war in Ukraine

Gatling · 25-01-2015 08:41PM

Iranoutofideas wrote: »

How so?

Simple it wasn't an American backed coup or anything like it ,
Was the orange revolution a American backed coup too.
Less educated conspiracy theories .

The people of Ukraine stood up and said it had enough of been kept under the kremlins heel .
Putin invaded Crimea for one reason only the port of sevastopol and russia troops stationed there

Egginacup · 25-01-2015 09:17PM

irish coldplayer wrote: »

Perhaps because he called the fall of the USSR the "greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century"

Also have you a source on how he was instrumental in bringing down the USSR?

I'm not sure if you are aware of this, doubtless you are not, but Vladimir Putin in 1991 as assistant to the mayor of St. Petersburg put down a rising that was hatched by Communist members of both the Army and Central Committee. Their goal was to maintain the Soviet Union. Putin, who as a former KGB analyst and advocate of establishing detente with the West, destroyed their plot.

Now if you want to bullshit about Putin being a Bolshevik, or Soviet or whatever label that you don't understand, who wants to control the world then go back to your Rambo movies and the gibberish that you hear in the chipper at 2am.

I would like you to tell us with a smidgen of accuracy WHEN the Russians have invaded and subjugated a country or a people.

Iranoutofideas · 25-01-2015 09:21PM

Gatling wrote: »

Simple it wasn't an American backed coup or anything like it ,
Was the orange revolution a American backed coup too.
Less educated conspiracy theories .

The people of Ukraine stood up and said it had enough of been kept under the kremlins heel .
Putin invaded Crimea for one reason only the port of sevastopol and russia troops stationed there

I can't take your opinion seriously regarding the American role in this.

Egginacup · 25-01-2015 09:34PM

Trigger Happy wrote: »

No he didnt.
Putin was behind a desk in Dresden pushing data at the time of the collapse.

NO...he wasn't.
Let's get our facts right there, ok?

Iwasfrozen · 25-01-2015 09:35PM

Egginacup wrote: »

I'm not sure if you are aware of this, doubtless you are not, but Vladimir Putin in 1991 as assistant to the mayor of St. Petersburg put down a rising that was hatched by Communist members of both the Army and Central Committee. Their goal was to maintain the Soviet Union. Putin, who as a former KGB analyst and advocate of establishing detente with the West, destroyed their plot.

Now if you want to bullshit about Putin being a Bolshevik, or Soviet or whatever label that you don't understand, who wants to control the world then go back to your Rambo movies and the gibberish that you hear in the chipper at 2am.

I would like you to tell us with a smidgen of accuracy WHEN the Russians have invaded and subjugated a country or a people.

Poland. Many times throughout history.

Also the Baltic nations. But don't let facts get in the way of your russophilia.

gandalf · 25-01-2015 09:40PM

Egginacup wrote: »

I would like you to tell us with a smidgen of accuracy WHEN the Russians have invaded and subjugated a country or a people.

They did a deal with the Nazi's and along with their "buddies" invaded Poland in 1939 and split the country between them. That also kicked off WW2, nice one Russia

Egginacup · 25-01-2015 09:41PM

wretcheddomain wrote: »

I assume, then, that you would be opposed to Russian intervention in Ukraine if it wasn't a "neo-Nazi junta hell bent on genocide against the ethnic Russian population"?

By the way, it's possible to be simultaneously against US intervention and Russian intervention. You seem to be erecting a false position that if one is against one form of intervention, we are somehow supportive of the other.

I am absolutely opposed to both a Russian and an American intervention in The Ukraine. In fact I am opposed to any intervention by a country's government/military within another state according to the Geneva Protocol and the United Nations Mandate.
The US however has already intervened in the Ukraine by orchestrating a coup to topple the existing president and install a government of their choosing. So if you have any kind of rules to which people should adhere then ought you not go all the way back to the genesis of this crisis?

Irish Praetorian · 25-01-2015 09:45PM

Egginacup wrote: »

I am absolutely opposed to both a Russian and an American intervention in The Ukraine. In fact I am opposed to any intervention by a country's government/military within another state according to the Geneva Protocol and the United Nations Mandate.
The US however has already intervened in the Ukraine by orchestrating a coup to topple the existing president and install a government of their choosing. So if you have any kind of rules to which people should adhere then ought you not go all the way back to the genesis of this crisis?

Source please.

Egginacup · 25-01-2015 09:58PM

pablomakaveli wrote: »

Northern Ireland is considered a core part of Ireland with ethnic and cultural Irish living in it.

Would it be right for Ireland to do to NI what Russia did to Crimea?(Hypothetically if that was possible)

You've just made yourself look like a complete idiot. Was it not Margaret Thatcher who stated that Northern Ireland would be united with the Irish Republic if and when the majority therein (NI) voted in a referendum to do so? Exactly as the people of Crimea have done.

Ireland had a constitutional claim to Northern Ireland from partition (although becoming the law in 1937) until the Good Friday Agreement when it was ceded in order to ease the way for negotiations with Unionists.

If Harold McMillan or Ted Heath or Winston Churchill gave away Yorkshire to Germany after a belly full of beer and then the people of Yorkshire later voted to return to the English fold you would not be sputtering the same nonsense you are now.

Gatling · 25-01-2015 09:59PM

Iranoutofideas wrote: »

I can't take your opinion seriously regarding the American role in this.

Nor your uneducated conspiracy theory

Egginacup · 25-01-2015 10:07PM

robindch wrote: »

In all fairness, as somebody said above, the Russian army has been there from the very start. Here's a GRU (Russian Military Intelligence) agent named Igor Girkin, aka Strelkov, who was the guy who organized the initial takeover in East Ukraine:

http://zavtra.ru/content/view/kto-tyi-strelok/

(needs translation, but google's good enough).

Another deluded gobshite who allegedly "led" rebel troops in Eastern Ukraine yet most of those who came in contact with him stated that he was a basic bullshit artist who thought he was actually important and took anything monetary.
Strelkov Chalabi :pac:

Herb Powell · 25-01-2015 10:56PM

Has anyone in this thread spoken with Ukranians on the matter?

I have a few friends from the east (Lugansk, etc.), of Russian ethnicity themselves, and the overwhelming opinion seems to be they do not want to be part of Russia. Not sure if this is representative of the whole, but they insisted it really is most people who want nothing to do with Russia.

This makes me very skeptical of anyone claiming the east of Ukraine is "practically Russia". It has closer ties, certainly. But it is Ukraine.

Irish Praetorian · 25-01-2015 11:15PM

Herb Powell wrote: »

Has anyone in this thread spoken with Ukranians on the matter?

I have a few friends from the east (Lugansk, etc.), of Russian ethnicity themselves, and the overwhelming opinion seems to be they do not want to be part of Russia. Not sure if this is representative of the whole, but they insisted it really is most people who want nothing to do with Russia.

This makes me very skeptical of anyone claiming the east of Ukraine is "practically Russia". It has closer ties, certainly. But it is Ukraine.

My only experience is with a guy from Kiev, fiercely anti-Putin and very wary of Russian treatment of his country, despite being a native-Russian speaker (has literally tried and failed to switch to Ukrainian on several occasions). So I'm incredibly suspicious of anyone who says 'Oh Russian speaker, wants to be part of Putins Russia'.

pablomakaveli · 25-01-2015 11:20PM

Egginacup wrote: »

You've just made yourself look like a complete idiot. Was it not Margaret Thatcher who stated that Northern Ireland would be united with the Irish Republic if and when the majority therein (NI) voted in a referendum to do so? Exactly as the people of Crimea have done.

Ireland had a constitutional claim to Northern Ireland from partition (although becoming the law in 1937) until the Good Friday Agreement when it was ceded in order to ease the way for negotiations with Unionists.

If Harold McMillan or Ted Heath or Winston Churchill gave away Yorkshire to Germany after a belly full of beer and then the people of Yorkshire later voted to return to the English fold you would not be sputtering the same nonsense you are now.

If you think that rigged referendum in Crimea is in anyway legitimate than you'd be better off looking in the mirror for an idiot.

Egginacup · 25-01-2015 11:28PM

These are the glorious defenders of democracy in Ukraine that are fighting for a better future. A band of thugs installed in Kiev and paid for by NATO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FSbvbzwOb8

Irish Praetorian · 25-01-2015 11:35PM

Egginacup wrote: »

These are the glorious defenders of democracy in Ukraine that are fighting for a better future. A band of thugs installed in Kiev and paid for by NATO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FSbvbzwOb8

Source please?

Just by the by, how do videos of Russian troops and pro-Russian militias doing far worse effect your biased narrative?

Iranoutofideas · 26-01-2015 01:06AM

Gatling wrote: »

Nor your uneducated conspiracy theory

American involvement in stirring up this crisis is no conspiracy theory.

Gatling · 26-01-2015 01:50AM

Iranoutofideas wrote: »

American involvement in stirring up this crisis is no conspiracy theory.

Let me guess american snipers shot protester's in meridian,

The only who stirred up anything is russia ,and have been for the last 10+ years directly been involved in controlling Ukraine for its own benefit,
Amazing yanukovich was a nobody political wannabe who wanted to hold a referendum asking for russian withdrawl of troops and ships from Sevastopol over 10 years ago ,all of sudden hes elected President and gets very rich and no referendum mean while pro west political leaders suddenly get charged with corruption and face show trials and guess who supplied all the information showing corruption Gazprom aka putins gas company ,
Where did the elite police force the Berkut who shot and killed protesters in meridian go to ,
Straight to Crimea to be paid by the kremlin as new russian militia,
Crimea home to the port of Sevastopol and the russian black fleet ,sound familiar 10+years yanukovich the amateur political leader who came from nothing to become extremely rich at the hands of the Kremlin and Putin's merry nut jobs,
Where did yanukovich go with his russian military escort along with millions of dollars of Ukrainian money oh yeah straight to the kremlin
Now where does America come into this

irish coldplayer · 26-01-2015 01:53AM

Egginacup wrote: »

I'm not sure if you are aware of this, doubtless you are not, but Vladimir Putin in 1991 as assistant to the mayor of St. Petersburg put down a rising that was hatched by Communist members of both the Army and Central Committee. Their goal was to maintain the Soviet Union. Putin, who as a former KGB analyst and advocate of establishing detente with the West, destroyed their plot.

Again source please ?

Egginacup wrote: »

Now if you want to bullshit about Putin being a Bolshevik, or Soviet or whatever label that you don't understand, who wants to control the world then go back to your Rambo movies and the gibberish that you hear in the chipper at 2am.

:eek:
WTF? Where the hell did that rant come from?
I said none of the above and I am quite aware what all those terms mean.
I quoted something Putin said recently that was widely reported, gibberish is what you seem to excel at.

Egginacup wrote: »

I would like you to tell us with a smidgen of accuracy WHEN the Russians have invaded and subjugated a country or a people.

How about most of eastern Europe for about 40 years, but I'm sure you'll say they all loved being part of the soviet bloc.
Heres a few more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_occupations_by_the_Soviet_Union
And yes I am equivocating Russia with the Soviet Union, its not much of a stretch considering anyone in Ukraine who doesn't love Russia is a Nazi according to you.

Its amazing how a two line post asking for a source and giving a quote provokes so much vitriol from you, makes it pointless even having a discussion on this topic with you.

Egginacup · 26-01-2015 11:29AM

Iwasfrozen wrote: »

Don't be so naive. There are three reasons the referendum was illegitimate.
The options: There was no "keep the status quo" option a referendum with no option to defeat the movement is by definition an undemocratic referendum since it is forcing change on the population regardless of their views.

The conditions: The referendum was carried out during occupation by a foreign country. Crimean citizens have reported to western media that they felt under duress to vote how Putin wanted them to.

The result: Putin won 97% of the vote. 97% of voters voting one way in any referendum is utterly unrealistic.

