Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Interesting Stuff Thread

1149150152154155219

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,989 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    robindch wrote: »
    ... and the Philippines (which, frankly, I wouldn't have expected)...
    Its common for filipino women to work abroad as nurses or childminders while the men stay at home, often with the kids.
    In very recent times numerous call centres have opened up in the Phillipines (as their spoken English has an American twang and is much easier to understand than those gentlemen in India) and they are mostly staffed by women who would otherwise have gone abroad.

    In some African tribal societies the women go out to chop wood and carry water while the men smoke, chat and keep an eye on the cattle.

    This contrasts with a coffee shop I passed recently in Foxrock, South Dublin, on a midweek around 11 am, which I noticed was packed with "yummy mummy" type women happily chatting and spending money.

    Perhaps "spending power" should be looked at as much as "participation in the workforce" when measuring gender equality?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,208 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    robindch wrote: »
    In terms of gender equality, the World Economic Forum says that Ireland is doing well and has maintained its place as the sixth most gender-equal country in the world, coming in after Iceland, Finland, Norway, Sweden and the Philippines (which, frankly, I wouldn't have expected):

    Ireland is gender-neutral country. Both men and women are denied abortions.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    3kTIouC.jpg

    They won't like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    Fascinating site. The Journey of Mankind. Interactive map, begins circa 160k years ago.

    What causes an Ice Age?
    Milutin Milankovitch was a Serb. He was caught in the wrong country at the outbreak of the Great War in 1914 and interned. Luckily a friendly Hungarian professor had him paroled and moved from his cell to Budapest where he had access to the library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Oblivious to the war, he continued his calculations and finally published his first set of predictions in 1920. The genius of Milankovitch lay in the correct combination of astronomical cycles and meticulous calculation. When he died in 1958, the theory was falling out of vogue partly because of various discrepancies between his predictions and geologists' findings. Since then, the older techniques of geologists, particularly the accuracy of carbon-dating, have been found wanting and the Milankovitch model has emerged triumphant, thus standing the test of time.

    A detailed description of the theory can be found elsewhere (see A.G.Dawson, Ice Age Earth, Routledge, London, 1992, chapter 13). But it is important to realise that frequent, apparently random, episodes of warming and cooling of the Earth can be explained to a great extent by the interplay of at least three celestial cycles, all running at different speeds. These cycles affect the warmth transmitted by the Sun to various parts of the Earth in a complex way. Of particular importance for the onset of glaciation is a decline in heat transmitted to northern temperate latitudes during summer with the resulting failure to melt last winter's snow. The amount of summer sun is controlled by three important heavenly cycles, which can be called respectively: the 100,000-year stretch, the 41,000-year tilt and the 23,000-year wobble.

    Every year when the Earth circles the Sun, it moves alternately nearer and farther at different points of the circuit. This motion is called elliptical and the Sun lies to one end of the ellipse rather than in the middle. Over a period of approximately 100,000 years this ellipse stretches somewhat, and then shortens and fattens until it is nearly circular. The process is rather like taking a child’s hula-hoop and distorting it intermittently with two hands to make an ellipse. Over the cycle, the distance between the Earth and the Sun varies by as much as 18.26 million kilometres (11.35 million miles). Although the change in heat delivery over this cycle is relatively small, the effect on the Earth's climate is, for some reason, greater than with the other two mechanisms. At present the Sun's circuit does not particularly favour an ice age, but the onset of the next major glaciation can be predicted accurately from the cycles.


    The human population was reduced to around 10,000 adults, due to Mt. Toba's super-eruption around 74k years ago. We were quite close to being wiped out. A fact which I seem to remember being mentioned by Hitchens during at least one of his many debates.

    The Lord works in mysterious ways. It's almost as if he rules through the laws of chance. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    recedite wrote: »
    Its common for filipino women to work abroad as nurses or childminders while the men stay at home, often with the kids.
    Interesting to know that it's common. Our next-door neighbours have exactly this setup. Though it also appears that they went back to the Phillippines to give birth and then stayed there for the duration of her maternity leave, before coming back. Which to me is a ridiculously sensible thing to do.

    It's funny though, my wife has commented a number of times on how the wife appears to bully the husband and basically expects him to do everything because she is the one who goes out to work.
    They joined the rest of the neighbours for a picnic during the summer, during which she sat on the grass talking while ordering him around fetching stuff, looking after the baby, etc.
    While that would still be viewed negatively if the genders were reversed, it definitely stood out more because the roles were reversed.

    However, what it really showed to me is that either party in a marriage can play the overbearing and demanding "provider" and the other the submissive "carer" who does all the work at home. It's not something which bears any relation to the actual genders involved.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    David Quinn would have exploded on the spot.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Well, the evidence suggests that a certain religion used it's control over our education system to greatly exaggerate it's importance in Gaelic Ireland, underplay it's role in the loss of Irish independence and lie outright about it's part in the fight to regain independence. ;)

    Are there any books on Gaelic Ireland that would be accessible to the uninitiated that you could recommend?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    keane2097 wrote: »
    Are there any books on Gaelic Ireland that would be accessible to the uninitiated that you could recommend?

    Anything by this chap - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Nicholls.

    His Gaelic and Gaelicised Ireland in the Middle Ages is a good 'primer'.

    He's my historian hero - and not just because we have wonderfully passionate discussions with the odd disagreement :D


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Well, well, well.

    The LA Times has announced that it will no longer print letters which deny that climate change is largely caused by human activity. I can't see the IT doing that any time soon, but it's a welcome change.

    http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-climate-change-letters-20131008,0,871615.story
    LA Times wrote:
    A piece this weekend debunking the claim that Congress and the president are exempted from Obamacare has drawn a harsh reaction from some readers and conservative bloggers. But their umbrage wasn't with the piece's explanation of why letters making this claim do not get published.

    Rather, they were upset by the statement that letters "[saying] there's no sign humans have caused climate change" do not get printed. Noel Sheppard at NewsBusters blogged about it over the weekend:

    "It's one thing for a news outlet to advance the as yet unproven theory of anthropogenic global warming; it's quite another to admit that you won't publish views that oppose it. As amazing as it may seem, that's exactly what the Los Angeles Times did Saturday in an article by editorial writer Jon Healey.... So letters to the editor 'that say there's no sign humans have caused climate change ... do not get printed. That's quite a statement coming from an editorial writer not named Al Gore."

    Point of order: Jon Healey didn't write that intro, and neither did Al Gore; as The Times' letters editor, I did. It ran without a byline because it was intended to be a straightforward editor's note introducing the piece; my apologies if that caused any confusion. Healey was responsible for everything beneath the boldface subhead, "Editorial writer Jon Healey explains why this claim in the debate over the healthcare law is off-base."

    As for letters on climate change, we do get plenty from those who deny global warming. And to say they "deny" it might be an understatement: Many say climate change is a hoax, a scheme by liberals to curtail personal freedom.

    Before going into some detail about why these letters don't make it into our pages, I'll concede that, aside from my easily passing the Advanced Placement biology exam in high school, my science credentials are lacking. I'm no expert when it comes to our planet's complex climate processes or any scientific field. Consequently, when deciding which letters should run among hundreds on such weighty matters as climate change, I must rely on the experts -- in other words, those scientists with advanced degrees who undertake tedious research and rigorous peer review.

    And those scientists have provided ample evidence that human activity is indeed linked to climate change. Just last month, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- a body made up of the world's top climate scientists -- said it was 95% certain that we fossil-fuel-burning humans are driving global warming. The debate right now isn't whether this evidence exists (clearly, it does) but what this evidence means for us.

    Simply put, I do my best to keep errors of fact off the letters page; when one does run, a correction is published. Saying "there's no sign humans have caused climate change" is not stating an opinion, it's asserting a factual inaccuracy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Anything by this chap - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Nicholls.

    His Gaelic and Gaelicised Ireland in the Middle Ages is a good 'primer'.

    He's my historian hero - and not just because we have wonderfully passionate discussions with the odd disagreement :D

    Thanks very much. If anyone is interested the book mentioned is going cheap on Amazon for Kindle:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Gaelic-Gaelicized-Ireland-Middle-Ages/dp/1843510030/ref=dp_ob_title_bk


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    keane2097 wrote: »
    Thanks very much. If anyone is interested the book mentioned is going cheap on Amazon for Kindle:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Gaelic-Gaelicized-Ireland-Middle-Ages/dp/1843510030/ref=dp_ob_title_bk

    Ohhh...I don't have it on my kindle...YET. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,208 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Dell is replacing laptops that smell of cat wee.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Sulla Felix


    keane2097 wrote: »
    Thanks very much. If anyone is interested the book mentioned is going cheap on Amazon for Kindle:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Gaelic-Gaelicized-Ireland-Middle-Ages/dp/1843510030/ref=dp_ob_title_bk
    Price is more or less the same on the .com for those of us that haven't switched to .co.uk :D
    It's something of a pet hate of mine as I've several relations who'd be both religious and of a nationalistic bent and the two seem to dovetail a little too neatly...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,142 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    ninja900 wrote: »

    I smell wee. Where's that from?

    *looks around*

    It's this one here! This one smells of wee!

    *laptop growls*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    This may interest some of the denizens of this forum.
    A subscription to nature generally costs over over €200 but for a limited time (very limited!) it's only €50. That's 51 issues for the entire year of a highly reputable science mag. :)

    http://www.nature.com/ecommerce/subscribe.action?productId=NATURE&source=EXTNSO13


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Sulla Felix


    Jernal wrote: »
    This may interest some of the denizens of this forum.
    A subscription to nature generally costs over over €200 but for a limited time (very limited!) it's only €50. That's 51 issues for the entire year of a highly reputable science mag. :)

    http://www.nature.com/ecommerce/subscribe.action?productId=NATURE&source=EXTNSO13
    Hmm, billing address restricted to US territories? Anyone have a workaround?
    Solved that, change location duh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Jernal wrote: »
    This may interest some of the denizens of this forum.
    A subscription to nature generally costs over over €200 but for a limited time (very limited!) it's only €50. That's 51 issues for the entire year of a highly reputable science mag. :)

    http://www.nature.com/ecommerce/subscribe.action?productId=NATURE&source=EXTNSO13

    I should really have said €55.:o Bloody VAT. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,208 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Shamsi Ali: The rise and fall of a New York imam
    The Islamic Thinkers' Society have taken to internet campaigns to denounce Ali. "Shamsi Ali is a moderate Uncle Sam Muslim who wants the Muslim community to imitate the west," the group writes on its website.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,208 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    There was an item in yesterday's dead-tree Irish Times (can't find it online) about how Senator Averil Power was doing white-collar boxing to fundraise for something or other.

    Hmm. Punch a Fianna Failer in the face. For charidee. Can't see that catching on :pac:

    Brian Cowen, your country needs you. Now hop up into that ring there...

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Opposition to wind farms, a bit like opposition to vaccines and fluoridation, has been growing over the last number of years thanks largely to a small number of uninformed or dishonest activists working mostly via social media.

    Research suggests that complaints of illness attributed to nearby windfarms has nothing to do with the windfarms themselves, and everything to do with anti wind farm groups (a) targetting specific locations for complaints and (b) adding health concerns to their wider opposition.

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0076584


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    robindch wrote: »
    Opposition to wind farms, a bit like opposition to vaccines and fluoridation, has been growing over the last number of years thanks largely to a small number of uninformed or dishonest activists working mostly via social media.

    Research suggests that complaints of illness attributed to nearby windfarms has nothing to do with the windfarms themselves, and everything to do with anti wind farm groups (a) targetting specific locations for complaints and (b) adding health concerns to their wider opposition.

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0076584
    There was a great thread in another forum which exemplified this perfectly. Campaigners going round to locals asking if they had any niggly health complaints, explaining that these were actually quite serious conditions, and informing them that wind farms were actually to blame and that rejecting them was key to 'salvation'.

    Quite like religious pamphlet pushers. Same sh**, different bucket.

    Edit: Infrasound, f*** sake. You'd get more low frequency noise from the wind shaking your house!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    robindch wrote: »
    Opposition to wind farms, a bit like opposition to vaccines and fluoridation, has been growing over the last number of years thanks largely to a small number of uninformed or dishonest activists working mostly via social media.

    Research suggests that complaints of illness attributed to nearby windfarms has nothing to do with the windfarms themselves, and everything to do with anti wind farm groups (a) targetting specific locations for complaints and (b) adding health concerns to their wider opposition.

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0076584

    There's a bunch of nonsense arguments associated with wind power - they kill birds (I doubt it's a big deal), they're ugly (I don't really think so but so are all power plants anyway), the space issue is less important (because as far as I know animals can graze on land with wind farms) and I suspect the "illnesses" are similar to those attributed to mobile phone towers (almost certainly absolute bollocks).


    However just because some of the arguments are nonsense that doesn't necessarily mean it's a good idea. I'm a bit on the fence about the whole thing.
    I find it difficult to judge whether data I've seen is trustworthy and tells the whole story when it comes to cost, subsidies and I've never read a clear explanation about how intermittency is dealt with.

    Having better storage and transmission technology would get me a little more on board.

    And, of course, no form of power generation exists in a vacuum. It doesn't just have to work, it has to be better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    There's definitely some concerns regards cost/transmission/storage but in this country it seems so be working pretty well so far. A couple of years ago on a good day wind powered generation hit 50% of the total generated!

    The above are legitimate concerns but I just see red when people scaremonger with pseudoscientific bollox.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    TheChizler wrote: »
    There's definitely some concerns regards cost/transmission/storage but in this country it seems so be working pretty well so far. A couple of years ago on a good day wind powered generation hit 50% of the total generated!

    That doesn't really say much though. On a calm day it could be **** all%.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    Gbear wrote: »
    That doesn't really say much though. On a calm day it could be **** all%.
    Well it's only indicative of potential. More relevantly it hovers on average around 11%, which is still pretty good considering how recently we got into the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,447 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Could we relocate the Dail to point at a wind farm? The hot air generated on any given day should be more than enough to allow us to do away with all other forms of supply. The chamber might as well be given over to some useful purpose...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,989 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    Gbear wrote: »
    There's a bunch of nonsense arguments associated with wind power - they kill birds (I doubt it's a big deal),
    There was a study done in the UK on this; they do kill some birds.
    However, they also found that cars kill twice as many birds as wind turbines, and cats 20 times as many.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Gbear wrote: »
    There's a bunch of nonsense arguments associated with wind power - they kill birds (I doubt it's a big deal), they're ugly (I don't really think so but so are all power plants anyway), the space issue is less important (because as far as I know animals can graze on land with wind farms) and I suspect the "illnesses" are similar to those attributed to mobile phone towers (almost certainly absolute bollocks).
    To which list you could have added "lower the price of your house", only the UK's Advertising Standards Authority has banned a leaflet which makes that claim:

    http://www.advertiser.ie/mullingar/article/63017/uk-ruling-strengthens-midlands-windfarm-project-
    Advertiser wrote:
    [...] “There is no peer-reviewed research which definitively states that wind turbines have a negative impact on property prices. It was very interesting to see the British Advertising Standards Authority move to ban claims that windfarms depress property prices last month,” said CEO of Element Power Ireland, Tim Cowhig.

    Element Power is the company behind the Greenwire project, a plan to erect 600 wind turbines across five Midland counties in an €8bn project to sell 3,000 megawatts of electricity to the UK by 2018. One hundred of these are planned to be erected on private land in Westmeath.

    Mr Cowhig went on to say that “Spurious claims that windfarms cause a drop in the value of adjacent properties were being made on a regular basis by a small group of anti-wind campaigners in the Midlands”.

    “I think the ruling by the ASA sets a precedent that false and mischievous claims about wind energy are not going to go unchallenged. Our company is committed to providing factual peer-reviewed information and that is what we have been doing through our public information days in counties Kildare, Laois, Meath, Offaly, and Westmeath.

    “Some people may not like or agree with the information we are providing, however, they shouldn’t try to mislead, confuse, or muddy the waters by peddling information which is factually incorrect. Minister Pat Rabbitte summarised the issue best on local radio last week when he said the concerns which were being whipped up and preyed on by anti-wind campaigners were ‘entirely unfounded’ and amounted to ‘unnecessary fear’,” concluded Mr Cowhig.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    3D printing is something that really excites me, so its rather cool to see how a Father managed to create a prosthetic hand for his son at a fraction of the cost.

    http://www.iflscience.com/technology/man-makes-3d-printed-prosthetic-hand-son-only-10

    1452350_698281043526243_1092344193_n.jpg


Advertisement