Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

UK considered giving half of NI to ROI

  • 03-01-2014 10:31AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭


    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news...-29884724.html

    I wonder what would have happened if this had actually became a reality.
    Could this have made things better?
    Hard to see them turning Belfast into essentially the new Berlin Wall and I cant wrap my head around how splitting that city in half would have worked.
    Still very interesting though


«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    I can see the theory of it alright. Keep both communities separated so they stop shooting each other. I think that formed part of the logic of the peace walls. A bit naive though in my eyes. Frankly I'm surprised it managed to go so far up the chain in the UK before being poo poohed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭moxin


    The Nazi's would have been proud, shows you how bad Thatchers regime was to even entertain the idea.
    Other incentives, such as loyalty tests for benefits and large-scale internment "should drive out large numbers", they speculated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Im curious how the half Belfast to ROI would have worked, I imagine a bit like Berlin before 1990.
    I imagine Derry would have become the main town in Donegal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    bear1 wrote: »
    Im curious how the half Belfast to ROI would have worked, I imagine a bit like Berlin before 1990.
    I imagine Derry would have become the main town in Donegal?

    I think the common travel area was in effect by the 80's. I'd imagine that most of the heavy industry (H&W, Shortts etc) would have remained in North Belfast mind


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,179 ✭✭✭hfallada


    How many Irish people want NI? If the people riot over a flag, how bad will it be over a united Ireland? Most young people don't see people from NI as Irish, but British. Plus I'm sure there would a need to throw some foreign firms from the republic up to the north to show were integrating NI into the republic.

    Do we really want some of the those wrack job NI politicians being able to run for the dail? I can't see a single benefit for the ROI taking over the running of NI


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 222 ✭✭harryr711


    hfallada wrote: »
    How many Irish people want NI? If the people riot over a flag, how bad will it be over a united Ireland? Most young people don't see people from NI as Irish, but British. Plus I'm sure there would a need to throw some foreign firms from the republic up to the north to show were integrating NI into the republic.

    Do we really want some of the those wrack job NI politicians being able to run for the dail? I can't see a single benefit for the ROI taking over the running of NI
    The majority of Irish people want unification, and according the an Irish Times poll would be prepared to pay extra taxes if necessary. I'm young, I see the six counties as Irish even if some of the residents consider themselves to be British. A single economy, with one tax system, legal system, etc. and ultimately one larger market is attractive for investors/businesses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    hfallada wrote: »
    How many Irish people want NI? If the people riot over a flag, how bad will it be over a united Ireland? Most young people don't see people from NI as Irish, but British. Plus I'm sure there would a need to throw some foreign firms from the republic up to the north to show were integrating NI into the republic.

    Do we really want some of the those wrack job NI politicians being able to run for the dail? I can't see a single benefit for the ROI taking over the running of NI

    To be honest, that whole situation confuses me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    harryr711 wrote: »
    The majority of Irish people want unification, and according the an Irish Times poll would be prepared to pay extra taxes if necessary. I'm young, I see the six counties as Irish even if some of the residents consider themselves to be British. A single economy, with one tax system, legal system, etc. and ultimately one larger market is attractive for investors/businesses.

    I wouldn't be prepared for extra taxes to take on something which used to belong to us.
    Times have changed, for everyone and in no way would I pay more to have the North. This is my opinion :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭moxin


    hfallada wrote: »
    Most young people don't see people from NI as Irish, but British.

    Where did you spring this rubbish from?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    harryr711 wrote: »
    The majority of Irish people want unification, and according the an Irish Times poll would be prepared to pay extra taxes if necessary. I'm young, I see the six counties as Irish even if some of the residents consider themselves to be British. A single economy, with one tax system, legal system, etc. and ultimately one larger market is attractive for investors/businesses.

    Even though I believe that a majority in the Republic would vote for a UI I would be very wary of poll data for something that may never happen in the lifetime of the people being asked the question.

    Poll data from NI may be more accurate, as the people there are ones that will decide, based on who they elect to the Assembly, whether a UI vote may ultimately take place.
    And as we have seen from recent NI pools there is little appetite for a UI at the moment.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Just further proof for me that had the Irish government been more strident and brave there is no telling what could have been achieved. From the renewed outbreak in 69 it's abundantly clear that the British where searching for the easiest way out of a situation that exasperated and had defeated them.
    The ultimate responsibility for what happened lies with the two powers vested with finding solutions. The vacumn was filled by the two extremes until the British manned up and done the deal that needed to be done.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 9,842 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    It does seem rather ironic given the historic context that the Boundary Commission report in the 1920s to change the border was shelved and (AFAIR) only suggested modest changes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,193 ✭✭✭[Jackass]


    Jesus, the absolute contempt she had for the Irish.

    Although in fairness, some of them did try and blow her up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Just further proof for me that had the Irish government been more strident and brave there is no telling what could have been achieved. From the renewed outbreak in 69 it's abundantly clear that the British where searching for the easiest way out of a situation that exasperated and had defeated them.
    The ultimate responsibility for what happened lies with the two powers vested with finding solutions. The vacumn was filled by the two extremes until the British manned up and done the deal that needed to be done.

    Have to totally agree with this.
    Does anyone know how much NI costs the UK every year? and how it compares to Wales and Scotland?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭An Coilean


    hfallada wrote: »
    Most young people don't see people from NI as Irish, but British.

    Sorry, what? Can you back ths up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Tramps Like Us


    Would have worked out excellently for the IRA, plenty of new staging grounds for them, would have increased their effectiveness to south armagh levels


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Tramps Like Us


    moxin wrote: »
    Where did you spring this rubbish from?

    Not even most British people view loyalists from the north as british


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,308 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    bear1 wrote: »
    I wouldn't be prepared for extra taxes to take on something which used to belong to us.
    Times have changed, for everyone and in no way would I pay more to have the North. This is my opinion :)
    You'd be paying extra taxes to support the North. The North currently receives lots of money from the UK and Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,928 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    the_syco wrote: »
    You'd be paying extra taxes to support the North. The North currently receives lots of money from the UK and Ireland.

    The post however was made out that the general population here in ROI would be prepared to pay extra taxes to get NI back.
    I'm simply saying I wouldn't but of course I have no control over that if it's passed in a referendum.
    I didn't know though that the ROI is handing money over to the North.
    Any figures?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    bear1 wrote: »
    I didn't know though that the ROI is handing money over to the North.
    Any figures?

    Have a tour of the carparks of Asda and B&Q and look at numberplates.;)
    The cost of partition to this island is unknown, there are many many variables to take into account.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    the_syco wrote: »
    You'd be paying extra taxes to support the North. The North currently receives lots of money from the UK and Ireland.

    It would be a brave/naive politician to raise that point in the context of irish politics mind


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    Love this bit:
    However, officials later noted that while moving half-a-million people -- mostly Catholics -- might be acceptable for a totalitarian regime, human rights arguments would be an obstacle.

    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/uk-officials-considered-walled-ghetto-for-catholics-29884724.html

    Not that half a million people would have suffered from psychological trauma, violence and murder but that 'human rights arguments would be an obstacle'.

    Despicable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Love this bit:



    Not that half a million people would have suffered from psychological trauma, violence and murder but that 'human rights arguments would be an obstacle'.

    Despicable.

    Pesky Human Rights! British government thinking hasn't really changed in centuries. Image is everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 Allknowing


    Including South Armagh....


    Gee Thanks Maggie :-)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,884 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    I think Fermanagh moving over at least would have made some sense.

    Only 65k people... Mostly catholic, nationalist.... And it would look better on a map.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,884 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    bear1 wrote: »
    I didn't know though that the ROI is handing money over to the North.
    Any figures?

    Unsure of the exact amount but since Bertie's 1997 election victory it has been at least a couple of hundred million.... Mostly in small chunks with some largish transfers for capital projects.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,179 ✭✭✭hfallada


    An Coilean wrote: »
    Sorry, what? Can you back ths up?

    I have had this discussion with my friends and in college and most young people don't view the people of Northern Ireland as Irish. I seriously doubt there is any stats of young Irish persons view of north Irish people. But unlike older generations, most young people have the view that citizens of NI are far more British than Irish.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    hfallada wrote: »
    I have had this discussion with my friends and in college and most young people don't view the people of Northern Ireland as Irish. I seriously doubt there is any stats of young Irish persons view of north Irish people. But unlike older generations, most young people have the view that citizens of NI are far more British than Irish.

    Short answer 'No' i.e. you cannot back it up.

    This is the politics forum. Your chats with the company you keep do not constitute evidence of anything other than you hang out with people with bizarre views.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,059 ✭✭✭Tuco88


    Id love to see a UI, but being realistic its not going to happen anytime soon. The longer it goes, the more difficult it looks for me. Or is it already at the stage that the people of the NI are happy enough they way it is, or heading to. If it was to be done i would think changing single counties slowly, would work best starting with Fermanagh, derry.... maybe 2 - 3 years between each all depending.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,328 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    harryr711 wrote: »
    The majority of Irish people want unification, and according the an Irish Times poll would be prepared to pay extra taxes if necessary. I'm young, I see the six counties as Irish even if some of the residents consider themselves to be British. A single economy, with one tax system, legal system, etc. and ultimately one larger market is attractive for investors/businesses.

    Yes and the giant cluster fvck that it would take to get anywhere near a viable and working United Ireland is worth it?


Advertisement