Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Flightradar24 Thread Part II

1204205207209210334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    smurfjed wrote: »
    OK, thats one reason, but why didn't they land overweight?

    The plane would be way too heavy to land with full fuel tanks causing the aircraft to overshoot the runway and crash on landing or a ground fire when landing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    The plane would be way too heavy to land with full fuel tanks causing the aircraft to overshoot the runway and crash on landing or a ground fire when landing.
    Wow, where did you get this idea from?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭AGC


    Why ask the question when you could just explain it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    AGC wrote: »
    Why ask the question when you could just explain it?

    I'm, guessing someone's in a mood and looking to take it out on someone :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Pat Dunne


    fr336 wrote: »
    I'm, guessing someone's in a mood and looking to take it out on someone :p

    Ah give us break pal, your own wittering in the last few days has become fairly intolerable as well :p


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Pat Dunne wrote: »
    Ah give us break pal, your own wittering in the last few days has become fairly intolerable as well :p

    Last few days surely you mean years? :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Pat Dunne


    fr336 wrote: »
    Last few days surely you mean years? :P

    Yeah, that's some amount of horse manure from just one person. No smilie face!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Pat Dunne wrote: »
    Yeah, and that's some amount of horse manure for one just person. No smilie face!

    Ah well I suppose I'll have to go and mope around and be depressed now you've said that, thanks for the feedback :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭bkehoe


    fr336 wrote: »
    The plane would be way too heavy to land with full fuel tanks causing the aircraft to overshoot the runway and crash on landing or a ground fire when landing.

    Boeing would probably find this interesting to learn!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Pat Dunne


    smurfjed wrote: »

    Many thanks smurfjeb, a very good and interesting peice of information.

    "Furthermore, service experience indi- cates that damage due to overweight landing is extremely rare."

    It is fascinating as to the many peices of information that must be taken into account by the flight deck, before acting upon the final decision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,390 ✭✭✭Skuxx


    DLH404 squawking 7700 and turning around over Scotland! Same A/C that had a wheel well fire indication incident in Frankfurt a few days ago!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭jimbis


    Lufty 747 Squaking 7700, turning back at the Scottish coast/Irish Sea.

    Manchester maybe?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭PinOnTheRight


    Skuxx wrote: »
    DLH404 squawking 7700 and turning around over Scotland! Same A/C that had a wheel well fire indication incident in Frankfurt a few days ago!

    Same indication again tonight.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    Same indication again tonight.

    And they dumped fuel as well

    I think this must be to do with the nature of the emergency. Both cases were suspected fires.

    Noticed that the gear was down as well. Suspected wheel bay fire was the reason for emergency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭Shannon757


    Honeywell 757 was in Shannon today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭jimbis


    rrpc wrote: »
    And they dumped fuel as well

    I think this must be to do with the nature of the emergency. Both cases were suspected fires.

    Noticed that the gear was down as well. Suspected wheel bay fire was the reason for emergency.

    Can anyone tell me why they have the gear down?
    Is it a case of get them down now in case they lose the ability to do so after or for drag and more fuel burn?
    Or something else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭PinOnTheRight


    jimbis wrote: »
    Can anyone tell me why they have the gear down?
    Is it a case of get them down now in case they lose the ability to do so after or for drag and more fuel burn?
    Or something else?

    They usually lower it for landing...


    Being serious though, but I believe the emergency checklist for wheel well fire indication would call for the gear to be lowered. The increased drag is also a secondary benefit, burning more fuel on the way to MAN. They had requested/informed Scottish that they'd need to be dumping fuel all the way to final approach.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭jimbis


    They usually lower it for landing...


    Being serious though, but I believe the emergency checklist for wheel well fire indication would call for the gear to be lowered. The increased drag is also a secondary benefit, burning more fuel on the way to MAN. They had requested/informed Scottish that they'd need to be dumping fuel all the way to final approach.

    Lol, I was expecting a reply like that :D
    Sounds like they wanted to land very soon alight. If there was a fire in the wheel well would the fast wind help or hinder a fire?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    I would hazard a guess that most wheel well fires happen after takeoff due to the residual heat in the brakes and tires, if the gear is retracted than its very hard for this heat to dissipate in an enclosed space, so the gear is extended to allow the airflow to cool the gear, plus you also avoid the damage that would be caused by an exploding tire in that enclosed space. Depending on the aircraft, you will find all sorts of fuel pumps, hydraulic pumps, flight controls etc in the wheel well, so it makes sense to try to protect these items.

    While the aircraft will burn more fuel with the gear down, I would consider this a secondary result of putting the gear down rather than a reason to do so.

    Finally, for a wheel well fire over an hour into a flight, I would guess that its a sensor problem as the heat would have dissipated, but as there is no way of confirming that, the full procedure would have to be followed.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeria_Airways_Flight_2120


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Images shared on Twitter showed the 442 tonne plane coming into land with its landing gear extended.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3189969/Lufthansa-plane-360-people-board-makes-emergency-landing-Manchester-Airport-warning-light-flashes-Frankfurt-New-York-flight.html#ixzz3iEMTbCxL
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    I love this statement..... surely it would be more shocking if it came in to land WITHOUT the landing gear extended.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    G-favs inbound to Shannon, pilot informed ATC that he had booked a taxi to collect them from einn at 19:30 but they wouldn't make it until 20:30, requested that Atc contact the taxi company to rearrange their booking... Amid a few giggles and sighs the atco agreed to the request :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    G-favs inbound to Shannon, pilot informed ATC that he had booked a taxi to collect them from einn at 19:30 but they wouldn't make it until 20:30, requested that Atc contact the taxi company to rearrange their booking... Amid a few giggles and sighs the atco agreed to the request :D

    What time was this? :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    fr336 wrote: »
    What time was this? :P

    Around 19:45 local, 18:45z, it was on Shannon approach/tower feed, could hear the other Atco's laughing in the background


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 922 ✭✭✭FWVT


    Finnair from Helsinki doing only 230 knots groundspeed at FL380. What is the cruise speed of these? Headwind should only be arpund 60 kts at that level there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 922 ✭✭✭FWVT


    Finnair from Helsinki doing only 230 knots groundspeed at FL380. What is the cruise speed of these? Headwind should only be arpund 60 kts at that level there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 269 ✭✭hobie14


    Anyone notice a KLM 777 KL745 arriving SNN this morning (about an hour or so ago) ..... CALI >AMS
    Wonder why? .....

    10/8 update .... Rumour has it was a splash and dash! ...... an expensive way to run a 777 I would think .....

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/63232964@N06/20246416778/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭cgill


    EI-DUO has levelled off at FL150 and is holding over Roscommon/Sligo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 581 ✭✭✭pepe the prawn


    Shamrock 125 from Dublin to Chicago, currently holding at ENULA, south of Sligo, possible medical emergency onboard, crew are waiting for further information from the cabin before making a decision on whether or not to proceed..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭cgill


    EIN125 returning to Dublin


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement