Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

World Cup 2014 Super Thread copyright warning #1645

1495052545564

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    ^^^^^^^^^^^^

    normally no, but seeing that it was the physio ..you gotta chuckle:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,539 ✭✭✭joe123


    Can someone tell me where Alan Hansen is? I was almost sure he wasnt retiring until after the world cup?

    Did something happen since to change that or was it always the case he wouldn't be on the world cup?

    He went through the motions a bit but I actually miss him on the bbc now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    Last night resolved my own internal debate on RTE's punditry against BBC/ITV.

    RTE started 20 minutes earlier, so I watched that. Bunch of old men continuously talking over each other, rehashing points they've made just 30 seconds previously. Moved to BBC at 22:20, easy going guys talking a bit of sense, nice and handy to watch.

    Then again Phil Neville was pretty lame on the commentary, I guess I better keep the remote close by for the duration of the tournament.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,286 ✭✭✭seligehgit


    Last night resolved my own internal debate on RTE's punditry against BBC/ITV.

    RTE started 20 minutes earlier, so I watched that. Bunch of old men continuously talking over each other, rehashing points they've made just 30 seconds previously. Moved to BBC at 22:20, easy going guys talking a bit of sense, nice and handy to watch.

    Then again Phil Neville was pretty lame on the commentary, I guess I better keep the remote close by for the duration of the tournament.

    God I thought the 3 amigos on RTE won hands down :) Phil Neville was awful on the Beeb commentary,super cure for insomnia.:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup



    Then again Phil Neville was pretty lame on the commentary, I guess I better keep the remote close by for the duration of the tournament.

    terrible co-commentator how he got that gig i don't know, used every cliche under the sun, has to be Lawro for the england games


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    seligehgit wrote: »
    God I thought the 3 amigos on RTE won hands down :) Phil Neville was awful on the Beeb commentary,super cure for insomnia.:pac:

    Yeah but Im focusing on the analysis in the studio.

    There was one moment where Bill O'Herlihy was trying to stir things saying "You think its a disgrace dont you John", even though Giles had said nothing of the sort and clarified that he hadnt. What the hell is he like?

    It's gotten old, and needs a serious overhaul. Respect to Bill's years but I think it's best that he's going.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,797 ✭✭✭Shane St.


    Loving the world cup so far. Plenty of goals. Hope of more today please!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,382 ✭✭✭✭greendom


    fryup wrote: »
    terrible co-commentator how he got that gig i don't know, used every cliche under the sun, has to be Lawro for the england games

    Neville's delivery was poor but the content was far superior to anything Lawro has to offer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    I will say it again I love this World Cup.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    Rough on Ecuador, great world cup though!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    It has been an enjoyable tournament so far with the games being so open and having so many goals, but the officiating is a real black mark on it for me.

    The Brazil game was refereed so poorly it wouldn't be a stretch to say it was fixed, Mexico had two goals wrongly ruled out against Cameroon, the penalty Spain got was very controversial, and yet another poor decision from the officials cost Drmic a goal today.

    I must say the referee played a great advantage for the Switzerland winner mind, but overall the standard of refereeing has been very, very poor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Paully D wrote: »
    It has been an enjoyable tournament so far with the games being so open and having so many goals, but the officiating is a real black mark on it for me.

    The Brazil game was refereed so poorly it wouldn't be a stretch to say it was fixed, Mexico had two goals wrongly ruled out against Cameroon, the penalty Spain got was very controversial, and yet another poor decision from the officials cost Drmic a goal today.

    I must say the referee played a great advantage for the Switzerland winner mind, but overall the standard of refereeing has been very, very poor.

    Mexico won, Spain lost, Switzerland won. Sure the Brazil game was dodgy, but it's a bit of a stretch that a few bad decisions that mostly haven't changed any results are a "black mark".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Mexico won, Spain lost, Switzerland won. Sure the Brazil game was dodgy, but it's a bit of a stretch that a few bad decisions that mostly haven't changed any results are a "black mark".

    That's besides the point for me. Just because the decisions mostly haven't changed any results, it doesn't mean they don't have an effect in other ways.

    For example, Dos Santos would currently be the leader as top goalscorer (by virtue of also having an assist) if his two wrongly disallowed goals had stood. These decisions could well play a part in goal difference in deciding whether a team gets out of their group or not.

    The World Cup has been excellent so far, but the officiating is certainly one thing that hasn't been.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Paully D wrote: »
    That's besides the point for me. Just because the decisions mostly haven't changed any results, it doesn't mean they don't have an effect in other ways.

    For example, Dos Santos would currently be the leader as top goalscorer (by virtue of also having an assist) if his two wrongly disallowed goals had stood. These decisions could well play a part in goal difference in deciding whether a team gets out of their group or not.

    The World Cup has been excellent so far, but the officiating is certainly one thing that hasn't been.

    You're assuming that Mexico would have scored again had the first one been counted. Football doesn't work that way.


  • Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    On a general note - match threads here, social media, some friends IRL, the amount of over reaction over the opening games is incredible. Goes for the majority of games played so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Nuri Sahin wrote: »
    On a general note - match threads here, social media, some friends IRL, the amount of over reaction over the opening games is incredible. Goes for the majority of games played so far.

    The quality of football may not be the best but for excitement and goals so far it has been the best tournament in a long long time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    You're assuming that Mexico would have scored again had the first one been counted. Football doesn't work that way.

    Then your point regarding the decisions not changing the results is invalid, surely? If that's the case, how do you know that Cameroon, as an example, wouldn't have gone on to win 3-1 if Mexico's first goal had counted?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Paully D wrote: »
    Then your point regarding the decisions not changing the results is invalid, surely? If that's the case, how do you know that Cameroon, as an example, wouldn't have gone on to win 3-1 if Mexico's first goal had counted?

    Good point :pac:

    All I'm trying to say is, it's hardly been awful. Ref was brilliant in England v Italy last night, the only really poor one for me has been Brazil/Croatia. There's a contentious decision every game in the Premier League too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Still no draws! Still averaging over 2.5 goals per game. Its great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    mike65 wrote: »
    Still no draws! Still averaging over 2.5 goals per game. Its great.

    Is it just the general Brazilianess of the occasion?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,315 ✭✭✭Reventon93


    Haven't heard much about the Germany - Portugal match. Surprising, seeing as I think it's probably going to be as good as Spain - Netherlands in terms of player quality. Also looking forward to seeing how Ghana do against the US, especially as the other Boateng brother will likely make an appearence


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭beno619


    Should be a cracker, I fancy Portugal to pull a bit of a shock result off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    Reventon93 wrote: »
    Haven't heard much about the Germany - Portugal match. Surprising, seeing as I think it's probably going to be as good as Spain - Netherlands in terms of player quality. Also looking forward to seeing how Ghana do against the US, especially as the other Boateng brother will likely make an appearence

    He only came out of retirement for them for their play off :pac:.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    Hoping to see a 6-5 screamer with hat-tricks from Ronaldo and Nani. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,278 ✭✭✭x43r0


    What really blows my mind about the opening game is that the Japanese ref didn't speak any English

    How can you competently officiate a game if you can't communicate with the players?

    and before anyone says it, I refuse to believe that he speaks both Portugese AND Croatian :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,054 ✭✭✭IK09




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,315 ✭✭✭Reventon93


    Lucas Hood wrote: »
    He only came out of retirement for them for their play off :pac:.

    Well sh*t :o

    Still though, I'm hoping Dempsey will get a goal :D

    I was thinking a draw for the Germany - Portugal match. I think the squads are going to be evenly matched. looking forward to it. I'd like Germany to win though :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,382 ✭✭✭✭greendom


    x43r0 wrote: »
    What really blows my mind about the opening game is that the Japanese ref didn't speak any English

    How can you competently officiate a game if you can't communicate with the players?

    and before anyone says it, I refuse to believe that he speaks both Portugese AND Croatian :p

    It's going to be very tough to find enough multi-lingual refs to cover all the languages involved. don't have a problem with that at all.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,315 ✭✭✭Reventon93


    And i'd say that there'd be a good number of ref's with German, English, Portuguese and Spanish along with some Asian languages. Depending on where certain players play during the season, it's possible that at least one player would understand the ref or at least the linesmen


Advertisement