Bf4 clans

Burkie7 wrote: »

Anyone going to be on it tonight?

Nahhh!!!

paul_booth_fan wrote: »

Nope. I want me some proper vehicle combat......where the occupants obey correct motor safety and keep all arms and legs inside at all times

That counts me out being inside any vehicle you are driving so as I usually end up falling out of moving vehicles and die instantly! :pac: lol

Yeah i like "Tactical Disembark" better! I'll go with that...

SharpCoder wrote: »

this beta might make the bf4 servers run better too, less load lol

On the flip side though, less COD noobs to destroy

paul_booth_fan wrote: »

Nope. I want me some proper vehicle combat......where the occupants obey correct motor safety and keep all arms and legs inside at all times

Let me merge!!!!!

I am going to stuck my ore on here.

Personally I am having a great laugh with Hardline, and I don't see what the problem is. The game is sufficiently different to BF but so similar enough that I can pick up and play with no need to learn new button configurations.

It is obviously less vehicle orientated to BF but it is meant to be of course. The hit reg is sweet and satisfying and I think Heist is class.

Will I get 800 hours out of it? No

But when most people just keep playing BF4 vanilla maps I welcome another set of maps gladly at this stage.

paul_booth_fan wrote: »

Yeah the lack of varied servers is abysmal to be honest. Custom server admins won't run Ranked servers cos nobody looks for them, despite the fact they offer the exact server rotations most players long for. DICE need to set up a few Official servers with vanilla AND dlc maps, just like BF3

EA should hold a poll of fav maps then do an official server rotating them!

jaffusmax wrote: »

EA should hold a poll of fav maps then do an official server rotating them!

They did a poll for the Second Assault dlc. Operation Firestorm was 9th but still got in ahead of Damavand Peak, Seine Crossing and Grand Bazaar. Not even a sniff of Karkand getting in. DICE seemingly don't care for fan votes

paul_booth_fan wrote: »

They did a poll for the Second Assault dlc. Operation Firestorm was 9th but still got in ahead of Damavand Peak, Seine Crossing and Grand Bazaar. Not even a sniff of Karkand getting in. DICE seemingly don't care for fan votes

I loved rush on Damavand, it was the only rush game I played. I have not played a single rush game on BF4 since I got it at launch.

Played about 5 hours today so now in good position to comment.

- hotwire is a good laugh, maybe something to play once in a while but it is too easy to accumulate points

- heist is quality, every game seems different and it really fits the theme

- the gun play is FAR better than BF4, so snappy, the recoil is great on the ARs, the sniper rifles are unreal fun: I have more kills with the Scout Elite today than in BF4 already!

- I like the way the medic can't drop down medi packs as often as BF4, makes it is decision to drop now or wait

- I actually don't miss vehicles strangely enough, you can pop into a car and mow lads down once in a while

- No lock on weapons...apart from pick ups. Enuf said!

- Time to kill is fine but the hit receiving indicators seem a little delayed

- Class balance seems great, I used the classes evenly and didn't feel out of place anytime

- The class specific side arms is a masterstroke, makes recon more viable as they are the only ones with automatic sidearms

I love it so far and definite purchase

mozattack wrote: »

Played about 5 hours today so now in good position to comment.

- the gun play is FAR better than BF4, so snappy, the recoil is great on the ARs, the sniper rifles are unreal fun: I have more kills with the Scout Elite today than in BF4 already!

Great to hear you are enjoying it, and I know a lot of people who are loving it too especially gamemode Heist. But just a point on the guns. Having the hit detection spot on is great progress and that is how BF4 should've been. But i like BF4 and the gun physics there, just the hit detection needed to be improved and still does. I really like the realistic bullet drop physics for the guns and in particular sniper rifles there. It makes it so rewarding when you finally get a long distance kill. And its one of the reasons i switched from COD, along with having vehicles. I can get into a vehicle and vary my gameplay any time i want to. Of course i still get destroyed in a one on one tank battle or in a chopper but its a steep learning curve which i am still on. lol

I'm sure its nice to get a break from BF4 and Hardline seems to be giving that to BF players. But to me it should have been an add-on to BF4 rather than being a separate game. Like Zombies mode in COD. If they did it that way it would have been better than expecting people to pay €70 for it. In my opinion its not worth that.

Luke92 wrote: »

Played a bit today. I'd rather bf4! Seems battlefield is going down the slippery slope that happened cod! I hope they can pull themselves back up!

I'm fairly confident Battlefield 5 will knock everything outta the park. It's not going to be made for the older consoles so they won't have to tone anything down or make compromises regarding content/quality. DICE admitted it several times that old gen consoles held them back from making the game they wanted, even during BF3, let alone BF4 so I'm cautiously optimistic.
Sure BF4 is still too Battlefieldy to attract all the COD kiddies(fortunately). That's where Hardline comes in, it's the gateway drug for the franchise. I said it months ago that I wouldn't touch the damn game. To me it looks like a horrendously watered down and twitchy version of a Battlefield game and I've seen nothing from the beta to sway my opinion. Let's be honest though, it's a demo. The full game launches in 6 weeks so they ain't gonna be making wholesale changes at this stage. I've still seen trade kills, randomly falling over dead, false reloads, dying from 5 foot drops, super arcady driving and going around in circles for points......really???

I'm just crossing my fingers Insurgency comes over to the PS4.