Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread - See Mod Warning in OP, 09/11

12627293132333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,265 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    irishfeen wrote: »

    Who's the four?

    Jones, Valencia, McNair, Lingard ?????


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 42,996 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lord TSC


    TheDoc wrote: »
    He has a lot of ready made excuses to be fair to him he's kept quiet and gone about his business. A lot of managers would be in the papers every week making excuses etc. Moyes has been pretty amicable in what was IMO a pretty rubbish way we went about sacking him...

    He's had to be quiet and patient imo. He was toxic when he lost the United job, a job which had been widely advertised as a "job for life, we don't sack our managers". Had he come out mouthing about what happened, if he'd been in the papers like that not being amicable, he'd have made himself even more undesirable.

    By staying quite, he maintained the status of being "a nice guy" and not brought more criticism of his ability (via retorts, etc) on top of himself. By staying out of the limelight, he's not had the pundits further examining his abilities, which means he'll get a bigger job easier.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Now let's be honest about Moyes - yes there were definitely holes in the squad, but at the same time he did have Vidic and Ferdinand at CB on top of Evans, so was not exactly in dire straits there. Up front he could not complain with RVP, Rooney, Hernandez and Welbeck. LB with Evra well past it, the wide spots, and CM he was in a bad spot with... but in the same breath, many reports said he went with Fellaini over Herrera in the end because he had seen more of Fellaini. That was one of the worst signings the club has made in a long, long, long time and was entirely down to him - Herrera would not have made all the difference but is obviously a massive upgrade. At LB, we could have had Coentrao who Madrid were basically trying to throw at us on loan, but again missed out because of Moyes blind insistence on chasing Leighton Baines which also led to Fellaini costing us more (and who also would not have been good enough for a top team, in my estimation).

    On the pitch, he had some major flaws also. Even though our midfield was weak, he had no idea (or at least no interest) when it came to using our best player there in Carrick correctly, who had been the best DM in the league the year prior. He got a guy who was never a great athlete but was as good as anyone in the league positionally at CM, and tried to get him to turn into a workhorse along with whoever partnered him. He then made this worse by insisting upon a deep defensive line and out forwards/wingers typically staying quite high up the pitch.

    And yes, he was left with poor wide players in Young/Valencia as well as the eternal question mark that is/was Nani (and I will fully credit him with getting Januzaj going)... but he did nothing to combat this. He just insisted on "get wide and cross" over and over and over and over. Even when we got a top end #10 in Mata he still persisted for a long time in playing like this, trying to turn him into a winger which he was never going to work as in that system. Of course the height of this (and the real tipping point for a lot of United fan I know) was bragging about breaking the league record for crosses in a home game with Fulham, when it wasn't having much effect at all (one of their CBs commented how it played right into their hands since he had played in the Conference for a good while, if I recall) and would up in a 2-2 draw at home to the bottom club in the league.

    And that was the real issue with Moyes... he had no idea what to do when we took a lead. Some tried to label it as "just unlucky" but the fact is whenever we went up a goal you could guarantee that we would just throw 8 men behind the ball and desperately try to cling on for dear life rather than doing what we always did, which was keeping to what had got us ahead and looking to expand our lead. It didn't matter who we were playing against, top 4 quality side, midtable team, relegation fodder... once we had a lead with 20-25 minutes left his game plan was similar to what a newly promoted team would do against the league champions. Even though we held on (just barely, and in large part thanks to DDG if I recall) the Olympiakos game was the height of this, and again was a tipping point for many.

    Don't get me wrong, he seems a very decent fella, I wish him the best moving forward and he has proven to be a good manager in the mid table type of range - Newcastle for example may do well to pick him up if Pardew gets the sack. Bit that is about his ceiling, he proved to be completely out of his depth on a number of levels and simply just not up to the task.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,889 ✭✭✭✭The Moldy Gowl


    You have a few sensationalist things there Billy.


    Nonetheless, Moyes, Schmoyes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,265 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    Trilla wrote: »
    Who's the four?

    Jones, Valencia, McNair, Lingard ?????

    Fumpy bumpy!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,547 ✭✭✭Your Airbag


    Guys I've been traveling through Eastern Europe this past week with another to go and haven't got a sniff of news. Its hard to get a good wifi connection in a Sarajevo hostel :D

    I'd appreciate it if someone filled me in on any important news I may have missed.


  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If Herrera is still out play both Blind and Carrick imo. Just not Carrick and Fellaini again please. I don't know my internal anger could handle it :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,241 ✭✭✭Vic Vinegar


    Guys I've been traveling through Eastern Europe this past week with another to go and haven't got a sniff of news. Its hard to get a good wifi connection in a Sarajevo hostel :D

    I'd appreciate it if someone filled me in on any important news I may have missed.

    Not much happening man, it's a little quiet due to the International break.

    Injuries are easing though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,210 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    TheDoc wrote: »
    He went into the club and the initial delusion was he was provided a top team that would be competitive for years.

    This simply isn't true.

    I weep to remember the millions of words written lamenting the state of our team and especially our midfield in the summer of Moyes arrival.


  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Moyes biggest failing was his misuse of Kagawa early in the season, especially when Rooney and RVP were injured. Could have made all the difference in those games where the team looked panicked and unable to hold possession in the middle.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    irishfeen wrote: »

    Always a relief to see players coming back from Internationals unscathed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,857 ✭✭✭Valmont


    I just watched Class of '92 there for the first time and really enjoyed it. I was only 11 when they won Champions League but listening to them relive the memories brought me back to that night when I sat sullenly on the couch for 90 minutes before climbing all over the furniture screaming for another 10 minutes afterwards. Let's hope good times are coming again soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭beno619


    TheDoc wrote:
    If anything has come out of the star of LVG reign is that probably Moyes has been a little vindicated and rightly so.


    What a load of hogwash, LVG has been repairing the damage caused by Moyes. The squad LVG took over vs the squad Moyes took over are incomparable in terms of quality and morale.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Kerrydude1981




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour



    Glad to have him back.

    Been very impressed with what I have seen of him so far.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Kerrydude1981


    Glad to have him back.

    Been very impressed with what I have seen of him so far.

    Is it worth risking him though if he has to wear a protective corset?

    Surely will start on the game on the bench,keep him wrapped up for the Chelsea game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Is it worth risking him though if he has to wear a protective corset?

    Surely will start on the game on the bench,keep him wrapped up for the Chelsea game.

    You're probably right.

    its good to see these injuries been eased especially with the games coming up.

    No injuries from International week is minor miracle in itself.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,060 ✭✭✭✭adox


    beno619 wrote: »
    What a load of hogwash, LVG has been repairing the damage caused by Moyes. The squad LVG took over vs the squad Moyes took over are incomparable in terms of quality and morale.

    Nail on the head.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    beno619 wrote: »
    What a load of hogwash, LVG has been repairing the damage caused by Moyes. The squad LVG took over vs the squad Moyes took over are incomparable in terms of quality and morale.

    Sure that's it... the incomparability of the squads surely vindicates him somewhat, he took over a squad who had done it all and had just been cut loose from the Ferguson era having achieved that one final high, they quite obviously went on holiday and plenty comments since from inside have backed that up. They didn't respect him, and why would they they'd been working with one of the greatest of all time.
    He had an impossible task in hindsight.
    It was mentioned above that he had Rio and Vidic and that was a positive, if anything he would have had a better chance of succeeding without such players who were so influential yet were disinterested themselves. A clear out a year earlier would have served him better and given him a chance.

    Quality wise LVG has a practically brand new squad of superstars with no ties to the Fergie era after the biggest transfer splurge ever so I'd say its pretty different alright.

    Moyes focked up, no doubt, but he was on a hiding to nothing almost every which way he looked. He will be an excellent manager somewhere and I'd say it'll be at a level a lot higher than the 'mid table' which many are throwing about willy nilly.

    The whole thing is looked at in a far too simplistic level in my opinion...82 crosses vs fulham....finished 7th with the champions...well he must be sh!t so...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    No shame in not being good enough for United.

    Does not make Moyes poor manager.

    Moyes needed to bring a bit of arrogance with him, but sadly and understandably he didnt.

    Wherever he goes I wish him well, but we got the right man in charge at the right time now. IMO of course :)

    EVENFLOW



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,209 ✭✭✭KH25


    No shame in not being good enough for United.

    Does not make Moyes poor manager.

    Moyes needed to bring a bit of arrogance with him, but sadly and understandably he didnt.

    Wherever he goes I wish him well, but we got the right man in charge at the right time now. IMO of course :)

    I agree. Moyes was not good enough for the job but that's ok. Not many are good enough for the top jobs. He did very well with Everton and I think he'll do well wherever he goes next.

    Also, despite the way he was sacked he has never spoken I'll of the club or the fans. I have tremendous respect for him for doing that and I wish him the best in future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,575 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Newcastle would be a good fit for Moyes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,382 ✭✭✭✭greendom


    beno619 wrote: »
    What a load of hogwash, LVG has been repairing the damage caused by Moyes. The squad LVG took over vs the squad Moyes took over are incomparable in terms of quality and morale.

    in terms of spend too


  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Too many people showing LVG a lot of blind loyalty so far. I'll remain sceptical until he achieves something with the far better squad he has than Moyes did which is worse than the one Moyes would have right now if he stayed imo. Still, ifs and buts and we'll never know I guess...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    ericzeking wrote: »
    Sure that's it... the incomparability of the squads surely vindicates him somewhat, he took over a squad who had done it all and had just been cut loose from the Ferguson era having achieved that one final high, they quite obviously went on holiday and plenty comments since from inside have backed that up. They didn't respect him, and why would they they'd been working with one of the greatest of all time.
    He had an impossible task in hindsight.
    It was mentioned above that he had Rio and Vidic and that was a positive, if anything he would have had a better chance of succeeding without such players who were so influential yet were disinterested themselves. A clear out a year earlier would have served him better and given him a chance.

    Quality wise LVG has a practically brand new squad of superstars with no ties to the Fergie era after the biggest transfer splurge ever so I'd say its pretty different alright.

    Moyes focked up, no doubt, but he was on a hiding to nothing almost every which way he looked. He will be an excellent manager somewhere and I'd say it'll be at a level a lot higher than the 'mid table' which many are throwing about willy nilly.

    The whole thing is looked at in a far too simplistic level in my opinion...82 crosses vs fulham....finished 7th with the champions...well he must be sh!t so...
    Moyes didn't have the players respect because he was not up to the job and it showed right from the outset. For one when he got rid of most of Ferguson's proven backroom staff and replaced them with his own he was taking a gamble, and that gamble proven to be a failure when he took older players and drove them into the ground during training sessions for... Well God only knows why. His training methods were draconian and amateurish by pretty much all accounts, which is why Ferdinand went from having a quality season they year before, and a good first month or two under Moyes, to falling off the face of a cliff through mismanagement. Vidic would have been extremely useful for us to have held onto for another year or two, but even he has said that Moyes was the reason he left.

    Also, LVG got a squad without three of out most experienced defenders who had formed perhaps the best backline in the clubs history and all left at once - that's a major challenge that Moyes didn't have to deal with. He did get Di Maria and Falcao in for us... but this "brand new squad of superstars" talk ends there. Moyes could have had Herrera but opted for Fellaini so he has no complaints to make with that one. Blind and Rojo are looking decent enough but to try and label either as a superstar is kind of laughable at this point (Vidic and Carrick both have string arguments to be superior, neither of which LVG has had yet) and Shaw is a long term project with a lot of development to be done still.

    As for the crosses against Fulham and finish in the league there were far more issues than that and I think/hope you know that. If he wants to be a manager at a top club in the modern era he will have to update a lot of his methods.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,902 ✭✭✭MagicIRL


    Liam O wrote: »
    Too many people showing LVG a lot of blind loyalty so far. I'll remain sceptical until he achieves something with the far better squad he has than Moyes did which is worse than the one Moyes would have right now if he stayed imo. Still, ifs and buts and we'll never know I guess...

    People are showing blind loyalty because LvG has the history to back it up. Moyes didn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,857 ✭✭✭Valmont


    I am glad for Moyes that Everton's honeymoon period with Martinez is over though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,292 ✭✭✭Adamocovic


    Liam O wrote: »
    Too many people showing LVG a lot of blind loyalty so far. I'll remain sceptical until he achieves something with the far better squad he has than Moyes did which is worse than the one Moyes would have right now if he stayed imo. Still, ifs and buts and we'll never know I guess...

    Are we really still talking about showing LVG blind loyalty? Obviously people have more faith in a manger that has managed and won trophies with the big clubs, and so far he has impressed quite a few people, I wouldn't call it "blind" loyalty. Yes this rebuild will take time but so far the direction seems to be a good one.

    I liked Moyes but there was no doubt that he didn't have any experience managing a club the size of United, this would be the main reason I imagine most would have more faith in LVG than when Moyes was in charge. In time he might have done well but in football these days you don't get time unless you hit the ground running, and well never know.

    And the whole idea of Moyes having a better team now if he had of stayed seems like a silly statement. We have had our biggest transfer window, bringing in huge names and great talent, I don't see the point speculating how the window would have gone with a different manager, theres no possible way of even guessing how it would have went.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Moyes didn't have the players respect because he was not up to the job and it showed right from the outset. For one when he got rid of most of Ferguson's proven backroom staff and replaced them with his own he was taking a gamble, and that gamble proven to be a failure when he took older players and drove them into the ground during training sessions for... Well God only knows why. His training methods were draconian and amateurish by pretty much all accounts, which is why Ferdinand went from having a quality season they year before, and a good first month or two under Moyes, to falling off the face of a cliff through mismanagement. Vidic would have been extremely useful for us to have held onto for another year or two, but even he has said that Moyes was the reason he left.

    Also, LVG got a squad without three of out most experienced defenders who had formed perhaps the best backline in the clubs history and all left at once - that's a major challenge that Moyes didn't have to deal with. He did get Di Maria and Falcao in for us... but this "brand new squad of superstars" talk ends there. Moyes could have had Herrera but opted for Fellaini so he has no complaints to make with that one. Blind and Rojo are looking decent enough but to try and label either as a superstar is kind of laughable at this point (Vidic and Carrick both have string arguments to be superior, neither of which LVG has had yet) and Shaw is a long term project with a lot of development to be done still.

    As for the crosses against Fulham and finish in the league there were far more issues than that and I think/hope you know that. If he wants to be a manager at a top club in the modern era he will have to update a lot of his methods.

    You draw a lot of your own conclusions and present them as facts.

    It was in your post that I read the bit about Rio and Vidic being positive for Moyes. I addressed it I'm my post, you didn't need to repeat yourself.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Adamocovic wrote: »
    Are we really still talking about showing LVG blind loyalty? Obviously people have more faith in a manger that has managed and won trophies with the big clubs, and so far he has impressed quite a few people, I wouldn't call it "blind" loyalty. Yes this rebuild will take time but so far the direction seems to be a good one.

    I liked Moyes but there was no doubt that he didn't have any experience managing a club the size of United, this would be the main reason I imagine most would have more faith in LVG than when Moyes was in charge. In time he might have done well but in football these days you don't get time unless you hit the ground running, and well never know.

    And the whole idea of Moyes having a better team now if he had of stayed seems like a silly statement. We have had our biggest transfer window, bringing in huge names and great talent, I don't see the point speculating how the window would have gone with a different manager, theres no possible way of even guessing how it would have went.

    Biggest transfer window and still a sub-standard defense bar left back and midfield cover. Kroos, Fabregas, Benatia and others were all heavily linked, Falcao may have happened anyway if RVP got shipped out.

    In 3 years Falcao will be in his 30s, Di Maria will be close. When City were rising they got 22-24 year olds like Kompany, Silva and Aguero to build around, LVG seems to be thinking short term in terms of attack but long term in defense and right now that is causing the chasm in performances. Does LVG care about the club in 5-10 years? Unlikely tbh, he's only there for 3 at the moment anyway. That's why I'm sceptical.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement