Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Anglo Tapes

191012141525

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭Mr.Micro


    serfboard wrote: »
    In relation to how long will it take for someone to be jailed have a look at this item.

    :eek:

    An American insurance firm is involved here, so nothing less than justice to appease our US cousins would suffice. When it comes to ourselves then its often a different story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Rightwing wrote: »
    Our justice system is shocking.

    But, can you jail someone for just being stupid? That's all most of these bankers were, tapes with a few of them cursing and singing a national anthem taking the piss doesn't warrant jail as far as I'm concerned.

    If we couldn't nail our ex taoiseach, I can't see how we can nail these.

    They weren't stupid, they were greedy, egotistical, arrogant and highly unethical.
    They probably possess the right criteria to rise in the world of banking anywhere it seems.
    Scofflaw wrote: »
    Er, I compared Madoff and Anglo because the thread is about Anglo, and your point, I presumed, was that the Anglo investigation is taking too long for your liking. As to the case you mentioned, I think that's covered by the point that Madoff was first investigated in 1992, and wasn't brought to book until 2008.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw

    You see once again I think you are being disengenous.
    I think it was pretty plain to see I was drawing a correlation between two ponzi scheme architects, albeit one much much larger and more complex than the other.
    You chose to disregard it because it didn't suit your argument.

    Yes the SEC had investigated, and very poorly at that, Madoff and a related accountancy firm in 1992.
    They also investigated him again in 199, 2000, 2004.
    There were enough red flags and they cocked up big time.
    Hell most of those guys would have fitted right in with our CB/IFSRA/Dept of Finance or our stock exchange who can't even spot insider trading.

    But here is where there is a big difference.
    Once his sons blew the whistle he was whisked away in handcuffs and within a year was on trial.
    And yes we know he pleaded guilty, but then again wasn't his case more complex, longer running and international.

    Whereas here it has taken over 4 odd years to try a guy who diddled 10-20 odd million.
    Oh and we haven't even finished the trial yet.

    As for Anglo, I don't expect any justice in this country.
    Yeah they will give a slap on the wrist to seanie for his non declaring of director loans but that will be it.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,010 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Rightwing wrote: »
    Our justice system is shocking.

    But, can you jail someone for just being stupid? That's all most of these bankers were, tapes with a few of them cursing and singing a national anthem taking the piss doesn't warrant jail as far as I'm concerned.

    If we couldn't nail our ex taoiseach, I can't see how we can nail these.

    Of course you can jail someone for being stupid - its certainly not a defense. Their only valid defense is that they carried out their actions in good faith and in line with their responsibilities as employees of the shareholders, which they clearly did not. I see you're selectively editing your own reading of the transcripts - all they were doing was cursing and singing? Please.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Thankfully this is yet another of those cases where nobody was at fault and nobody in any political party actually knew anything at all about it.
    So move along electorate, and remember to vote for FF or FG again next time as usual. Thanks!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 311 ✭✭Lbeard


    jmayo wrote: »
    Yes the SEC had investigated, and very poorly at that, Madoff and a related accountancy firm in 1992.
    They also investigated him again in 199, 2000, 2004.

    There were enough red flags and they cocked up big time.
    .

    They could have caught him by looking at a single monthly trading statement he issued to clients. He used to just make up the prices of the securities.. They didn't match the market prices.

    Ed Thorp was asked to do due diligence for an investor in the 90s who was looking at Madoff's fund. Thorp saw straight away it was a fraud.

    The bankers themselves tend to be very stupid. I think Drummer's personal property investment was enough to make him insolvent. And Thick Seanie Fitz blew a fortune "investing" in moronic properties such as a bog in Ghana that supposedly had oil. Would you buy a bog in Ghana?......They saw that eejit coming.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,010 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Lbeard wrote: »
    The bankers themselves tend to be very stupid. .

    97% of people involved in the product/corporate/sales side of banking are morons. With a 3% margin of error.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Sand wrote: »
    97% of people involved in the product/corporate/sales side of banking are morons. With a 3% margin of error.

    That's a little extreme I should think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,010 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    No, it really isn't. I did allow that 3% might be competent. That's pretty much in line with the level of competency demonstrated by the requirements for bailouts and extraordinary state support over the past 5 or 6 years.

    If you cant make money as a bank, you're not all that smart in my book.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 311 ✭✭Lbeard


    Sand wrote: »
    97% of people involved in the product/corporate/sales side of banking are morons. With a 3% margin of error.


    These people really are that stupid. It has to do with the way many people don't like intelligent people (the swots always get bullied at school). Upsetting someone can blow a major deal. A woman banker who did an anonymous interview with the Guardian said a "political skill" for surviving in the environment is to pretend you're more stupid than you actually are.

    I've heard plenty of other stories. One time I went for a job interview with an IT company that services some of the major banks - the whole way through the interview, they kept re-iterating, that their clients were really stupid. And the hardest part of the job was dealing with their stupidity.....One of the questions was "If you were under a desk fixing cables, if the banker kicked you in the stomach, what would you do?"....

    The Anglo guys were morons. They knew the calls were recorded. If they were that thick, wait'll we see the emails.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Lbeard wrote: »
    The Anglo guys were morons. They knew the calls were recorded. If they were that thick, wait'll we see the emails.
    And the FF/FG boys are any better?
    "Give us 7 billion" and they do it off the back of a phone call?
    TBH anyone who thinks these millionaires who have ripped off and wrecked Ireland are merely inept and not just straight up thieves is being pretty generous to the cnuts.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    So today we learn Merrill Lynch told the Govt to 'shut down' Anglo. Only conclusion I can draw, which is the 1 I believed from the moment the crisis broke, the government did not want to burn bondholders. But,,, why?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,876 ✭✭✭Scortho


    According to today's indo drumm wanted to burn the bondholders but the government wouldn't let them.

    It also mentions that Merril lynch advised the government to shut it down.
    While last week was interesting, this week will be really interesting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,876 ✭✭✭Scortho


    Rightwing wrote: »
    So today we learn Merrill Lynch told the Govt to 'shut down' Anglo. Only conclusion I can draw, which is the 1 I believed from the moment the crisis broke, the government did not want to burn bondholders. But,,, why?

    You got there before me!:(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,876 ✭✭✭Scortho


    Rightwing wrote: »
    So today we learn Merrill Lynch told the Govt to 'shut down' Anglo. Only conclusion I can draw, which is the 1 I believed from the moment the crisis broke, the government did not want to burn bondholders. But,,, why?

    I find more interesting that drumm who is one of the most hated men in Ireland, had put a plan in place for a bond buy back.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,654 ✭✭✭Noreen1


    Rightwing wrote: »
    So today we learn Merrill Lynch told the Govt to 'shut down' Anglo. Only conclusion I can draw, which is the 1 I believed from the moment the crisis broke, the government did not want to burn bondholders. But,,, why?

    The possibilities are endless.
    Whether we ever get a definitive answer remains to be seen.
    So far, all we seem to have gotten are lies, where we have been given any information at all.

    We desperately need an International investigation.
    Personally, Id like to see an Australian team investigate, because:

    A: Their legal system is similar (or so I'm led to believe) - and there are no language barriers, and:

    B: I don't think they have such a vested interest as Europe or the US, in the sense that they don't appear to have as much to lose, financially, as the aforementioned Continents.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    ‘Independent’ limits coverage of Anglo tapes following contact from DPP

    The Irish Independent curtailed its coverage of the Anglo Irish Bank recordings in yesterday’s newspaper after being contacted by the Director of Public Prosecutions.

    It is understood the DPP did not take issue with the Independent’s coverage of the story, but that it expressed concern about the potential consequences of the emergence of certain other information into the public domain.

    The Friday editions of the paper did not contain any new details from the Anglo tapes.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/independent-limits-coverage-of-anglo-tapes-following-contact-from-dpp-1.1447110

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,004 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    Scofflaw wrote: »

    Right,so now it begins to get interesting....One hopes that the DPP as a Public Official of the highest order will be fortright in explaining to the middle "P" in his title the EXACT reasons behind this interjection ?

    Equally INM,now have to front-up to the type of Media-Organ they proffess to be....fearless in pursuit of the truth etc etc...

    Surely at this point,the only avenue open is the FULL disclosure of every second of recorded Anglo conversations ?

    Or,are we seeing the first instances of the old-guard making good their initial slack handling of the clean-up....If I recall correctly,it took 9 weeks for the Gardai to rock up to Stephens Green,so if the Anglo's didn't sanitize their den in that time they thoroughly deserve everything that's currently hitting their fans ;)


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    As if the DPP will actually prosecute anyone over this. They have consistently been the champion of the established elite and they're not going to change now. Backed up by a police force that flat out refuses to investigate any criminality not involving lads in tracksuits, we can all see what'll happens from here clear enough can't we?
    Media silenced and the colossal fraud can get back in motion.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,276 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    There is an ongoing investigation. How can the guards be refusing to investigate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭Mr.Micro


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    As if the DPP will actually prosecute anyone over this. They have consistently been the champion of the established elite and they're not going to change now. Backed up by a police force that flat out refuses to investigate any criminality not involving lads in tracksuits, we can all see what'll happens from here clear enough can't we?
    Media silenced and the colossal fraud can get back in motion.

    Looks like it. I posted a few days back that there would be injunctions, if that is what is going on. Such revelations in the tapes is making the DPP and others look bad..... we cannot have that now.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Scofflaw wrote: »

    That's interesting. Yesterday they were meant to have a big story coming online at 12, I wondered why it never appeared.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 311 ✭✭Lbeard


    Scortho wrote: »
    I find more interesting that drumm who is one of the most hated men in Ireland, had put a plan in place for a bond buy back.


    Yeah, and I have a plan to grow wings and fly around like a fairy.

    They were very literally doomed several years before the crash. The idiotic fly by the seat of your pants, as if it's a rugby match, doesn't work with a large financial institution.

    There was no saving the bank.

    And something very similar happened with Lehmann Brothers. The management had screwed the bank, building an overpriced property portfolio. They were doomed for years regardless of their exposure to dodgy mortgage derivatives.

    Dick Fuld, the eejit behind Lehmann's, he believed, and others in the bank believed it could be saved right up to a few hours after Fuld was forced to step down. When the new management were piecing together the portfolio, Fuld was still in his office, every so many minutes they'd go in to him to ask him to explain major deals. Fuld had given the go ahead for these deals, they were all his "strategy", but he didn't have a clue about the details. His "strategy" was to just do big deals for the sake of doing big deals - like a gambler who believes they have an infinite supply of cash, running around a casino laying heavy bets on all the tables. Snuff at a wedding style.

    Fuld's management technique was also very similar to your typical thick and sneaky Irish manager (aw we know these traditional Irish fellas well). They don't have a clue what's happening, and they keep everyone else in the dark to maintain their power - if anyone is a threat (ie clever) get them sacked. Lehmanns employed a lot of very bright people. Parts of the operation were running very well, but Fuld managed to keep everyone in the dark as to the true exposure (a major part of his tactic being not having a clue himself) - Fuld was a brutally incompetent psychopath, who creamed the profits of the work of better people for himself (Like Seanie Fitzpatrick).

    But back to Anglo and the plan........Like Lehmann Brothers, they were doomed for years. All Drummer had left was the same faffing about with the American central bank (the Fed) and the American government as Fuld.

    The difference between Lehmanns and Anglo is the Americans let Lehmanns go under. It's arguable whether this was a good idea or not, as it caused a massive financial shockwave. At the same time it might be arguable that the entire banking system is diseased and infected with a class of toxic parasite we could all be better without.

    Our best option would have been to force the European Central Bank to take Anglo, (spread the pain), and not the Irish Central Bank (another operation of useless traditional Irish paddy whacks).

    This is what Merkle meant by saying the ESF couldn't retroactively resolve the Anglo situation. Had Drummer and the boys not been so dishonest and our "leaders" not so thick, then the ECB would have had to act as the FED. Instead we have a situation, where the Bank of Delaware (that's us) has had to bailout the entire continent.

    And while Drummer and the boys are still living the high life, we have mentally disabled people sleeping on the streets, people committing suicide over debts and job losses, the majority of the country are suffering - and for years. IT'S A BLOODY NIGHTMARE. And I don't think we'll have closure until Drummer's wind pipe is closed - permanently

    And Drummer and the boys are just laughing at us.

    drumm1.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Cody Pomeray


    Scortho wrote: »
    I find more interesting that drumm who is one of the most hated men in Ireland, had put a plan in place for a bond buy back.
    People tend to forget that there was a bond buyback in Anglo, i.e. there was a quasi-restructuring on junior debt, they just called it a "liability management exercise" instead of a default.

    The ducks that David Drumm instructed John Bowe to have lined up were 'shot' six months after this phone call.

    I don't believe Drumm was expecting this solution to answer the senior debt problems at Anglo, because there is an obvious limit to how successful a senior debt buyback can possibly be. The marginal ratio of capital arising on a buyback is inversely proportional to debt seniority, and to Government/ NCB intervention, put simply, the effect wears off the more important the debt becomes, and the effect wears off the more of it you buy.


  • Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There is an ongoing investigation. How can the guards be refusing to investigate.

    are you serious? Is it not totally obvious now, 5 years later?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,876 ✭✭✭Scortho


    People tend to forget that there was a bond buyback in Anglo, i.e. there was a quasi-restructuring on junior debt, they just called it a "liability management exercise" instead of a default.

    The ducks that David Drumm instructed John Bowe to have lined up were 'shot' six months after this phone call.

    I don't believe Drumm was expecting this solution to answer the senior debt problems at Anglo, because there is an obvious limit to how successful a senior debt buyback can possibly be. The marginal ratio of capital arising on a buyback is inversely proportional to debt seniority, and to Government/ NCB intervention, put simply, the effect wears off the more important the debt becomes, and the effect wears off the more of it you buy.

    From the glimpse I've gotten from the indo it was going to be a serious burning. It'd have to have been if it were to have any chance of rescuing the bank.

    Seeing where we are now, it'd be interesting as to what effect it'd have.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Cody Pomeray


    Scortho wrote: »
    From the glimpse I've gotten from the indo it was going to be a serious burning. It'd have to have been if it were to have any chance of rescuing the bank.
    But the 50% mentioned tallies with the 50% they got 6 months later. AIB did similar, I can't remember what the others did. What you're hearing there isn't that dramatic, in my lay person's opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    are you serious? Is it not totally obvious now, 5 years later?

    The gardai are investigating it otherwise we wouldn't have the tapes. As Scofflaw has mentioned its complex. The ran the business very badly to say the least but where stupidity becomes criminal isn't always clear and requires time and expertise to sort out with a bank the size of Anglo. But hey who needs due process rule of law etc. Sure it would be better if they were put up on trumped up charges and which get shot down in the courts at some stage than actually conduct a proper investigation that actually has consequences/punishment for the people involved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭maninasia


    Scortho wrote: »
    From the glimpse I've gotten from the indo it was going to be a serious burning. It'd have to have been if it were to have any chance of rescuing the bank.

    Seeing where we are now, it'd be interesting as to what effect it'd have.

    Writing off 50% of their value was discussed. The elephant in the room is why didn't the government do this or **** the bank down like Merrill recommended?

    Another interesting tidbit was revealed by Noonan. Seems the tapes coming out now is highly inconvenient and we could have 'done without this now'.

    I've a feeling he's known about the tapes for quite a while and he kept schtum due to the investigation and the obvious damage they do in terms of public relations and relations with the ECB and Germany.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    PeadarCo wrote: »
    The gardai are investigating it otherwise we wouldn't have the tapes.
    Like all those other financial sector crooks our law enforcement has successfully investigated and our judiciary have successfully prosecuted in the last few years?
    Holding my breath here...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭maninasia


    PeadarCo wrote: »
    The gardai are investigating it otherwise we wouldn't have the tapes. As Scofflaw has mentioned its complex. The ran the business very badly to say the least but where stupidity becomes criminal isn't always clear and requires time and expertise to sort out with a bank the size of Anglo. But hey who needs due process rule of law etc. Sure it would be better if they were put up on trumped up charges and which get shot down in the courts at some stage than actually conduct a proper investigation that actually has consequences/punishment for the people involved.

    There doesn't seem to have been any urgency or feedback about the progress of these investigations. In the meantime some of the major players have left the jurisdiction.


Advertisement