Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How long will Suarez's ban be? Mod warning in OP and post#455

1…6791112…42

Comments

  • #242
    Pro. F
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    5 matches
    rarnes1 wrote: »
    So much for a 2 year ban eh ☺

    So much for FIFA can't ban him from playing for his club eh


  • #243
    Nerdlingr
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    Bit harsh on Liverpool considering this incident had nothing to do with them. They should have banned him for longer internationally.


  • #244
    Will I Amnt
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,222 ✭✭✭✭Will I Amnt


    8 matches
    super_furry wrote: »
    Seriously think it'll be either no ban at all or an international ban of no more than six games, followed by enough internet and media rage to fuel the national grid for a week.

    Well you got that bit right at least :pac:


  • #245
    Son Of A Vidic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    12 month global ban
    I expected him to get a worldwide ban and he got it. FIFA for once send out the right message.


  • #246
    Lucas Hood
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    9 matches
    Lucas Hood wrote: »
    So can Liverpool appeal?

    I think it is a bit extreme.

    Quoting myself i know but apparently not

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91010571&postcount=556
    Oliver Kay ‏@OliverKayTimes 2m
    Fifa making up rules as they go along, but to judge by what they've just told me, only #URU (not #LFC) would be allowed to appeal Suarez ban


  • Advertisement
  • #247
    Agueroooo
    Site Banned Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭Agueroooo


    Liverpool cant appeal.

    only Uruguay Fed can.

    Oliver Kay ‏@OliverKayTimes 2m
    Fifa making up rules as they go along, but to judge by what they've just told me, only #URU (not #LFC) would be allowed to appeal Suarez ban


  • #248
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Iang87 wrote: »
    Honest to christ I cant see why liverpool are being punished worse than uruguay

    Suarez is the one being punished. Also Liverpool clearly failed to give him the required help after last time so looking at it that way it's more their fault.


  • #249
    Pro. F
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    5 matches
    Iang87 wrote: »
    Honest to christ I cant see why liverpool are being punished worse than uruguay

    They're being punished is just a consequence of Suarez being punished. LFC are paying the price for buying and keeping a player with serious disciplinary issues.


  • #250
    MagicIRL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,902 ✭✭✭MagicIRL


    I expected a year ban, 6 months on appeal.


  • #251
    Hulk Hands
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,023 ✭✭✭Hulk Hands


    Vanolder wrote: »
    Liverpool will win an appeal. He will be back in two months and well rested. Lovely.

    Liverpool aren't stupid enough to get embroiled in this after the last debacle. Think both parties will count themselves slightly lucky he'll be back in November


  • Advertisement
  • #252
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Headshot wrote: »
    I wonder will Pool wake up and finally sell him. A very very flawed genius

    I'd rather keep our flawed genius than have no genius at all.

    Mostly Utd fans telling me we should sell him funny enough. I'd imagine if it was Aspas it would be a different story ☺


  • #253
    super_furry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,356 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    3 matches
    Court of Arbitration for Sport it is so.


  • #254
    JP Liz V1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,265 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I thought it would be longer than 4 months
    https://forumofgames.com/




  • #255
    jonnyfingers
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭jonnyfingers


    Over 10 matches
    Iang87 wrote: »
    Honest to christ I cant see why liverpool are being punished worse than uruguay

    I think we should get away from thinking it's the club or the country that are being punished. It's Suarez that is being punished, he just happens to play for both Liverpool and Uruguay, and he'll just happen to have more club games during the ban duration.

    Regarding any appeal, the only person that should have the right to appeal is Suarez. It's tough on both club and country but that is Suarez's fault. Any reduction in the ban that benefits Liverpool or Uruguay will also benefit Suarez and that can't be fair.


  • #256
    Benzino
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,816 ✭✭✭Benzino


    Ravenid wrote: »
    4 Months Worldwide......I can see Liverpool successfully appealing that as they had no hand in this, and even if they don't not available until October/November not really gonna hurt em that much now is it?

    Err, yeah it will hurt us (if it's kept), he'll miss 9 PL games and something like 3 CL games.

    Don't want to go down the "if" road, but if Suarez wasn't banned for the start of last season, we may have won the league.


  • #257
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Pro. F wrote: »
    So much for FIFA can't ban him from playing for his club eh

    Did anyone actually know that for certain. We were all speculatiing


  • #258
    Pro. F
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    5 matches
    Agueroooo wrote: »
    Liverpool cant appeal.

    only Uruguay Fed can.

    Oliver Kay ‏@OliverKayTimes 2m
    Fifa making up rules as they go along, but to judge by what they've just told me, only #URU (not #LFC) would be allowed to appeal Suarez ban

    It wouldn't surprise me at all if FIFA think that and are completely wrong about it. That would presumably mean that LFC would have to take FIFA to the court of arbitration for sport and by that stage (considering the amount of time passing) would be suing for damages rather than looking to get the ban lifted.


  • #259
    Utopia Parkway
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,024 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    1 match
    Corvus Maximus wrote: »
    I expected him to get a worldwide ban and he got it. FIFA for once send out the right message.

    If only clubs with mass racist chanting got the same. They usually get a 20K fine.


  • #260
    jester77
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,264 ✭✭✭✭jester77


    Can't see Liverpool appealing it. Appealing it would be seen as condoning it, and that is not an image they would want to associated with.

    Can they sell him, or does the ban also prevent that?


  • #261
    Cypher_sounds
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,278 ✭✭✭Cypher_sounds


    Does he not have to get the teeth pulled?


  • Advertisement
  • #262
    keano_afc
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,711 ✭✭✭keano_afc


    1 match
    Monetary fine is less than Bendtner got for his Paddy Power pants.


  • #263
    Jon Large Volleyball
    Posts: 0 ✭ Jon Large Volleyball


    12 month global ban
    Iang87 wrote: »
    Honest to christ I cant see why liverpool are being punished worse than uruguay
    Your not being punished and there's nobody laughing at Liverpool.

    The point is he's not fit to be on the pitch in his current state of mind. Until he gets his **** sorted he got what he deserved and gives Liverpool adequate time for his counselling and re-assessment after the four months.


  • #264
    Headshot
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,725 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    I'd rather keep our flawed genius than have no genius at all.

    Mostly Utd fans telling me we should sell him funny enough. I'd imagine if it was Aspas it would be a different story ☺

    Not really, I would be the same for any player. Iv lost count how many times he has hurt your club now.


  • #265
    Pro. F
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    5 matches
    rarnes1 wrote: »
    Did anyone actually know that for certain. We were all speculatiing

    No, but people were saying it, just like people were saying that he will be banned for two years.


  • #266
    Bannerman7
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 220 ✭✭Bannerman7


    Nerdlingr wrote: »
    Bit harsh on Liverpool considering this incident had nothing to do with them. They should have banned him for longer internationally.

    Yeah & if Liverpool say anything to him when he comes back he'll eat them.


  • #267
    Fizman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,605 ✭✭✭Fizman


    brevity wrote: »
    Yikes.

    He can't even play FIFA on his PlayStation?

    FIFA have probably blocked his IP address anyway.


  • #268
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Lucas Hood wrote: »
    Quoting myself i know but apparently not

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91010571&postcount=556

    Wouldn't be the first time, they basically did the same when Rio Ferdinand got banned. Threatened to expel Man Utd from European football for a few years if they went to the court of arbitration, if I recall.


  • #269
    jem
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,056 ✭✭✭jem


    in june now so back 26 oct? after the transfer deadline.
    harsh to say the least, particularly on liverpool.
    they will have to look at the costa headbutt now etc, sure the legal eagles will push why one and not the other on appeal.


  • #270
    paddyh117
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 404 ✭✭paddyh117


    Fizman wrote: »
    He can't even play FIFA on his PlayStation?

    FIFA have probably blocked his IP address anyway.


    He can play PES though.


  • Advertisement
  • #271
    Pro. F
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    5 matches
    Headshot wrote: »
    Not really, I would be the same for any player. Iv lost count how many times he has hurt your club now.

    Sure aren't you always saying that you want Rooney sold, even when he's having a great season? IIrc any way. So you're being consistent.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement