Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2015 Mod Note Post #2331

1324325327329330332

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    Difficult to see what Mourinho would have to lose by taking over now instead of the summer if indeed that is the situation at the moment, the fans are not going to expect anything from this season and I think we're safe from relegation at the moment


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,417 ✭✭✭Korat


    I don't know if it's been mentioned here already but I was just reading about the ejector clause in David Moyes' contract. When it became mathematically impossible to qualify for the CL the club could sack him and only pay him one year's compensation. That was all very well in Moyes' case as he hadn't been in the job very long.

    But I have a horrible feeling the reason LVG hasn't been sacked already is because Woodward is waiting to activate the same clause in LVG's contract. That seems insane given how badly wrong things have been going for months now but it would make complete sense for someone like Ed Woodward, saving money is more important than the team. I might cut him some slack and hypothesise that he’s already under orders from the Glazers to cut staff costs and is afraid for his own job if he’s seen to be going against their instructions.

    What kind of a f*cked up club has it become where such things are even plausible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭duffman13


    Korat wrote: »
    I don't know if it's been mentioned here already but I was just reading about the ejector clause in David Moyes' contract. When it became mathematically impossible to qualify for the CL the club could sack him and only pay him one year's compensation. That was all very well in Moyes' case as he hadn't been in the job very long.

    But I have a horrible feeling the reason LVG hasn't been sacked already is because Woodward is waiting to activate the same clause in LVG's contract. That seems insane given how badly wrong things have been going for months now but it would make complete sense for someone like Ed Woodward, saving money is more important than the team. I might cut him some slack and hypothesise that he’s already under orders from the Glazers to cut staff costs and is afraid for his own job if he’s seen to be going against their instructions.

    What kind of a f*cked up club has it become where such things are even plausible.

    I really dont think its the case this time. Moyes was on a 6 year contract, it possibly saved the club 10-15 million depending on what Moyes was on by sacking him with that clause however if the same clause is in LVGs contract it doesnt make sense as he only has a year remaining on his deal. Its not a money exercise to not sack him, just an exercise in sheer stupidity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,779 ✭✭✭✭jayo26


    Korat wrote: »
    I don't know if it's been mentioned here already but I was just reading about the ejector clause in David Moyes' contract. When it became mathematically impossible to qualify for the CL the club could sack him and only pay him one year's compensation. That was all very well in Moyes' case as he hadn't been in the job very long.

    But I have a horrible feeling the reason LVG hasn't been sacked already is because Woodward is waiting to activate the same clause in LVG's contract. That seems insane given how badly wrong things have been going for months now but it would make complete sense for someone like Ed Woodward, saving money is more important than the team. I might cut him some slack and hypothesise that he’s already under orders from the Glazers to cut staff costs and is afraid for his own job if he’s seen to be going against their instructions.

    What kind of a f*cked up club has it become where such things are even plausible.

    I really don't think it's about his contract, its either that the club dont care about results or else the youth setup review and behind the scene work is mostly coming from lvg and they value his input so much in that to the extent they are gambling this season of football on lvg.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,271 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Yeah, I agree, the lack of sacking has nothing to do with money. It has got to do with Ed and the board not wanting to look like failures.

    The Moyes disaster could be levelled at SAF, he picked him and the club went with him. LVG was Ed's man, so to dispense with him is to admit that they got it terribly wrong.

    On top of that is the reluctance to give the job to Jose. People in the club (SAF, Gill & BC for starters) are all against it and so Ed is faced with having to go against their wishes and so really put his neck on the line That is a big risk to take and so seems to have resulted in the whole thing being frozen by fear, hoping beyond any evidence that LVG can turn things around.

    Funnily, their is no way Ed would let a business transaction fail so completely and just let it continue, action would be taken.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,277 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Korat wrote: »
    When it became mathematically impossible to qualify for the CL the club could sack him and only pay him one year's compensation.

    So we would only have to pay Van Gaal a years compensation, instead of the year and 4 whole months that we would have to pay him right now...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,417 ✭✭✭Korat


    You wonder what the mood of the players will be like when it becomes a mathematical certainty that they're getting a 25% pay-cut because the club won't be playing in the CL next season. Fully deserved but I can imagine some players sulking about it, especially younger ones who like buying Rolls-Royces.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,271 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    In any other 'top' club (of which Utd are no longer part of based on results) the manager would have been sacked. Take RM for example. Not a good example for continuity, but it was clear that Rafa was not going to work out (not sure why they ever appointed him) and they moved him on. No waiting around hoping. Got a terrible result against Barca and he was out the door.

    In the last few months we have been beaten by Norwich, Stoke, Sunderland and the Europa cup disaster. And nothing. The team has not shown are real signs of improvement. Yes there have been glimpses of more attacking intent but that has been matched by a complete disintegration of our defense. We have a manager who seems to have only one way of playing and is incapable of any adjustment to that regardless of the actual happenings on the pitch.

    In LVG's defence, the injuries has been unbelievable. 13 top team players are gone. Imagine taking that out of any of Leicster, Arsenal, Spurs or City. They are each heavily dependent on one or two players (Aguero, Costa, Mahrez etc) so that level of injuries, and the sustained nature of it will have an impact on any team.

    But even with his full team playing, LVG's style is one that has not shown any signs of being able to provide anything close to the level required.

    The top of the club is paralysed by indecision. That, even more than the results on the pitch, is the most worrying. Any team can suffer a drop in form, an injury crisis etc, but you can normally be assured that behind the scenes the right things are being done that will remedy the situation. I have the feeling that behind the scenes Utd are simply looking on aghast and hoping that LVG can turn it around so that they can all get back to worrying about shirt sales and not waste their time thinking about football.

    On a final point, SAF and Gill should be removed from the club. They did a great job, but opted to step down from that job and should give the people remaining the respect to stay out of it. SAF in particular cast a massive shadow over Moyes and continues to do so even with LVG. You have your stand and your statue, you have your legacy and the respect and every Utd fan, but its time to step aside and let the new era happen without you. This includes getting rid of Giggs, The class of 92 were awesome, but WERE is the word.

    We can continue to live in the past like Liverpool or look to the future and focus on the risks from City and Arsenal and the changing environment of the EPL. No doubt Ed W is a genius in the business world, Utd will soon be the 1st club to generate 500m in a year, but we need to harness that to deliver results. With that massive advantage in revenue we should be aiming to be winning 10 CL trophies in the next 15 years, not settling for maybe getting 4th in the EPL.

    We should be aiming for doing the same in the EPL, with a mixture of FA and other cups thrown in. That is what City want, that is what they are looking to deliver and they are constantly striving to achieve that. They have just got in the best manager to try and deliver teh CL trophy for them. You get the feeling that if Utd were in the top 4 Utd would be more than happy to stay there and simply exist.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    There was a very valid point made on one of those BBC discussion programmes about 2 weeks ago that Woodward had gambled on the assumption that Leceister would eventually fall away and United improving would end up being enough for top 4.

    Also highlighted a complete misunderstanding of the suituation though when even without Leicester, the signs were there that United were slipping rapidly down the pecking order and it was being ignored.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 32,508 ✭✭✭✭Mars Bar


    Lord TSC wrote: »

    I love the fact that at no point in the paragraph about others finding the idea ludicrous, her being a female wasn't a factor! :)


  • Posts: 27,583 ✭✭✭✭ Emilio Chubby Llama


    Mars Bar wrote: »
    I love the fact that at no point in the paragraph about others finding the idea ludicrous, her being a female wasn't a factor! :)

    Mars Bar for manager


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,779 ✭✭✭✭jayo26


    Bt are saying it's because jose dont want to take over mid season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    In LVG's defence, the injuries has been unbelievable. 13 top team players are gone. Imagine taking that out of any of Leicster, Arsenal, Spurs or City.

    That list of injuries contains mainly players who are not first choice players-in there Darmian,Rooney and DDG have only missed 1 game, Fellaini has missed two. Shaw has been out all season. Injuries is a lame excuse, when even with our first choice team out we are losing games and playing terrible.

    The rest are either kids or back up players. Or I'll put it another way-the injury list just shows how poor our squad quality is, something however that many fans highlighted last September but others chose to ignore it. We have injury crisis every year and yet when it comes to squad planning, our club ignores it.

    Meanwhile, the so called injury proned players we got rid of last summer have had all had relatively injury free seasons and have over 150 games played between them.

    Getting rid of all those players in the interest of a smaller squad or more to the point cost cutting, has been a huge part why we are in the Shi* now and for that, LVG and Woodward are culpable. Smaller squad also means players are needed to play more games and that increases risk of injuries.

    When you look at everything out together, it's truely disgraceful what has been left to happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭madcabbage


    jayo26 wrote: »
    Bt are saying it's because jose dont want to take over mid season.

    Would it not be better to take over now? He'll have less time to work with the squad with the Euros in the summer as well as the fact that he'd know what players he needs and doesn't need transfer wise.

    Personally I wouldn't be the slightest surprised if there's been zero contact from the club or if there's going to be any at all!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    madcabbage wrote: »

    Personally I wouldn't be the slightest surprised if there's been zero contact from the club or if there's going to be any at all!

    Exactly- we've not made any contact with Jose is the most likely scenario and Woodward genuinely puts our current "run" down to bad luck, injures and every other excuse you see in football.

    His comments before Christmas about the fans expectations and LVG being a "genius" should have set off alarm bells for most in the sense that we should have known what was coming.

    And that is even before we reflect on what he said around this time two years ago-we Don't need success to sell shirts.

    In that one line right there, you see what our club has become.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    That list of injuries contains mainly players who are not first choice players-in there Darmian,Rooney and DDG have only missed 1 game, Fellaini has missed two. Shaw has been out all season. Injuries is a lame excuse, when even with our first choice team out we are losing games and playing terrible.

    The rest are either kids or back up players. Or I'll put it another way-the injury list just shows how poor our squad quality is, something however that many fans highlighted last September but others chose to ignore it. We have injury crisis every year and yet when it comes to squad planning, our club ignores it.

    Meanwhile, the so called injury proned players we got rid of last summer have had all had relatively injury free seasons and have over 150 games played between them.

    Getting rid of all those players in the interest of a smaller squad or more to the point cost cutting, has been a huge part why we are in the Shi* now and for that, LVG and Woodward are culpable. Smaller squad also means players are needed to play more games and that increases risk of injuries.

    When you look at everything out together, it's truely disgraceful what has been left to happen.

    City and arsenal have had much the same issues with injuries and arsenal in particular have coped much better than utd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Crimson King


    I honestly believe if the club don't proceed in the Europa he is gone, it cannot be anything other than a sacking failing to beat Danish minnows 1-0 at OT at least.

    Saying that the indecision and slowness to react is something very noticeable at the club and is evident every Summer. Top clubs don't let things like this season happen without change, somehow United think it's ok to right off seasons in December.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    City and arsenal have had much the same issues with injuries and arsenal in particular have coped much better than utd.

    And that a down to having more senior players than we do.Arsenal have 22 senior outfield players, we have 19 and that list includes some very very average players.

    They have not needed to play their youngsters at all really apart from the odd game here and there. Had we kept Evans, Rafael, Nani and Hernandez for example, we'd be in Much better shape but nope, sell them on and rely on Lingard, Varela, Mcnair and all the other to play instead of them.

    Wouldn't happen at any other club . Like, could you imagine Lingard starting regularly for Barcelona, Madrid and Bayern ?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭JaMarcusHustle


    Off topic, but what are some of the long running failed transfer sagas you remember at United (whether there was substance to the rumours or not)? Just popped into my mind that Mourinho could be the latest addition.

    Kluivert and Batistuta are the two earliest ones I remember. Kevin Hofland was also linked to us for years.

    More recently there was Ronaldinho, Robben, Sneijder, Fabregas, Pedro, Hazard, Benzema, Ramos, Lucas Moura. I think Nasri was strongly linked for a while too. What big ones am I forgetting?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Kerrydude1981


    Off topic, but what are some of the long running failed transfer sagas you remember at United (whether there was substance to the rumours or not)? Just popped into my mind that Mourinho could be the latest addition.

    Kluivert and Batistuta are the two earliest ones I remember. Kevin Hofland was also linked to us for years.

    More recently there was Ronaldinho, Robben, Sneijder, Fabregas, Pedro, Hazard, Benzema, Ramos, Lucas Moura. I think Nasri was strongly linked for a while too. What big ones am I forgetting?

    Not that big but...

    Gaitan and Garay have both signed for Utd on numerous occasions :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,779 ✭✭✭✭jayo26


    madcabbage wrote: »
    Would it not be better to take over now? He'll have less time to work with the squad with the Euros in the summer as well as the fact that he'd know what players he needs and doesn't need transfer wise.

    Personally I wouldn't be the slightest surprised if there's been zero contact from the club or if there's going to be any at all!

    In a realistic world id imagine it would be better to take over sooner but at the end of the day we are in a situation where we are heading for our worst season in 30 plus years and the club are sticking by a manager that seems now to have lost the players and for some reason or other they are not pulling the trigger on him so really we haven't a clue why.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,379 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    Had we kept Evans, Rafael, Nani and Hernandez for example, we'd be in Much better shape

    Some people (I'm on the fence) think all these players weren't good enough for United and\or in terrible form.

    Others say, I've seen it a bit int he press... if we had less injuries some would argue we'd be 10-12 points better off now.

    But yes ifs and ands were pots and pans etc etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,417 ✭✭✭Korat


    Off topic, but what are some of the long running failed transfer sagas you remember at United (whether there was substance to the rumours or not)?

    Utd were linked with David Hirst the entire summer before we got Cantona. How different things might have been if that deal had gone through. :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    Nalz wrote: »
    Some people (I'm on the fence) think all these players weren't good enough for United and\or in terrible form

    And many people would say Valencia, Mcnair, Lingard, Fellaini, Jones and a lot of the young lads that were promoted to make are nowhere near United standard.

    I think we all would like(whether we admit it or not) experienced and proven players with multiple PL titles between them in our squad right now, as opposed to a bunch of average players who have achieved very little.

    It was a cost cutting exercise that played a big in putting us into this mess.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,779 ✭✭✭✭jayo26


    U18 doing well 2 nill up gibbon looking good


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    jayo26 wrote: »
    U18 doing well 2 nill up gibbon looking good

    Change of manager!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,779 ✭✭✭✭jayo26


    Change of manager!!

    Haha yehh i didnt wanna say.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 43,001 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lord TSC


    Dean Henderson, a 19 year old keeper, has been recalled from loan ahead of the FA Cup match.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement