Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

If there was a referendum tomorrow - how would you vote?

2456789

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda


    No based on social and economical reasons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭Lad Of Banter


    I voted yes because "I would like a United Ireland.".


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    It's not just the loyalists. There's two factions of extremists I don't want in my country.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Northern Ireland can stay Northern Ireland. It's nice to be able to hop on a bus to the UK instead of flying. Great shopping up there. Besides, the country's pissing away enough money as it is. And besides besides, the Troubles would flare up again, and Sinn Feinn would be gloating so very hard it would cause most of us to puke ourselves inside-out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,226 ✭✭✭Solair


    For me, the main concern would be:

    1) Cost. We can't even afford to pay our own deficits, never mind NI's massive one. NI runs a deficit of roughly £9bn / €10.6 billion / year.
    The Republic's deficit during the crisis is €20.2 billion / year and it aims to close that down to very little over the next few years.

    NI's actually not in very good economic shape when you pull out the UK's support. Particularly when you consider that there's no plan to reduce that massive deficit.
    That NI figure doesn't include many things e.g. cost of servicing of the NI bit of the UK national debt, or various other services that may be provided into NI as benefit in kind from the UK.

    2) Social unrest / serious violence spreading south of the former border.

    .....

    If partition hadn't happened, I think Ireland would probably have avoided a lot of the problems it had on both sides of the border as the various political movements / populations would have balanced each other out.

    I don't think Northern Unionism would have gone to the excesses it did in the 60s and 70s and I don't think in the Republic that the Catholic Church + assorted cronies would have had the influence they ended up having during the 1930s-70s.

    However, the problem now is that the Republic has matured into a stable democracy, which despite the current economic crisis, is well capable of functioning within the EU on its own two feet.

    While Northern Ireland has kind of fossilised all the social unrest from another era and continues to battle out those old arguments while being totally dependent on the rest of the UK for state-back up in terms of subsidy.

    They've grown apart very dramatically in the last few decades too. I don't really see all that much in common in terms of politics / economic between the two anymore. Politically speaking, I can't really see how you'd reconsile what is a fairly bland, liberal, Northern European style democracy in the South with a very conservative unionist community and a perhaps slightly less conservative nationalist one.
    I just find some of the debates you see in NI are like something from the 50s here, especially on issues like gay marriage or stuff like that. There's a lot of overtly religious stuff in politics that reminds me more of the US deep south than Europe. While I think in the Republic, that kind of dogmatic approach to life has kind of died out over the past few decades.

    I just can't really see how the two would function as one state at present.

    As much as it would be nice and would be satisfying all sorts of national ideals, I can't really see how we can practically integrate the two, or what the benefit would be to either jurisdiction.

    I think we just need to leave well enough alone and let it tick away. Perhaps 30+ years down the line, the Republic could be booming while the UK might not be so attractive, who knows. Minds may change, generations move on, old ideas and prejustices die.

    For now, I just think integration of the two would be WAY more hassle than it would be worth. If it happens it will have to happen by osmosis all by itself and totally consensual.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    Faith+1 wrote: »
    They can keep the North. Don't give a f*ck, we can barely look after ourselves.

    The north is as much "ourselves" as Dublin, Cork or Galway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    The north is as much "ourselves" as Dublin, Cork or Galway.
    Obviously not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    iDave wrote: »
    As a matter of principle I would like to vote yes, it would also be great to reunify with those who identify as Irish up there.
    However Loyalism hasnt moved on, its still violent and sectarian to the core and I dont want bombs being detonated in Dublin, Cork etc by the UVF. The border for now keeps us safe.

    So you would let a small group of criminals dictate the nation's future?
    "Republic" indeed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,226 ✭✭✭Solair


    The north is as much "ourselves" as Dublin, Cork or Galway.

    I think the issue is if you rush/force any kind of integration of the two, it will cause chaos, unrest and probably violence.

    At present, NI is still in the UK and it doesn't look like it's very keen to do anything different. The only way you can change that is by political persuasion and making the Republic a very attractive place to be part of tbh.

    Basically, if we want a united Ireland in the future sometime, we have to make the sales pitch!

    If the Republic's a booming (genuinely), open, friendly, safe, progressive place, I honestly think that's 3/4 of the battle.

    We are where we are, and I think we just have to be practical about it. It's got to be about consensus or it will just always be violent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    So you would let a small group of criminals dictate the nations future?
    "Republic" indeed.

    The IRA tried to do it for 30 years


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    If the loyalists decided to go back to Scotland I would like to see a UI but as long as they are on the Island I want to be seperate from them.

    Things might have been a lot different if O Neill and O Donnell didn't high tail it to the Continent 400 years ago as there would have probably been no plantation of what was the most Gaelic part of Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Wht way would a vote go?

    Would it be an all Ireland vote or just a referendum in the North?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,226 ✭✭✭Solair


    If the loyalists decided to go back to Scotland I would like to see a UI but as long as they are on the Island I want to be seperate from them.

    Things might have been a lot different if O Neill and O Donnell didn't high tail it to the Continent 400 years ago as there would have probably been no plantation of what was the most Gaelic part of Ireland.

    Hmm... how far do you want to go back though!

    I blame it all on those pesky Vikings and the Romans!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Misty Chaos


    Would I like to see a United Ireland? Yes.

    Would I like to see it within my lifetime? Yes.

    Is this the right time? NO.

    Ireland has an economic crisis to sort and NI is whole kettle of fish one it's own. That and a lot of worn out ideals still prevail in both landscapes - Only when they become a little more even should we even begin consider it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Meh. I'd like to see a UI but I don't think conditions are right currently. I'm not voting because the choices are reductive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭CZ 453


    If that clown Devalera went to London with Collins they could have got more done I think. The unionists were rewarded for their contribution of men to the war. We could have played to that. Enough Irish men south of the border joined the British army and we could have gotten more for it from London.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    The IRA tried to do it for 30 years

    No they didn't. Nor are they the subject of this thread. This is the problem with these discussions on Boards. A handful of the usual suspects always try to drag the argument into an endless round of whataboutery so that it gets nowhere


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Solair wrote: »
    Hmm... how far do you want to go back though!

    I blame it all on those pesky Vikings and the Romans!

    I was just saying things might have been different.

    BTW the Romans didn't come here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Wht way would a vote go?

    Would it be an all Ireland vote or just a referendum in the North?
    It would have to be a referendum in both jurisdictions. The North cannot decide to join the South without the South's agreement and vice-versa.

    Theoretically the North could vote to join the South and the South could fumble it's way into ratifying the union without referendum, but that would be tied up indefinitely by challenge after challenge.

    Most likely each jurisdiction would hold a referendum. If both jurisdictions approve, then there would be a constitutional rewrite, which again both jurisdictions would have to approve by referendum as the "new" constitution of Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭Reoil


    I'm not voting because the choices are reductive.

    The choices are Yes and No. Binary answers are generally pretty reductive.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭rn


    I would abstain from such a vote. I am genuinely torn between the romantic idea of a united Ireland, verses the harsh reality of the economic and political situation a united Ireland would bring about.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Reoil wrote: »
    The choices are Yes and No. Binary answers are generally pretty reductive.

    Which means the outcomes don't have much value.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 50 ✭✭abbeyrock


    Vote no to a united Ireland, all that will happen is the loyalists will start trouble similar to the IRA did in London in the 80's down the south. Plus why do the IRA want a united Ireland when it would put them out of business, who else is going to supply heroin and protection racketeering.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,372 ✭✭✭im invisible


    United Ireland all the way, total reform of public service in both regions asap, if not sooner


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 31,119 ✭✭✭✭snubbleste


    We would'nt be allowed to have a vote. It would only be for North denizens. It's their choice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭StudentDad


    Northern Ireland as part of the Banana Republic? No thanks. We have a hard enough time mis-managing this country as it is, without incorporating another state into this mess. If we are going to do stupid things we may as well rejoin the UK. Imagine the fun of Gerry Adams and co. sulking in parliament and the rest of us just trying to get on with life :D Now there's an idea! Get on with life and stop rabbiting on about stupid lines on a map. So no I would vote against re-unification!

    SD


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,146 ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Where is the option for "I would like NI to go on their own"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,067 ✭✭✭Gunmonkey


    snubbleste wrote: »
    We would'nt be allowed to have a vote. It would only be for North denizens. It's their choice.

    Wouldnt both countries have to vote, and a "yes to UI" from both sides. The North couldnt hold a vote to re-unite with the South and then go "were part of your country now, give us money". And vice-versa.

    As for me, I would vote no. I always hear this figure of £10 billion given to NI each year, could be overblown but when you see the unemployment figures up north, and the size of their public service it must still be a large sum England coughs up.

    Never see Gerry mentioning the billions of € in cuts/new taxes we would have to endure for a united Ireland. Why dont we try get this part of the island back on track before we start taking more debt onboard? Plus the massive cost of switching everything in the north to €'s, plus issuing 1.5 million passports and PSRI numbers, and would public service workers just be transferred over or would England have to sack em all and we rehire them? Can we, with the Croke Park in effect? Or would we see doctors/nurses/Gardai/firefighters spread even further apart in our country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    United Ireland all the way, total reform of public service in both regions asap, if not sooner

    THIS! Thank Christ. I'm so sick of people assuming a united Ireland would just be stapling six counties onto 26 or an extension of the free state.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    Gunmonkey wrote: »
    Wouldnt both countries have to vote, and a "yes to UI" from both sides. The North couldnt hold a vote to re-unite with the South and then go "were part of your country now, give us money". And vice-versa.

    As for me, I would vote no. I always hear this figure of £10 billion given to NI each year, could be overblown but when you see the unemployment figures up north, and the size of their public service it must still be a large sum England coughs up.

    Never see Gerry mentioning the billions of € in cuts/new taxes we would have to endure for a united Ireland. Why dont we try get this part of the island back on track before we start taking more debt onboard? Plus the massive cost of switching everything in the north to €'s, plus issuing 1.5 million passports and PSRI numbers, and would public service workers just be transferred over or would England have to sack em all and we rehire them? Can we, with the Croke Park in effect? Or would we see doctors/nurses/Gardai/firefighters spread even further apart in our country.

    See, this would be the problem with having a vote tomorrow. People basing their decision on stuff they "heard somewhere" or something somebody said in the pub.
    Thankfully if/when it does come to a referendum it will be more like Scotland and people will have plenty of time to examine the actual facts and figures, pros and cons, realities and perceptions of what a united Ireland would mean rather than baselessly shouting "we cant afford it, blah blah blah"


Advertisement
Advertisement