Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"The Origin of Specious Nonsense"

1319320322324325328

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Mickrock has been carded and banned again for failing to debate honestly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,452 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    robindch wrote: »
    Mickrock has been carded and banned again for failing to debate honestly.
    Point of order....

    Surely 'failing' implies 'trying'?

    :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭kiffer


    what_28845c_421828.png

    I'm mildly irritated by mickrocks failure to give any indication of what he would consider a novel development in a species.
    Can we make a list of outstanding claims/questions and a responses that were ignored?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    I don't see why we should bother. He's obviously trolling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭kiffer


    I don't see why we should bother. He's obviously trolling.

    True but there's a tendency for people to think that because he kept asking talking he must have been on to something... like Kent Hovind believes he has never lost a debate...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Kent Hovind also believes you can start a PhD with "Hello, my name is Kent Hovind...". What he thinks about debates really doesn't matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    And here I was looking forward to explain how the Cambrian Explosion was started by Michael Bay...


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,593 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Galvasean wrote: »
    And here I was looking forward to explain how the Cambrian Explosion was started by Michael Bay...
    I'm there if Michael Bay makes that movie. As long as they get [insert hot female lead] there via a wormhole or some such method. And also mangle the dates so that there's T-Rexes and megalodons there too. And RPGs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 390 ✭✭sephir0th


    Sarky wrote: »
    Kent Hovind also believes you can start a PhD with "Hello, my name is Kent Hovind...". What he thinks about debates really doesn't matter.

    Ah there it is: http://wlstorage.net/file/kent-hovind-doctoral-dissertation.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,452 ✭✭✭✭endacl



    Wow.
    Wow indeed Doctor Jimbob! I'm a'fixin' to git me one o' them there degrees in doctorin' too! Praise Jebus!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Wow.


    O yeah. The Patriot University produced no fools, I'll tell ye.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,452 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Nodin wrote: »


    O yeah. The Patriot University produced no fools, I'll tell ye.
    Should we club together and buy a doctorate for a certain somebody? Feck it, maybe they'd do a group rate. We could all have one!

    'I don't have to suggest an alternative! I'm a doctor, I tells ya! I have a certificate to prove it!'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    The doctorate needs a fun name. I suggest 'Awesotronics"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,452 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Galvasean wrote: »
    The doctorate needs a fun name. I suggest 'Awesotronics"
    This could turn into one of 'those' strings...:-)

    How about 'Cognitive Impenetrology'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭legspin


    endacl wrote: »
    This could turn into one of 'those' strings...:-)

    How about 'Cognitive Impenetrology'?

    Considering most of the thread is one continuous painful mind****, that may be a good thing to do with it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 965 ✭✭✭Doctor Strange


    endacl wrote: »
    Hey! Welcome to Boards! And frustration...

    I meant to get to this earlier :p Not an entirely new user, had intended on an extended break from here (to reduce my blood pressure :pac:), but mickrock carried on being too wrong to ignore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    I meant to get to this earlier :p Not an entirely new user, had intended on an extended break from here (to reduce my blood pressure :pac:), but mickrock carried on being too wrong to ignore.

    Some things are too wrong to ignore.

    I think that needs to go in the Quotes thread.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    239972.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,452 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    robindch wrote: »
    239972.png
    That doesn't look even the least bit like me!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    endacl wrote: »
    That doesn't look even the least bit like me!
    Oh, yes it does :)

    240002.png


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,452 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    robindch wrote: »
    Oh, yes it does :)

    240002.png
    You have waaaaaaaay too much time on your hands...

    :-)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    endacl wrote: »
    You have waaaaaaaay too much time on your hands...
    Just bored of Python's silly attitude to tabs + spaces at the moment...!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭kiffer


    robindch wrote: »
    Just bored of Python's silly attitude to tabs + spaces at the moment...!
    I hear that the snake in Eden was a python and that the fruit was really an IDE... after all IDLE hands do the devil's work...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭mickrock


    You do know you're calling EVERY scientist in the last 150+ years that has tested, and subsequently agreed with the Darwinian model wrong? Just clarifying that point. Cause it's all of their work versus your ignorance of the subject.

    The great philosopher of science Karl Popper said:

    "I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme—a possible framework for testable scientific theories."

    Later he partly recanted this because of the pressure from the Darwinist mob.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,452 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    mickrock wrote: »
    Blah Blah philosopher Blah science Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Darwinism Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah theories."

    Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Darwinist Blah.
    Go away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭mickrock


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Yes there is, mountains of it [evidence]. Much of which has already been highlighted to you.

    Dickie Dawkins has some interesting things to say about evidence:

    "My argument will be that Darwinism is the only known theory that is in principle capable of explaining certain aspects of life. If I am right it means that, even if there were no actual evidence in favour of the Darwinian theory (there is, of course) we should still be justified in preferring it over all rival theories."

    What a nincompoop! (BTW Dickie, there is evidence for evolution but none for evolution by natural selection.)


    Here's another of his quotes:

    “The theory of evolution by cumulative natural selection is the only theory we know of that is in principle capable of explaining the existence of organized complexity. Even if the evidence did not favour it, it would still be the best theory available.

    How deluded can he get? He has reached the conclusion that Darwinism is correct from the outset and to hell with the evidence or lack of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,452 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    mickrock wrote: »
    Dickie Dawkins has some interesting things to say about evidence:

    "My argument will be that Darwinism is the only known theory that is in principle capable of explaining certain aspects of life. If I am right it means that, even if there were no actual evidence in favour of the Darwinian theory (there is, of course) we should still be justified in preferring it over all rival theories."

    What a nincompoop! (BTW Dickie, there is evidence for evolution but none for evolution by natural selection.)


    Here's another of his quotes:

    “The theory of evolution by cumulative natural selection is the only theory we know of that is in principle capable of explaining the existence of organized complexity. Even if the evidence did not favour it, it would still be the best theory available.

    How deluded can he get? He has reached the conclusion that Darwinism is correct from the outset and to hell with the evidence or lack of it.
    HeadScanIL-443_1.jpg


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7 dead786


    Sarky wrote: »
    Even if he refuses to learn, his tragic lack of understanding is a great springboard for others to share their knowledge with people who ARE interested. Some day we can take this thread, remove every one of J C's and dead one's and mickrock's posts, and the amount of fascinating knowledge left will be a beautiful thing indeed.
    you have lost your cause. Because you start banning people. JC is victim of your tyranny. Deadone is still fighting. With what mouth you are talking.. You cut people's tongues and then you think you have won.. You're a loser sarky, with all of your dogmas, with all of your creeds.. with all of your misery.... face the truth.. the moderators who are ruling in this foram are real world tyrant... they can't face truth.. they support you in propagating your religion but can't bear other people... I feel pity on all of converts here...:pac:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7 dead786




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,019 ✭✭✭nagirrac


    dead786 wrote: »
    you have lost your cause. Because you start banning people. JC is victim of your tyranny. Deadone is still fighting. With what mouth you are talking.. You cut people's tongues and then you think you have won.. You're a loser sarky, with all of your dogmas, with all of your creeds.. with all of your misery.... face the truth.. the moderators who are ruling in this foram are real world tyrant... they can't face truth.. they support you in propagating your religion but can't bear other people... I feel pity on all of converts here...:pac:

    Have you really been banned 785 times? Wow, what a hero..


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement