Big Brother UK 2015 Use spoiler tags, mod warning post #1 & 3037

power pants · 01-07-2015 01:09PM

yeah, all happened during the bunker. I think that is how Helen and Marc formed their opinion on him

Peist2007 · 01-07-2015 01:10PM

The "Frozen Duck" issue is quite a big issue to be completely ignorant about if arguing about Mark's treatment of Brian.

messrs · 01-07-2015 01:10PM

MsGiggles wrote: »

Was that this series !?

Am I allowed to post links?

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-brother/450751/Big-Brother-Brian-s-naked-frozen-duck-gag-came-from-Down-Under

apologies if I shoudnt be

power pants · 01-07-2015 01:10PM

http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/stripping-panting-unprovoked-rage-helen-5964621

daisybelle2008 · 01-07-2015 01:12PM

Peist2007 wrote: »

I failed at making a point yet you seem to be really bothered by it. And i wasnt even making the point to you. You werent a part of it at all :pac:

You two are like Boards very own Marc and Danny!

MsGiggles · 01-07-2015 01:18PM

Peist2007 wrote: »

The "Frozen Duck" issue is quite a big issue to be completely ignorant about if arguing about Mark's treatment of Brian.

Dont think I was :rolleyes:

Peist2007 · 01-07-2015 01:19PM

daisybelle2008 wrote: »

You two are like Boards very own Marc and Danny!

Ha ha i did say yesterday that Old Perry must be a Danny fan giving his rush to defend the honour of Jjiip. When no one was asking him to of course.

Peist2007 · 01-07-2015 01:20PM

MsGiggles wrote: »

Dont think I was :rolleyes:

Did you think Mark and Brian had a frozen duck issue in another BB series?

MsGiggles · 01-07-2015 01:21PM

Peist2007 wrote: »

Did you think Mark and Brian had a frozen duck issue in another BB series?

I didn't know what the issue was in the first place really. Someone mentioned it and I asked..

Old Perry · 01-07-2015 01:36PM

Peist2007 wrote: »

Ha ha i did say yesterday that Old Perry must be a Danny fan giving his rush to defend the honour of Jjiip. When no one was asking him to of course.

if you check your posts you will find all you said was old perry must be a danny fan. here is the first time you actually explained yourself. Well done to you on using words rather than smiley faces

i wasnt nessesaryily defending anyone, what seems to be lost on you is thst i was pointing out that with very little and very skewed reasoning you have no right to question why anyone participates here.

lastly i dont need to be asked you post in a public forum, your views are opened to be accepted or rejected by whom ever takes issue.

Old Perry · 01-07-2015 01:40PM

daisybelle2008 wrote: »

You two are like Boards very own Marc and Danny!

Fair nuff, but whos who? ;-)

Robsweezie · 01-07-2015 01:54PM

Very true, when marc was fake evicted he was delighted with the reception he got and the interactions he had with the crowd on going back in. Once he was back in the diary room he was nearly moved to tears over the positive reaction to him outside. He even said how much it meant to him if I remember correctly. He clearly cares hugely about his perception on the outside and wants to keep the viewers on side. And he will take exception to anyone who attempts a character assassination of him to paint him in a poor light. That explains the aggro toward Christian and Co over brian and the water. He wants validation from the public as they can make or break him in terms of winning and progressing in the show.

When Victor came in whispering to him about helen, he again was in tears in the diary room because of his paranoia about his popularity with the viewers. Both Victor and John McCriricks words got a heightened reaction out of him as he sees them as voices from the outside. It's ****ing with his head majorly. If thats what they think, what are the public thinking?

Peist2007 · 01-07-2015 01:54PM

Old Perry wrote: »

if you check your posts you will find all you said was old perry must be a danny fan. here is the first time you actually explained yourself. Well done to you on using words rather than smiley faces

i wasnt nessesaryily defending anyone, what seems to be lost on you is thst i was pointing out that with very little and very skewed reasoning you have no right to question why anyone participates here.

lastly i dont need to be asked you post in a public forum, your views are opened to be accepted or rejected by whom ever takes issue.

The above is utterly brilliant as it completely contradicts itself whilst simultaneously failing to spot the irony with which it drips. Kudos Old Perry :pac:

power pants · 01-07-2015 01:59PM

He said as much in his first week there. He stated that he wants to be liked and is very insecure in real life hence his personality.

Just remembered Ash and charlie making fun of his teeth and lip last night with their smile impressions. If helen and marc had done that about brian......

Another thing is it a little racist to say to charlie

youre exactly my type I prefer mixed race girls

what happened if he had said to ash, I prefer white girls?

Old Perry · 01-07-2015 02:01PM

Peist2007 wrote: »

The above is utterly brilliant as it completely contradicts itself whilst simultaneously failing to spot the irony with which it drips. Kudos Old Perry :pac:

Once again nothing but criticism without reasoning.

i know its pointless to ask as most of the time you just spout whatever pops into your head first but ill ask anyways. where is the contradiction? where is the irony?

ricero · 01-07-2015 02:05PM

The show ends with mark and the producers know this so I'd be surprised if its not a vote to save this week.

Also what happened to that poster in here that was obsessively anti mark was the person banned ?

Mam of 4 · 01-07-2015 02:10PM

Loathe him or love him , without Marc it would make for one very dull boring house in all fairness. I actually haven't a clue who I'd like to see winning as apart from Marc stirring it up , the rest of them are kinda boring and annoying imo anyway

edit... Apart from Harri and Nick lovey/dovey then arguing antics !

power pants · 01-07-2015 02:13PM

True, I think though the house would have taken on completely different dynamics without marc. For example Jack just melted away in terror when marc came in and has never recovered.

Nick might not have latched on to Harri as much and become his own person but feels easier to be part of someone than on his own in case marc starts on him

Mam of 4 · 01-07-2015 02:15PM

[QUOTE=ricero;96082378

Also what happened to that poster in here that was obsessively anti mark was the person banned ?[/QUOTE]

Yep, he re-regged and was found out within a few posts and is gone.

power pants · 01-07-2015 02:18PM

Mam of 4 wrote: »

Yep, he re-regged and was found out within a few posts and is gone.

united chester of something or other?

Mam of 4 · 01-07-2015 02:21PM

power pants wrote: »

united chester of something or other?

correct , united chester men .

Robsweezie · 01-07-2015 02:21PM

United Chester Men?? Yes, banned but he gradually dug a hole for himself that he was never getting out of. Needlessly aggressive, always at the centre of every argument on this thread. A good contribution when he wanted to be I must say.

power pants · 01-07-2015 02:23PM

if you did not agree with him, he would inform you that he was reporting you

:rolleyes::pac:

I didnt realise he was being deadly serious

Mam of 4 · 01-07-2015 02:26PM

power pants wrote: »

if you did not agree with him, he would inform you that he was reporting you :rolleyes::pac:

I didnt realise he was being deadly serious

I'm not sure what's allowed to be discussed ? Mods please delete if inappropriate . apparently he sent some abusive/threatening pm's to people.
After that, I don't know really.

Peist2007 · 01-07-2015 02:26PM

Old Perry wrote: »

Once again nothing but criticism without reasoning.

i know its pointless to ask as most of the time you just spout whatever pops into your head first but ill ask anyways. where is the contradiction? where is the irony?

In your previous post you say that you pointed out to me that i have no right to question anyone's participation here. In the very next paragraph of the very same post you tell me that this is a public chatroom and my views are open to being accepted or rejected by whomever takes issue. There is your contradiction

Telling me i have no right to question someone's participation here is ironic given that is exactly what you have jumped in to do to me. There's your irony

And i wouldnt be calling me out on my literacy skills before looking closer to home. I have read the following more than once and decided to go with what i think you were trying to say:

Old Perry wrote: »

lastly i dont need to be asked you post in a public forum, your views are opened to be accepted or rejected by whom ever takes issue.

Anything else, Old Perry?

Edit: and any other inanities you have on this subject can be sent to me by PM. No one else wants to read it. FYI i may not reply

tipptom · 01-07-2015 02:39PM

eoghan104 wrote: »

Sounds class, is there a video of that anywhere?

On YouTube,if you search John McCririck/Barney Curley I think.

Peist2007 · 01-07-2015 02:45PM

tipptom wrote: »

On YouTube,if you search John McCririck/Barney Curley I think.

Is that the same Barney Curley who sold his house by way of lottery in Westmeath? And caused a huge rumpus at the time?

tipptom · 01-07-2015 02:46PM

Robsweezie wrote: »

Very true, when marc was fake evicted he was delighted with the reception he got and the interactions he had with the crowd on going back in. Once he was back in the diary room he was nearly moved to tears over the positive reaction to him outside. He even said how much it meant to him if I remember correctly. He clearly cares hugely about his perception on the outside and wants to keep the viewers on side. And he will take exception to anyone who attempts a character assassination of him to paint him in a poor light. That explains the aggro toward Christian and Co over brian and the water. He wants validation from the public as they can make or break him in terms of winning and progressing in the show.

When Victor came in whispering to him about helen, he again was in tears in the diary room because of his paranoia about his popularity with the viewers. Both Victor and John McCriricks words got a heightened reaction out of him as he sees them as voices from the outside. It's ****ing with his head majorly. If thats what they think, what are the public thinking?

Spot on there,thats where he disappoints me,he dishes it out and says he doesn't give a fu*k but he becomes so touchy about nominations and cannot handle it at all when he thinks the public will see him in a bad light.
He seems to be completely subservient to BB in the DR and looks like he would sell his mother to keep them happy.

Old Perry · 01-07-2015 02:52PM

Peist2007 wrote: »

In your previous post you say that you pointed out to me that i have no right to question anyone's participation here. In the very next paragraph of the very same post you tell me that this is a public chatroom and my views are open to being accepted or rejected by whomever takes issue. There is your contradiction

like ive pointed out before, you persisted in questioning why the other poster was here after they had quite simply explained why. yet you refused to acknowledge this and continued implying they have no reason to be here, ignoring the post and only refering to the poster.

in the next paragraph i said your views are open to everyone, this is just what i have done, i have only ever taken issue what you have said and its lack of any reason.

Peist2007 wrote: »

Telling me i have no right to question someone's participation here is ironic given that is exactly what you have jumped in to do to me. There's your irony

ive never questioned your participation here and have never asked for your reasons as to being here, if im wrong feel free to point it out. ive only taken issue with the points youve made and their lack of reason.

Peist2007 wrote: »

And i wouldnt be calling me out on my literacy skills before looking closer to home. I have read the following more than once and decided to go with what i think you were trying to say:

well you managed to understand it no? excluding the odd missing comma id like you to point out what exactly is incorrect with what you quoted?

Peist2007 wrote: »

Anything else, Old Perry?

Finally you have decided to make your point in some sort of coherent manner. That wasnt so hard was it.

Peist2007 · 01-07-2015 02:54PM

Old Perry wrote: »

like ive pointed out before, you persisted in questioning why the other poster was here after they had quite simply explained why. yet you refused to acknowledge this and continued implying they have no reason to be here, ignoring the post and only refering to the poster.

in the next paragraph i said your views are open to everyone, this is just what i have done, i have only ever taken issue what you have said and its lack of any reason.

ive never questioned your participation here and have never asked for your reasons as to being here, if im wrong feel free to point it out. ive only taken issue with the points youve made and their lack of reason.

well you managed to understand it no? excluding the odd missing comma id like you to point out what exactly is incorrect with what you quoted?

Finally you have decided to make your point in some sort of coherent manner. That wasnt so hard was it.

Ah i figured i'd get the above when i answered your question. Some self-awareness wouldnt go amiss Old Perry. Now, run along.

Big Brother UK 2015 **Use spoiler tags, mod warning post #1 & 3037**

Comments

Big Brother UK 2015 Use spoiler tags, mod warning post #1 & 3037