Liverpool v Man City. Sun April 13th KO 13:37 SS1, Important Mod Warning in OP.

Liamalone · 13-04-2014 03:48PM

nuxxx wrote: »

City/Chelsea have both won leagues since all that money has been invested.

Liverpool haven't exactly kept their hands in their pockets lol

Nuri Sahin · 13-04-2014 03:49PM

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

So playing at least six less games makes zero difference. Genius.

You just want a big astrix besides Liverpool's name if they do go on and wrap up the league. It's okay to admit it.

OwaynOTT · 13-04-2014 03:52PM

Liamalone wrote: »

Liverpool haven't exactly kept their hands in their pockets lol

Don't think anyone has claimed that lol.

Chazz Michael Michaels · 13-04-2014 03:53PM

Nuri Sahin wrote: »

You just want a big astrix besides Liverpool's name if they do go on and wrap up the league. It's okay to admit it.

Read my posts, I actually said in plain English that it wasn't luck. I also congratulated Liverpool. You're seeing what you want to see. Can't help you with that.

Soft Falling Rain · 13-04-2014 03:53PM

If I wasn't a slap head already I would have been anyway after watching that #aged5years

5starpool · 13-04-2014 04:34PM

This thread is suffering from a Chazz attack.

13-04-2014 04:47PM

If Liverpool win the league then no one else can complain. City and Chelsea had the finances and squad to cope with the extra European games. If they really do use Liverpool's lack of European action as an excuse then that is really scraping the barrel.

bad2dabone · 13-04-2014 04:52PM

From 7th to champions, nobody can deny that's impressive. If it happens.

ThirdMan · 13-04-2014 04:54PM

bad2dabone wrote: »

From 7th to champions, nobody can deny that's impressive. If it happens.

As a Man U fan I'm banking on it for next year :P

mayordenis · 13-04-2014 04:56PM

who won man of the match? missed it

Knex* · 13-04-2014 04:58PM

mayordenis wrote: »

who won man of the match? missed it

I think Sterling got it.

K-9 · 13-04-2014 04:58PM

quarryman wrote: »

Shouid have gone. No doubt.

And skyrtel literally PUNCHING the ball out.

Very lucky result for Liverpool but they'll tell you they EARNED it.

We've listened to others telling us we whinge about referee decisions and "the best team losing" so yeah, we earned it.

Mickeroo · 13-04-2014 05:01PM

Deleted User wrote: »

If Liverpool win the league then no one else can complain. City and Chelsea had the finances and squad to cope with the extra European games. If they really do use Liverpool's lack of European action as an excuse then that is really scraping the barrel.

bad2dabone wrote: »

From 7th to champions, nobody can deny that's impressive. If it happens.

Liverpool are actually having the season I thought Arsenal were having

LiamoSail · 13-04-2014 05:01PM

Liamalone wrote: »

Liverpool haven't exactly kept their hands in their pockets lol

Of course not, but relevant to City and Chelsea, Liverpool have spent a pittance. Even the likes of United and Spurs have side that were assembled at a considerably greater cost to that of Liverpool's

K-9 · 13-04-2014 05:04PM

Mickeroo wrote: »

Liverpool are actually having the season I thought Arsenal were having

It's the form since January really when you think about it. We were only a point ahead of Everton when we played them in January and in a dog fight with them and Spurs fourth.

Chelsea now favourites for me because Liverpool winning it is still too unlikely.

Mickeroo · 13-04-2014 05:09PM

K-9 wrote: »

It's the form since January really when you think about it. We were only a point ahead of Everton when we played them in January and in a dog fight with them and Spurs fourth.

Chelsea now favourites for me because Liverpool winning it is still too unlikely.

Yeah the run of form since then has been unbelievable. Wouldn't sell Liverpool short now, Chelsea have looked fairly poor in the league apart from thrashing us 6-0 and I can't see them winning in Anfield.

DazMarz · 13-04-2014 05:13PM

The league will be decided at Anfield. It has not been a happy hunting ground for Chelsea (think the last time Chelsea won there in the League was May 2010?) and that Liverpool offensive line is just frightening at times. There is a belief, conviction and steel in that Liverpool squad right now that cannot be denied.

eagle eye · 13-04-2014 05:22PM

LiamoSail wrote: »

Of course not, but relevant to City and Chelsea, Liverpool have spent a pittance. Even the likes of United and Spurs have side that were assembled at a considerably greater cost to that of Liverpool's

£150 million in three seasons is a pretty large amount to spend. Outside of Chelsea and City thats on a par with anybody else at the moment.

ratracer · 13-04-2014 05:28PM

ThirdMan wrote: »

As a Man U fan I'm banking on it for next year :P

Haven't got 7th place wrapped up yet

13-04-2014 05:31PM

ThirdMan wrote: »

As a Man U fan I'm banking on it for next year :P

Could well happen. I really do think Moyes is better than people think he is. I mean to be fair to him he has taken a job from a man who spent a little over 26 or so years in the job and won on average 1 league title every second year. He needs time to get things right

Moneymaker · 13-04-2014 05:33PM

No one can argue Liverpool don't deserve it if they win the league.

They've beaten everyone around them, played the best football, scored the most goals and have had the outstanding player(maybe players) in the league this year.

What they've spent, whether or not they were in Europe is completely irrelevant.

OwaynOTT · 13-04-2014 05:40PM

eagle eye wrote: »

£150 million in three seasons is a pretty large amount to spend. Outside of Chelsea and City thats on a par with anybody else at the moment.

Actually it's roughly 97 million net spend in the last 3 years.

Super-Rush · 13-04-2014 06:04PM

See you all next weekend.

:cool:

LiamoSail · 13-04-2014 06:16PM

eagle eye wrote: »

£150 million in three seasons is a pretty large amount to spend. Outside of Chelsea and City thats on a par with anybody else at the moment.

Yea absolutely it is. But it's still a league behind that of City and Chelsea.

My point regarding United etc referred to the cost of the current squad. Obviously that doesn't include the likes of Downing, Carroll etc

5live · 13-04-2014 06:51PM

murpho999 wrote: »

No you haven't

In a month's time you might see Stephen Gerrard lift the Premiership trophy at Anfield. You'll enjoy that.

Damn, i just want to thank that post again.

Thanks:)

5live · 13-04-2014 07:02PM

5starpool wrote: »

This thread is suffering from a Chazz attack.

Mr.Nice Guy · 13-04-2014 07:12PM

It was a cracking game of football. Fair play to the Liverpool fans for producing a smashing atmosphere. No one can begrudge the title going to Anfield if that's how it pans out as they have played some eye-catching stuff and won key games in style. I think the Chelsea game will be winner-takes-all.

PS I hope Jose plays Torres up top for the Anfield game just for the amazing sub-plot of Torres trying to deny the club where he once used to be idolised. You can't write that kind of script. (Don't fancy his chances though)

Chucky the tree · 13-04-2014 07:32PM

Wooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! Have that bitches!

dirtyden · 13-04-2014 07:43PM

OwaynOTT wrote: »

Actually it's roughly 97 million net spend in the last 3 years.

I had a look at transfer spend of premier league teams out of curiosity. Stoke have the 4th highest net spend at 91 million over the last 5 years, just a few quid behind united and more than Liverpool. Chelsea and city are way way out in front.

mada999 · 13-04-2014 09:04PM

Knex. wrote: »

Madness from Suarez anyway. **** was he thinking?

was it in the box, if it was he deffo would have given it

Liverpool v Man City. Sun April 13th KO 13:37 SS1, Important Mod Warning in OP.

Comments