Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Terminator Genisys

2456744

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭SouthTippBass


    ^^^^^^ Noooooooooooooooo!! :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭.jacksparrow.


    See my post on the second page, this is the worst possible plot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    wilddarts wrote: »
    ''On June, 20, 2013, it was revealed that Dwayne Johnson is being considered for the film. Further, a possible plot synopsis was released for the film: "The next chunk they have on the film is on the setting for the story. According to Examiner sources, the setting for Terminator 5 will be set before the birth of Sarah Connor and focus on her parents in the 1940s and 50s.''


    Sweet Jesus........ NO.

    I'd rather see The Rock than an aging Arnie as a Terminator again though


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭Jumboman


    krudler wrote: »
    I'd rather see The Rock than an aging Arnie as a Terminator again though

    Arnie was already too only by the time he made T3. He should of made T3 in the mid 1990s when he was still young enough to play Terminator.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,618 ✭✭✭Mr Freeze


    Another Trilogy??? But there was only 2 Terminator films, 1 and 2. They never made a third, it never happened ok.............:pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Sofiztikated


    If T2 was being made right now, and Arnie was younger, how many people would lament, and beat their breast about how much of a wooden actor he is.

    In fact I could see it as interesting, assuming The Rock is the T4000.

    1940/50's USA, moonshiners, bootleggers, racial tension (the Rock isn't the most Caucasian, now, is he?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 92,250 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    If this is a reboot which I think it is, be interesting to see who will play Sarah, Kyle and the Terminator

    Jensen Ackles would be good as Kyle Reese :P

    No matter what people tell you, words and ideas can change this World



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    This hurts me so much to read.

    I'm a massive Terminator fan. My Da showed me Terminator 1 and 2 at a relatively young age and it kicked off my fascination in Arnie, films and Science Fiction.

    Watching the consecutive releases has been painful. I came out of T3 and T4 from the cinema saying I enjoyed it, and I did, because it was Terminator. But this was fanboyism covering over the cracks. I couldn't possibly take another set of releases

    In saying that, I'll definitly go see them, just to get that hurt....


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    Terrible idea. If you're going to start the Terminator franchise up; revive the telly series. That was some cliffhanger and Summer Glau had to be the most awesome Terminator ever :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    1940's and 50's?

    Chances are they'll try to bring in some kind of WWII/Cold War tie into it. Because it's nearly 100 years in the past, the terminator has to be careful about contaminating the timeline or skynet may never exist. So he's programmed to integrate into the military and cause the death of Mr John Connor Sr. somewhere on the battlefield and make it look natural. This Terminator is a special once-off Terminator with a special emotion chip that allows him to outwardly display emotion and so integrate better and befriend Connor to get close to him. He goes back and enlists in the army as "Mr Hugh Mann". When the Terminator finally has his chance to kill Connor, there's a problem - he's learned to care too much about Connor and can't do it! But just as the terminator is about to reveal all, a huge shell detonates beside him and forces a full reset. Connor sees the terminator rise from the explosion and realises that this man is not human and is trying to kill him! Connor flees into a Nazi laboratory. After a tense chase scene involving fabulous inventions designed in the steampunk fashion, the terminator is eventually defeated with a large electric coil.
    The US military sweep in and the terminator is taken to Tennessee where its hydrogen power cell provides the key detonation component that the manhattan project was missing from its nuclear bomb programme. The US military, afraid of what Connor knows, arranges an "accident" for him on his way to work on the same day that his wife has just revealed she pregnant - Sarah if it's a girl, and John if it's a boy.

    There you go, I'll take $450,000 in cash please hollywood. Kthxbye.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    Mr Freeze wrote: »
    Another Trilogy??? But there was only 2 Terminator films, 1 and 2. They never made a third, it never happened ok.............:pac:

    Which is precisely the clever angle the telly show took :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭SouthTippBass


    seamus wrote: »
    1940's and 50's?

    Chances are they'll try to bring in some kind of WWII/Cold War tie into it. Because it's nearly 100 years in the past, the terminator has to be careful about contaminating the timeline or skynet may never exist. So he's programmed to integrate into the military and cause the death of Mr John Connor Sr. somewhere on the battlefield and make it look natural. This Terminator is a special once-off Terminator with a special emotion chip that allows him to outwardly display emotion and so integrate better and befriend Connor to get close to him. He goes back and enlists in the army as "Mr Hugh Mann". When the Terminator finally has his chance to kill Connor, there's a problem - he's learned to care too much about Connor and can't do it! But just as the terminator is about to reveal all, a huge shell detonates beside him and forces a full reset. Connor sees the terminator rise from the explosion and realises that this man is not human and is trying to kill him! Connor flees into a Nazi laboratory. After a tense chase scene involving fabulous inventions designed in the steampunk fashion, the terminator is eventually defeated with a large electric coil.
    The US military sweep in and the terminator is taken to Tennessee where its hydrogen power cell provides the key detonation component that the manhattan project was missing from its nuclear bomb programme. The US military, afraid of what Connor knows, arranges an "accident" for him on his way to work on the same day that his wife has just revealed she pregnant - Sarah if it's a girl, and John if it's a boy.

    There you go, I'll take $450,000 in cash please hollywood. Kthxbye.

    Ha! :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    I'm a fan in equal measures of both good cinema, and 'good' i.e entertaining visually arresting garbage cinema, and I genuinely am quite excited about another slew of Terminator Films whilst being in no doubt as to which category it'll belong to.

    If the film was even remotely as ridiculously entertaining as Seamus's pitch, I'd leave the cinema an unexpectedly fulfilled man.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,197 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    Ha! :pac:

    You think that's good? I knew a guy in college studying Archaeology & Anthropology by the name of Hugh Mann. Poor bugger never heard the end of those jokes :D

    Back on topic: Seamus's pitch sounds far better than what we will, in all probability, actually get from a Terminator reboot :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭.jacksparrow.


    Future war god dammitt!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,485 ✭✭✭Thrill


    Three Actresses Up for Sarah Connor Role in Terminator Reboot

    The Hollywood Reporter today brings word that a number of actresses are up for the Sarah Connor role, including "Game of Thrones" star Emilia Clarke, 21 Jump Street's Brie Larson and About Time's Margot Robbie. The trade does make clear, however, that a fourth, unknown, actress is also being given heavy consideration.


    Although no one has officially been cast in the franchise reboot, other roles are said to include both John Connor and Kyle Reese. The Dark Knight Rises star Tom Hardy is said to be Taylor's ideal for the former with TRON: Legacy's Garrett Hedlund among those reading for the latter.

    http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=111202

    It looks like things are starting to roll on the Terminator reboot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭Goldstein


    Thought Headley was a great Connor in TTSCC. Depends what age they're starting the character off at - The actresses mentioned are all in their mid 20s so I wonder will it be a reboot set around the events of The Terminator.

    This time.
    Skynet: Not a building.
    Terminators: Not designed for humans to plug their ipods into and ride like a motorbike.

    And most importantly - The lights: Leave them alone.

    It's ****in' distracting! Oooh Good! No. No Fu©k No! Best remix ever :D


  • Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So these movies might see the Terminator go back to kill Sarah Connor's parents? John Connor's grandparents? And what about the next reboot after that; If the machines fail in the next trilogy, which they obviously will do as Sarah Connor was born, will they then do another trilogy where a Terminator is sent back to kill Sarah's grandparents around the time of WW1? Oh, think of the possibilities...:confused:

    Hollywood, how about taking half of the few hundred million that you will spend on this trilogy and you dish it out amongst 20 original projects that have potential? You can pocket the other half and save it, versus losing it on making this new trilogy. No? I didn't honestly think so.

    I like my summer blockbusters and big budget popcorn-fests as much as many a movie-goer, but the rate at which franchises are getting rebooted these days is really disheartening. Either make Seamus' synopsis from above into a movie or don't make anything!

    Seriously though, Terminator should be left as a memory. Even with Christen Bale and Sam Worthington, both of who's stock was very high at the time, and a 'not bad' cameo from Arnie, T4 made a loss at the box office. Surely this should show that the public have had their fill of that world for now, but Hollywood are going to put it out there anyway.

    It's hard to predict what I'll be doing in 2015, if fate spares me, but queuing at the cinema to see this is something I know I definitely won't be doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,440 ✭✭✭Lamper.sffc


    Its like driving down a cul de sac after seeing the sign and still thinking the road will get you somewhere :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,014 ✭✭✭✭jaykhunter


    I generally don't like hearing "first of a trilogy" because it tells you you're not getting a full story (just the beginning of a bigger story) and it assumes you'll watch all three, because the first will definitely be a success. We haven't even been sold on the first, yet we're quietly being hassled to watch more films. No likey! I'm more accepting for Star Wars or Tolkien but Terminator especially has always been in single films, almost a decade apart and it just got rebooted/remade/re-something'd a few years back to tepid response.

    Saying that, I'm a big terminator fan so unless it gets horrific reviews, I'll see this film in the cinema or at home.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 865 ✭✭✭FlashD


    stankratz wrote: »
    Seriously though, Terminator should be left as a memory. T4 made a loss at the box office. Surely this should show that the public have had their fill of that world for now, but Hollywood are going to put it out there anyway.
    .

    T4 didn't make a loss at the box office, it was the least successful of the franchise but still pulled in a profit of $125 million.
    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=terminatorsalvation.htm

    ... the overall franchise is a massive success with profits close to a billion.
    http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/Terminator.php

    If there isn't a Terminator movie made between now and 2018, then control reverts back to James Cameron. That's the rumour! With huge profits and control of rights up for grabs, there is plenty of reason to reboot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 92,250 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Yvonne Strahovski would be good as Sarah Connor

    No matter what people tell you, words and ideas can change this World



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭SirLemonhead


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Yvonne Strahovski would be good as Sarah Connor

    Dear god, no. And no to any involvement with Summer Glau or anyone from the Sarah Connor Chronicles.

    I'd love unknowns, personally. but I know that can't really happen.

    I've always been someone who doesn't really care for a film set in the future. I think Terminator 4 *did* show interesting locations, but a lot of fans seem to want everything to look like the future scenes from the first two films - dark, small generic destroyed building sets. I don't think it'd be particularly interesting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭.jacksparrow.


    Will they ever give us the future was they briefly showed us in t2?

    A petition was signed by thousands, why don't they ever listen to what the fans know and want.

    A terminator in the 50s, dear oh dear.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭Adamantium


    This is one of the rare instances where

    I'd prefer they go for a straight reboot Batman Begins style, no 1950's storyline to murder Sarah Connor's parents or Days of Future Past tangling timelines. The last film was a semi reboot at this point despite how much i love the series, it'd be best off to wipe the slate.

    Alan Taylor has hinted that it would be a back to basics, grounded approach of the first two, apparently they're casting now

    http://screenrant.com/terminator-5-cast-list-john-sarah-connor/

    I've a feeling it's going to be a really excellent, captivating reboot for some odd reason, like they'll try different takes on the scenario

    Maybe they'll set it 80% in a future war, with flashbacks to pre war civilisation, althought it'll be sort of disappointing if its a stop the clock/Judgement day scenario again

    The mythos/universe of the series I found so captivating years ago, it's probably one of the reasons I love movies so much, fate vs free will, gloomy atmosphere, the immenent threat of nuclear war, malovent AI. It all felt so real/bordering on reality therefore terrifying

    Maybe they'll try different themes considering we're a different era tech wise.

    I've a feeling it'll be derivative at worst, the good kind

    Also this man was born to play Kyle Reese if they intend to reimagine characters:

    Aaron_Paul_a_p_0.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭.jacksparrow.


    Also heard their redesigning the t800 for it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭Adamantium


    Tom Hardy is the sort of man of stature you would follow into war for real, some good news if he is been cast as John Connor (future war general). Its probably a good indicator of the caliber of the script if they're getting the likes of him onboard.

    I'm surprised it's not being given a slasher remake with a bunch of unknowns that is typically done of 1980's horror remakes, fright night, halloween, probably more something close to T2 we'll get for money sakes

    All speculation at this point I suppose!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 269 ✭✭bellinter


    make one more attempt to wipe out John Connor.... only this time succeed. Then cut back and see what happens to the war when he dies. Terminator meets Looper. That would be a serious head f*ck. And it would certianly mix it up.

    Aaron Paul certainly looks the part to play Kyle Reese alright. And I'm with Adamantium above. Seeing as they simply MUST make another Terminator rather than trying to get an original film from somewhere, then a complete reboot is whats needed, with a line drawn under everything thats come before, rather than trying to tie in any of them which would just be a series of contrivances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Just make the future war section of T2 into a full lenght film, and don't let McG anywhere near it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭.jacksparrow.


    krudler wrote: »
    Just make the future war section of T2 into a full lenght film, and don't let McG anywhere near it.

    Yes yes yes!


Advertisement