Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2014 - Mod Warning in OP, 10/12

1201202204206207333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭mav79


    We were always going to struggle to score even close to what we did last season, but losing Suarez and having Sturridge injured is only one of the many problems with the team. Last night I can't remember one time where the back four held a flat line when on the back foot. Lovren and Skrtel kept looking at each other but never moved to support each other, and the fullbacks were usually missing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,222 ✭✭✭✭Will I Amnt


    e.r wrote: »
    But last nite with 25 minutes to go that went out the window and we saw more raw fluid football.

    Hopefully Rodgers can pick up on that and try to get some sort of run going!!

    I wouldn't read too much into that. Basel were trying to see out the game, became defensive and invited the pressure on themselves. You see it all the time. It was very like the City v United game, United with 10 men finished the game with City hanging on when they really should have just kept playing the way they were.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    Fair play to the Basel fans last night. Sang from start to finish. Nice touch with the JFT96 banner at half time. Pity about the result and performance and most importantly the selections made by the manager. I want to get behind him but he's entered Benitez mode with his selections.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Dayum


    I'll never understand how Rodgers, a guy that's paid stupid amounts of money for his football knowledge, has chosen a player that has had problems at every single club he's been at over the likes of Remy, Bony and Benteke. He could have signed all three strikers for 35million and still have more than half of the Suarez money to play around with nevermind the Champions League cash and sponsorship funding...

    It boggles the mind....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    What's going to be very interesting is Sturridge when he gets back. I fear he won't be near the same level of player he was when he had Suarez beside him, spotting runs, executing passes, creating space, taking the focus of defences.

    The expectation heaped onto
    Sturridge by fans, the manager & players at the club is going to be absolutely monumental.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Dayum wrote: »
    I'll never understand how Rodgers, a guy that's paid stupids amounts of money for his football knowledge, has chosen a player that has had problems at every single club he's been at over the likes of Remy, Bony and Benteke. He could have signed all three strikers for 35million and still have more than half of the Suarez money to play around with nevermind the Champions League cash and sponsorship funding...

    It boggles the mind....

    The only name on that list open to him/committee in the summer was Bony. The Remy deal was pulled for some reason and plenty of us have heard the rumours why. Can you imagine the sh1tstorm if Benteke was signed while injured?
    Liverpool should have offered massive money for Alexis Sanchez. No idea if they did but knowing FSG I doubt they did


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    What's going to be very interesting is Sturridge when he gets back. I fear he won't be near the same level of player he was when he had Suarez beside him, spotting runs, executing passes, creating space, taking the focus of defences.

    The expectation heaped onto
    Sturridge by fans, the manager & players at the club is going to be absolutely monumental.

    Sturridge is getting better every week he is out. If he misses the whole season he'll be better than Suarez


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    The expectation heaped onto Sturridge by fans, the manager & players at the club is going to be absolutely monumental.

    He'll never have experienced anything like it before, that's for sure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    SlickRic wrote: »
    Rodgers is an issue right now, but the transfer policy is the big, big, big problem.

    That really doesn't follow from our position.

    We're not where we are because the players we bought aren't good enough. We're where we are because of mismanaging the squad of players we have available and a failure to fill a key role after overestimating our main threat's ability to stay fit. Rodgers' ability to use his squad properly is an ongoing concern and if he can't improve then he'll get the can but one mistake in the transfer market isn't evidence of systemic failures.

    Our players are better than the players of all the other teams in the league with the exception of what you'd predict would be the top 4.
    Southampton, Swansea, West Ham and all that - they're not top quality and all the good players at us, Arsenal and Utd aren't crap all of a sudden just because of the way the table looks after less than half of the season.

    Rodgers has bungled the team selection at times this season and we've failed to find another player who can play up front effectively but that doesn't invalidate the entire strategy or consign the entire squad we've assembled to the bin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,205 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    i just watched the highlights from last year ,fcuk the haters it was such a rollercoaster,such quality attacking football ,cheered me right up :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    amiable wrote: »
    Sturridge is getting better every week he is out. If he misses the whole season he'll be better than Suarez

    I think he got 10 goals in 10 games when Suarez was suspended. He has looked good for England and we scored 6 goals against southampton city and spurs and looked a totally different team than we have since he got injured.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Dayum


    amiable wrote: »
    The only name on that list open to him/committee in the summer was Bony. The Remy deal was pulled for some reason and plenty of us have heard the rumours why. Can you imagine the sh1tstorm if Benteke was signed while injured?
    Liverpool should have offered massive money for Alexis Sanchez. No idea if they did but knowing FSG I doubt they did

    Remy was snapped up by Chelsea and then scored 2 goals in the 3 senior games he's played any meaningful amount of time (before getting injured). Benteke did enough to warrant his rating in the last few years regardless of whether or not he was out injured. He's back and playing great for Villa.

    I don't think anyone could say these two players were a 50/50 risk.

    We can talk about the big strikers in world football but it's quite obvious FSG are not prepared to start paying big wages.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Dayum wrote: »
    Remy was snapped up by Chelsea and then scored 2 goals in the 3 senior games

    Well he is hardly going to play under 21's now is he being 27.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Dayum wrote: »
    Remy was snapped up by Chelsea and then scored 2 goals in the 3 senior games he's played any meaningful amount of time (before getting injured). Benteke did enough to warrant his rating in the last few years regardless of whether or not he was out injured. He's back and playing great for Villa.

    I don't think anyone could say these two players were a 50/50 risk.

    We can talk about the big strikers in world football but it's quite obvious FSG are not prepared to start paying big wages.

    Benteke was injured. No way Liverpool could have bought him. Naive to suggest otherwise IMO.
    Remy did a medical and Liverpool pulled the plug on him for some reason. So it is very unlikely that was down to Rodgers like you suggested in your previous post. Rodgers seemed to want him.
    If the medical team pull the plug on a deal then I don't see how you can blame the manager.
    Chelsea can afford to take risks Liverpool can't

    If FSG want the team to succeed it's about time they paid these ''big wages''


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Dayum wrote: »
    I'll never understand how Rodgers, a guy that's paid stupid amounts of money for his football knowledge, has chosen a player that has had problems at every single club he's been at over the likes of Remy, Bony and Benteke. He could have signed all three strikers for 35million and still have more than half of the Suarez money to play around with nevermind the Champions League cash and sponsorship funding...

    It boggles the mind....

    I get the feeling balo was the only option he had left, and his goal second before pool was decent enough.

    Things I don't get about Rodgers is his refusal to play some players, lalana who I've only ever seen play in a Liverpool shirt can't get near the team.

    Other things I don't get - mig, can anybody remember what he was like at sunderland, I bet he had the same problems then as he does now, surely Rodgers and the committee could have spotted this, also pool still had rein on the books who was still very decent at the time.

    Actually pretty much all his signings even the average punter could spot flaws in most of the signings.

    As recruiting players is a huge part of football management and just like mignolot can't catch a ball, Rodgers can't make signings, he can't do his job then he shouldn't have one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Dayum


    amiable wrote: »
    Benteke was injured. No way Liverpool could have bought him. Naive to suggest otherwise IMO.
    Remy did a medical and Liverpool pulled the plug on him for some reason. So it is very unlikely that was down to Rodgers like you suggested in your previous post. Rodgers seemed to want him.
    If the medical team pull the plug on a deal then I don't see how you can blame the manager.
    Chelsea can afford to take risks Liverpool can't

    If FSG want the team to succeed it's about time they paid these ''big wages''

    Liverpool can't afford to take risks?!

    Then what the hell do you call Balotelli?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Dayum wrote: »
    Liverpool can't afford to take risks?!

    Then what the hell do you call Balotelli?!

    What I actually wrote is Liverpool can't afford to take the risks Chelsea can. There's a difference to what I said and what you are implying I said.


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Dayum wrote: »
    Liverpool can't afford to take risks?!

    Then what the hell do you call Balotelli?!

    :confused:

    Sign a player who had a bad achilles injury, or a player who previously had a heart problem.

    Surely, you can see the difference in risks compared to a risk on a player like Ballotelli (ie attitude risk etc) :confused:


    Didn't you ask the exact same thing the other day ?

    hmmm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    :confused:

    Sign a player who had a bad achilles injury, or a player who previously had a heart problem.

    Surely, you can see the difference in risks compared to a risk on a player like Ballotelli (ie attitude risk etc) :confused:


    Didn't you ask the exact same thing the other day ?

    hmmm

    Exactly. Seemingly something showed up on the medical that made Liverpool pull the plug. Chelsea went ahead previously and bought Demba Ba too who has failed several medicals previously.

    Am I right in saying in his time back in Serie A Balotelli scored more goals than any other player? I think I read that somewhere recently


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,407 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Just on your summer signings, I thought there was a lot of good signings or prospects as some would say.

    Anyways when you look at the players that were bought and consider the squad that was already there you'd have expected to see a move to a 4-2-3-1 formation. The players brought in never looked like they suited a 4-3-3 and that seems to be what Rogers has tried to play. The signing of Balotelli surprised me because he just didn't seem like somebody that would suit the system.
    Mignolet/Jones

    Johnson/Manquillo Lovren/Skrtel Sakho/Toure Moreno/Enrique
    Lucas/Allen
    Gerrard/Henderson/Can
    Sterling
    Markovic/Suso
    Lallana/Coutinho
    Sturridge/Balotelli/Lambert/Borini
    I haven't a clue what the man was trying to do last night with the team he started with. Its like a team you would put up if you were setting up for a draw but Liverpool had to win last night. It seems to me that Rogers has lost his way but to be fair Sturridge has been missing and he was the most important player coming into this season with the loss of Suarez.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,076 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    Dayum wrote: »
    I'll never understand how Rodgers, a guy that's paid stupid amounts of money for his football knowledge, has chosen a player that has had problems at every single club he's been at over the likes of Remy, Bony and Benteke. He could have signed all three strikers for 35million and still have more than half of the Suarez money to play around with nevermind the Champions League cash and sponsorship funding...

    It boggles the mind....

    He didn't choose Ballotelli. He's made it clear the options he was given towards the end of the transfer window were Ballotelli or nobody and we badly needed somebody.

    Now how we ended up in the position of Ballotelli or nobody is another story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭garra


    What has any of that got to do with current performance?

    Carragher played on for 2-3 seasons beyond his sell by date, the fact Gerrard is still a regular let alone a key player is a key indicator of why Liverpool are where they are at. Nostalgic sentimentality merchants.

    I'm perplexed at how the example you provided re Carragher has not enlightened you to the contribution of highly skilled & experienced team members, regardless of their waning physical condition.. I would consider playing Carragher at the weekend if he has been playing 5-a-side since retiring. :D

    Gerrard still has more critical attacking ability to GOAL than all the other midfielders and he is not the problem, he should not be expected to carry the team at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,205 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    think its fair to say,given the amount of games he has played in,and time at his new club... the mig aint up to it,good shot stopper....awful at most other things. and hendo has gone to sleep since becoming vc. also the players deserve just as much heat as the manager,they are not performing..they have shown they can when they want too,they just are not .. the main players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭garra


    think its fair to say,given the amount of games he has played in,and time at his new club... the mig aint up to it,good shot stopper....awful at most other things. and hendo has gone to sleep since becoming vc. also the players deserve just as much heat as the manager,they are not performing..they have shown they can when they want too,they just are not .. the main players.

    Why aren't they performing for their manager?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    Players not performing could also be down to the manager. If you are guaranteed to be getting your game every week then there is no need for you to bust your gut. If you're one of the younger players looking to break into the team knowing that at best you'll be on the bench unless our older players can't manage 3 games in a week, what's your incentive?

    The players might also think the manager's a spoofer, some people think it based on weekly press conferences and post match interviews, the players hear a lot more every day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭googled eyes


    Have I missed anything from today ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,916 ✭✭✭brevity


    A couple of things floating around my head about our situation.

    Top of the list really is Rodgers. If he indeed had the last say on signings, then he has gone about it all wrong. The players that we brought in aren't bad players imo, a lot are coming off the back off good season or have a bit of buzz of potential. The problem with the players is that we've bought to many and at the wrong time.

    What the club needed was a good spine. Instead what we got is a bunch of players that are don't know what to do because Rodgers doesn't know what to do. He's had to change his set up because he lost Suarez but he doesn't know how. He though he had to buy so many but he didn't!

    Imo, if you lose a player of that quality and cannot replace like for like, then you don't flood the squad. You obviously have to fill the position but it should be filled in a way that suits the way we play. We didn't do this. We arbitrarily bought a load of players hoping that they would some how work together. Its ****ed us.

    The other is they way we go about buying players.

    If we don't change this it doesn't matter who we bring in, if we don't fix this we will always struggle. We need to be able to go out and offer a competitive package. If we cannot do this, then we need to bring in a Director of Football (I think we need this anyway) who oversees the sourcing of players and improves our scouting. There needs to be a clear message that this is the way its going to be. No ignoring players a la Borini, Can and Lallana.

    Such a frustrating season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Konoplyanka is available on a bosman we really should be going back for him.

    We have been linked to Neto he is also available on a bosman.

    Andre Ayew & Hunterlaar are also available on bosmans.

    So if don't have money to spend there is at least four players we should be able to afford who would improve the team I believe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Have I missed anything from today ?

    About 300 posts, 90% of which are utter bilge.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Suarez looks like he has put on a few extra pounds since his move to Spain not as much as Reina thoughsince his move to Germany.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement