Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Summer 2015 Transfer Window General Discussion

1565759616298

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,860 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    I knew he hadnt played much for Barca in those 4,5 years.
    31 appearances of which 16 in the first half season he was there.
    Knee injury didnt help of course but didnt set the world on fire during his loan spells at Schalke and Olympiakos either.

    And how the **** he got back in the Dutch squad only Hiddink knows.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,556 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    ASOT wrote: »
    Stokelona building a really decent squad.

    Are they? When was Affelay last good?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,636 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    CSF wrote: »
    Are they? When was Affelay last good?

    Yeah, I think these players are at Stoke appropriately. But regular football and the relatively lower expectations may work for them all and allow them to click together.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,428 ✭✭✭Talib Fiasco


    Afellay looked phenomenal when he was younger but injuries have ruined his career completely, he's pure glass. Moving to Barcelona didn't help either, completely wrong move especially for a winger. Hard to believe he's 29 now. Very decent signing for Stoke if they can keep him injury free.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,556 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Yeah, I think these players are at Stoke appropriately. But regular football and the relatively lower expectations may work for them all and allow them to click together.

    I don't really see it in Stoke's squad in any case. They did well last season but are nothing special and could easily go the other way this season. Affelay is not the most inspiring signing there's been this summer by any stretch. I'd expect 9th-13th from them as usual.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,677 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    At 29 and having had the injuries he has had then its difficult to see him doing much in a physical English league, if he gets going hes a decent shout for them though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,133 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    We were linked to Afellay quite often a few years back. In hindsight, it looks like we dodged a bullet. Could very well do a job for Stoke though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Given Hughes' superb record in the (free) low to mid price market, it'd be hard to back against Afellay ending up a successful signing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,860 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    Afellay looked phenomenal when he was younger but injuries have ruined his career completely, he's pure glass. Moving to Barcelona didn't help either, completely wrong move especially for a winger. Hard to believe he's 29 now. Very decent signing for Stoke if they can keep him injury free.

    Only had 1 serious injury, the knee that took way too long to get ok again.

    He did look great at PSV where he played in midfield.
    Only ended up on the wing for the Dutch national team but he isnt a winger. Dont think Barca bought him (payed 5 million while he was out of contract 6 months later) to play him on the wings.

    Selling him did cost PSV the league title that year. That 5 million wasnt such smart business in the end.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 23,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bounty Hunter


    Finally confirmed, Villa sign Jordan Ayew for what is believed to be 9m

    http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10265~4891745,00.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,222 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Watford confirming their tenth signing of the summer and theres already over a month left in the window, theyll be pretty much a team of strangers come september. Interesting to see how that goes.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,950 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    klose wrote: »
    Watford confirming their tenth signing of the summer and theres already over a month left in the window, theyll be pretty much a team of strangers come september. Interesting to see how that goes.

    Apparently that brings them up to 22 non homegrown players. There's going to have to be a bit of a clear out pretty soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,636 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    klose wrote: »
    Watford confirming their tenth signing of the summer and theres already over a month left in the window, theyll be pretty much a team of strangers come september. Interesting to see how that goes.

    Relegation, that's how it will go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    Apparently that brings them up to 22 non homegrown players. There's going to have to be a bit of a clear out pretty soon.

    In fairness they might as well try it that way, Burnley signed hardly no one, because of financual constraints, tried to use the team ethic and still got relegated. It can go well or go terrible really.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭SantryRed


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Relegation, that's how it will go.

    :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Relegation, that's how it will go.

    Yep. Doing their best QPR impression it appears.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭ShoulderChip


    We were linked to Afellay quite often a few years back. In hindsight, it looks like we dodged a bullet. Could very well do a job for Stoke though.

    who the hell is 'we'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,202 ✭✭✭Gavlor


    who the hell is 'we'?

    Boxers from the travelling community obviously.

    Nice username by the way, you'll fit in well here!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    who the hell is 'we'?
    'We' is Liverpool;)


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    'We' is Liverpool;)

    Tra La La La La


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    At the rate of attrition Spurs will have sold/loaned all their "Bale bounty" transfers by Sept 1st!

    29/08/13 C. Eriksen Ajax € 12M
    29/08/13 E. Lamela Roma € 30M loan to Porto with option to buy mooted this evening
    29/08/13 V. Chiricheş Steaua € 8.5M Napoli deal being talked of
    14/08/13 E. Capoue Toulouse € 11M SOLD
    04/08/13 Soldado Valencia € 30M
    25/07/13 N. Chadli Twente € 6.5M
    05/07/13 Paulinho Corinthians € 20M SOLD


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭garra


    At the rate of attrition Spurs will have sold/loaned all their "Bale bounty" transfers by Sept 1st!

    29/08/13 C. Eriksen Ajax € 12M
    29/08/13 E. Lamela Roma € 30M loan to Porto with option to buy mooted this evening
    29/08/13 V. Chiricheş Steaua € 8.5M Napoli deal being talked of
    14/08/13 E. Capoue Toulouse € 11M SOLD
    04/08/13 Soldado Valencia € 30M
    25/07/13 N. Chadli Twente € 6.5M
    05/07/13 Paulinho Corinthians € 20M SOLD

    Of the Suarez money, Liverpool look like selling Lambert & Balotelli.. meanwhile Lovren, Markovic and Llama (approx stg67m worth of talent) look more like average squad players than anything special tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,819 ✭✭✭EuropeanSon


    garra wrote: »
    Of the Suarez money, Liverpool look like selling Lambert & Balotelli.. meanwhile Lovren, Markovic and Llama (approx stg67m worth of talent) look more like average squad players than anything special tbh

    Very defensive there.

    Both clubs blew their money, one wasting their money on poor players doesn't excuse the other one being equally wasteful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,600 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    I remember when Levy used to be a god around here and twitter. Then he went and spent £100m on sh*te and never recovered his reputation.

    Yer man at United seems to be the 2015 version of Daniel Levy from what I've seen. Everyone is talking about the wonderful job a man with an infinite budget is doing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Ed Woodward, is in the happy position of not needing to be the equaliser of the Utd books.

    /I'll get me coat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    Woodward has the easiest job of all CEO's in the PL with a seemingly bottomless pit of money at his disposal. He's bought good players, but United haven't bought any bargains in the past 2 years, and a lot of the players he bought last summer still have to prove their worth (Blind, Shaw, Rojo for example). Di Maria is also a big blackspot on his reputation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    garra wrote: »
    Of the Suarez money, Liverpool look like selling Lambert & Balotelli.. meanwhile Lovren, Markovic and Llama (approx stg67m worth of talent) look more like average squad players than anything special tbh

    Wait, which one are we talking about here?
    BykbvEzCEAArG0Z.jpg:large


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Raylan Ugly Rucksack


    Woodward has the easiest job of all CEO's in the PL with a seemingly bottomless pit of money at his disposal. He's bought good players, but United haven't bought any bargains in the past 2 years, and a lot of the players he bought last summer still have to prove their worth (Blind, Shaw, Rojo for example). Di Maria is also a big blackspot on his reputation.

    there are several teams in the premier league that seemingly have a bottomless pit of money at there disposal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    there are several teams in the premier league that seemingly have a bottomless pit of money at there disposal.

    In the past 2 years, no. Chelsea have reigned in their net spend a lot and City haven't spent a whole lot by their standards. United are doing now what Chelsea did in 2004/2005, and what City did before.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Raylan Ugly Rucksack


    In the past 2 years, no. Chelsea have reigned in their net spend a lot and City haven't spent a whole lot by their standards. United are doing now what Chelsea did in 2004/2005, and what City did before.

    does it matter if they didn't spend it in the last 2 years if those players are still on the team?


Advertisement