Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Fluoride update re IQ

1246718

Comments

  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you got your wish , how would you expect the government to justify the change in policy and what would the implications be for other fluoride containing products/foodstuffs?


  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    Where did I state that ?

    And please stop the anwser a question with a question approach
    So then you agree with him when he claims that there is scientific evidence that fluoridation is dangerous then?
    If not, then you believe his is presenting falsehoods to manipulate the public into banning fluoride.

    I believe that this is a very underhanded, bad and potentially dangerous think for a politician to do, and I think it's incredibly ironic that you are applauding him for it.

    You don't believe that tea is dangerous even though it's got a much higher dose.
    It doesn't make sense that you would believe water is more dangerous with a lower dose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    So then you agree with him when he claims that there is scientific evidence that fluoridation is dangerous then?
    If not, then you believe his is presenting falsehoods to manipulate the public into banning fluoride.

    I believe that this is a very underhanded, bad and potentially dangerous think for a politician to do, and I think it's incredibly ironic that you are applauding him for it.

    You don't believe that tea is dangerous even though it's got a much higher dose.
    It doesn't make sense that you would believe water is more dangerous with a lower dose.

    That is a No then to my question to show where I stated several times that I do not agree that it is dangerous.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    Tea

    Studies of humans, animals, and petri-dish experiments show that tea is high beneficial to our health. Research suggests that regular tea drinkers -- people who drink two cups or more a day -- have less heart disease and stroke, lower total and LDL cholesterol, and recover from heart attacks faster. There's also evidence that tea may help fight ovarian and breast cancers.

    http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/health-benefits-tea

    Studies of humans and animals show that the antioxidants in black and green teas are highly beneficial to our health, says 82-year-old John Weisburger, PhD, senior researcher at the Institute for Cancer Prevention in Valhalla, N.Y.

    "I've published more than 500 papers, including a hell of a lot on tea," says Weisburger, who drinks 10 cups daily. "I was the first American researcher to show that tea modifies the metabolism to detoxify harmful chemicals."

    http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/antioxidants-in-green-and-black-tea

    Perhaps nature finds its own balance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    No , because there is no evidence for adverse effects in any country with less than 1ppm flouride in their water. The first sign of getting close to an unsafe level would be fluorosis . Mild cosmetic only fluorosis indicates that we don't exceed the safe dose.

    And at what levels does that start to occur ?

    How much ppm could ones daily intake go up to according to you ?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    That is a No then to my question to show where I stated several times that I do not agree that it is dangerous.

    You have said that there isn't any evidence of toxicity at sub 1ppm levels but that the safe level is getting lower over time. Would that be a fair assesment of where you stand


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    enno99 wrote: »
    Tea

    Studies of humans, animals, and petri-dish experiments show that tea is high beneficial to our health. Research suggests that regular tea drinkers -- people who drink two cups or more a day -- have less heart disease and stroke, lower total and LDL cholesterol, and recover from heart attacks faster. There's also evidence that tea may help fight ovarian and breast cancers.

    http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/health-benefits-tea

    Studies of humans and animals show that the antioxidants in black and green teas are highly beneficial to our health, says 82-year-old John Weisburger, PhD, senior researcher at the Institute for Cancer Prevention in Valhalla, N.Y.

    "I've published more than 500 papers, including a hell of a lot on tea," says Weisburger, who drinks 10 cups daily. "I was the first American researcher to show that tea modifies the metabolism to detoxify harmful chemicals."

    http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/antioxidants-in-green-and-black-tea

    Perhaps nature finds its own balance

    I think there was a study done on cheap brands of Tea having high levels of fluoride in it (I posted them in the other closed thread)

    I think different blends of Tea can be very beneficial


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    And at what levels does that start to occur ?

    How much ppm could ones daily intake go up to according to you ?

    According to the forum for fluoridation that figure is between 1.2 and 2ppm a litre for cosmetic fluorosis..

    So that would be approximately double what we have now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    If you got your wish , how would you expect the government to justify the change in policy and what would the implications be for other fluoride containing products/foodstuffs?

    Government is worried about legal/claim implications, that's why its maintaining the status quo

    You do realize concerning the other foodstuff that a consumer actually has a simple choice not to consume it


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    I think there was a study done on cheap brands of Tea having high levels of fluoride in it (I posted them in the other closed thread)

    I think different blends of Tea can be very beneficial

    All brands listed by Waugh contained between 1.7 and 3ppm a litre fluoride.

    So do you believe tea has a safe level of fluoride?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    According to the forum for fluoridation that figure is between 1.2 and 2ppm a litre for cosmetic fluorosis..

    So that would be approximately double what we have now.

    What is your estimate in how much fluoride (ppm) is someone exposed to on a daily basis (taking in effect all we eat and drink) and coal burning as well ?


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    Government is worried about legal/claim implications, that's why its maintaining the status quo

    You do realize concerning the other foodstuff that a consumer actually has a simple choice not to consume it

    The government is following best practice based on the evidence available.

    But they have to be safe for the consumer too or restricted to ensure safe use.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    All brands listed by Waugh contained between 1.7 and 3ppm a litre fluoride.

    So do you believe tea has a safe level of fluoride?

    Since when are you happy quoting Waugh to make your point ??

    And what Tea's did he investigate ?


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    Since when are you happy quoting Waugh to make your point ??

    And what Tea's did he investigate ?

    All major brands from the supermarket.

    Why won't you answer the question on whether you believe tea to be toxic?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    The government is following best practice based on the evidence available.

    But they have to be safe for the consumer too or restricted to ensure safe use.

    It is urgent that governmental and international agencies adopt safe standards of fluoride content in tea commodities." (Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 2008).

    What did the Government do about this ?

    Specially taking in effect the Irish are a Tea drinking nation

    the-world-s-biggest-tea-drinkers-average-annual-tea-consumption_chartbuilder-1.png?w=1024&h=2155


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    What did the Government do about this ?

    Specially taking in effect the Irish are a Tea drinking nation

    Could you just answer the question first, is tea more toxic than Irish tap water?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    All major brands from the supermarket.

    Why won't you answer the question on whether you believe tea to be toxic?

    Black tea so

    What about green and White tea?

    I already stated (other thread) I was concerned about these levels and it should be put on the packaging


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 266 ✭✭kilkenny12


    Fluorine, chlorine and bromine knock the iodine out of our bodies. Iodine is essential for thyroid function and IQ, as well as every other organ in the body. We all need to supplement iodine because of exposure to the first three halogens I mentioned.

    Expect more mental clarity when you begin supping iodine :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    Could you just answer the question first, is tea more toxic than Irish tap water?

    Potentially yes (depending on what tea)

    And made with fluoridated water is a double whammy


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    Black tea so

    What about green and White tea?

    I already stated (other thread) I was concerned about these levels and it should be put on the packaging

    But given the levels are multiples that of water only a label is required? The equivalent of 3ppm fluoridated irish water just needs a warning label?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    Potentially yes (depending on what tea)

    And made with fluoridated water is a double whammy

    Most tea in ireland is black tea.

    Did read on the Daily Mail that increased green tea consumption in China correlates with better bone health and this may be due to fluoride.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    But given the levels are multiples that of water only a label is required? The equivalent of 3ppm fluoridated irish water just needs a warning label?

    So What is your estimate in how much fluoride (ppm) is an Irish person exposed to on a daily basis (taking in effect all we eat and drink) and coal burning as well ?
    It is urgent that governmental and international agencies adopt safe standards of fluoride content in tea commodities." (Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 2008).

    What did the Government do about this ? specialy with the Irish among the top (black) tea drinkers in the world


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    So What is your estimate in how much fluoride (ppm) is an Irish person exposed to on a daily basis (taking in effect all we eat and drink) and coal burning as well ?



    What did the Government do about this ? specialy with the Irish among the top (black) tea drinkers in the world

    Because we know that the first sign of fluoride over exposure is fluorosis that is all it is necessary to monitor.

    No fluorosis or cosmetic fluorosis only means the levels of fluoride we consume from tea or any other sources is within safe levels..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    I have dental flourosis. I'm Irish and I drink a lot of black tea.
    According to this conversation i am over exposed toflouride. It's in my drinking water too obviously.
    Should I be taking the health miniister to court? lol


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Torakx wrote: »
    I have dental flourosis. I'm Irish and I drink a lot of black tea.
    According to this conversation i am over exposed toflouride. It's in my drinking water too obviously.
    Should I be taking the health miniister to court? lol

    Cut back on the tea by one cup and that is more fluoride out of your diet than if the government ended water fluoridation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    Because we know that the first sign of fluoride over exposure is fluorosis that is all it is necessary to monitor.

    No fluorosis or cosmetic fluorosis only means the levels of fluoride we consume from tea or any other sources is within safe levels..

    Can you just answer the questions ?


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    weisses wrote: »
    Can you just answer the questions ?

    I did it just doesn't suit your agenda, if fluorosis isn't a major problem then either is water fluoridation.


  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I have no idea what the average intake is , do you? I do know adverse effects are not associated with our intake so who cares.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    I did it just doesn't suit your agenda, if fluorosis isn't a major problem then either is water fluoridation.

    What agenda ??

    I asked what the government did to adopt safe standards of fluoride content in tea commodities ??

    you stated earlier
    The government is following best practice based on the evidence available.

    How do you know they do

    You don't even know what the daily average intake of Irish people is ... but you know its safe .... terrific


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    jh79 wrote: »
    I have no idea what the average intake is , do you? I do know adverse effects are not associated with our intake so who cares.

    so you don't know the average but you do know its safe ....strange approach


Advertisement