Until a an internationally organized and monitored referendum can take place you have no right to say the majority of people favor unification as that is an unfounded and groundless statement.

The reason there was no status quo choice was because at the time of the referendum there was (and still is) an illegitimate nazi junta in control of Kiev. To have the status quo recognised would mean to validate the US installed coup junta and that was out of the question. So the choices were

(a) How things were before these neo-nazi thugs were installed by Washington or

(b) Say "fuck that!" and rejoin Russia.

Since the Kiev junta have started massacring civilians in Eastern Ukraine, 2 more regions have asked to become part of Russia. They're under duress alright in the form of artillery from Kiev owned batteries blowing them to pieces.

You can call the referendum illegitimate all you want but it just smells like sour grapes on your part. Putin outsmarted Washington and the West at just about every turn and you don't like it. Sucks being a sore loser.

Roger Hassenforder · 26-01-2015 11:35AM

Nazis, Nazis everywhere...

Egginacup · 26-01-2015 11:48AM

Further suspicions that US/UK have personnel operating inside the Ukraine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&x-yt-cl=84503534&x-yt-ts=1421914688&v=jW1JdOXdJkU

TerrorFirmer · 26-01-2015 11:51AM

Why don't you stop spewing **** all over every thread you comment on and start providing the sources for your wild statements that are being asked for, in this thread and every other thread you post, which you refuse to do and go off on wild tangents?

You're not well, seriously.

Gatling · 26-01-2015 12:23PM

Egginacup wrote: »

Further suspicions that US/UK have personnel operating inside the Ukraine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&x-yt-cl=84503534&x-yt-ts=1421914688&v=jW1JdOXdJkU

What suspicion is that

humanji · 26-01-2015 12:30PM

Egginacup wrote: »

Further suspicions that US/UK have personnel operating inside the Ukraine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&x-yt-cl=84503534&x-yt-ts=1421914688&v=jW1JdOXdJkU

MOD: This isn't the conspiracy theories forum, so stop making wild claims and backing them up with Youtube videos that don't actually show anything. If you have proof, provide it. If not, stop derailing the thread with random theories.

kravmaga · 03-02-2015 06:43PM

As Putin is not backing down and is not prepared to attend talks which happened recently in Minsk regarding ceasefires, I think its high time the US Government started arming the Ukranian Army to hold off any further insurgency by the Russian backed rebels in Eastern Ukraine.

Its looking like a proxy war between Russia and U.S. in Ukraine.

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/02/02/politics/us-ukraine-lethal-aid/index.html

BrianDug · 04-02-2015 01:00AM

kravmaga wrote: »

As Putin is not backing down and is not prepared to attend talks which happened recently in Minsk regarding ceasefires, I think its high time the US Government started arming the Ukranian Army to hold off any further insurgency by the Russian backed rebels in Eastern Ukraine.

Its looking like a proxy war between Russia and U.S. in Ukraine.

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/02/02/politics/us-ukraine-lethal-aid/index.html

The US government have been arming Ukraine - they have spent $5 billion so far. And there is already US mercs on the ground.

You can't blame the local residents for taking up arms against the Ukraine Army to combat the daily shelling/ethnic cleansing.

BrianDug · 04-02-2015 01:10AM

Gatling wrote: »

Let me guess american snipers shot protester's in meridian,

Yes exactly...a text book operation, the exact same as what happened in Syria and Libya. "Police/Army" shooting on unarmed civilians.

Russia, China, Iran de-dollarising.... oh look "democracy" protests in Hong Kong

!

Angela never got her gold back did she (from the USA)? Too large a logistical process they told her...Yet they can lift fly all the gold from the Ukraine banks to the USA overnight :cool:

They won't beat Russia at chess in there own back yard, thats for sure.

c_man · 04-02-2015 01:12AM

BrianDug wrote: »

They won't beat Russia at chess in there own back yard, thats for sure.

They have Deep Blue running the show. It's sorted.

BrianDug · 04-02-2015 01:14AM

c_man wrote: »

They have Deep Blue running the show. It's sorted.

Deep Blue is no match for Putin!

war in Ukraine

Comments