Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

People who use words they don't understand

1246

Comments

  • Site Banned Posts: 12 Shorc


    Yeah, another case of improper use of a word being accepted generally.
    Like the case made for "literally" becoming accepted as "figuratively".

    If literally means figuratively or non literally what da fuq means literally?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,935 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Indeed. I suspect the "nausea/nauseated" one comes to us very recently from that Big Bang Theory programme. I seem to recall the "let's laugh at the high functioning autistic" Sheldon character corrected one of the other characters for it.

    I actually had a windowlicker of the Sheldonesque variety call me out on this very thing a while back in the middle of a conversation that didn't involve him directly. I replied with "is the following sentence grammatically correct? fúck off, you thundering gobshíte". Apparently it is. Grammar nazis. Jesus, get a bloody life.

    Is that detail crucial or are you adding it epexegetically?*



    *A prize for anybody who gets the reference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,669 ✭✭✭who_me


    Languages change constantly. Isn't it only dead languages that don't change?

    At the same time, a language is a standard of communication. If the standard changes too much, it's no longer a standard - nor a language - and it becomes a hinderance to understanding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭wil


    BeerWolf wrote: »
    Nothing hard in saying "I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the tuth, so help me.." :confused:
    unless you're Jonathan Ross:D

    No I literally didnt mean literally, more in the sense of bad language, no not grammar, you know dirty words, no not hygiene, you know what I mean ffs.
    OK using swear words, four letter words for no other reason than having them in the sentence, not for humour, emphasis, anger or any reason, or simply using them in completely wrong context.
    Well but in exactly not the same way this isn't, just to be clear:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,161 ✭✭✭✭M5


    Bought a new thesaurus today. Nothing to write house about!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭wil


    osarusan wrote: »
    Is that detail crucial or are you adding it epexegetically?*



    *A prize for anybody who gets the reference.
    I think you may have forgotten to explain that:D

    Gotta be the word of the century, but no, I give up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,334 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    Muise... wrote: »
    favourite (2nd hand) malaprop. It could be a suburban myth, but I don't care.

    "She had the house done up lovely - a dildo rail the length of the hall."

    They'll be nice and tidy then, don't want to be tripping over them in the hall. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,935 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    wil wrote: »
    I think you may have forgotten to explain that:D

    Gotta be the word of the century, but no, I give up.

    It'll take a few minutes, but the answer is here.

    That link opens a word.doc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭xgwishyx


    One word.

    eXpresso

    *shudder*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,444 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    M5 wrote: »
    Bought a new thesaurus today. Nothing to write house about!

    Bought one myself. It's really, really, really good.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭IrishExpat


    One particular use I was irked about:

    "I know how to work an iPad, I'm not a philistine."

    definition: a person who is hostile or indifferent to culture and the arts, or who has no understanding of them.

    It does not simply mean lack of knowledge on any subject.

    grr


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 95 ✭✭Judge Roy Bean


    'Get two birds stoned at once'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 996 ✭✭✭HansHolzel


    To refute means to disprove (NOT to reject, deny or rebut).

    Fate and faith are two different words.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    http://www.independent.ie/woman/miss-ireland-aoife-walsh-hopes-her-red-hair-will-cinch-the-miss-world-title-29555699.html

    Headline:

    "Miss Ireland Aoife Walsh hopes her red hair will cinch the Miss World title"


    Cinch does not mean what you think it does Indo .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭loalae


    When people say weary when they mean wary -

    "I was a bit weary at first about sending him to that creche because I heard bad things but it has worked out well"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,053 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Honey-ec wrote: »
    Anyone who uses the word "revert" when they actually mean "reply".

    That makes baby jesus (and me) cry.
    I applied for a job in Trinity a couple of months back and they promised to "revert to" me. I complained about their usage (after they turned me down) but received no reply.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 136 ✭✭Jimmy444


    Nearly every time I hear the word "misnomer" it's used incorrectly, e.g. "There's a great misnomer out there that the rich are paying their fair share". I think they mean misconception or misunderstanding. As far as I know, "Misnomer" just means giving something the wrong name.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,198 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Chronic means long-lasting, not terrible
    Dirge is a noun meaning a sad song, and is not a synonym of bilge


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭Alice1


    I hate hearing "it's a big ask". For goodness sake, ask is a verb - not a noun. A verb I tell you!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,334 ✭✭✭earlyevening


    "Generic" means unbranded. It is not a synonym for "general".


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 996 ✭✭✭HansHolzel


    presently does not mean at present


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 476 ✭✭christ on a bike!


    That's a really interesting point of you


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,900 ✭✭✭rannerap


    Was it for a job in Subway? :pac:

    No :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,720 ✭✭✭✭Earthhorse


    "Generic" means unbranded. It is not a synonym for "general".

    Actually, it is.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/generic?s=t
    HansHolzel wrote: »
    presently does not mean at present

    Actually, it does.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/presently?s=t


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭WhatNowForUs?


    Links234 wrote: »
    This thread is starting to read like John Waters' vocabulary.

    Do you not mean Kevin Myres


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 996 ✭✭✭HansHolzel


    Earthhorse wrote: »

    Presently may mean at present to people who don't know the difference. That does not make it correct, no matter what wiki-type dictionary you look at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,720 ✭✭✭✭Earthhorse


    No, presently just means "at present", in certain contexts. This is true regardless of what you personally believe.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/presently
    http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/presently


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 996 ✭✭✭HansHolzel


    Earthhorse wrote: »
    No, presently just means "at present", in certain contexts. This is true regardless of what you personally believe.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/presently
    http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/presently

    From your own 'Oxford' source:

    "Both senses date back to the Middle Ages, but the second sense fell into disfavor between the 17th and 20th centuries."

    Note the American spelling of disfavour in an 'Oxford' link. This is NOT a link to the OED.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,720 ✭✭✭✭Earthhorse


    It doesn't matter if it fell into disfavour, or disfavor, for that matter, what matters is that it is correctly used; this is entirely a different thing from preferred usage.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,720 ✭✭✭✭Earthhorse


    Also, the note on usage from the first link I posted is more expansive (and sensible in my opinion):

    The two apparently contradictory meanings of presently, “in a little while, soon” and “at the present time, now,” are both old in the language. In the latter meaning presently dates back to the 15th century. It is currently in standard use in all varieties of speech and writing in both Great Britain and the United States. The sense “soon” arose gradually during the 16th century. Strangely, it is the older sense “now” that is sometimes objected to by usage guides. The two senses are rarely if ever confused in actual practice. Presently meaning “now” is most often used with the present tense ( The professor is presently on sabbatical leave ) and presently meaning “soon” often with the future tense ( The supervisor will be back presently ). The semantic development of presently parallels that of anon, which first had the meaning, now archaic, of “at once, immediately,” but later came to mean “soon.”


Advertisement