Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Same Sex Marriage Referendum Mega Thread - MOD WARNING IN FIRST POST

1319320322324325327

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭Hulk Hands


    Any logical no voter would've known it was a waste of energy going to vote as there was zero chance they could win regardless. Same could apply to some yes voters obviously. Silly to assume all people who didn't vote were on the yes side however


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,138 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    MrWalsh wrote: »
    I didn't. But they weren't a No vote either.

    So out of Yes votes and didn't votes and No votes, No votes are in a significant minority. It's pretty simple stuff!

    If you wanted to be pedantic about it you could say between the No vote and people that didn't vote the Yes vote is the Vocal minority.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Because those most likely not to vote in the referendum(younger, liberal, urban) were also most likely to vote yes in the referendum if they did vote.

    Old people, rural people and more conservative people are known for their high turnout rates in the polls.

    This doesn't seem to hold up though, the turnout in some of the more conservative, rural areas appears to have been quite low.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,188 ✭✭✭DoYouEvenLift


    Any news on those exit polls since?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,052 ✭✭✭Un Croissant


    I've no problem with old people voting no. They may think, rightly or wrongly, that their society is destroying itself. But young people, some of my friends, that vote no can suck a fat dick..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    It was so warm in bed this morning, I thought; "The No side were right, the world is on fire!". Turns out it was just really really sunny.

    Anyone know when god is sending the hurricanes/ earthquakes/ locusts/ whatever else? Because apparently, that's what causes natural disasters in the USA. (gays)


    The Yes side won agus, tá an ghrian ag taitneamh - nil aon scamall sa speir. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Glorious day today. The sun is shining here in Dublin. I said to a very religious member of my family, who may have voted no although I hope not, "it doesn't look like the heavens are weeping."

    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    I've no problem with old people voting no. They may think, rightly or wrongly, that their society is destroying itself. But young people, some of my friends, that vote no can suck a fat dick..

    Old at heart?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,052 ✭✭✭Un Croissant


    ronivek wrote: »
    What's wrong with lasagna :mad:

    Hot dogs vs kebabs, if you will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Check out #tallytweets raw data from the counts being constantly added


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,629 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    David Norris ripping Iona Inst right now on radio. Very enjoyable. The inerview is good too.

    Is this the same David Norris who defended a statutary rapist?

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,052 ✭✭✭Un Croissant


    Old at heart?

    The...children thing.. I don't really know..

    ^ an actual response.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    ronivek wrote: »
    What's wrong with lasagna :mad:

    Its distinctly lacking in carbs in comparison...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,063 ✭✭✭Kiwi in IE


    ronivek wrote: »
    What's wrong with lasagna :mad:

    Nothing at all, that's the point! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭galljga1


    I've no problem with old people voting no. They may think, rightly or wrongly, that their society is destroying itself. But young people, some of my friends, that vote no can suck a fat dick..

    I presume that is towards the female of the species. Not sure that too many no voting males would be inclined to indulge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    It was so warm in bed this morning, I thought; "The No side were right, the world is on fire!". Turns out it was just really really sunny.

    Anyone know when god is sending the hurricanes/ earthquakes/ locusts/ whatever else? Because apparently, that's what causes natural disasters in the USA. (gays)


    The Yes side won agus, tá an ghrian ag taitneamh - nil aon scamall sa speir. :D

    It's fire and brimstone. And based on this lovely weather we're obviously skating on thin ice! Prepare for His vengeance when it becomes official. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    The main reason that some people voted No:





    Conservatives* (No voters) will try their best to retard society, digging in their heels every chance they get. I blame the Daily Mail.

    * Social conservatives (for the pedants)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Hermy wrote: »
    Is this the same David Norris who defended a statutary rapist?

    Christ the redeemer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Hermy wrote: »
    Is this the same David Norris who defended a statutary rapist?

    The same David Norris that said he would like to have been 'befriended' by an older man when he was growing up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 255 ✭✭Mechanical Clocktail


    I'm delighted. Some absolute idiots voting no for the wrong reasons on here, and then the bigots who didn't think it would be a yes. Eat it, fools. Today is a good day.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,887 ✭✭✭traprunner


    I just wish that the media would stop referring to the Iona institute and refer to it as its registered company name. It would sort out a lot of the confusion associated with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,762 ✭✭✭bmcc10


    I don't get why people who voted no are being branded idiots, Was the same if they put up vote no on social media they where shot down right away but nobody seemed to care if was other way around.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭galljga1


    traprunner wrote: »
    I just wish that the media would stop referring to the Iona institute and refer to it as its registered company name. It would sort out a lot of the confusion associated with it.

    Bolek Ltd?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    galljga1 wrote: »
    I presume that is towards the female of the species. Not sure that too many no voting males would be inclined to indulge.

    Usually, the loudest voices in anti-gay groups tend to be gay themselves.

    Anti-LGBT vicar Matthew Makela resigns after being found on Grindr gay dating app.

    In short, many of the men on the No side want to 'suck a dick', but like R Kelly, T Cruise and J Travolta, they're stuck in the closet:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,364 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    The same David Norris that said he would like to have been 'befriended' by an older man when he was growing up.

    I would have really liked to have been 'befriended' by an older woman when I was growing up. Only difference I see is orientation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭matrim


    So how long do people recon it will be before Iona or the like raise a constitutional challenge to the referendum, to try to hold it up for as long as possible?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭J_E


    bmcc10 wrote: »
    I don't get why people who voted no are being branded idiots, Was the same if they put up vote no on social media they where shot down right away but nobody seemed to care if was other way around.

    That's funny, because you could also say that it was those who posted a No vote who were the ones spreading misinformation, sniping at others, and going on about victimhood while harassing other voters. You can say the above about either side, no point generalising.

    Put it this way, you wouldn't have heard the No side singing for love.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,456 ✭✭✭Icepick


    blacklilly wrote: »
    Ok, thanks for your contribution
    was never going to be close


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    The people who didn't vote don't count. That's why the Yes and No campaigns both urged their followers to vote. If you were entitled and able to vote and chose not to exercise it, your opinion does not matter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭miralize


    What a sea change this country has gone through. Delighted!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement