Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How long will Suarez's ban be? Mod warning in OP and post#455

17810121342

Comments

  • Site Banned Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭Agueroooo


    a precedent has been set but it might just open up a big can of worms.

    clubs are reluctant enough to release players for useless friendlies etc. and this aint gonna help one bit.




  • 12 month global ban
    rarnes1 wrote: »
    I'd rather keep our flawed genius than have no genius at all.

    Mostly Utd fans telling me we should sell him funny enough. I'd imagine if it was Aspas it would be a different story ☺

    So your proud for a player acting the way he does to wear the Liverpool jersey regardless?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    1 match
    Pro. F wrote: »
    They're being punished is just a consequence of Suarez being punished. LFC are paying the price for buying and keeping a player with serious disciplinary issues.

    His non injury record and the goals he scores make up for it ten fold though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,723 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Pro. F wrote: »
    Sure aren't you always saying that you want Rooney sold, even when he's having a great season? IIrc any way. So you're being consistent.

    Yap. If a player takes a mick out of your club, they go. Fergie always said no player is bigger than the club


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    2 matches
    Totally unfair on Liverpool.
    When he was banned previously, did this include international games?? No!

    Over the top sentence for me!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,280 ✭✭✭✭DARK-KNIGHT


    he is wreckless and dangerous on the pitch ban should be harsh and at all levels. fifa have a responsibility to players playing against suarez for club and country to protect them. biting is serious assault he deserves exactly what he gets imo. a disgusting act to bite someone


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 4,676 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hyzepher


    7 matches
    niallo27 wrote: »
    His non injury record and the goals he scores make up for it ten fold though.

    That nasty bump he got on the teeth might take a while to heal..


  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Apparently FIFA aren't sure about whether it prevents transfers. I assume a case in Europe would be taken if they prevented him leaving the club.


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭Agueroooo


    M!Ck^ wrote: »
    So your proud for a player acting the way he does to wear the Liverpool jersey regardless?

    put down the spoon Mick..we both know thats not what he meant


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    1 match
    The rest will do him good anyway. He looks ****ed. He will come back better than ever and we all move on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,280 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    He will miss the first 9 EPL games of the season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,278 ✭✭✭Cypher_sounds


    First racist dog i've ever come across. Very light ban all things considered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,444 ✭✭✭✭Skid X


    Hulk Hands wrote: »
    Liverpool aren't stupid enough to get embroiled in this after the last debacle. Think both parties will count themselves slightly lucky he'll be back in November

    I agree. It could have been a lot worse and Liverpool would be crazy to try to appeal the judgement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    1 match
    Hyzepher wrote: »
    That nasty bump he got on the teeth might take a while to heal..

    Not more than 4 months hopefully.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,681 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    1. FIFA are making it up as they go along.
    2. It's a lengthy ban because biting is taboo - nothing more, nothing less. If a guy who has a penchant for an elbow did this, you would not see this length of ban.
    3. It's harsh on Liverpool.
    4. While it's harsh, Liverpool should be angry at Suarez first, FIFA second. He's put them in this position...again.
    5. I'm genuinely intrigued as to what the club will do now - 1st November is a long time to wait.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    2 matches
    M!Ck^ wrote: »
    So your proud for a player acting the way he does to wear the Liverpool jersey regardless?

    Utd fans still cheer Cantona today after he kicked the fan

    Also, Keane is still a hero after intentionally injuring Haaland.

    Of the 3 which is the worst?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    Mutu got 7 months for doing a bit of recreational cocaine.
    Suarez gets 4 for biting someone on the field of play for the third time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    How many games will this be that he has missed for Liverpool without ever receiving a red card???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,136 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    It would be funny if they appealed and he got a longer ban, he's maintained his innocence in this which is the worst thing IMO


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    1 match
    he is wreckless and dangerous on the pitch ban should be harsh and at all levels. fifa have a responsibility to players playing against suarez for club and country to protect them. biting is serious assault he deserves exactly what he gets imo. a disgusting act to bite someone

    Is he dangerous. Has he ever injured a player seriously.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,280 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Will he have to wear a muzzle when he comes back?


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭Agueroooo


    FIFA cannot restrict transfers as that is in breach of European employment law


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Is he dangerous. Has he ever injured a player seriously.

    He tried to bite someone. Thankfully he screwed up the execution. Honestly, this downplaying of human bites is rather ignorant. Bites can be very fcking serious.




  • 12 month global ban
    Agueroooo wrote: »
    put down the spoon Mick..we both know thats not what he meant

    I'm sorry but not sure what other way to read it. He would rather keep him regardless @ Liverpool FC as a flawed Genius. That's what I took from the post.

    No player should be bigger than the Club, especially a club with a history like Liverpool.

    Liverpool now have a choice to either sell him off or use the months provided by FIFA to help him get his head straight but there is no guarantee that will happen with his past.

    Fair play for Rodgers initially standing by him because of his talent but enough is enough at this stage he's damaged goods.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,136 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Is he dangerous. Has he ever injured a player seriously.


    Racism causes psychological injury so yes


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 9,709 Mod ✭✭✭✭mayordenis


    Appealing it 100% does not mean condoning it, it is possible to think what he did was completely wrong but that there should be some limit on how far the ban goes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭SantryRed


    6 matches
    Agueroooo wrote: »
    FIFA cannot restrict transfers as that is in breach of European employment law

    This gets brought up a lot. They can't restrict transfers but they can refuse to register him. Which in effect, is the same thing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    5 matches
    @UberFootFact: Luis Suarez has now been banned for 34 games since 2010, despite not receiving a single red card.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,280 ✭✭✭✭DARK-KNIGHT


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Is he dangerous. Has he ever injured a player seriously.
    he has been very lucky imo. looking at the extreme and him biting and puncturing a major vein in shoulder or neck area.... it is vey dangerous...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,057 ✭✭✭WallyGUFC


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Is he dangerous. Has he ever injured a player seriously.
    Biting somebody is dangerous. Risk of awful infections etc.

    TBH I'm surprised he's been banned domestically too. I thought it might just have been a 2 year international ban. He's being made an example of and he deserves it. He's done it 3 times and had the nerve to deny it after the match on Tuesday. Liverpool knew what they were getting themselves in for - he had previously bitten an opponent before signing him. It will be interesting to see what they do now. Will there be any club even in for him after this?

    He has severe mental issues clearly. I wonder is 4 months away from the game enough to sort them out?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement