in regards because if I was facing a big bill like the OP in question I would demolish and rebuild.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    murphaph wrote: »
    Are you familiar with the process? It does seem a little at odds with that Donegal CC memo, which us not as black and white.

    The approach Tipp coco take is that if the roof is intact and it has water supply and the electricity can be reconnected then it is habitable and liable for nppr.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement