Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Asking A Father's Permission

1568101117

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    I certainly hadn't thought to ask the whole family as they were not in that position of authority to give permission for me to marry their sister.

    Just like the father is not in a position of authority to give permission for you to marry his daughter.

    In fact, nobody is in a position of authority to give permission for you to marry her except herself, so asking anyone else for permission is a bit weird.

    And asking anyone else before you ask her is incitement to violence in my book.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,646 ✭✭✭✭qo2cj1dsne8y4k


    Traditional weddings always win out. My dads not alive anymore, so the original post doesn't matter. I don't think my oh would have asked my dads permission anyway. Would it be a big deal? No.

    I always said when I got married I didn't want an engagement ring, or a giant wedding. Ideally, it's an expensive pair of shoes, just me and him and two witnesses and then a really long honeymoon. No big church wedding because honestly I'd be so terrified of stage fright walking down an aisle, in front of hundred plus people. The big giant wedding full of people we barely know. Thousands on a dress ill never wear again. It seems such a waste.

    Neither of my parents are around to interfere in my 'perfect day', but the OHs mom is outrageous for it. Because its her oldest sons wedding, it's almost like its her day too and it's kind of like her way or no way.

    She didn't like my cheap wedding dress because it wasn't wedding dressy enough.
    She was horrified we weren't getting married in a church.
    Completely outraged there was no reception. What would she tell people?!
    And then when were planning the invitations its like people I have never even heard of are important enough to not be excluded.

    There's definitely the pressure there for the traditional wedding.

    So, were doing everything traditional now.

    I have an engagement ring even though I don't wear jewellery.
    My brother will be walking me down the aisle I never planned on walking.
    Well be getting married in a church.
    I'll be wearing a proper wedding dress.
    And there'll be about 150 sitting down at the reception.

    Yay for conformity!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    That may be how it appears from your perspective Shenshen, however I can assure you that's not the case. I never considered it question of ownership, more a question that it's at least only polite to ask. I certainly hadn't thought to ask the whole family as they were not in that position of authority to give permission for me to marry their sister. To me personally, the term 'father in law' actually means just what it says on the tin so to speak.



    Well, I could have done, if I'd actually thought of the question the same way you do, but the fact is that I really don't. I also refer to my sisters in law by their first names, however I still refer to my wife's parents by their proper titles - Mr. <Surname>, Mrs. <Surname>. They told me upon meeting them for the first time that I could refer to them by their first names, but I just couldn't bring myself to do it as I felt it was disrespectful. They didn't particularly care whether I did or I didn't refer to them by their first names, but that the option was available for me to do so. Seventeen years later and I still refer to them by their proper titles, as I'm just not comfortable referring to them by their first names, and we still enjoy a great relationship.

    The bolded bit is what I would take issue with... in my eyes, that authority would either lie excusively with your wife, or else with he entire close family.
    Why pick one family member?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Tarzana wrote: »
    I'll probably have both my folks walk me up. And not taking your husband's name is becoming increasingly common.


    You're after reminding me actually - the double-barrelled surname! It seems even more common (to me at least), than the person retaining their maiden name? Am I wrong? I could be, but it seems particularly prevalent on social media. I've only come across it a handful of times offline, and what seems even more rare, but gaining momentum, is the husband taking their wife's name!

    The only reason I mention it as to imply how strange it is, is moreso to say it's still quite rare, and I thought it was unusual the first time I ever heard of it. It still seems unusual, but now less so than it was initially.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭FactCheck


    I think the thing that gets me a bit is that:

    I totally appreciate that people who like to do this are doing it for positive reasons, they see it as relationship-building, it's about joining families, it's about respecting each other. And all of that is really great - I mean it actually is, this is stuff I do really value in my own life.

    But it's very possible and very easy to keep all of that, and prioritise all of that, without doing the actual asking for permission. Agreeing to get engaged together first, then going to the sets of parents and telling them the good news and asking for their blessing - you are ticking all those boxes! And everybody gets to have a lovely moment together!

    Like I said above, my parents adore my husband. Seeing their faces when we told them we were getting married is one of my happiest memories. I'm very glad I had that. They won't be with me forever.

