Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Iceland Volcano Thread

194959799100115

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭rickdangerouss


    Jon's Website created allot or opinion's, the site is very "marmite" either you like the site or you do not.

    What I understand is that Jon has contact with different official\semi official groups of people, some of this information finds its way on to the website. How much of this "information goes through the grape vine", I do not know.

    This event is a once in a life time or could be 2 or three. Everyone is learning from it, including the professional's.
    I understand that the 3 options from the IMO reports are weighted and the 1st one has the highest change, however it could be months, before this takes place.

    The Caldera dropping is at around 24+ meters, wait for a quick drop of dozens if not 100's of meters, maybe then think of VEI time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭fits


    All the volcanologists are gone to a conference this week anyway, so they must not be expecting anything to happen soon!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie

    Subscribe and save boards.ie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭fits


    I've been following Jon's writings since 2010 and I actually find that he generally doesn't sensationalize or hype things up at all. I've never seen him write like this about Katla, Hekla or Grímsvötn etc.. I think this is actually a case where he honestly believes that a large eruption at the caldera is very likely to happen. Officially, that scenario is 1 of the 3 likely possibilities anyway.

    I thought he had really hyped up a major eruption at hekla (or Katla) when eyjafjallajokull went up, but perhaps I am mistaking him for somebody else.

    I was in Iceland this time last year and was sitting beside one of their meteorologists on a domestic flight across the middle of the country in clear skies. I pretty much got a guided tour of all the geological features from a guy who knew the place like the back of his hand. Best flight ever!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie

    Subscribe and save boards.ie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,563 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,322 ✭✭✭The One Doctor


    SeaBreezes wrote: »

    Interesting that Bardarbunga is now a VEI 5, comparable to the 79AD Vesuvius eruption.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,556 ✭✭✭Reckless Abandonment


    Interesting that Bardarbunga is now a VEI 5, comparable to the 79AD Vesuvius eruption.

    It's no where near a VEI 5, if It was we'd nearly be able to hear It.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 341 ✭✭tomcosgrave


    Bardarbunga may be erupting - but it hasn't exploded yet.
    It's not on the VEI scale, or if it is, it's a 1 - there's not enough tephra (ash, cinders bombs) ejected to place it any higher than that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Duiske


    Bardarbunga may be erupting - but it hasn't exploded yet.
    It's not on the VEI scale, or if it is, it's a 1 - there's not enough tephra (ash, cinders bombs) ejected to place it any higher than that.

    On Wikipedia it states that the fissure eruption became VEI 4 on Sept 19th, but the citation given relates to this article on Iceland Review, which says nothing about the VEI scale. I understood, like you, that the scale was a combination of explosivity, the amount of debris ejected and the height of the ash plume. Whoever edited the Wikipedia article seems to be confusing volumes of lava with volumes of tephra.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭rickdangerouss


    These links might be able to answer some questions regarding, VEI Scaling.

    My opinion, make a best guess now, but wait till this stops, could be years or could end up with a big bang. VEI has been reviewed with mixed opinions on both sides of the camp, is it of use or not?


    http://geology.com/stories/13/volcanic-explosivity-index/

    http://oregonexpat.wordpress.com/2010/04/23/volcanic-fallout-or-lets-talk-about-a-real-eruption/


    VEI.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 341 ✭✭tomcosgrave


    I definitely think it is of use and that table is excellent.

    The point with VEI and saying that such and such an eruption is on such and such a point of the scale is how explosive is it. And having refreences for each point, such as Vesuvious or Tambora or whatever is really helpful.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Duiske


    These links might be able to answer some questions regarding, VEI Scaling.

    My opinion, make a best guess now, but wait till this stops, could be years or could end up with a big bang. VEI has been reviewed with mixed opinions on both sides of the camp, is it of use or not?

    Looking at your chart, Kilauea is described as a VEI 0, despite producing over 3.5 cubic kilometres of Lava in its current long running eruption. If amounts of lava were the basis for applying VEI numbers, as some appear to be doing for the Holuhraun fissure eruption, then Kilauea could easily be described as VEI 5, which it clearly isn't. Must see if I can find a volcanologists blog where I can ask about it.

    By the way, that second link you posted, about Mt. Mazama, is an excellent read. Cheers. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭rickdangerouss


    Duiske wrote: »
    Looking at your chart, Kilauea is described as a VEI 0, despite producing over 3.5 cubic kilometres of Lava in its current long running eruption. If amounts of lava were the basis for applying VEI numbers, as some appear to be doing for the Holuhraun fissure eruption, then Kilauea could easily be described as VEI 5, which it clearly isn't. Must see if I can find a volcanologists blog where I can ask about it.

    By the way, that second link you posted, about Mt. Mazama, is an excellent read. Cheers. :)


    I read from this site sometimes, a number of volcanologists post there, also Eric is a assistant professor of Geosciences at Denison University. Twitter has a ton of them under #bardarbunga too.

    http://www.wired.com/2014/09/when-a-giant-asteroid-impact-created-its-own-volcanoes-magma/

    http://www.wired.com/2011/11/how-big-is-that-scale-and-rates-of-volcanic-eruptions/

    http://www.wired.com/2013/07/revamping-the-volcanic-explosivity-index-or-tiny-eruptions-need-love-too/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Duiske


    If you overlook the huge hole in the ground which is spewing out molten rock and noxious gas, it looks like a nice, crisp Autumn evening in Iceland.

    barda2.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 341 ✭✭tomcosgrave


    Duiske wrote: »
    If you overlook the huge hole in the ground which is spewing out molten rock and noxious gas, it looks like a nice, crisp Autumn evening in Iceland.

    barda2.jpg

    What are you on about? I can't see anything? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭stooge


    Any word on whats happening with Bardarbunga? Thread has gone slient and no new stories about the sinking of the crater or possible future eruptions. Has it all just fizzled out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭rickdangerouss


    [PHP][/PHP]
    stooge wrote: »
    Any word on whats happening with Bardarbunga? Thread has gone slient and no new stories about the sinking of the crater or possible future eruptions. Has it all just fizzled out?


    Nope, still ongoing. The drop in the caldera has slowed a small amount. 5+ quakes, not so many.

    50KM+ field from the eruption. Possible new shield volcano getting created.
    Biggest event in Iceland for over 100 years.

    If the eruption will stay at this slowing down rate, ETA of 5-6 months before it stops. Thats an estimate.

    The drop is around 40+ meters, I understand now. If you use 6 months time, as a point of stopping. The drop could be around 150+ meters in total.

    BB could erupt before that point, bigger chance is when the drop stops, with a drop of 150 meters, plus new pressure build up.

    ysJJx.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 437 ✭✭illumin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭RoisinD


    Lots of increased activity over the past few hours. Don't know if it has any significance? http://baering.github.io/

    Over the past few days there have a good few 4/5 quakes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭RoisinD




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Duiske


    RoisinD wrote: »

    Just for a bit of perspective on the size of this eruption, the distance between the camera and the eruption site is the same as the straight-line distance between O'Connell Bridge in Dublin and Celbridge, Co Kildare. (a little over 18km's)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭RoisinD


    Increase in activity over the past few hours http://baering.github.io/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,689 ✭✭✭✭Rikand




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭RoisinD


    Increased activity today following a slowing down over the past few weeks. Don't know if it has any significance: http://baering.github.io/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭rickdangerouss


    The eruption has ended. 85 Square KM + in size.

    Just to many ways this eruption was unique to put in one post.
    The eruption in Holuhraun, which began 31 August 2014, has come to an END.
    The area continues to be closely monitored.
    Gas contamination is still detected around the eruption site.
    No changes have been made to the restricted area north of Vatnajökull.
    The Civil Protection still operates in alert phase.
    Aviation Colour Code for Bárðarbunga has been downgraded from orange to yellow.

    http://en.vedur.is/earthquakes-and-volcanism/articles/nr/2947


    barc_gps_3d_is.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 592 ✭✭✭hotwhiskey


    Not in Iceland. But Chile. Villarrica erupting some 465 miles south of Santiago de Chile.

    3-3-15-villarrica-3.jpg?itok=ya5txxdq

    B_J50peUoAEGL3u.jpg

    B_J3jM8U8AAMzOU.jpg:large


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 401 ✭✭iora_rua


    Is it true that a dormant volcano in Kerry (Derrynane) has started to erupt? Or have I just misheard something ... can't see anything on the Kerry regional Boards thread.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,099 ✭✭✭Stinicker


    There was a furze fire on top of a mountain in Derrynane which coincidentally is an extinct volcano. Some photos and bit of Kerry cute hoorism at its best :pac:

    https://www.facebook.com/149104368441351/posts/952211884797258


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 401 ✭✭iora_rua


    Stinicker wrote: »
    There was a furze fire on top of a mountain in Derrynane which coincidentally is an extinct volcano. Some photos and bit of Kerry cute hoorism at its best :pac:

    https://www.facebook.com/149104368441351/posts/952211884797258

    Thanks - I can put the rosary beads away then ... :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭Alexis Sanchez


    iora_rua wrote: »
    Thanks - I can put the rosary beads away then ... :D

    Is that some sort of joke? Guatemala and the Philippines are predominately Catholic countries, yet volcanic eruptions there took hundreds of lives.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,023 ✭✭✭GhostInTheRuins


    Is that some sort of joke? Guatemala and the Philippines are predominately Catholic countries, yet volcanic eruptions there took hundreds of lives.

    I may be wrong, but I think it was actually a joke, yes.


Advertisement