Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2014 - Mod Note in OP, 1/09

17879818384334

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭Fescue


    Sometimes football teams lose football games.

    The important thing is to bounce back.

    The next game is an ideal opportunity to do so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭SuperTortoise


    Hard to find any positives after that performance, looked like the chelsea game all over again, we just did'nt have any ideas when they sat so deep.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,888 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Honestly, i question whether we have defensive coaches. If we do, genuinely, they should be sacked. They seem to have a knack of making players worse.

    yup.

    they've been blessed that we've had a penchant for scoring within 20 minutes most games.

    remember, we'd more mistakes leading to goals than ANY team last season.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭Fescue


    SlickRic wrote: »
    yup.

    they've been blessed that we've had a penchant for scoring within 20 minutes most games.

    remember, we'd more mistakes leading to goals than ANY team last season.

    That's the major problem. Sakho is a mistake waiting to happen everytime he receives the ball under pressure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭SuperTortoise


    Fescue wrote: »
    That's the major problem. Sakho is a mistake waiting to happen everytime he receives the ball under pressure.

    The major problem today was we had ~80% possession and Guzan never made a save...not one.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭daithijjj


    The manager got it wrong, end of.

    Said it last night, you cant just rest Sterling in this form, if you want to rest him you simply do less training or take him off early (if you have that luxury of a lead). We're not exactly playing top quality midweek either, made zero sense to me.

    3 new at the back, 3 new up front. You cant just parachute new players into a team and expect the same level. You'd have a hard time with 2 new players, nevermind 6. It doesnt matter how much you spend, United will have the same issues for example. Many teams have this issue when the turnover of personnel is too much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭mrsoundie


    Villa attacked for the first 15 minutes, scored from a corner and pretty much sat back and defended for the rest of the game. Liverpool never really looked like scoring though. If they were there to midnight it would probably still have ended 1-0.

    And then kicked all around them, how Sendatoss got away with all his kicks on Mario is beyond me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,660 ✭✭✭COYVB


    mrsoundie wrote: »
    And then kicked all around them

    There were about 4 Villa fouls all game ffs


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭Fescue


    COYVB wrote: »
    There were about 4 Villa fouls all game ffs

    To be fair Senderos should have been red carded in the first half. Hutton could have went for two wreckless challenges.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭mrsoundie


    COYVB wrote: »
    There were about 4 Villa fouls all game ffs

    I was waiting of the myopic comment of the evening, welcome.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,987 ✭✭✭Kerrigooney


    Note to self: do not,under any circumstances watch the Villa game at Anfield next season...life's too ****in short.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭Fescue


    daithijjj wrote: »
    The manager got it wrong, end of.

    Said it last night, you cant just rest Sterling in this form, if you want to rest him you simply do less training or take him off early (if you have that luxury of a lead). We're not exactly playing top quality midweek either, made zero sense to me.

    3 new at the back, 3 new up front. You cant just parachute new players into a team and expect the same level. You'd have a hard time with 2 new players, nevermind 6. It doesnt matter how much you spend, United will have the same issues for example. Many teams have this issue when the turnover of personnel is too much.

    The problem was he needed to play Henderson alongside Gerrard to avoid a repeat of what happened to him last year.

    Unfortunately we don't seem to play well with two deep midfielders.

    Not sure Sterling would have made a massive difference today. Didn't do much when he came on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,660 ✭✭✭COYVB


    Fescue wrote: »
    To be fair Senderos should have been red carded in the first half. Hutton could have went for two wreckless challenges.

    Which two for Hutton? IIRC the second one you're referring to he won the ball.

    Senderos' trip on Balotelli was ridiculous though, but hardly constitutes kicking all around him. He was niggling the crap out of Mario, and there was no need for it, but Villa were nothing approaching dirty in that game


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,182 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    daithijjj wrote: »
    The manager got it wrong, end of.

    Said it last night, you cant just rest Sterling in this form, if you want to rest him you simply do less training or take him off early (if you have that luxury of a lead). We're not exactly playing top quality midweek either, made zero sense to me.

    3 new at the back, 3 new up front. You cant just parachute new players into a team and expect the same level. You'd have a hard time with 2 new players, nevermind 6. It doesnt matter how much you spend, United will have the same issues for example. Many teams have this issue when the turnover of personnel is too much.

    Couldn't of said it better. Spurs tried the same last year and looked like strangers. I'm confident rodgers won't experiment like that again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,660 ✭✭✭COYVB


    mrsoundie wrote: »
    I was waiting of the myopic comment of the evening

    I'm not sure what you were waiting for, you're the one who made it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    What was Sakho playing at giving away a cheap corner for their goal?! Fk sake, use you right to knock it back to the keeper or use your left to knock it out for a throw! Don't dawdle on it !! Our centre backs were very poor all day in possession. Don't know why they didn't carry it out of defence themselves, there was about ten yards of space in front on them every time they got the ball....nah, I'll play a 5 yard pass to someone who's facing their own goal and who's marked instead...infuriating.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Sakho giving away a corner, Lovren's headless marking, Gerrard sitting to deep and hollywood passing Brendan Rodgers getting it wrong again.

    A back 4 who have only played together once before a front 3 who never played together before.

    Not playing 2 up front.

    There was so much wrong from that game.

    Defensive coaches need to replaced or put in place if there is none.

    Brendan Rodgers needs to try and stop being so clever in league games leave that to the League and FA cup games.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭astonaidan


    Fescue wrote: »
    To be fair Senderos should have been red carded in the first half. Hutton could have went for two wreckless challenges.
    Lallana should have went for diving


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,905 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    Is Steve Clarke looking for a job?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,199 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    astonaidan wrote: »
    Lallana should have went for diving

    In fairness he hopped up straight away and never appealed for anything so I think a card would have been fairly harsh.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭quarryman


    astonaidan wrote: »
    Lallana should have went for diving

    Indeed. Ref actually went for his book before realising he'd already given him a yellow. Should have gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,316 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Shocking stuff. Really really poor. The worst we've seen since something from Hodgson's era.

    Nah, Kennys era! ;)

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭daithijjj


    Fescue wrote: »
    The problem was he needed to play Henderson alongside Gerrard to avoid a repeat of what happened to him last year.

    Unfortunately we don't seem to play well with two deep midfielders.

    Not sure Sterling would have made a massive difference today. Didn't do much when he came on.

    I dont think Rodgers is due all the blame. We have a few injuries and his hand was forced somewhat but..........you cant lose Sturridge, moan about losing a form player (which he is right to) and then compound that yourself with resting Sterling.

    There's simply no way he would have rested Sturridge if he was fit so why Sterling?. There was a bit of naivety and splash of arrogance with the selection. Sometimes you need to step out from the team you see every day training and see the bigger picture. Many of the players looked like they had never played with each other, because they havent.

    The last highlighted point you made isnt valid for me. He couldnt do anything because Villa were playing for the 0-1 before he came on. That's why i said last night he had to start, and, if the luxury was there with a nice lead, then haul him off early and bring on a new player to the club with no pressure to perform out the gate. The game would have been open at the start, a 'place' that Sterling would have reveled in, not a closed door.

    Man of the match one week, rested the next, that will never work in my eyes. Give him an extra day off during the week if we are concerned about tiredness.

    One final point id like to make. You said he needed to play Henderson beside Gerrard, i agree with you. But that would mean we both know that Rodgers was setting us up from a position of knowing Villa would cause us big problems. This just reiterates the point about resting our best in form player.

    Simply a very poor decision by Rodgers tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,301 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Fairly ott posts here since the game, bad game to experiment in considering villa always play well v us and it failed, Rodgers got it wrong again. No more 4231 ever again please not while Gerard is a starter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,161 ✭✭✭tok9


    I understand the point daithijjj but it's not exactly as easy as just saying give him a day off training and he'll be grand.

    He was away and played 2 full matches. Some days these decisions work and others they don't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,360 ✭✭✭YouTookMyName


    martyos121 wrote: »
    Hopefully Johnson returns a rejuvenated player. He couldn't possibly cross worse than Manquillo did today.

    No no no, Moreno & Manquillo were the least of our problems today.

    Manquillo had a good game.


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    daithijjj wrote: »
    The manager got it wrong, end of.

    Said it last night, you cant just rest Sterling in this form, if you want to rest him you simply do less training or take him off early (if you have that luxury of a lead). We're not exactly playing top quality midweek either, made zero sense to me.

    3 new at the back, 3 new up front. You cant just parachute new players into a team and expect the same level. You'd have a hard time with 2 new players, nevermind 6. It doesnt matter how much you spend, United will have the same issues for example. Many teams have this issue when the turnover of personnel is too much.

    He got it wrong is an understatement.

    He took so long to even change it around ffs.

    No Suarez to bail Rodgers out this season and I think it's gonna be a difficult season for him tbh


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭astonaidan


    In fairness he hopped up straight away and never appealed for anything so I think a card would have been fairly harsh.
    He got up straight away cause he knew he was screwed if he didnt, was a obvious dive and should have gone, not a fan off the whole cant touch Sterling rule either


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,301 ✭✭✭✭klose


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    He got it wrong is an understatement.

    He took so long to even change it around ffs.

    No Suarez to bail Rodgers out this season and I think it's gonna be a difficult season for him tbh

    I don't have the facts but I believe Sturridges goals won us more points last season no? Bit of a doomsday post in any case. 4 games in is all lads.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,983 ✭✭✭✭NukaCola


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    He got it wrong is an understatement.

    He took so long to even change it around ffs.

    No Suarez to bail Rodgers out this season and I think it's gonna be a difficult season for him tbh

    Knee jerk at its best tbh.......as is calling players signed chancers like you did in the match thread....

    4 games too small of a sample size....some people like yourself need to get a grip.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement