Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2014 - Mod Warning in OP, 10/12

1158159161163164333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭brevity


    https://twitter.com/101greatgoals/status/540433154071617536

    Eeek.

    Wonder what really happened? I initially thought it was a problem with agents fees but, considering what's come out recently, it looks as though we have no problems paying agents fees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭ush


    brevity wrote: »
    Wonder what really happened?


    He failed the medical.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,162 ✭✭✭Augmerson


    ush wrote: »
    He failed the medical.

    This.

    Previous teams have taken the risk. Chelsea can take the risk because they're loaded and if they are in a bad way Roman will just spunk up the cash so they can buy another striker. We aren't in that position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,932 ✭✭✭brevity


    We've a long list of sick notes that passed medicals with the club...Remy has played quite a few games with Newcastle and QPR and doesn't appear to have suffered.

    Maybe I'm looking for something that isn't there, the whole thing just seems off to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,845 ✭✭✭Hidalgo


    T-K-O wrote: »
    Personally I love it. We cannot play any worse yet we are still close to the top 4. Our main rivals are not playing that much better than us by any stretch of the imagination. Everton, Spurs are worse, Utd & Arsenal marginally better.

    Then you have West Ham, Southampton et all, these teams will fall away just like every other year.

    Utd and Arsenal are the two main obstacles for top 4.
    Imo they're playing more than marginally better than Liverpool.
    Both have 2 positives that Liverpool lack right now, pace about the pitch and a player a cut above the norm. Sanchez and Rooney/some games Di Maria. This type of player can pull a struggling side along. Right now Liverpool don't have that player


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,710 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    Augmerson wrote: »
    This.

    Previous teams have taken the risk. Chelsea can take the risk because they're loaded and if they are in a bad way Roman will just spunk up the cash so they can buy another striker. We aren't in that position.

    Hah.

    No insetad we take risks on 20 year olds and troublemakers!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Stadium work starts on Monday! :)

    8xn7s5.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,168 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    brevity wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/101greatgoals/status/540433154071617536

    Eeek.

    Wonder what really happened? I initially thought it was a problem with agents fees but, considering what's come out recently, it looks as though we have no problems paying agents fees.
    Remy is in a team that is just humming along incredibly. Drop him into our team, and he's be struggling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    Whats the knock on effect going to be for the stadium capacity?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,925 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    jasonb wrote: »

    we're still outsiders for the top 4...

    ....

    Indeed, 4/1 ish
    T-K-O wrote: »
    Personally I love it. ............

    The underdog mentality no doubt suits, coming strong from behind, ohhhhhhhhhh arrrrrrrrrr matron


  • Posts: 17,925 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nerdlingr wrote: »
    Whats the knock on effect going to be for the stadium capacity?

    13K by the beginning of the 2016-17 season according to the Echo article.
    A decent increase in match day revenues, couple that with regular CL and things will be looking good financially.
    The club has come on leaps and bounds in many ways in the recent years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    Augeo wrote: »
    13K by the beginning of the 2016-17 season according to the Echo article.
    A decent increase in match day revenues, couple that with regular CL and things will be looking good financially.
    The club has come on leaps and bounds in many ways in the recent years.

    Sorry, meant whats the knock on effect in a negative way whilst its being built. We gonna be reduced to about 35,000?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,309 ✭✭✭T-K-O


    Hidalgo wrote: »
    Utd and Arsenal are the two main obstacles for top 4.
    Imo they're playing more than marginally better than Liverpool.
    Both have 2 positives that Liverpool lack right now, pace about the pitch and a player a cut above the norm. Sanchez and Rooney/some games Di Maria. This type of player can pull a struggling side along. Right now Liverpool don't have that player

    Potentially, we could have that player in a few weeks.

    From the games I have seen, Utd / Arsenal are struggling and this is backed up by friends who are fans of those clubs.

    IF we can sort ourselves out CL is very much a possibility.


  • Posts: 17,925 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nerdlingr wrote: »
    Sorry, meant whats the knock on effect in a negative way whilst its being built. We gonna be reduced to about 35,000?

    Apologies, negligable I'd imagine, there are two banks of May, June & July in the period to the start of the 2015/2016 season, you'd like to think those two 3 month windows over a planned 20 month project would be the periods where the current capacity would be effected.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Augmerson wrote: »
    This.

    Previous teams have taken the risk. Chelsea can take the risk because they're loaded and if they are in a bad way Roman will just spunk up the cash so they can buy another striker. We aren't in that position.

    Chelseas business model has changed over the last few years, but thats besides the point.

    £10m couldn't be "risked" on Remy.........but £20m could be on Markovic, 16 on Balotelli etc

    Doesn't really add up, considering the outlay over the summer, a 10 million figure for Remy doesn't seem like a big risk at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,272 ✭✭✭✭klose


    kryogen wrote: »
    Chelseas business model has changed over the last few years, but thats besides the point.

    £10m couldn't be "risked" on Remy.........but £20m could be on Markovic, 16 on Balotelli etc

    Doesn't really add up, considering the outlay over the summer, a 10 million figure for Remy doesn't seem like a big risk at all.


    The main reason ive seen, and obviously there could be a few feasons, is that something was up with his heart and he has failed medicals before. Now obviously the lad is quite happy to play on despite this apparent problem but i imagine after what happened with the club and doni 2 years ago put them off taking the risk. Doni had cardiac arrest in a pre season medical by all accounts. Once bitten, twice shy.

    Doni is alive and well btw but had to retire after.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    kryogen wrote: »
    Chelseas business model has changed over the last few years, but thats besides the point.

    £10m couldn't be "risked" on Remy.........but £20m could be on Markovic, 16 on Balotelli etc

    Doesn't really add up, considering the outlay over the summer, a 10 million figure for Remy doesn't seem like a big risk at all.


    Markovic and Baloteeli haven't failed medicals so not sure how you say it doesn't add up. :confused:


  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    T-K-O wrote: »
    Potentially, we could have that player in a few weeks.

    From the games I have seen, Utd / Arsenal are struggling and this is backed up by friends who are fans of those clubs.

    IF we can sort ourselves out CL is very much a possibility.

    The scope for Arsenal and United to sort themselves out is far more than that of Liverpool. Hamming on about Sturridge all season when Falcao, Rafael, Shaw and now Di Maria spending time on the sidelines amongst many squad players for United and Ozil, Koscielny, Giroud, Walcott and Debuchy missing for Arsenal amongst others is a bit clutching at straws. Arsenal have now sorted out their defense purely from getting Koscielny back and I hate to think how their attack could flourish with Ozil back in the fold feeding Sanchez. United's attack is getting a bit better and the defence has been solid for over a month now. Sturridge could make a big difference but enough to counteract the improvement of these 2 teams? I don't think so. Then there's still Southampton who could easily turn over United at home on Monday.

    It is all to play for but I think Liverpool have both played the worst by far out of all these teams and have the least scope for improvement as the personnel currently stands.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,872 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    Augeo wrote: »
    Apologies, negligable I'd imagine, there are two banks of May, June & July in the period to the start of the 2015/2016 season, you'd like to think those two 3 month windows over a planned 20 month project would be the periods where the current capacity would be effected.

    No reduction in capacity at any stage is planned during construction.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,428 ✭✭✭Lord Trollington


    Wildred Bony.

    Discuss


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Markovic and Baloteeli haven't failed medicals so not sure how you say it doesn't add up. :confused:

    Yeah weird comparison.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,983 ✭✭✭✭NukaCola


    Wildred Bony.

    Discuss

    Wilfrieds lesser known younger brother, not the finished product but has great potential.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,428 ✭✭✭Lord Trollington


    NukaCola wrote: »
    Wilfrieds lesser known younger brother, not the finished product but has great potential.

    What mother would call their sons the same name only adding and I .

    I bet her favorite is Wilfred without the i


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,983 ✭✭✭✭NukaCola


    Bony scores goals. Whats not to like?

    To be perfectly honest when we were linked to him I had some foolish hope that we were in for a top quality striker and I was turning up my nose to the link. Never thought he would fit into our great system BR had once upon a time.

    He'd be an instant upgrade in terms of productivity and output on what we have.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,162 ✭✭✭Augmerson


    kryogen wrote: »
    Chelseas business model has changed over the last few years, but thats besides the point.

    £10m couldn't be "risked" on Remy.........but £20m could be on Markovic, 16 on Balotelli etc

    Doesn't really add up, considering the outlay over the summer, a 10 million figure for Remy doesn't seem like a big risk at all.

    Remy failed a medical.
    Markovic and Balotelli passed their medicals.

    It add's up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,983 ✭✭✭✭NukaCola


    What mother would call their sons the same name only adding and I .

    I bet her favorite is Wilfred without the i

    Her favourite is Wilifred his little sister :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,296 ✭✭✭shamrock55


    The best way for us to get cl for nxt year is to get knocked out of it against basel , and win the uefa cup..... sorted!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,983 ✭✭✭✭NukaCola


    Augmerson wrote: »
    Remy failed a medical.
    Markovic and Balotelli passed their medicals.

    It add's up.

    But Remy passed his medical at Chelsea. Whatever risk he had was deemed not serious enough to stop that transfer. Someone said thats a risk Chelsea can take but we couldn't.

    So the poster is saying the risk of buying Remy failing a medical is less than a risk of signing Balottelli/Markovic.

    Personally I would like to think its more of a money issue and is not quite so simple. Liverpool found an issue with the players heart (allegedly) and after getting a second opinion did not think he could play for Liverpool with that condition.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,983 ✭✭✭✭NukaCola


    shamrock55 wrote: »
    The best way for us to get cl for nxt year is to get knocked out of it against basel , and win the uefa cup..... sorted!!

    Nah, lets just win the CL instead. Sorted! :P


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement