Historic battles

Drweavil · 2014-03-23 09:42:43

So far I've learned that if you're playing Tigers and split up you're dead from the start. 5 vs 9+ is not unusual in favour of the ruski's. It's going to take time for the playing community tactically to catch up. Thoughts?

23-03-2014 09:42AM

#1

Drweavil

Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 79 ✭✭

Join Date: April 2008

Posts: 75

So far I've learned that if you're playing Tigers and split up you're dead from the start. 5 vs 9+ is not unusual in favour of the ruski's. It's going to take time for the playing community tactically to catch up.

Thoughts?

0

Comments

#2 23-03-2014 04:44PM

Tenger

Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,214 Mod ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2004

Posts: 10020

Well I for one am looking forward to this mode.

The outnumbered by superior element will bring back the historical attitude towards the Tiger. Looking at the couple of videos online.....I wonder would multiple T-34's work better than having 2-3 SU-152 on the Soviet side?
I wonder how the Ardennes will work out? Hordes of M4's vs Panthers, Tiger II's and JadPanther's?

However the random team makeup may well mean that so many pp will not stick together.

0