Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gameweek 25 Matchday Thread

1…1617192122…35

Comments

  • #542
    Copper_pipe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭Copper_pipe


    Funnily enough the highest score from last night was 65, look at the point hit though :P

    http://fantasy.premierleague.com/entry/3192301/event-history/25/


  • #543
    jimmii
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,810 ✭✭✭✭jimmii


    Copper_pipe wrote: »
    Funnily enough the highest score from last night was 65, look at the point hit though :P

    http://fantasy.premierleague.com/entry/3192301/event-history/25/

    The old 56 points hit! Looks like the first few weeks they were really trying then thought f this lets just start going for a big weekly! Be a fun game to play.


  • #544
    Iused2likebusts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Chelsea conceding tonight would be most welcome.


  • #545
    jimmii
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,810 ✭✭✭✭jimmii


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    Chelsea conceding tonight would be most welcome.

    Don't even joke about that! Thinking of going Ivan (c) alongside Terry tonight!


  • #546
    Iused2likebusts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    jimmii wrote: »
    Don't even joke about that! Thinking of going Ivan (c) alongside Terry tonight!

    Almost everyone bar myself has a Chelsea def and ill probably lose both my h2h if they get a clean sheet. It's wishful thinking though as having watched Everton on sat they offered very little going forward.


  • Advertisement
  • #547
    jimmii
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,810 ✭✭✭✭jimmii


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    Almost everyone bar myself has a Chelsea def and ill probably lose both my h2h if they get a clean sheet. It's wishful thinking though as having watched Everton on sat they offered very little going forward.

    I don't have one in the regular game either so might redress the balance and go heaby in UFPL!


  • #548
    stiffler123
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭stiffler123


    Absoulute disaster, really wish I wasn't around last night to see Sanchez was starting. Going to take a -8 to get Sturridge or Costa now whereas it would be free if I had just kept Ozil and Giroud. Wtf was I thinking with Jermain Defoe.


  • #549
    Mr.Prodston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,305 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Prodston


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    Almost everyone bar myself has a Chelsea def and ill probably lose both my h2h if they get a clean sheet. It's wishful thinking though as having watched Everton on sat they offered very little going forward.

    We stand together against the Chelsea clean sheet. You have my sword...

    aragorn.jpg


  • #550
    Rikand
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,632 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    jimmii wrote: »
    Don't even joke about that! Thinking of going Ivan (c) alongside Terry tonight!

    Thinking of it ?

    Surely you made your team changes last night ? :)


  • #551
    Chesty08
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,083 ✭✭✭Chesty08


    Just had a look at my private leagues (boards league) tonight is massive for me!!

    Have a captain to play & a numerical player advantage over all rivals (with a decent score already)

    I know it doesn't work out like that! Have a work event on tonight so will just be catching the scores around the 80th min!

    don't think I can get through that long without checking updates


  • Advertisement
  • #552
    jimmii
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,810 ✭✭✭✭jimmii


    Rikand wrote: »
    Thinking of it ?

    Surely you made your team changes last night ? :)

    No still plenty of time. Will probably go Aguero but really tempted to go Ivan.


  • #553
    Scorpion Sting
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,253 ✭✭✭✭Scorpion Sting


    Rikand wrote: »
    Thinking of it ?

    Surely you made your team changes last night ? :)

    Think he means in UFPL.


  • #554
    G1032
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,350 ✭✭✭G1032


    jimmii wrote: »
    No still plenty of time. Will probably go Aguero but really tempted to go Ivan.

    Was just listening to SSN and they mentioned that Stoke v City aren't usually high scoring affairs. They weren't wrong!!

    aab735e293098d9266009f354ca7acc4.png


  • #555
    jimmii
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,810 ✭✭✭✭jimmii


    G1032 wrote: »
    Was just listening to SSN and they mentioned that Stoke v City aren't usually high scoring affairs. They weren't wrong!!

    aab735e293098d9266009f354ca7acc4.png

    Surely that will change post Pulis though. Gives me another reason to justify Ivan though which I like!


  • #556
    mccard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 239 ✭✭mccard


    For anyone considering Walcott take a look at his passes completed last night.

    walcott_leicester.jpg

    Pathetic.


  • #557
    AdMMM
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,472 ✭✭✭AdMMM


    G1032 wrote: »
    Was just listening to SSN and they mentioned that Stoke v City aren't usually high scoring affairs. They weren't wrong!!

    aab735e293098d9266009f354ca7acc4.png
    Tonight Stoke are going to be without three of the defenders that started in August when they kept City out, so those head to head stats aren't worth a damn in my mind.

    If all games were played with the exact same teams, with the exact same managers, playing the exact same philosophy, then those head-to-head stats might actually be worth something.


  • #558
    FutureGuy
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 15,255 Mod ✭✭✭✭FutureGuy


    mccard wrote: »
    For anyone considering Walcott take a look at his passes completed last night.

    walcott_leicester.jpg

    Pathetic.

    Goal. 7 points. 2 goals in last 2 starts. They're the stats I care about in FPL.


  • #559
    G1032
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,350 ✭✭✭G1032


    AdMMM wrote: »
    Tonight Stoke are going to be without three of the defenders that started in August when they kept City out, so those head to head stats aren't worth a damn in my mind.

    If all games were played with the exact same teams, with the exact same managers, playing the exact same philosophy, then those head-to-head stats might actually be worth something.

    Alright like. They're just stats. We're not using them to solve world hunger or anything!!


  • #560
    KevIRL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,392 ✭✭✭✭KevIRL


    FutureGuy wrote: »
    Goal. 7 points. 2 goals in last 2 starts. They're the stats I care about in FPL.

    Ya they are definitely the key ones alright. But things like touches inside the box, shots inside(and outside) the box, key chances created etc are all good to know. Gives an idea that even though the player might have blanked the potential is there for improvement - or vice versa of course.

    Its why I love the Big Numbers article on FFS. Always has some interesting tidbits


  • #561
    Iused2likebusts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    G1032 wrote: »
    Was just listening to SSN and they mentioned that Stoke v City aren't usually high scoring affairs. They weren't wrong!!

    aab735e293098d9266009f354ca7acc4.png

    That 19 45 game must have been epic ☺


  • Advertisement
  • #562
    iroced
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    mccard wrote: »
    For anyone considering Walcott take a look at his passes completed last night.

    walcott_leicester.jpg

    Pathetic.
    FutureGuy wrote: »
    Goal. 7 points. 2 goals in last 2 starts. They're the stats I care about in FPL.

    That explains the 0 Bonus though :cool:.


  • #563
    Iused2likebusts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    I got walcott in yesterday but I really shouldve got Ozil. I'm not sure walcott will be in their strongest starting eleven. Sanchez being injured for a couple of weeks would suit me as I have 2 fts and need to sell a mid it would also mean walcott should play.


  • #564
    G1032
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,350 ✭✭✭G1032


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    I got walcott in yesterday but I really shouldve got Ozil. I'm not sure walcott will be in their strongest starting eleven. Sanchez being injured for a couple of weeks would suit me as I have 2 fts and need to sell a mid it would also mean walcott should play.

    This. He's not and shouldn't be part of Arsenal's strongest team anymore. He'll feature more from the bench then ever before I think....


  • #565
    patmac
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,607 ✭✭✭patmac


    Going to watch Match of the Day and stay away from this thread and all media after 7:45 tonight.


  • #566
    jimmii
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,810 ✭✭✭✭jimmii


    patmac wrote: »
    Going to watch Match of the Day and stay away from this thread and all media after 7:45 tonight.

    Good luck with that! I remember doing it a couple of times when it was easier to do not sure I could do it any more!


  • #567
    dahat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,092 ✭✭✭✭dahat


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    I got walcott in yesterday but I really shouldve got Ozil. I'm not sure walcott will be in their strongest starting eleven. Sanchez being injured for a couple of weeks would suit me as I have 2 fts and need to sell a mid it would also mean walcott should play.

    Sanchez is fine but Ramsey is out 4 weeks, also means that Cazorla could be playing advanced once again.


  • #568
    Iused2likebusts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    patmac wrote: »
    Going to watch Match of the Day and stay away from this thread and all media after 7:45 tonight.

    Was going to try that but it's not on till 1140


  • #569
    Shedite27
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,513 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    Iused2likebusts wrote: »
    I'm not sure walcott will be in their strongest starting eleven.
    Just so long as they keep their strongest starting XI for Champions League I'll be happy.

    And at the end of the day, this is Arsenal, it's never about their strongest starting XI, it's the strongest starting XI that's fit that matters.


  • #570
    AdMMM
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,472 ✭✭✭AdMMM


    G1032 wrote: »
    Alright like. They're just stats. We're not using them to solve world hunger or anything!!
    Haha sorry, habit of mine from seeing tonnes of graphs and comparisons like this in work that just aren't relevant!


  • Advertisement
  • #571
    G1032
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,350 ✭✭✭G1032


    AdMMM wrote: »
    Haha sorry, habit of mine from seeing tonnes of graphs and comparisons like this in work that just aren't relevant!

    No worries!!:)


Advertisement