Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2014 - Mod Warning in OP, 10/12

12728303233333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino


    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/luis-suarez-overachieved-liverpool-fc-8061755

    “I went to the meeting with Ajax and came out and called the owner in America and said, ‘I’ve got this deal, it’s more than we expected,’ and he said, ‘OK, but it’s coming out of your budget next summer.’


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,646 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Magnificent?! :rolleyes:

    To be fair, they did a lot better than the "full" team at Anfield....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,241 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Magnificent?! :rolleyes:

    Wonderful contribution as usual :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    Vicxas wrote: »
    To be fair, they did a lot better than the "full" team at Anfield....

    But nowhere near magnificent. Slightly above average against a Real team in first gear.

    The mentality of the team is all wrong this season & it's a large part to do with nonsense like praising that performance as magnificent tbh


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm still to hear a decent argument why the guys dropped would have put in a better shift the other night. Guys that on the whole have been poor this season


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino


    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/live-liverpool-fc-news-views-8058818

    Divock Origi will get his first taste of the City of Liverpool this evening as Lille take on Everton and boss Brendan Rodgers has been keeping tabs on his progress.

    "We're in regular contact with the kid, he's a wonderful talent," Rodgers said.

    "I get all of his games downloaded from our recruitment team. We're in contact, which is great, and we're helping him with his game.

    "He's a big talent for someone so young and we're looking at aspects of his game.

    "When he plays in France, we get a download of the game here, analyse that and then feedback to him on areas he can improve in the game and what he's doing very, very well, so when he comes into here next summer he's prepared and we know the areas of his game that are his strengths.

    "Hopefully in this time, he can improve in other areas."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    I'm still to hear a decent argument why the guys dropped would have put in a better shift the other night. Guys that on the whole have been poor this season

    You havent heard one as there isnt one. They went out, played fairly well and tried their b*llox off. Enough said.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,475 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    gafferino wrote: »
    You havent heard one as there isnt one. They went out, played fairly well and tried their b*llox off. Enough said.

    You'll hear stuff like, "Tried, is it? Because that's the standard? We still lost :mad:"

    Despite the fact we were losing before hand, regardless, with players not putting in seemingly near as much effort.

    Lets see what the lineup and performance is like for Chelsea. We were in for a guaranteed loss without a shake up, I feel. Who knows now. I'm hoping its the kick that the players needed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    Just to clarify, I've no issue with the team Rodgers picked. My issue is pretending that we were great out in Madrid. We weren't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,161 ✭✭✭tok9


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    But nowhere near magnificent. Slightly above average against a Real team in first gear.

    The mentality of the team is all wrong this season & it's a large part to do with nonsense like praising that performance as magnificent tbh

    "Slightly above average" doesn't quite have the same ring to it.

    You need to stop believing everything you read. This is some pretty standard PR.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,646 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    I'm still to hear a decent argument why the guys dropped would have put in a better shift the other night. Guys that on the whole have been poor this season

    There isnt, the team that played Newcastle looked like the couldnt be arsed, the guys who played RM looked like the Liverpool of last year, fast paced and willing to run with the ball.

    Something we've been lacking a lot this season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,799 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    D'Agger wrote: »
    I see your point Alan, I particularly liked the part where you expanded on your solid introduction of repeating one word Rodgers said in a media interview, with a rolleyes

    I finally feel like I get you y'know?

    Jaysus, so you're not allowed to communicate a point snappily if it is critical about Rodgers or a player or the club? Harrumph. It's like you need to couch a negative in five paragraphs of mealy mouthed positivity to keep people happy. Bonus: :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,475 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Just to clarify, I've no issue with the team Rodgers picked. My issue is pretending that we were great out in Madrid. We weren't.

    It was better than the crap we had been producing before. Great, no. But everyone was expecting a hammering. Sure, that should never be a position Liverpool are in, but its reality.

    How we progress from this is what matters. The Madrid game has given cause for some optimism in that the manager and the players can do just this.

    You seem to be completely disregarding this in order to maintain your stance that we weren't great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,799 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    ****ing hell. The side he picked put in a credible performance, and one that was much improved from the previous Saturday. "Magnificent" is absolutely a bull**** and wrong word to describe it however. Echoes of "famous" victories in Turkey tbh...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Echoes of "famous" victories in Turkey tbh...

    This is exactly what came to mind for me too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭gafferino


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    ****ing hell. The side he picked put in a credible performance, and one that was much improved from the previous Saturday. "Magnificent" is absolutely a bull**** and wrong word to describe it however. Echoes of "famous" victories in Turkey tbh...
    Mr Alan wrote: »
    This is exactly what came to mind for me too

    There isnt a manager in any sport anywhere in the world who doesnt big up his teams performance or players at times.

    Dalglish, Benitez.... they all did it and sometimes its needed regardless. Rodgers has been critical of the team too in recent weeks. Its not all sunshine and rainbows but talking up a performance is standard.

    Rodgers has never gone anywhere near that Hodgson quote. He has always talked about 'big club', 'expectation to win' etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Its a black and white world for some here, you need to look past the headlines, read between the lines and ignore manager speak


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Jaysus, so you're not allowed to communicate a point snappily if it is critical about Rodgers or a player or the club? Harrumph. It's like you need to couch a negative in five paragraphs of mealy mouthed positivity to keep people happy. Bonus: :rolleyes:
    Exactly :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Just to clarify, I've no issue with the team Rodgers picked. My issue is pretending that we were great out in Madrid. We weren't.

    I thought the team he picked was grand, apart from Markovic. Would have definitely opted for Sterling instead. It was obvious looking at the team sheet that Liverpool were largely going to try and contain and have very few chances to score. Sterling would have offered more of a threat on the counter, increased the chances of producing a moment of magic and generally would have tracked back better than Markovic. Probably wouldn't have made a difference, but would have increased your chances for sure.

    I agree that the performance wasn't magnificent, it was decent/above average. Real were very comfortable throughout and probably score 3 goals in that game on another night with the chances they created.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭5live


    :rolleyes:




















    Just thought i wouldn't like to be left out of the whole 'roll eyes' infestation today:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    I love the fact that because the result didn't live up to peoples expectations they are taking comfort in the 'on another night Madrid would have won by X amount' line.

    On another night the ref wouldn't have been fooled by Ramos' dive and Borini equalised.

    We got a draw, fantastic performance.

    Edit: Magnificent even.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,241 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    There is a couple of posters that will jump on anything Rodgers says. Its media talk its for printing headlines, that is all, that plonk Mourinho does exactly the same thing.

    Im sure what he says behind closed doors is a lot different.

    Comparing his comments to Hodgson lol give over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    Suarez on Flanagan (Who has been a big loss & forgotten about a bit)

    B1xI85DIIAAJklr.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,356 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    I am not sure Flanagan will be pleased or annoyed with that!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    Does he wish him well?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,241 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I am not sure Flanagan will be pleased or annoyed with that!

    That is high praise there probably isn't many young players he singles out in his book. I agree with him I have always seen the comparison too. Only 21 too plenty of time to be as good as Jamie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,567 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    If Flanno came back with a bit more attacking flair and decent crossing ability, he could easily reach the level of Coleman and Zabaleta.

    When Suarez says you're good, you are feckin good!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,836 ✭✭✭Sir Gallagher


    I am not sure Flanagan will be pleased or annoyed with that!

    Why wouldnt he be pleased, i'd be fairly certain Jon Flannagan isnt swanning around thinking he's Maradonna.

    It's just a shame more younger players dont recognise that technical ability isnt the be all and end all of making it. We've seen a fair few 'next best things' over the past few years coming up through the ranks who have not amounted to much, maybe if they had the work ethic and drive of Flannagan they could have made it at the club.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,475 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    I am not sure Flanagan will be pleased or annoyed with that!

    I really don't see Flanno on the training pitch, doing a Ronaldinho. I'd be fairly certain he's aware of his limitations. That's probably one of his main strengths.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,265 ✭✭✭benny79


    when is he back?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement