How long will Suarez's ban be? Mod warning in OP and post#455

Zico · 28-06-2014 12:57PM

1 match

eyescreamcone wrote: »

I can see clubs looking for extra insurance from FIFA and international teams against the loss of a valuable asset

They might get insurance to cover injury on international duty but they won't get insurance for suspension due to misconduct.

weisses · 28-06-2014 01:18PM

Anyone can understand Suarez being banned but if the same people using video evidence to discipline players leave this unpunished then there is something wrong IMO

sorry if this GIF was posted earlier

Fr. Ned · 28-06-2014 01:22PM

12 month global ban

weisses wrote: »

Anyone can understand Suarez being banned but if the same people using video evidence to discipline players leave this unpunished then there is something wrong IMO

sorry if this GIF was posted earlier

Ah, you see the Suarez thing was teeth making contact with arm, this is an example of arm making contact with teeth.
Perfectly acceptable in the screwed up minds of some.

egghead. · 28-06-2014 01:25PM

Fr. Ned wrote: »

Ah, you see the Suarez thing was teeth making contact with arm, this is an example of arm making contact with teeth.
Perfectly acceptable in the screwed up minds of some.

Please stop.

Fr. Ned · 28-06-2014 01:37PM

12 month global ban

egghead. wrote: »

Please stop.

No.

Fr. Ned · 28-06-2014 01:42PM

12 month global ban

egghead. wrote: »

Please stop.

Tell you what, for an Arsenal fan you seem to have a real interest in all things Suarez/Liverpool/Uruguay.
100 posts and over 50 of them are about the above.
Strange.

egghead. · 28-06-2014 01:42PM

Fr. Ned wrote: »

Tell you what, for an Arsenal fan you seem to have a real interest in all things Suarez/Liverpool/Uruguay.
100 posts and over 50 of them are about the above.
Strange.

Even stranger you would trawl through my posts and count them.

Anyway each to their own.

RayCon · 28-06-2014 01:45PM

6 month global ban

So has this descended into a Liverpool V's Man Utd clusterfcuk yet ?

Fr. Ned · 28-06-2014 01:49PM

12 month global ban

egghead. wrote: »

Even stranger you would trawl through my posts and count them.

Anyway each to their own.

Takes less than a minute to 'trawl' through 100 posts.

It's good to know who I'm engaging with.

28-06-2014 02:00PM

RayCon wrote: »

So has this descended into a Liverpool V's Man Utd clusterfcuk yet ?

As usual

Will I Amnt · 28-06-2014 02:13PM

8 matches

rarnes1 wrote: »

As usual

You say that like you don't get involved or something :pac:

28-06-2014 02:25PM

Will I Amnt wrote: »

You say that like you don't get involved or something :pac:

I have a fair few posts in this thread and afaik haven't mentioned Utd once.

Iused2likebusts · 28-06-2014 02:37PM

Easy solution suarez gets his teeth removed and gets a set of falsies which he leaves in the dressing room.

eyescreamcone · 28-06-2014 02:43PM

2 matches

Zico wrote: »

They might get insurance to cover injury on international duty but they won't get insurance for suspension due to misconduct.

Suarez's wages are 250k per week.
Liverpool should tell Uruguay/FIFA that he won't get permission to play international football again unless they are covered for all eventualities. That type of thing on a large scale would soften their cough. (or he's unavailable with a hamstring injury - again!)

Pro. F · 28-06-2014 02:46PM

5 matches

Grayditch wrote: »

I love when the people who spend most of the time slagging off Liverpool roll out the old "He's dragging the name of Liverpool down"

D'fck do you care?!

It's a weird one all right. I'm delighted he's making Liverpool look bad and giving me a laugh at the club's expense. I had been hoping that they would sell him because he's so good, but the laughs he provides, coupled with the lengthy bans (which limit all forms of damage he can do) mean I'd be sad now if that happened.

niallo27 · 28-06-2014 02:52PM

1 match

Pro. F wrote: »

It's a weird one all right. I'm delighted he's making Liverpool look bad and giving me a laugh at the club's expense. I had been hoping that they would sell him because he's so good, but the laughs he provides, coupled with the lengthy bans (which limit all forms of damage he can do) mean I'd be sad now if that happened.

That post is just plain bizarre. Your laughing at a man who scored 30 league last season. Even with his bans he plays more games than all the other top scorers in the last year. Do you really care that liverpool look bad.

Fescue · 28-06-2014 02:53PM

Pro. F wrote: »

It's a weird one all right. I'm delighted he's making Liverpool look bad and giving me a laugh at the club's expense. I had been hoping that they would sell him because he's so good, but the laughs he provides, coupled with the lengthy bans (which limit all forms of damage he can do) mean I'd be sad now if that happened.

He provided me with a lot of laughs last season too. Football has a memory like a goldfish. Wherever he plys his trade next, if he starts scoring lots of goals and playing like he can, that will be the big story.

I was amazed how easily the Evra and Ivanovic baggage disappeared once he started to perform.

Rayne Wooney · 28-06-2014 03:08PM

Suarez's latest statement is comical and actually makes me believe he is just a disgusting person rather than a case of the "it wasn't his fault he has problems" angle some seem to be peddling

IvySlayer · 28-06-2014 03:12PM

I didn't punch him, he ran into my fist.

Grayditch · 28-06-2014 03:12PM

7 matches

I'm interested to see what solidifies the "disguisting person" opinion.

Probably not interested enough to Google it, though, how bad are we talking?

Rayne Wooney · 28-06-2014 03:13PM

Ordinary man · 28-06-2014 03:19PM

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

There is no way he could have said that with a straight face:P

28-06-2014 03:21PM

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

Suarez's latest statement is comical and actually makes me believe he is just a disgusting person rather than a case of the "it wasn't his fault he has problems" angle some seem to be peddling

Disgusting person, lol,give me a break. Time to unleash the moral values.

Footballers would be way down the list on people you'd hold as role models tbh.

Grayditch · 28-06-2014 03:22PM

7 matches

Did you not expect a statement like that once Uruguay planned a defence, thought?

Saying that, I'd be fairly embarrassed to have to put my name to that, no matter what the lawyers said.

Fescue · 28-06-2014 03:23PM

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

Suarez's latest statement is comical and actually makes me believe he is just a disgusting person rather than a case of the "it wasn't his fault he has problems" angle some seem to be peddling

To be fair thats the excuse they cooked up for the hearing a few days ago. He hasn't just released that now.

It was a pathetic excuse that got the short shrift it deserved.

Pro. F · 28-06-2014 03:24PM

5 matches

niallo27 wrote: »

That post is just plain bizarre. Your laughing at a man who scored 30 league last season. Even with his bans he plays more games than all the other top scorers in the last year. Do you really care that liverpool look bad.

No, I'm laughing at Liverpool for having a player who regular bites opposition players which obviously makes the club look bad and gives me something to slag you, the fans, about. Of course I care if Liverpool look bad. If Liverpool were some super respectable club I wouldn't have as much to slag you about.

He did not play more than all the other top scorers last season. I just had a check there, and while he played 33 games, the first one I checked, Yaya (apparently City finished first), played 35. If Suarez had played in the games he was banned for last season, there's a good chance Liverpool would have won the league. And I'm supposed to not be happy about this turn of events?

28-06-2014 03:25PM

Grayditch wrote: »

Did you not expect a statement like that once Uruguay planned a defence, thought?

Saying that, I'd be fairly embarrassed to have to put my name to that, no matter what the lawyers said.

It'd be a decent defence if all the FIFA members were actually blind. Damn eyes eh. I blame evolution

Ordinary man · 28-06-2014 03:26PM

Grayditch wrote: »

Did you not expect a statement like that once Uruguay planned a defence, thought?

Saying that, I'd be fairly embarrassed to have to put my name to that, no matter what the lawyers said.

I would have expected a temporary insanity defence or even it was retaliation for something but not an "oops i slipped into him" statement when every angle of the incident was available

Pro. F · 28-06-2014 03:30PM

5 matches

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

Suarez's latest statement is comical and actually makes me believe he is just a disgusting person rather than a case of the "it wasn't his fault he has problems" angle some seem to be peddling

The reaction from the Uruguayan manager, public, president and the president of their FA makes the country look pretty bad too.

Unearthly · 28-06-2014 03:30PM

Lol at the statement. If that is the appeal then an extension should be handed down

How long will Suarez's ban be? Mod warning in OP and post#455

Comments