    And as someone else said above - it isn't even really a tradition! Traditionally the bride still gave the ok first! Why would you want to be more old-fashioned than Mr Darcy?!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭Shakespeare's Sister


    newport2 wrote: »
    I agree. But engagement rings evolved as a level of insurance to the woman, because:

    "If the groom-to-be walked out after he and the bride-to-be had sex, that left her in a precarious position. From a social angle, she had been permanently "damaged." From an economic angle, she had lost her market value."
    (http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/04/the-strange-and-formerly-sexist-economics-of-engagement-rings/255434/)


    Pretty chauvinistic tradition too. No objections to engagement rings though.
    Well I did say that this tradition has lost its chauvinism and is just a well meaning gesture, but it's a silly gesture IMO as I said.
    It also shouldn't be assumed every woman would be dying for an engagement ring. Wouldn't care myself, and I certainly don't agree the man should be the only one paying for it.
    I would say the women who are mad for engagement rings would tend to be the same ones who have no issue with this asking the father tradition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    You're after reminding me actually - the double-barrelled surname! It seems even more common (to me at least), than the person retaining their maiden name? Am I wrong?

    Lots of people keep their maiden name and you might not even notice it, but a double barrelled name jumps out and calls attention to itself.

    My wife didn't change her name for a while, and still uses it at work 20+ years later. But when the kids come along, you get into grief with what you call them: travelling with them when your surname is not theirs can attract a lot of unwelcome attention. So we settled on my surname on all passports.

    Her mother addresses letters to Mrs. [my_initial] [my_surname], which annoys the hell out of her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    Traditional weddings always win out. My dads not alive anymore, so the original post doesn't matter. I don't think my oh would have asked my dads permission anyway. Would it be a big deal? No.

    I always said when I got married I didn't want an engagement ring, or a giant wedding. Ideally, it's an expensive pair of shoes, just me and him and two witnesses and then a really long honeymoon. No big church wedding because honestly I'd be so terrified of stage fright walking down an aisle, in front of hundred plus people. The big giant wedding full of people we barely know. Thousands on a dress ill never wear again. It seems such a waste.

    Neither of my parents are around to interfere in my 'perfect day', but the OHs mom is outrageous for it. Because its her oldest sons wedding, it's almost like its her day too and it's kind of like her way or no way.

    She didn't like my cheap wedding dress because it wasn't wedding dressy enough.
    She was horrified we weren't getting married in a church.
    Completely outraged there was no reception. What would she tell people?!
    And then when were planning the invitations its like people I have never even heard of are important enough to not be excluded.

    There's definitely the pressure there for the traditional wedding.

    So, were doing everything traditional now.

    I have an engagement ring even though I don't wear jewellery.
    My brother will be walking me down the aisle I never planned on walking.
    Well be getting married in a church.
    I'll be wearing a proper wedding dress.
    And there'll be about 150 sitting down at the reception.

    Yay for conformity!

    I can understand why you do it, you can't put a value on peace.

    But I do feel for you. I was lucky enough to have just that wedding - reasonable dress, only closest family and friends (I forced my mother to uninvite people she had invited "on my behalf"), no church, no rings, none of that nonsense.
    I told people the first one to get up to hold a speech would not be drinking for free any more.

    Not everybody's cup of tea I'm sure, but it suited me and my husband down to the ground.


  • Posts: 0 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Nathan Colossal Rumba


    Her mother addresses letters to Mrs. [my_initial] [my_surname], which annoys the hell out of her.

    Being addressed as mrs john smith would send me into a rage!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    How on earth is it in ANY way disrespectful to talk to her parents using their first names? You are all (I assume?) grown adults, on an equal footing?


    Well that's where our perspectives differ - I don't see myself as being on an equal footing with her parents. I'm not their friends, I'm their son in law.

    If anything, I personally would find it quite disrespectful if I found myself in the strange position of having to specifically request someone to talk to me as *first name* and not as Ms *second name*, and yet - despite me specifically requesting it - they refused to do so.


    Thankfully, for me at least, my wife's parents aren't like you, and they understood that as hard as I tried (and I did, and it just came out like I'd portmanteau'd their proper title and their full names, or similar effect), I just wasn't able to do it, and they accepted that and still to this day have never had an issue with it.

    If you ever have a daughter or son who has a partner, are you going to request that the boyfriend/girlfriend calls you Mr Whatever-yer-surname-is at all times? It just seems so odd! :confused:


    I would ensure that my son has made his girlfriend/boyfriend aware of the fact that I prefer to be referred to by my proper title -
    Those neighbors children that call adults by their first names...

    Your parents might be all cool and new agey, but I still believe in respect for your elders, pouncing in here like they own the place with their "Hi Czarcasm!"... :mad:

    That's Mr. Czarcasm to you! :pac:

    Just like the father is not in a position of authority to give permission for you to marry his daughter.


    I would see it differently though, and my wife has never had an issue with that.

    In fact, nobody is in a position of authority to give permission for you to marry her except herself, so asking anyone else for permission is a bit weird.


    It's only weird to you though really because you don't think the same way I, my wife, and her family do. My wife's family had no issue with it either.

    And asking anyone else before you ask her is incitement to violence in my book.


    Perhaps that's where the confusion seems to be arising - my wife and I were living together for seven years before we got married, so it wasn't as if we hadn't had regular discussions around the whole idea of marriage and other matters.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 189 ✭✭Hold the Cheez Whiz


    It's not the end of the world, but the babbling about respect is frustrating to listen to because it's so mindless. Literally a second's thought about why it's considered "respectful" to the bride's father explains why it's disrespectful to her at the same time. And it's not even subtle when you actually have people explicitly talking about the idea of the dad is the gatekeeper of the family.

    This is one of the things that's so common it's easier not to think about, but for people who do, it's not unreasonable to consider it pretty belittling.

    Sitting at the back of the bus didn't do black people any material harm, but we understand why it's not the done thing anymore. Why is it important to play out something this unpleasant when the thinking behind it is such a slight? If it's as meaningless as the guys defending it think, it shouldn't cost anything to ditch it.

    Honestly, I think it is pretty insulting to compare blacks being forced, under threat of violence, to be treated as second-class citizens to the remnants of an anachronistic practice that had no real ramifications in modern memory save perhaps a grumpy father-in-law at Christmas dinner. If a couple talks about it together, and the bride to be is ok with it (or is indifferent, but thinks it matters to her father), then I don't think it is worth all of the pearl-clutching on this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    bluewolf wrote: »
    Being addressed as mrs john smith would send me into a rage!!

    By your own mother!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭FactCheck


    I guess mileage varies, but I would find it very uncomfortable to have someone I liked calling me "Mrs Check" for two decades. I would much prefer to be called what I'd asked to be called.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 189 ✭✭Hold the Cheez Whiz


    How on earth is it in ANY way disrespectful to talk to her parents using their first names? You are all (I assume?) grown adults, on an equal footing?

    If anything, I personally would find it quite disrespectful if I found myself in the strange position of having to specifically request someone to talk to me as *first name* and not as Ms *second name*, and yet - despite me specifically requesting it - they refused to do so.

    If you ever have a daughter or son who has a partner, are you going to request that the boyfriend/girlfriend calls you Mr Whatever-yer-surname-is at all times? It just seems so odd! :confused:

    Because people are raised differently, and sometimes it is hard to let go of relatively harmless lifelong habits? My husband was raised in a part of the US where parents of even close friends were always called "Mr/Mrs so-and-so" and 'sir' and 'ma'am' are terms commonly used to refer to adult strangers. It is just a more formal way of interacting that seems normal to him, and although it seems odd to me and my family, nobody minds it or sees it as disrespectful as it is so ingrained at this point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,269 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    I don't see how there's any respect involved, for anyone, in that scenario.

    Approval, not permission.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,647 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    I'm actually genuinely surprised at how traditional your views in this thread are, Czarcasm, because we've tended to have very similar opinions on a lot of matters in the past (mostly under my old username, in case you're wondering what the hell I'm talking about.
    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Your parents might be all cool and new agey, but I still believe in respect for your elders, pouncing in here like they own the place with their "Hi Czarcasm!"... mad.png

    That's Mr. Czarcasm to you! pacman.gif.

    This bit, in particular, I just can't agree with. People aren't automatically deserving of respect simply as a consequence of being older than you. Respect should be earned, not assumed, imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 560 ✭✭✭Philo Beddoe


    Honestly, I think it is pretty insulting to compare blacks being forced, under threat of violence, to be treated as second-class citizens to the remnants of an anachronistic practice that had no real ramifications in modern memory save perhaps a grumpy father-in-law at Christmas dinner.

    You don't think the history of women is one of being treated as second-class citizens under threat of violence?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,055 ✭✭✭IK09


    Love the way some women are say "if he asked for his permission....id be saying no". So you discard the person you love because they asked your Father for his blessing :pac:

    Fickle enough.

    I asked my Father in Law for his blessing, I did tell him I was going to ask her and asked him how he felt about having me as a Son in Law. We were good friends, he was someone I could always speak honestly to.

    He died between the engagement and the wedding. Its a memory I will always cherish, sitting outside his work on a freezing cold day, drinking cans of coke and smoking cigarettes. Its a memory that only the two of us experienced. I would do it again in the morning.

    By the way. Never heard anyone call it "asking permission" until here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 937 ✭✭✭swimming in a sea


    Traditional weddings always win out. My dads not alive anymore, so the original post doesn't matter. I don't think my oh would have asked my dads permission anyway. Would it be a big deal? No.

    I always said when I got married I didn't want an engagement ring, or a giant wedding. Ideally, it's an expensive pair of shoes, just me and him and two witnesses and then a really long honeymoon. No big church wedding because honestly I'd be so terrified of stage fright walking down an aisle, in front of hundred plus people. The big giant wedding full of people we barely know. Thousands on a dress ill never wear again. It seems such a waste.

    Neither of my parents are around to interfere in my 'perfect day', but the OHs mom is outrageous for it. Because its her oldest sons wedding, it's almost like its her day too and it's kind of like her way or no way.

    She didn't like my cheap wedding dress because it wasn't wedding dressy enough.
    She was horrified we weren't getting married in a church.
    Completely outraged there was no reception. What would she tell people?!
    And then when were planning the invitations its like people I have never even heard of are important enough to not be excluded.

    There's definitely the pressure there for the traditional wedding.

    So, were doing everything traditional now.

    I have an engagement ring even though I don't wear jewellery.
    My brother will be walking me down the aisle I never planned on walking.
    Well be getting married in a church.
    I'll be wearing a proper wedding dress.
    And there'll be about 150 sitting down at the reception.

    Yay for conformity!

    You've set a dangerous precedent, the mother in-law will be the bane of you life if you have kids... go and elope...save yourself


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Dial Hard wrote: »
    I'm actually genuinely surprised at how traditional your views in this thread are, Czarcasm, because we've tended to have very similar opinions on a lot of matters in the past (mostly under my old username, in case you're wondering what the hell I'm talking about.


    You and my wife DH :pac: -
    Czarcasm wrote: »
    I won't lie and say she didn't think it was unusual, but it was only unusual in the respect that she saw it as one of my more conventional views amongst many unconventional ones.

    This bit, in particular, I just can't agree with. People aren't automatically deserving of respect simply as a consequence of being older than you. Respect should be earned, not assumed, imo.


    Ah no, it's not just the fact that they're older than me (I've been in management positions where a good few of my team at the time were older than me and I would call them by their first names). It's more to do with as someone mentioned earlier, the way I was brought up (I was practically raised by my elderly next door neighbour, who incidentally I was able to call her by her first name, though that was from a very early age), but I would never refer to my parents by their first names, and by extension then so to speak, I wouldn't refer to my parents in-law by their first names either. They weren't at all put out by it or thought it was unusual or anything else. My wife refers to her parents as mum and dad and doesn't use their first names either, but as I noted above, it does seem to be becoming more common for people to view themselves as being on an equal footing with their parents in law and those in authority over them. I find it too familiar myself, not really anything to do with tradition tbh... :o


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,647 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    as I noted above, it does seem to be becoming more common for people to view themselves as being on an equal footing with their parents in law and those in authority over them. I find it too familiar myself, not really anything to do with tradition tbh... :o

    But they're just your wife's parents, they're not in a position of authority over you? You're all adults.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Tarzana


    Dial Hard wrote: »
    This bit, in particular, I just can't agree with. People aren't automatically deserving of respect simply as a consequence of being older than you. Respect should be earned, not assumed, imo.

    +1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Tarzana


    IK09 wrote: »
    Love the way some women are say "if he asked for his permission....id be saying no". So you discard the person you love because they asked your Father for his blessing :pac:

    Fickle enough.

    Hardly fickle. It would make me question how well he knew me, because he should know I wouldn't be OK with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    It's not the end of the world, but the babbling about respect is frustrating to listen to because it's so mindless. Literally a second's thought about why it's considered "respectful" to the bride's father explains why it's disrespectful to her at the same time. And it's not even subtle when you actually have people explicitly talking about the idea of the dad is the gatekeeper of the family.

    This is one of the things that's so common it's easier not to think about, but for people who do, it's not unreasonable to consider it pretty belittling.

    Sitting at the back of the bus didn't do black people any material harm, but we understand why it's not the done thing anymore. Why is it important to play out something this unpleasant when the thinking behind it is such a slight? If it's as meaningless as the guys defending it think, it shouldn't cost anything to ditch it.

    Good christ...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Dial Hard wrote: »
    But they're just your wife's parents, they're not in a position of authority over you? You're all adults.


    Honestly though, you could tell me that DH till you're blue in the face (and many have tried), but I just couldn't see it any other way - they are my parents, in law, and so in effect for me at least, they are in authority over me. I know you said respect must be earned, but for me I give respect by default so to speak, and withdraw that respect when it is no longer deserved, as in the case of my parents and my own family when they were unable to show respect to my wife, who was my girlfriend at the time. She had shown them respect, and they didn't feel there was any need to return that respect. In fact they went out of their way to make sure I knew they would never respect my girlfriend, and so I had to choose between either my parents, or my wife. My parents made that decision so much easier when they threatened to cut me out of any possible inheritance. I didn't want anything from them anyway, but to think I would bend to such a despicable threat was the moment when I lost all respect for their authority over me as their son.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    IK09 wrote: »
    Love the way some women are say "if he asked for his permission....id be saying no". So you discard the person you love because they asked your Father for his blessing :pac:

    Fickle enough.

    I asked my Father in Law for his blessing, I did tell him I was going to ask her and asked him how he felt about having me as a Son in Law. We were good friends, he was someone I could always speak honestly to.

    He died between the engagement and the wedding. Its a memory I will always cherish, sitting outside his work on a freezing cold day, drinking cans of coke and smoking cigarettes. Its a memory that only the two of us experienced. I would do it again in the morning.

    By the way. Never heard anyone call it "asking permission" until here.

    Indeed, I doubt one person on here who said they'd do that would do it in reality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Tarzana


    krudler wrote: »
    Good christ...

    Well, think about it for a second. Looking at it from an "I wanna take a load off" perspective, there was nothing wrong with it because you just needed somewhere to sit. But of course, there was SO much wrong with it. Getting off your tired feet wasn't one of them.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is this really a thing? How bizarre. What if the Father says no? Do you just not get married then?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Tarzana


    Lia_lia wrote: »
    Is this really a thing? How bizarre. What if the Father says no? Do you just not get married then?

    Indeed. And if he says doesn't give his blessing and you marry anyway, then what was the point? :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    Honestly, I think it is pretty insulting to compare blacks being forced, under threat of violence, to be treated as second-class citizens to the remnants of an anachronistic practice that had no real ramifications in modern memory save perhaps a grumpy father-in-law at Christmas dinner. If a couple talks about it together, and the bride to be is ok with it (or is indifferent, but thinks it matters to her father), then I don't think it is worth all of the pearl-clutching on this thread.

    It wouldn't be acceptable even without the threat of violence. You could reassure black people that don't worry, you're not really going to beat them up, this is just a tradition they have, to respect the white people on the bus, but I don't think that would go over terribly well either.

    This tradition is a deferential nod to a time when this gesture would not have been symbolic. Why is that something we'd want to honour? You're entering into a lifelong 50:50 partnership with this woman, and the foot you want to start on is asking her daddy if you can have her?


Advertisement