Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Player Watchlist

1121315171828

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Am I correct in saying Kagawa wasnt played alot by Ferguson either? As in it is not just a Moyes thing as I have been reading elsewhere. Maybe just maybe he is not quite the player the fans make him out to be? I like Kagawa alot, but to me its says alot when his managers at Utd either have not started him much or have played him out of his preferred position. A nailed on role for United would certainly appeal from a fantasy football perspective.

    kagawas biggest problem was that he was bought to play behind rooney once utd signed rvp that went out the window as rooney will play off rvp. I dont think utd would have signed kagawa if they knew at the time they were going to get rvp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Morzadec wrote: »
    Obviously not one to consider for the moment but if Sahko starts playing for Liverpool, at 5.5 he could be a big points scorer.

    Why? Could be in line for bonus in new bonus point system.

    He had over 90% pass accuracy last season averageing out 40-something passes. He would be the ultimate passing CB in FF terms, which we have seen already gives a great chance of bonus.

    So if he plays and if Liverpool keep a clean sheet (esp in a narrow win) he should be getting bonus.

    Like I said, just one to keep an eye on, cos I'm not sure if he'll walk straight in the team and there is a lot of competition there at CB

    Liverpool have a lot of nice fixtures coming up, if he starts then I'll be definitely bringing him in, what's his card stat do you know?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,962 ✭✭✭Hogey007


    any liverpool fans able to tell me what the likely back 4 will be? i had planned on toure as a player in my team for my final wildcard team but is he now unlikely to be a regular?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Hogey007 wrote: »
    any liverpool fans able to tell me what the likely back 4 will be? i had planned on toure as a player in my team for my final wildcard team but is he now unlikely to be a regular?

    They don't know themselves since Agger and sakho both only play the lcb role, id imagine sakho playing along with Agger or possibly sakho moved to lb, there is also the possibility of pool playing 3 centre backs but I don't think they will. But both skertl and Toure played well so maybe Bren will be reluctant to drop them just yet as he is known for giving players the position to lose.

    Toure could also be moved to defensivemid so I'm going to hold onto him just in case he finds a way into the team but I wouldn't gamble on him using my wildcard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    They don't know themselves since Agger and sakho both only play the lcb role, id imagine sakho playing along with Agger or possibly sakho moved to lb, there is also the possibility of pool playing 3 centre backs but I don't think they will. But both skertl and Toure played well so maybe Bren will be reluctant to drop them just yet as he is known for giving players the position to lose.

    Toure could also be moved to defensivemid so I'm going to hold onto him just in case he finds a way into the team but I wouldn't gamble on him using my wildcard.

    toure could also play rb with johnson injured. Tbh anything cud happen safest bet is go with mig.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,365 ✭✭✭Crash Bang Wall


    toure could also play rb with johnson injured. Tbh anything cud happen safest bet is go with mig.

    This....anything could happen. If Sakhois on International duty, I cant see him getting a debut away to Swansea on Monday week. Id imagine Johnson wont be fit for Swansea, so RB will be Wisdom or Toure. Hard to drop Skrtel after Sunday as well as Agger. Only nailed on positions are Mignolet in goal and Enrique at LB, but Cissoko will be fit in 4-6 weeks so id imagine that will be up in the air then.

    On Monday Id hazard a guess at:

    Mignolet
    Wisdom...Toure....Agger....Enrique

    But he could also go 3cbs. Cant see Toure at RB though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,962 ✭✭✭Hogey007


    cheers for the replies about the Liverpool defence.
    my plan had been to go coleman alongside vidic or zab and the a 5.0 def, toure or dawson. with shaw and turner who rotate nicely as my other 2.
    but now dawson is a bigger rotation risk and toure is too. might just go with toure and see how it pans out or else try free up .4 or .5 to get kos or mertesacker in instead of toure.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭SantryRed


    Everything that Kevin said above is spot on in my eyes. Cazorla will be on the left and is .5 more expensive that Walcott too. Everything points to Walcott being a much better pick than Cazorla. Walcott should see a lot more gametime compared to last season.

    THeo could have at least 3 goals this season already. He's getting into the right positions. Goals will come in time, very confident in that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Swiper the fox


    SantryRed wrote: »
    THeo could have at least 3 goals this season already. He's getting into the right positions. Goals will come in time, very confident in that.

    Absolutely true. Theo looks like he's in great nick, Lloris had to be at his very best on Sunday, particularly when challenging Theo outside the box, he looked razor sharp against Fulham also.
    I was a critic of his consistency and finishing before but I don't think I'd be without him in my team now, Ozil or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    Yeah basically anything could happen with Liverpool defence at the mo.

    I would avoid Johnson and Toure for the moment due to injury concerns.

    Mignolet is almost a must have as a goalkeeper at his price and there's little need to double up (I did at the start of the season as I thought Toure at 5 was too good to turn down).

    So stick with Mig.

    Enrique maybe the most likely to start regularly in the short term after - Sakho is not really a left-back and it would be very harsh to drop him after some very solid performances, so if you really wanted a Liverpool defender I'd be inclined to go with Enrique


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Swiper the fox


    Agger is pretty sure of his place isn't he? I'd much rather have an outfield defensive cover than a goalie.
    Johnson also is certain to play when he's fit, we'll have to say a decade of the rosary for Kolo, I'd say he's in a lot of our teams and was looking like an inspired buy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Agger is pretty sure of his place isn't he? I'd much rather have an outfield defensive cover than a goalie.
    Johnson also is certain to play when he's fit, we'll have to say a decade of the rosary for Kolo, I'd say he's in a lot of our teams and was looking like an inspired buy.

    its a shame toure got injured i was going toure boruc now its gonna be mig and maybe shaw or lovren. The toure boruc combo saves atleast .5 .As im on wildcard it makes most sense to go with mig now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,991 ✭✭✭sword1


    Toure injury was supposed to be minor,should be available,whether he starts with new signings and skertle performance is a Different thing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,256 ✭✭✭✭Lemlin


    sword1 wrote: »
    Toure injury was supposed to be minor,should be available,whether he starts with new signings and skertle performance is a Different thing

    I don't think Rodgers likes Skrtel. With the new signings, I'd say he'll be gone in January.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭RIALTO1


    kagawas biggest problem was that he was bought to play behind rooney once utd signed rvp that went out the window as rooney will play off rvp. I dont think utd would have signed kagawa if they knew at the time they were going to get rvp.

    On the Kagawa conundrum, this is from Danial Taylor of the Guardian:

    "United are taken aback, for example, by the latest suggestion they challenged Arsenal for Mesut Ozil. The truth is that United and Manchester City were both offered the player three weeks ago. United turned it down because they had already made up their mind that Wayne Rooney would not be leaving and they did not want to break their transfer record, paying upwards of £40m, for someone who plays in the same position.
    Their thinking also took into account they have Shinji Kagawa, among others, for the No10 role. Kagawa still features prominently in the thinking of David Moyes despite not even being on the bench against Liverpool on Sunday. His problem is two-fold: one, that he has had an exhausting summer with his national team and is being brought back slowly; two, that Moyes has not really seen him play or got to know him very well. He is not, however, being marginalised.
    United rebuffed an approach from Atlético Madrid for the Japan international and would have done the same if Borussia Dortmund had been in touch. As it was, there has not been a single telephone call from the Bundesliga club, despite talking up a possible return."

    Full article......

    http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/sep/04/manchester-united-ander-herrera-transfer-farce


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    RIALTO1 wrote: »
    On the Kagawa conundrum, this is from Danial Taylor of the Guardian:

    "United are taken aback, for example, by the latest suggestion they challenged Arsenal for Mesut Ozil. The truth is that United and Manchester City were both offered the player three weeks ago. United turned it down because they had already made up their mind that Wayne Rooney would not be leaving and they did not want to break their transfer record, paying upwards of £40m, for someone who plays in the same position.
    Their thinking also took into account they have Shinji Kagawa, among others, for the No10 role. Kagawa still features prominently in the thinking of David Moyes despite not even being on the bench against Liverpool on Sunday. His problem is two-fold: one, that he has had an exhausting summer with his national team and is being brought back slowly; two, that Moyes has not really seen him play or got to know him very well. He is not, however, being marginalised.
    United rebuffed an approach from Atlético Madrid for the Japan international and would have done the same if Borussia Dortmund had been in touch. As it was, there has not been a single telephone call from the Bundesliga club, despite talking up a possible return."

    Full article......

    http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/sep/04/manchester-united-ander-herrera-transfer-farce

    Im sorry but that is scutter, no way in hell that either of them turned down the chance to sign Ozil, infact Danial Taylor reported on Tuesday that United had attempted to hijack the deal at the last minute, he needs to at least kepp the fiction consistent. Kagawa over Ozil lol either Taylor or Moyes and Pelligrini needs to be sacked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,711 ✭✭✭keano_afc


    I'm still laughing at the disbelief amongst people that Arsenal have signed Ozil. Its almost like "hang on, its impossible that Ozil is going there, he must have turned down/been offered to other teams first."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,881 ✭✭✭bohsman


    Kagawa over Ozil lol either Taylor or Moyes and Pelligrini needs to be sacked.

    There's a difference between turning down Ozil because you already have Kagawa and being given an option between signing Ozil or Kagawa when you have neither.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,706 ✭✭✭premierstone


    bohsman wrote: »
    There's a difference between turning down Ozil because you already have Kagawa and being given an option between signing Ozil or Kagawa when you have neither.

    Turning down signing Ozil is retarded no matter who you have, and it would have been the perfect signing for both new managers to win over the fans, particularly Moyes who will always have Fergies shadow looming in the background.

    Quite simply the article is a load of horse shi*e.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,881 ✭✭✭bohsman


    So Madrid shouldn't have been willing to sell under any circumstances and he should definitely have gone for a multiple of 40m considering any club not attempting to sign him is retarded..

    I highly rate him as a player but when you have the players City have you just don't need to pay that much in transfers and wages whereas for United it is the one part of the pitch they don't need to strengthen.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 215 ✭✭jolim24601


    I'm sure it was an inter-league agreement. You get Bale we get one of yours. Can't suck the straw too much one way or the other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,962 ✭✭✭Hogey007


    Turning down signing Ozil is retarded no matter who you have, and it would have been the perfect signing for both new managers to win over the fans, particularly Moyes who will always have Fergies shadow looming in the background.

    Quite simply the article is a load of horse shi*e.

    no it's not! ozil's area is not a problem area for united, why on earth would they blow their transfer budget on an area that isn't a problem?
    yes Ozil is class, there's no disputing that, and he is better than the options united have there, but united's big concern is central midfield, if the article is correct and united did turn down the opportunity to speak to him, it was a while ago, at that time united still hoped on getting fellaini and another midfielder who we now know was herrerea. they got one and couldn't get down the price on the other but if they had we were talking over 50 million spent, at the time they didn't know they wouldn't get both so as i say, ozil wasn't a problem area.
    united were poor in the transfer market and i'm sure a lot of lessons were learned but not signing ozil wasn't a mistake. and before that's taken out of context, i have already said ozil is brilliant and will play that role better than rooney or kagawa but we had other area's that needed addressing more.
    In an ideal world we could have paid the 35-40 million for ozil and sold kagawa for 20 million or so but it's not football manager, it's real life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭kevinroche3333


    Andre Wisdom at 4.4 could become a bargain route into the Liverpool defence if rumours of Glen Johnson being out injured for 8-10 weeks are accurate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,305 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Prodston


    Andre Wisdom at 4.4 could become a bargain route into the Liverpool defence if rumours of Glen Johnson being out injured for 8-10 weeks are accurate.

    True or would Martin Kelly be preferred? He's even better at 4.3. I'll stick with Mig myself but there's a bargain to be had potentially.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭kevinroche3333


    True or would Martin Kelly be preferred? He's even better at 4.3. I'll stick with Mig myself but there's a bargain to be had potentially.

    The impression i got from the Liverpool thread is that Wisdom would be the one to step in.
    Its still a grey area as the extent of Johnsons injury is unconfirmed and its quite possible that he might not be out for long at all, but worth keeping an eye on.
    Wisdom was very close to dropping to 4.3 before Johnsons injury last weekend which would have been even sweeter!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,256 ✭✭✭✭Lemlin


    What about the two new defenders Liverpool have signed? Can either of them play right back?

    I was reading the Liverpool thread the other week and some were saying Liverpool may have signed two defenders because Rodgers' long term goal to play 3 at the back with 2 wing backs. He experimented with that at the end of last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    kolo toure could play rb aswell he played there for arsenal. Sakho is a left sided player there is talk he could even play lb.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,612 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    I reckon Kolo will start at RB, allowing Sakho to play at CB with Agger.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭Danger781


    I just noticed Danny Rose is a LB classed a midfielder in FF. I know OOP players can be ones to watch sometimes, but surely a defender classed as a mid is the opposite of what you want?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Swiper the fox


    Danger781 wrote: »
    I just noticed Danny Rose is a LB classed a midfielder in FF. I know OOP players can be ones to watch sometimes, but surely a defender classed as a mid is the opposite of what you want?


    Exactly, there is nothing worse. Coleman had the same problem last year but that was more understandable, Rose would be fantastic as a defender.


Advertisement