How long will Suarez's ban be? Mod warning in OP and post#455

Vanolder · 26-06-2014 03:30PM

3 matches

larrymiller wrote: »

Statement out. Can't link it

Statement saying they will wait to make a statement.

Professional Griefer · 26-06-2014 03:30PM

6 matches

Prop Joe wrote: »

If he had been red carded he would of only got a 1 match ban,Correct?

Punished for poor refereeing

Nope, they can still go back and take action even if the ref carded him.

26-06-2014 03:32PM

12 month global ban

weisses wrote: »

don't know if he injured the guy badly but the intend was there

http://www.goal.com/en/news/462/netherlands/2010/08/02/2052677/two-match-ban-for-ajax-star-luis-suarez

The above want to compare Keane all day to Suarez..

How's this one...if the two footed tackle landed the same result may have happened. A broken leg.

Idbatterim · 26-06-2014 03:32PM

the thing is, will he really care? will he be at a financial loss because of it? Should he be warned that if this is repeated, he will face a lifetime ban? Because some are speculating its uncontrollable, I dont think it is, I dont think there is a chance he would do it if he knew there would be severe consequences...

26-06-2014 03:32PM

12 month global ban

Pro. F wrote: »

I am most definitely laughing at Liverpool.

Well maybe just a little....:pac:

larrymiller · 26-06-2014 03:32PM

Vanolder wrote: »

Statement saying they will wait to make a statement.

Some statement

gandalf · 26-06-2014 03:33PM

Over 10 matches

Was nearly on the money with the International ban but really surprised at the four months worldwide football ban. I would expect Liverpool to appeal this strongly.

The only good news from this for Liverpool is that I doubt Barca or Real will buy him now with this restriction on him.

Lucas Hood · 26-06-2014 03:33PM

9 matches

He probably won't earn a penny from Liverpool till his ban is over.

Corholio · 26-06-2014 03:33PM

citytillidie wrote: »

He will miss 9 games for Uruguay which basically means he also misses next Summers Copa America

Yes but in relative present terms, the ban would have had little effect if it was only international.

alchemist33 · 26-06-2014 03:34PM

Over 10 matches

IMO the ridiculous stance of the Uruguayans contributed to FIFA's resolve here. The "he didn't do nuthin'" and "Europe is picking on poor li'l Luis" probably got their backs up.

same ol sh1te · 26-06-2014 03:35PM

gandalf wrote: »

Was nearly on the money with the International ban but really surprised at the four months worldwide football ban. I would expect Liverpool to appeal this strongly.

The only good news from this for Liverpool is that I doubt Barca or Real will buy him now with this restriction on him.

It's been said LFC can't appeal the ban, only Uruguay and the player can

minusthebear · 26-06-2014 03:35PM

if you buy a player with a history of biting & violence you've got to be prepared to take it on the chin if he does it again.

Nerdlingr · 26-06-2014 03:36PM

M!Ck^ wrote: »

He implied they applaud his antics for kicking out at a fan. Well I don't applaud it.

Try not to **** stir.

No. What he said was United Fans still cheer Cantona to this day. Which they do. Once again M!cK^ you dont seem to be able to read posts correctly.

Cienciano · 26-06-2014 03:36PM

alchemist33 wrote: »

IMO the ridiculous stance of the Uruguayans contributed to FIFA's resolve here. The "he didn't do nuthin'" and "Europe is picking on poor li'l Luis" probably got their backs up.

Yeah, I agree, if he said after the game that he made a mistake and was sorry with a proper apology it would have made a difference. He has a history of denial and getting his team to pretend he did nothing wrong.

hullaballoo · 26-06-2014 03:36PM

http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/news/y=2014/m=6/news=luis-suarez-suspended-for-nine-matches-and-banned-for-four-months-from-2386354.html

From the FIFA website: "Such behaviour cannot be tolerated on any football pitch, and in particular not at a FIFA World Cup when the eyes of millions of people are on the stars on the field. The Disciplinary Committee took into account all the factors of the case and the degree of Mr Suárez’s guilt in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Code. The decision comes into force as soon it is communicated,” said Claudio Sulser, chairman of the FIFA Disciplinary Committee."

DARK-KNIGHT · 26-06-2014 03:36PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rcm1yEXU6wA

pmsl suarez been watching walking dead

Fizman · 26-06-2014 03:37PM

Rayne Wooney wrote: »

Racism causes psychological injury so yes

Evra was psychologically injured long before that incident as far as I'm concerned.

Wichita Lineman · 26-06-2014 03:38PM

The suspension is harsh on Liverpool but even us diehard Liverpool fans have to say there is no defence for his actions.

Hyzepher · 26-06-2014 03:38PM

7 matches

minusthebear wrote: »

if you buy a player with a history of biting & violence you've got to be prepared to take it on the chin if he does it again.

or the shoulder...

hullaballoo · 26-06-2014 03:38PM

All sorts of confusion around the remit of this ban - seems to be banned from stadiums but allowed to train, banned from administrative football-related activity but can still be transferred?

Expect further clarification on this.

keano_afc · 26-06-2014 03:41PM

1 match

Will be interesting to see what happens if defenders start to refuse to take the pitch for fear of assault. The ban is only worthwhile if he acknowledges he has a problem and gets help for it. If he spends the time out being remorseless blaming the media he'll get nowhere.

bucketybuck · 26-06-2014 03:41PM

5 matches

Nerdlingr wrote: »

Bit harsh on Liverpool considering this incident had nothing to do with them. They should have banned him for longer internationally.

eyescreamcone wrote: »

Totally unfair on Liverpool.!

If one of my staff bit a guy on the LUAS on his way to work he could easily be sitting in a jail cell awaiting trial. That would be harsh on me, who is going to do his workload? There is fcuk all I could do about though, and its no different for Liverpool, they are incidental in all of this.

If Liverpool fans are upset about this they should direct their anger towards the perpetrator, Mr Luis Suarez. But that won't happen.

Prop Joe wrote: »

If he had been red carded he would of only got a 1 match ban,Correct?

Punished for poor refereeing

Punished for biting another human being.

eyescreamcone · 26-06-2014 03:42PM

2 matches

I can see a time when clubs will not allow their players play international football because of rulings like this.

Dubliner28 · 26-06-2014 03:42PM

"A stadium ban is pronounced against the player Luis Suárez in accordance with art. 21 of the FDC as follows: the player Luis Suárez is prohibited from entering the confines of any stadium during the period of the ban (point 3). The player Luis Suárez is prohibited from entering the confines of any stadium in which the representative team of Uruguay is playing while he has to serve the nine-match suspension (point 2). NIce

Also read online that Suarez has been banned for a total of 34 games since 2010 without receiving a red card. Says it all really

P_1 · 26-06-2014 03:43PM

Ok so I'm presuming the 9 match ban is for internationals, so that's at least the Colombia match with potentially 3 more in the WC. What other fixtures do Uruguay have lined up and does this ban cover friendlies or is it only for competitive matches?

The 4 month ban. does that start from today or from the start of the EPL season. If it's from today then Liverpool can have him back by the end of October, but if it includes all football related activities then I presume he's unable to train and the like so he'll have to go through preseason training from the end of October.

Pretty unclear as to the ramifications of the ban if I'm being honest.

Tipsy McSwagger · 26-06-2014 03:43PM

1 match

bucketybuck wrote: »

If one of my staff bit a guy on the LUAS on his way to work he could easily be sitting in a jail cell awaiting trial. That would be harsh on me, who is going to do his workload? There is fcuk all I could do about though, and its no different for Liverpool, they are incidental in all of this.

If Liverpool fans are upset about this they should direct their anger towards the perpetrator, Mr Luis Suarez. But that won't happen.

Punished for biting another human being.

Do you run an international LUAS system too?

SantryRed · 26-06-2014 03:43PM

6 matches

Hang on, something I only thought of now,

If Uruguay appeal this decision, will he be available to play on Saturday?

It's not going to be a simple appeal regardless and could drag on for a while, could he maybe play out the rest of Uruguay's games in the competition due to this?

Dubliner28 · 26-06-2014 03:45PM

eyescreamcone wrote: »

I can see a time when clubs will not allow their players play international football because of rulings like this.

Yes cos everyone goes around biting people not once, nor twice .....3 times

TheTownie · 26-06-2014 03:45PM

From BBC article;

Under the terms of the ban, Suarez is prohibited from entering the confines of any stadium during the period of his suspension.

Does that mean if Barca/Real bought him they couldn't present him in their stadium? :pac:

Cienciano · 26-06-2014 03:46PM

hullaballoo wrote: »

All sorts of confusion around the remit of this ban - seems to be banned from stadiums but allowed to train, banned from administrative football-related activity but can still be transferred?

Expect further clarification on this.

Apparently he's allowed to play Fifa on the PS3, but if he picks Uruguay or Liverpool, he has to sub himself out of the squad

How long will Suarez's ban be? Mod warning in OP and post#455

Comments