Films that do/don't live up to the Book or Screenplay

ibarelycare · 14-06-2013 10:34AM

TheComeUp wrote: »

Fight Club definitely stands out. One of my favourite books and my favourite movie.

The Hunger Games is a good read too and I liked the movie alot as well.

Just read the Hunger Games books, and much prefer the movie, but that's mainly down to the poor writing in the books.

AnonoBoy · 14-06-2013 10:36AM

Films?

I don't watch films. They're the work of the devil.

If I want moving pictures I'll turn to my shelf full of flip-books, thank you very much.

syklops · 14-06-2013 10:37AM

gramar wrote: »

Roddy Doyle's - The Van. I was very let down by the film.
The Godfather on the other hand is a great screen adaption of the book.

Part of the problem with the Barrytown trilogy's trip to the cinema is while the books were a trilogy involving the same family, they were all different families in the movies so there was less continuity.

hidinginthebush · 14-06-2013 10:37AM

ibarelycare wrote: »

Just read the Hunger Games books, and much prefer the movie, but that's mainly down to the poor writing in the books.

I'm the complete opposite. While I thought the books were poorly written, they were enjoyable, I though the film was terrible.

syklops · 14-06-2013 10:39AM

AnonoBoy wrote: »

Films?

I don't watch films. They're the work of the devil.

But you said you laughed at Law Abiding Citizen. Is Law Abiding Citizen the only movie you have ever seen?

AnonoBoy · 14-06-2013 10:41AM

syklops wrote: »

But you said you laughed at Law Abiding Citizen. Is Law Abiding Citizen the only movie you have ever seen?

Sssshhh.... you.

What I say in one forum is not to be referenced in another. Especially when I'm making a joke.

14-06-2013 10:45AM

desertcircus wrote: »

As an adaptation (and as a film), Wanted is a near-perfect failure. The graphic novel is sardonic, vicious, savagely unpleasant, hilarious and completely black-hearted, and the film is an utterly pointless action romp.

I Am Legend deserves a special mention, for getting so much right and falling at the last hurdle.

The movie adaptation of I Am Legend didn't get anything right from the book. Yes, Will Smith was relatively good, but so many things about it were wrong.

Children of Men is an example of a movie that was far better than the source material. While the book had an interesting story, it was just badly written and largely boring for the most part. Remember reading once that the director heard the story behind the book but refused to read it as it would ruin his vision - and it worked.

Next Friday I'm going to go see World War Z. I'm a huge fan of the book - have my own copy signed by the author, have listened to the audiobook, and love anything to do with zombies. I'm not expecting the movie to be anything like the book - the author himself has come out and said it has only the name in common, but I'm not expecting it to be a bad movie. I like Brad Pitt and there's going to be millions of effin' zombies on screen at once!!

One of the only examples I can think of right now of a good book making a good movie was The Green Mile.

Merkin · 14-06-2013 10:50AM

ibarelycare wrote: »

The title of this thread is confusing! Pick one or the other OP!!!

Lol, no way!

I'm genuinely interested in hearing about films that have surpassed or matched a great book as well as films that have been a huge disappointment so I can make note to avoid them!

Funny you say that about The Shining as I thought the film was amazing, another one of my favourites!

D-FENS · 14-06-2013 10:53AM

ibarelycare wrote: »

(I'm waiting for someone to mention The Shining as a good movie...personally I hated Stanley Kubrick's adaptation of the story).

Ah here, leave it out!

ibarelycare · 14-06-2013 10:55AM

Merkin wrote: »

Lol, no way! I'm genuinely interested in hearing about films that have surpassed or matched a great book as well as films that have been a huge disappointment so I can make note to avoid them!

Fair enough

Merkin wrote: »

Funny you say that about The Shining as I thought the film was amazing, another one of my favourites!

Yeah I know, I'm in the vast minority. I read the book before I ever saw the film. Stand-alone, it's a great movie, but I think it's a bad adaptation. I don't think it captures just how insane Jack is going. I'd other issues as well but it's been a few years since I've read or watched, so I can't really remember!

goose2005 · 14-06-2013 10:57AM

Harry Potter is weird, the good books (1-4) made crap movies, but the crap books (5-7) made good movies. I think as the books went along Rowling lost enthusiasm (and editors were afraid to correct her), while as the films went along the actors learned to act and the writers didn't stick so slavishly to the books.

TPD · 14-06-2013 11:02AM

I'd agree with the 'good adaptation' consensus for the green mile, shawshank redemption, trainspotting, cuckoos nest.

A bad adaptation that I've seen recently is 'On The Road'. Really didn't capture anything of the book IMO.

I think films will always have a hard time getting books right, as they can't really do a first person perspective very well.

ibarelycare · 14-06-2013 11:04AM

goose2005 wrote: »

Harry Potter is weird, the good books (1-4) made crap movies, but the crap books (5-7) made good movies. I think as the books went along Rowling lost enthusiasm (and editors were afraid to correct her), while as the films went along the actors learned to act and the writers didn't stick so slavishly to the books.

I don't agree that books 5-7 were bad, but the last 4 movies (books 5, 6, 7 pt I & II) were brilliant. But those books were a lot more grown up than the first 3 and way darker so that's why they could do so much more with the movies.

Green&Red · 14-06-2013 11:07AM

I think one flew over the cuckoos nest is probably the worst film ever made, or maybe just the biggest disappointment, in particular the amazing character of chief in the book is a non entity in the film

Pfff I say

long range shooter · 14-06-2013 11:10AM

Deep troath

steddyeddy · 14-06-2013 11:20AM

In the name off the rose is a brilliant book and although the movie isn't a patch one the book its still a bloody good film!

karma_ · 14-06-2013 12:14PM

Jaws, film is slightly better than the book.

rule of thumb in my experience though is that the books are almost always superior.

gramar · 14-06-2013 12:26PM

I remember reading The Chamber by John Grisham and thinking that Gene Hackman would be perfect for the Sam Cayhall role. Lo and behold he was cast for the part but the film was as dull as dishwater.

Pretzill · 14-06-2013 12:27PM

Cormac McCarty's the Road was a better book than the film - one where your own imagination sees better pictures. I read The Exorcist as a teen and it scared the bejaypers out of me didn't see the film until much later and thought it wasn't a bit scary. I'd say Godfather a better film than book great cast. Philip Pullman's first in the trilogy of His Dark Materials was an awful adaptation -

af_thefragile · 14-06-2013 12:28PM

American Psycho.
Love the film. Don't think I'ld be too keen on reading a book full of snuff porn...

The Watchmen.
It was good to see how well the film followed the comic right up until the end when they dumbed the film down. Also was amazing how closely the film actors matched the comicbook characters.

The Great Gatsby.
The film followed the main story very well although missed out a bit on the depth the book gave to the characters and the overall themes of the book.
And also f*cking Jay-Z!!! Ruined the whole film...

Lord of the Rings.
Didn't read the books but loved the visuals of the film. Peter Jackson did an amazing job directing it!

chopperbyrne · 14-06-2013 12:30PM

Deleted User wrote: »

DUNE

I assume you mean the film doesn't live up to the book.

--Kaiser-- · 14-06-2013 12:31PM

chopperbyrne wrote: »

I assume you mean the film doesn't live up to the book.

The thread title is up there somewhere

Celly Smunt · 14-06-2013 12:33PM

The godfather did the book a compliment.Awful book,great movie.

Frank Black · 14-06-2013 12:33PM

af_thefragile wrote: »

American Psycho.

Love the film. Don't think I'ld be too keen on reading a book full of snuff porn...

The book's way better than the film (imo).

chopperbyrne · 14-06-2013 12:37PM

--Kaiser-- wrote: »

The thread title is up there somewhere

It is.

"Films that do/don't live up to the Book or Screenplay"

af_thefragile · 14-06-2013 12:37PM

Frank Black wrote: »

The book's way better than the film (imo).

I'll agree but I do believe the film did an amazing job portraying Patrick Bateman's character and psyche and also the whole yippe culture the book was satirizing. Christian Bale's acting was brilliant and the film is full of really memorable scenes, especially the business card scene!

OneArt · 14-06-2013 12:37PM

Deleted User wrote: »

DUNE

HATED the David Lynch movie. The only thing I enjoyed was that the dialogue was almost identical to the book's. The visuals, character portrayals etc. all awful. Bald Bene Gesserit, wtf?

The mini-series was okay. Ian McNeice was a brilliant Baron. Sinister in the eloquent way he was supposed to be, not that sh!tty lunatic David Lynch created.

--Kaiser-- · 14-06-2013 12:38PM

chopperbyrne wrote: »

It is.

"Films that do/don't live up to the Book or Screenplay"

Ah so it is! My bad.
Well the film is an awful mess and the book is damn good so I would say your guess would be correct

DaveDaRave · 14-06-2013 12:43PM

surely the thread should have been about the exception to the rule

gufnork · 14-06-2013 12:47PM

The Flash Gordon novelisation of the 80's movie is amazingly good. So much better than the movie. It manages to maintain that real pulp feel without being cringeworthy. The Prologue is just fantastic. It's starts with Ming saying,

"UNDERLING, I am weary."

...and it just gets better and better from there. Dale is a bit of a revelation too. Bad girl!

Films that do/don't live up to the Book or Screenplay

Comments