Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

World Cup 2014 Super Thread copyright warning #1645

1252628303164

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Godin, Cavani, Caceres, Gaston, Rodriguez

    Putting Gaston Ramirez in there isn't doing them any favours, I'm of the opinion that Uruguay will be the one to finish 3rd in that group.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭Vinz Mesrine


    CSF wrote: »
    Putting Gaston Ramirez in there isn't doing them any favours, I'm of the opinion that Uruguay will be the one to finish 3rd in that group.

    I'll be shocked if they don't get through that group.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭roanoke


    I've a feeling it will be 1. Uruguay 2. England 3. Italy.

    WRT Italy we can ignore friendlies and their traditionally bad buildups all we want, but I think there's got to be something genuinely wrong with at them moment? A team that can't win in 7 games, can't put away Luxembourg isn't going to make an impact at the WC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,909 ✭✭✭Neeson


    Belgium and Tunisia on Setanta.

    And it's live.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    Neeson wrote: »
    Belgium and Tunisia on Setanta.

    And it's live.

    is it FTV?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,909 ✭✭✭Neeson


    batistuta9 wrote: »
    is it FTV?


    Setanta Ireland.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭Vinz Mesrine


    roanoke wrote: »
    I've a feeling it will be 1. Uruguay 2. England 3. Italy.

    WRT Italy we can ignore friendlies and their traditionally bad buildups all we want, but I think there's got to be something genuinely wrong with at them moment? A team that can't win in 7 games, can't put away Luxembourg isn't going to make an impact at the WC.

    Italy and Uruguay will both beat England. I expect both to qualify comfortably.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    Luiz gets an awful press in england and has made a few errors. I feel his style of play is better served in a more possession based league than in england. For brazil a team that will want a footballing centre back he is nearly as good as they come. Thinking of the likes of shawcross/dawson in a brazil jersey is no comparison. Im sure luiz will do well at psg and would have no problem playing at real/barca IMO. I agree with a fair few of your other comparisons particularly Cole who has been written off way too early.

    I agree that Luiz is better served playing in a possession dominating team as his footballing skills are useful. But he is a liability defensively, there's no two ways about it. He has made a lot more than a few errors. He'll be covered by playing alongside Thiago Silva, with Brazil dominating possession and pressing high. But he will still be a weak link in their team.

    He would want to do well at PSG, they play in a weak league and he'll be surrounded by world class talent.
    glued wrote: »
    Are you serious about De Jong? Easily Milan's player of the year and had a much better season than those 4 players combined. Also Marcelo is currently a much better player than Cole. De Jong at his worst his still a much better player than the likes of Britton and Cork

    Of course I'm serious about de Jong. He's a horrifically overrated player. He was not impressive with Milan this year, who were extremely poor overall. It might be a bit harsh to say that Carrick was better than him, considering this season's form, but Barry is definitely better than him and Cork and Britton are twice the player he is.

    Cole is excellent defensively and good going forward. Marcelo is okay defensively (nothing more) and good going forward.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,909 ✭✭✭Neeson


    Belgium Tunisia taking a break due to hailstones!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,301 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Wow those hailstones are massive


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,377 ✭✭✭Smithwicks Man


    Pro. F wrote: »
    Of course I'm serious about de Jong. He's a horrifically overrated player. He was not impressive with Milan this year, who were extremely poor overall. It might be a bit harsh to say that Carrick was better than him, considering this season's form, but Barry is definitely better than him and Cork and Britton are twice the player he is.

    Cole is excellent defensively and good going forward. Marcelo is okay defensively (nothing more) and good going forward.

    :eek:

    De Jong had a great season for Milan despite not having much quality around him and was, imo, Milan's best, most consistent player this year.

    Can't remember the last time I read something so wrong as the bit in bold. De Jong is infinitely better than Barry (who I think is good enough) and I wouldn't even be comparing the other two to him.

    You either haven't seen much of NDJ or you have something against him because I can't understand how you could rate him so lowly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,377 ✭✭✭Smithwicks Man


    Pro. F wrote: »
    This is very subjective and you can just choose to quibble with any comparison I bring up. But fúck it, I'll try to stick to the more obvious, less controversial, ones.

    France:
    Evra < Cole
    Sakho < Terry

    Brazil:
    David Luiz at CB < Terry, Shawcross and Dawson
    Marcelo and Maxwell < Ashley Cole

    Argentina:
    Demichelis < Terry (and I'm sure Argetina have a few more weak CBs)
    Maxi Rodriguez < Lennon, A Johnson, Jay Rodriguez, etc, etc.

    I'm not very familiar with their defence (by all reports it's very weak), but are you telling me that all the left-backs in their squad are better than Cole?

    Netherlands:
    De Jong < Britton, Cork, Carrick and Barry
    Clasie at DCM < Britton and Cork (although I do like Clasie, he's just not as good as those two)

    Italy, Spain and Germany I'll give you.

    I'm sure I've missed plenty more in all that, but searching around and comparing the weaker players in each top WC squad isn't the easiest job. The truth is you could say what you said about the English squad about most of the big sides at the tournament.

    Only seeing this post now but it is absolutely nonsensical. John Terry retired from international football in 2012??

    How can you use him being better than Demichelis (which I agree with) as an example??

    And Ashley Cole wasn't brought because he played very little all year.

    And I'd also argue that Cole is not better than Marcelo, and also that Dawson and Shawcross are not a better fit at CB than Luiz is for Brazil.

    What do you think of this?

    Shaw<Cole
    Smalling<Terry
    Phil Jone< Terry


    I've already said what I thought about the De Jong situation, you're very, very wrong here I feel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    Does anybody know if Spain vs El Salvador is on any UK tv station tonight?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    Only seeing this post now but it is absolutely nonsensical. John Terry retired from international football in 2012??

    How can you use him being better than Demichelis (which I agree with) as an example??

    It's obvious Terry would come out of retirement if Roy had managed the situation well enough.
    And Ashley Cole wasn't brought because he played very little all year.

    And I'd also argue that Cole is not better than Marcelo, and also that Dawson and Shawcross are not a better fit at CB than Luiz is for Brazil.

    Cole was still excellent when he played. He is still a top class left-back. Cole is light years ahead of Evra who will be starting for France. And are you telling me that he is no better than any of the left-backs in the Argentina squad? Are you going to deny that Cole is better than these players?

    I'm not going to bother arguing about Luiz and Shawcross and Dawson with you.
    What do you think of this?

    Shaw<Cole
    Smalling<Terry
    Phil Jone< Terry

    I'd probably agree with all of that. What's the point of it?
    :eek:

    De Jong had a great season for Milan despite not having much quality around him and was, imo, Milan's best, most consistent player this year.

    Can't remember the last time I read something so wrong as the bit in bold. De Jong is infinitely better than Barry (who I think is good enough) and I wouldn't even be comparing the other two to him.

    You either haven't seen much of NDJ or you have something against him because I can't understand how you could rate him so lowly.

    I didn't see a lot of Milan and de Jong, but any time I did he was at the same standard as I have come to expect. Poor first touch and weak passing are his biggest flaws. He can hit some nice long passes which can be impressive, but that doesn't come close to making up for his poor touch and how he occasionally misplaces easy short passes. He was also poor positionally when defending, but I'd put that more down to the bad management situation at the club.

    The fact that you think Britton and Cork are so poor just shows that we are never going to agree on central midfielders. You either don't rate touch and control as an important skill for the position or you aren't able to judge it. Either way I suspect that we would disagree on the abilities of most central midfielders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,166 ✭✭✭Beefy78


    Injuries and poor performances tonight aside I think we're seeing England's team vs Italy tonight vs Honduras. I thought Milner might play next week but I think he'd be playing tonight if so.

    Hart

    Johnson
    Baines
    Jagielka
    Cahill

    Henderson
    Gerrard

    Lallana
    Rooney
    Welbeck

    Sturridge


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭Vinz Mesrine


    Beefy78 wrote: »
    Injuries and poor performances tonight aside I think we're seeing England's team vs Italy tonight vs Honduras. I thought Milner might play next week but I think he'd be playing tonight if so.

    Hart

    Johnson
    Baines
    Jagielka
    Cahill

    Henderson
    Gerrard

    Lallana
    Rooney
    Welbeck

    Sturridge

    Sterling for Welbeck and that's their strongest 11


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,377 ✭✭✭Smithwicks Man


    Pro. F wrote: »
    It's obvious Terry would come out of retirement if Roy had managed the situation well enough.

    Cole was still excellent when he played. He is still a top class left-back. Cole is light years ahead of Evra who will be starting for France. And are you telling me that he is no better than any of the left-backs in the Argentina squad? Are you going to deny that Cole is better than these players?
    Well if he's not available, he's not available?

    I agree that Ashley Cole is better than the LB or other countries, however, that one fact is not near sufficient to prove your overall point.
    Pro. F wrote: »
    I'm not going to bother arguing about Luiz and Shawcross and Dawson with you.
    That's fair, but I'd imagine most would agree that David Luiz at CB for Brazil is a far better option than Michael Dawson or Ryan Shawcross.
    Pro. F wrote: »
    I'd probably agree with all of that. What's the point of it?
    The point of it is that we are talking about the available talent pool of England in comparison to other counties and this debate started off by me saying "To be fair, there are plenty of players not in other squads that are better than players in the English squad"

    To which you said that the same could be said about players not in the English squad better than players in other squads.

    Then the two main examples you gave to back up this point were Terry and Cole. Now i have stated that you could also say that Terry and Cole are also better than Shaw and Smalling/Jones. Do you follow me here?

    You can't say England better players not in the squad like Terry and Cole who are better than the players other teams brought when they're also better than the players England brought? :confused:
    Pro. F wrote: »
    I didn't see a lot of Milan and de Jong, but any time I did he was at the same standard as I have come to expect. Poor first touch and weak passing are his biggest flaws. He can hit some nice long passes which can be impressive, but that doesn't come close to making up for his poor touch and how he occasionally misplaces easy short passes. He was also poor positionally when defending, but I'd put that more down to the bad management situation at the club.

    The fact that you think Britton and Cork are so poor just shows that we are never going to agree on central midfielders. You either don't rate touch and control as an important skill for the position or you aren't able to judge it. Either way I suspect that we would disagree on the abilities of most central midfielders.

    I agree about De Jong, his shocking pass completion rate of 91.4% this season has let him down. You're talking absolute rubbish. In 2010-11, De Jong also had the highest pass completion rate out of any player in the Premiership. He is an accomplished passer of the ball and his positioning is also very good.

    Milan's lack of cohesion should have hindered him a lot more than it did this season because of the type of player that he is but yet he still managed to be their best player. He will be integral to Holland's chances in Brazil.

    And I never once said that I thought Britton or Cork were poor players, they just aren't near the same quality of De Jong imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,166 ✭✭✭Beefy78


    David Batty had the highest pass completion rate in England for a couple of years. It's easy to play a pass when you're just laying the ball off two yards to a more gifted player.

    If I can interject into this debate, it would seem that you're both appreciating different types of midfielders. There's room for both.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    Penalty! La Roja start quick, Costa shows exactly what he offers to this side, his run in behind El Salvador is the directness needed at times.

    Fabregas misses the penalty by a long way though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    Does anybody know if Spain vs El Salvador is on any UK tv station tonight?

    it's FTV on setanta sports 1 at 4am


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    batistuta9 wrote: »
    it's FTV on setanta sports 1 at 4am

    Ye I saw that, can't believe they aren't showing it live.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    That's fair, but I'd imagine most would agree that David Luiz at CB for Brazil is a far better option than Michael Dawson or Ryan Shawcross.

    As purely a defender I think Shawcross is better, Luiz may be all bells and whistles with his free kicks etc but I'd be more confident with Shawcross at centre half than Luiz.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Pro. F wrote: »
    I agree that Luiz is better served playing in a possession dominating team as his footballing skills are useful. But he is a liability defensively, there's no two ways about it. He has made a lot more than a few errors. He'll be covered by playing alongside Thiago Silva, with Brazil dominating possession and pressing high. But he will still be a weak link in their team.

    .

    I think his defensive weaknesses and the mistakes he makes are massively overstated as he doesnt suit the image of a stereotypical British CB. I think luiz would be one of the two first choice CBs at every club in the PL bar Chelsea and Arsenal. Then outside of england I could see him comfortably playing CB at nearly all of the european superpowers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    I think his defensive weaknesses and the mistakes he makes are massively overstated as he doesnt suit the image of a stereotypical British CB. I think luiz would be one of the two first choice CBs at every club in the PL bar Chelsea and Arsenal. Then outside of england I could see him comfortably playing CB at nearly all of the european superpowers.

    I don't think they are overstated. This is something that is always said when someone says that a player is liable to make mistakes. It's got nothing to do with image at all. It just seems he loses concentration in games or something, because his marking at times can be terrible. Silva will need to be doubly alert in that respect. There's quite a few better central defenders in Europe definitely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    A note for those without ITV/BBC who want to view it or who don't want to use lower quality streams - if you use Chrome, download an extension called ZenMate. It's an excellent extension which allows you to change your IP address and will give you BBC iPlayer and ITV Player, which shows the games they are carrying live, online and in excellent quality. It's only going to be free for a certain period of time, but we may get the World Cup out of it.

    c31ddc3eb3d634068624564d6f51d8d4.png


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭Vinz Mesrine


    Ye I saw that, can't believe they aren't showing it live.

    You don't seem to be missing too much judging by the current scoreline.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    You don't seem to be missing too much judging by the current scoreline.

    I'm watching it through other means. On the contrary, there has been a lot to see and a lot to learn.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭Vinz Mesrine


    I'm watching it through other means. On the contrary, there has been a lot to see and a lot to learn.

    Are they passing the ball a lot without actually doing anything with it?


    How in the name of God is Glen Johnson first choice for England? Surely Jon Flanagan would be a much better option.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    Well if he's not available, he's not available?

    Except that it's obvious Terry would come out of retirement if Roy had managed the situation well enough. Go on sticking your fingers in your ears there and just pretending that he couldn't have been called up if asked and managed properly. It's a piss poor argument.
    That's fair, but I'd imagine most would agree that David Luiz at CB for Brazil is a far better option than Michael Dawson or Ryan Shawcross.

    I'm not interested in what most people's opinions are on any particular football matter. The fans, journalists and pundits who don't have a clue are in the overwhelming majority. I'm happy to form my opinions without regard to what most people think.
    The point of it is that we are talking about the available talent pool of England in comparison to other counties and this debate started off by me saying "To be fair, there are plenty of players not in other squads that are better than players in the English squad"

    To which you said that the same could be said about players not in the English squad better than players in other squads.

    Then the two main examples you gave to back up this point were Terry and Cole. Now i have stated that you could also say that Terry and Cole are also better than Shaw and Smalling/Jones. Do you follow me here?

    You can't say England better players not in the squad like Terry and Cole who are better than the players other teams brought when they're also better than the players England brought? :confused:

    If you repeat the process that we just went through using Shaw, Smalling and Jones instead of Cole and Terry you will still find players that they are better than, going to the tournament with some of the big nations.

    As I've said since, your "To be fair, there are plenty of players not in other squads that are better than players in the English squad" could be said about a good few of the big international squads. If you compare the weaknesses of one international squad, to all the other international squads then you will find those match ups. It is a convoluted and ineffective way of assessing the depth of talent available.
    I agree about De Jong, his shocking pass completion rate of 91.4% this season has let him down. You're talking absolute rubbish. In 2010-11, De Jong also had the highest pass completion rate out of any player in the Premiership. He is an accomplished passer of the ball and his positioning is also very good.

    Milan's lack of cohesion should have hindered him a lot more than it did this season because of the type of player that he is but yet he still managed to be their best player. He will be integral to Holland's chances in Brazil.

    And I never once said that I thought Britton or Cork were poor players, they just aren't near the same quality of De Jong imo.

    Pass completion stats without context are a rubbish way of judging central midfielders. They end up making people think that Carrick is better than Xabi Alonso.

    A pass that puts a centre-back in trouble or slows a building attack is still counted as a completed pass. A pass where the CM drops between the CBs to do their job for them (playing easy passes under no pressure from deep) and achieves fúck all is still counted as a completed pass. A CM who doesn't have the skill to demand the ball when closely marked, turn on it and pass to the free team-mate, so taking his markers out of the game, can still rack up good pass completion numbers.

    You think that Britton and Cork are poor enough as to not even be worth comparing to de Jong. That's what I meant by "so poor".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    Sterling for Welbeck and that's their strongest 11

    Ive long been saying this but Roy really doesnt seem interested, hasnt even started him for one of the games, even the one with the completely changed side.


Advertisement