Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Government violating the human rights of women

  • 30-11-2015 05:08PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299
    ✭✭✭✭


    http://www.independent.ie/breaking-news/irish-news/irish-government-on-notice-it-is-violating-human-rights-of-women-34246181.html

    Kenny's approach seems to be muddying the issue with a citizen's convention. The NI High Court's decision today would indicate that a referendum should be held asap, with the citizen's voice being heard through vote rather than "convention".

    The Government's response to the NI High Court decision should be: 210 votes

    Call a referendum
    0% 0 votes
    Call the citizen's convention
    94% 199 votes
    Retain the existing constitution
    5% 11 votes


Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
«13456716

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,393 DarkyHughes
    ✭✭✭


    Call Joe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,278 tobsey
    ✭✭✭


    A judgement in a court outside of the jurisdiction should not be a reason to do anything here.

    I'd say all the parties will commit to a referendum in their manifesto but we'll see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 MadsL
    ✭✭✭✭


    tobsey wrote: »
    A judgement in a court outside of the jurisdiction should not be a reason to do anything here.

    The decision addresses the same issues and legal climate that exists in the Republic, so it is relevant.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 c_man
    ✭✭✭


    Realistically I think it's very unlikely to happen before the GE.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 Nodin
    ✭✭✭✭


    MadsL wrote: »
    http://www.independent.ie/breaking-news/irish-news/irish-government-on-notice-it-is-violating-human-rights-of-women-34246181.html

    Kenny's approach seems to be muddying the issue with a citizen's convention. The NI High Court's decision today would indicate that a referendum should be held asap, with the citizen's voice being heard through vote rather than "convention".

    Pointless **** designed to kick this into touch.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,096 the groutch
    ✭✭✭✭


    Everything is after the election.
    That's the FG (aka FF Lite) way.
    In the meantime enjoy these tax cuts and welfare increases that the country can't actually afford.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 kettlehead
    ✭✭


    A convention! More pointless chatter. This issue needs to be put to bed once and for all and put to the people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 591 sidneykidney
    ✭✭✭


    Abortion for all and guns too and miniature american flags for those that want them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 505 inocybe
    ✭✭✭


    A referendum - but you have to have ovaries to get a vote.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 darkpagandeath
    ✭✭✭✭


    Convention is just electioneering. People will be fooled into a vote that will not mean anything happens other than talking.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,083 questionmark?
    ✭✭✭


    kettlehead wrote: »
    A convention! More pointless chatter. This issue needs to be put to bed once and for all and put to the people.

    If the 'wrong' result happens it won't be put too bed and we will back on the merrypreggersgoround for the next 10 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,774 RobertKK
    ✭✭✭✭


    I am for keeping the 8th amendment, we have not heard what replaces it, and the people who argue for it's removal will need to present what they want to replace it.
    A majority will not accept the abortion situation they have in England for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,083 questionmark?
    ✭✭✭


    RobertKK wrote: »
    I am for keeping the 8th amendment, we have not heard what replaces it, and the people who argue for it's removal will need to present what they want to replace it.
    A majority will not accept the abortion situation they have in England for example.

    Prepare yourself for abuse as debate is not normally allowed. Your rightly ****ed if a Facebook page is started!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,774 RobertKK
    ✭✭✭✭


    Prepare yourself for abuse as debate is not normally allowed. Your rightly ****ed if a Facebook page is started!

    I am use to it...older and wiser so won't be debating as no one changes their opinion anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 Orangebrigade
    ✭✭


    The babies who are murdered in the thousands seem to have no human rights. The disgrace of our time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 c_man
    ✭✭✭


    inocybe wrote: »
    A referendum - but you have to have ovaries to get a vote.

    Well only those with ovaries and capable of reproducing right? The polling booth operators are gonna have to up their game from merely checking the voting card that's for sure.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,634 ThinkProgress
    ✭✭✭


    Just let people do what they want with THEIR body!

    It's a no-brainer.

    Not even sure why it should be a national agenda... it's about individuals and THEIR bodies! Nobody else's business.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 c_man
    ✭✭✭


    Not even sure why it should be a national agenda...

    Because it's in the constitution :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,634 ThinkProgress
    ✭✭✭


    c_man wrote: »
    Because it's in the constitution :confused:

    Yes I know. And it's wrong! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 darkpagandeath
    ✭✭✭✭


    lol, Was it not a FG/Lab government that introduced the 8th amendment ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,276 Wompa1
    ✭✭✭


    Just let people do what they want with THEIR body!

    It's a no-brainer.

    Not even sure why it should be a national agenda... it's about individuals and THEIR bodies! Nobody else's business.

    Would you support euthanasia being legalized too? That's not meant to be a snarky question to show you up. Actually interested in what people who would be pro-choice would think of that too.

    At this stage of my life, I'm in the camp that would say, legalize both.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 eviltwin
    ✭✭✭✭


    Wompa1 wrote: »
    Would you support euthanasia being legalized too? That's not meant to be a snarky question to show you up. Actually interested in what people who would be pro-choice would think of that too.

    At this stage of my life, I'm in the cap that would say, legalize both.

    I support both. Most pro choice people do cause they are, you know, pro choice


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,634 ThinkProgress
    ✭✭✭


    Wompa1 wrote: »
    Would you support euthanasia being legalized too?

    Yes

    Your life, your choice.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 The_Valeyard
    ✭✭✭✭


    inocybe wrote: »
    A referendum - but you have to have ovaries to get a vote.

    Unless you can virgin Mary up a baby without the need of a man, then we get to vote also.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,507 Buona Fortuna
    ✭✭✭


    Wompa1 wrote: »
    Would you support euthanasia being legalized too? That's not meant to be a snarky question to show you up. Actually interested in what people who would be pro-choice would think of that too.

    At this stage of my life, I'm in the cap that would say, legalize both.

    Me too :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,306 Zamboni
    ✭✭✭


    Are you fed up of religion dictating our laws?
    It's definitley time to tick no religion in the census.

    https://www.facebook.com/events/534512320046998/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,634 ThinkProgress
    ✭✭✭


    Unless you can virgin Mary up a baby without the need of a man, then we get to vote also.

    I think it's right that men should get a vote.

    But I think the female vote should be given more power. Their vote is bit more important than ours, because it's their body.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,078 vienne86
    ✭✭✭✭


    eviltwin wrote: »
    I support both. Most pro choice people do cause they are, you know, pro choice

    Spot on. Agree completely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,129 PucaMama
    ✭✭✭


    I think it's right that men should get a vote.

    But I think the female vote should be given more power. Their vote is bit more important than ours, because it's their body.

    Do you think my vote no to abortion as a woman will be given as much power? I don't think so. It's very much "on trend" at the minute to be all for choice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 669 josephryan1989
    ✭✭✭


    MadsL wrote: »
    http://www.independent.ie/breaking-news/irish-news/irish-government-on-notice-it-is-violating-human-rights-of-women-34246181.html

    Kenny's approach seems to be muddying the issue with a citizen's convention. The NI High Court's decision today would indicate that a referendum should be held asap, with the citizen's voice being heard through vote rather than "convention".

    We are a democracy and the Crotty judgement many years ago has forced constitutional changes to be put to the people to decide by referendum.

    If the majority want abortion not to be allowed under any circumstances, in some circumstances or available on demand, that is their decision.

    The majority will be influenced by what they consider is the best argument.


Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Advertisement