Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 12/13

1113114116118119335

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    RasTa wrote: »
    40k a week is too much tbh. Interesting situation if true. I couldn't see us paying it but City...

    You say that but at the end of the day the market dictates the price. Chelsea/City and a few others I'm sure would have no problem offering those kind of wages. I'm not just saying this as a Liverpool fan but he should have people around him that realise those sides won't afford him anything like the playing time he's currently getting at Liverpool which is the most important thing at this stage of his development and for his career. His agent though will most likely be ignoring that and just be looking for the most money he can get him.

    Opr


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,066 ✭✭✭Washington Irving


    Ive got a horrible little feeling we could loose the kid.

    Well so long as we don't lose him it's ok.


    Sorry, but that's the third time I've seen that spelling error in the thread today


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    opr wrote: »
    His agent though will most likely be ignoring that and just be looking for the most money he can get him.

    Opr
    Ultimately that is his job, isn't it?
    He may never be in as good a position to get a decent "pay day" for his client and himself....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,230 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    5starpool wrote: »
    This thread would explode if he refused to sign a new deal.

    a7d16b4cf14f27aac4992060b30f176508696bb6.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Kess73 wrote: »



    Well you got Hoillet to QPR spot on about a month before it happened........
    Gary Jacob is the source this time


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    RasTa wrote: »
    40k a week is too much tbh. Interesting situation if true. I couldn't see us paying it but City...

    I think Utd would tbh. He's an exceptional talent and if you have to pay a bit extra on wages at the start for the chance to secure his services over the next 15+ years, it'd be worth it.

    Could see Chelsea and City def being interested though and you'd have to think he'd chose them over Utd given that he's currently at Liverpool, it'd just be easier and it's what the club would much prefer if he did have to leave.

    Does anyone have any indication as to what kind of love he has for Liverpool? That'll probably be the major factor as to whether he'll sign a new contract or not because I have little doubt that other clubs are/will be sniffing around him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    If he signs for Liverpool he plays, at City he rots in splendid company.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    kippy wrote: »
    Ultimately that is his job, isn't it?
    He may never be in as good a position to get a decent "pay day" for his client and himself....

    If it was a player who was beyond the development stage who was say 22/23 then I would say yes. I think at 17 the most important thing for the player is that they're getting regular football. Yeah a small chance that it might be his last big chance but in Sterling case that's a tiny risk. I think in terms of team selection at 17 the most important factor should be regular first team football with the best team possible and not money. Money is of course a factor but it's not like he isn't being offered a reasonable wage.

    Opr


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    mike65 wrote: »
    If he signs for Liverpool he plays, at City he rots in splendid company.

    Not necessarily. It could be argued that he'd develop better at a club where he's only getting 20 starts + 20 sub appearances over the next couple of seasons.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,872 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    Blatter wrote: »
    Does anyone have any indication as to what kind of love he has for Liverpool? That'll probably be the major factor as to whether he'll sign a new contract or not because I have little doubt that other clubs are/will be sniffing around him.

    I wouldn't be surprised if he was open to a move away, with London being the likely destination as that's where hs family are I believe, and he came from QPR. I do think he will sign a new contract before the new year though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,258 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Blatter wrote: »
    Not necessarily. It could be argued that he'd develop better at a club where he's only getting 20 starts + 20 sub appearances over the next couple of seasons.

    Na, he wouldnt make the bench of either manchester clubs, would barely get a look in at the london clubs either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    Blatter wrote: »
    Does anyone have any indication as to what kind of love he has for Liverpool? That'll probably be the major factor as to whether he'll sign a new contract or not because I have little doubt that other clubs are/will be sniffing around him.

    Honestly at this stage I wouldn't say a great deal but I don't know how that may have changed since breaking into the first team. He was reportedly homesick, very unsettled in Liverpool a while back and the club moved his family down with him to help with those problems. London boy so if he was to take a move I'd say his first choice would be back to London.

    Opr


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    Na, he wouldnt make the bench of either manchester clubs, would barely get a look in at the london clubs either.

    If Scott Sinclair can make the bench for City....

    He's actually a player that City could do with. They don't really have any other player like him, he's a really talented natural winger that'd provide them with another option.

    As for United, it seems likely that Nani will leave soon and imo somebody like Sterling would be the perfect replacement given the attacking options they have already.

    I think he'd definitely make the bench/start a lot for Chelsea/Spurs/Arsenal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    opr wrote: »
    If it was a player who was beyond the development stage who was say 22/23 then I would say yes. I think at 17 the most important thing for the player is that they're getting regular football. Yeah a small chance that it might be his last big chance but in Sterling case that's a tiny risk. I think in terms of team selection at 17 the most important factor should be regular first team football with the best team possible and not money. Money is of course a factor but it's not like he isn't being offered a reasonable wage.

    Opr

    How many 17 year olds with "promise" have vanished into almost obscurity?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    Blatter wrote: »
    Not necessarily. It could be argued that he'd develop better at a club where he's only getting 20 starts + 20 sub appearances over the next couple of seasons.

    Would he even be getting near that kind of playing time? Look at Scott Sinclair since his move.

    Opr


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,379 ✭✭✭hefferboi


    My team for Southampton:

    Reina
    Wisdom----Skrtel
    Agger
    Johnson
    Lucas/Allen

    Allen/Suso
    Sahin
    ----Suso/Enrique
    Assaidi
    Suarez

    If Lucas is fit enough I'd like to see him start. Southampton aren't a physical side so he shouldn't really be too risky. If he is fit enough I'd have Allen and Sahin ahead of him with Suso, Assaidi and Suarez in the front three.

    If he's not fit enough I'd drop Allen back and have Sahin and Suso ahead of him. I'd bring in Enrique and switch him with Assaidi.

    Its an ideal match to rest Gerrard and Sterling as we're up against the weakest defence in the league and I'd love to see Assaidi get his first start.

    Southampton are playing well at the moment and have a very good team, attacking wise. Have watched them a lot this season and they're starting to get rewards for they way they've gone at teams. Gaston Ramirez is their main threat but Lallana and Puncheon are very good also.

    At the back they're prone to error and I think we have enough to beat them by 2, even though we haven't been great in front of goal. If Suarez turns up though it could be more.

    As we keep saying, this is a must win and I'm hoping Rodgers gets it right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    5starpool wrote: »
    I wouldn't be surprised if he was open to a move away, with London being the likely destination as that's where hs family are I believe, and he came from QPR. I do think he will sign a new contract before the new year though.
    opr wrote: »
    Honestly at this stage I wouldn't say a great deal but I don't know how that may have changed since breaking into the first team. He was reportedly homesick, very unsettled in Liverpool a while back and the club moved his family down with him to help with those problems. London boy so if he was to take a move I'd say his first choice would be back to London.

    Opr

    Liverpool have a huge fan base and there's been a lot of love for Sterling this season after his breakthrough. I'd be surprised if that didn't have a big effect on your average 17 year old. Everyone's different though I suppose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,325 ✭✭✭smileyj1987


    I would go with this for Southampton

    Reina
    Wisdom----Skrtel
    Agger
    Johnson
    Lucas

    Allen
    Sahin
    ----Gerrard
    Enrique
    Suarez


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    kippy wrote: »
    How many 17 year olds with "promise" have vanished into almost obscurity?

    Not many with his talent who're getting regular first team football already at 17 in the premiership. I would also argue that your point is precisely the reason that you should be looking out for him on a footballing level to give him the best chance of that not happening. At the end of the day the dream is to be a professional footballer for many years not to get a pay day at 17.

    Opr


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    opr wrote: »
    Would he even be getting near that kind of playing time? Look at Scott Sinclair since his move.

    Opr

    I think he's far better than Scott Sinclair and would get more game time than him. City's 'plan B' is usually to take off a forward player and push Yaya Toure further up. I think Sterling would be another option that could genuinely change a game. I don't think Scott Sinclair gives you that and that's why he isn't used that much. I still don't understand why City bought him. To have more home grown players? Buy one that will actually make a difference!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,258 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Blatter wrote: »
    If Scott Sinclair can make the bench for City....

    He's actually a player that City could do with. They don't really have any other player like him, he's a really talented natural winger that'd provide them with another option.

    As for United, it seems likely that Nani will leave soon and imo somebody like Sterling would be the perfect replacement given the attacking options they have already.

    I think he'd definitely make the bench/start a lot for Chelsea/Spurs/Arsenal.

    Yeah he does but how often does he play? I cant remember him ever playing for em, i feel he was a signing mancini made for the sake of it tbh while there was a busget left over. Wed never sell to united either. Hes very good but he wouldnt be getting a quarter of the game time with any of the other 3 london clubs or 2 manchester clubs that he does with us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,379 ✭✭✭hefferboi


    I think Sterling is getting built up too much by a lot of people. He's still very raw and his end product is poor but he's had a good season so far. He's nowhere near a world beater yet and won't be for another few years. He needs to bulk up and sort out the silly frees he gives away (that will come with experience). If he's dropped it won't be the end of the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭billybudd


    amiable wrote: »
    Are Southampton interested?


    You sound worried :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭billybudd


    hefferboi wrote: »
    I think Sterling is getting built up too much by a lot of people. He's still very raw and his end product is poor but he's had a good season so far. He's nowhere near a world beater yet and won't be for another few years. He needs to bulk up and sort out the silly frees he gives away (that will come with experience). If he's dropped it won't be the end of the world.


    We haventh much else to be excited about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,379 ✭✭✭hefferboi


    billybudd wrote: »
    We haventh much else to be excited about.

    He'll be class I've no doubt about it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    Yeah he does but how often does he play? I cant remember him ever playing for em, i feel he was a signing mancini made for the sake of it tbh while there was a busget left over. Wed never sell to united either. Hes very good but he wouldnt be getting a quarter of the game time with any of the other 3 london clubs or 2 manchester clubs that he does with us.

    Not often, but as I said above I don't think he's anywhere near Sterling in terms of talent or ability to change a game.
    hefferboi wrote: »
    I think Sterling is getting built up too much by a lot of people. He's still very raw and his end product is poor but he's had a good season so far. He's nowhere near a world beater yet and won't be for another few years. He needs to bulk up and sort out the silly frees he gives away (that will come with experience). If he's dropped it won't be the end of the world.

    I don't think he's been built up too much.

    He's an extraordinary talent considering the level he's performing at, at the age of 17. That's not saying he's currently the best winger in the PL or that he shouldn't be nurtured properly - it's just saying it how it is.

    You allude to his end product as being poor, I don't think it is. It's inconsistent but that's the case for most wingers at all ages, even the very best ones. I think his end product is hugely impressive for his age.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,605 ✭✭✭Fizman


    Anyone else notice the error in SSNs report on Gerrard tonight?

    They had his stats on screen for about 10 mins......14 games.....1 goal.....2 assists.

    That got me thinking.....how the hell does he have so many points in Fantasy Football if those are his stats? I check FF site and there he is, 12th highest performing MF in the whole league. 2 goals and 4 assists.

    Anyway, carry on......:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭daithijjj


    Fizman wrote: »
    Anyone else notice the error in SSNs report on Gerrard tonight?

    They had his stats on screen for about 10 mins......14 games.....1 goal.....2 assists.

    That got me thinking.....how the hell does he have so many points in Fantasy Football if those are his stats? I check FF site and there he is, 12th highest performing MF in the whole league. 2 goals and 4 assists.

    Anyway, carry on......:p

    FF has to go with scores as they are the day or two after the game. The dodgy goals panel alter them later, FF doesnt wait for that. Don know if they alter assists, cant see why they would be arsed.

    Careful what you read on sky.

    A8vBj9_CQAAOsVU.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,836 ✭✭✭Sir Gallagher


    Another nothing story from the Daily Mail

    The quote from Suso about Enrique is surprisingly accurate and funny.
    'What f*** is he doing? This guy is gay, he has some mental problems. He does everything except play football.'


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,066 ✭✭✭Washington Irving


    daithijjj wrote: »
    A8vBj9_CQAAOsVU.jpg

    :(


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement