Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Bible, Creationism, and Prophecy (part 2)

15960626465232

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,247 ✭✭✭pauldla


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    Don't be silly, pauldla. Everyone knows, deep down, what everyone knows deep down!

    Oh. I didn't know that. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,691 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    pauldla wrote: »
    Oh. I didn't know that. ;)
    Deep down, I knew you didn't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 352 ✭✭Masteroid


    J C wrote: »
    ... so you are both in denial of God ... and when you have the occasional doubt over your denial ... you also reject Him.

    ... not much reason for a God who believes in free will ... and therefore the right to be wrong, 'contacting' you then!!!!:)

    So why hasn't God been in contact with you? Rejection or denial?

    You see where being unscientific gets you?

    The available data suggests that since the statistical frequency of sick children of atheists that survive a fatal illness is no less than the frequency of sick children of devout religionists that survive a fatal illness, God must operate on an equal opportunities basis.

    More worryingly, many children die despite the fact that there is a huge amount of prayer going on on their behalf. It is quite evident that belief and prayer have no impact on child survival and that genetics and environment do. On what criteria would God choose not to save a child anyway?

    And I reckon, in these financial times, that more Mercedes-Benz's were lost in spite of prayer than were acquired through prayer.

    In fact, the statistical evidence shows that the world behaves as if there is no God at all. This is why science finds it so difficult to 'measure' God, He appears not to exist.

    And God 'wants' us to find Him? Well, would it kill Him to up His workrate on unselfish prayer. World peace would me more compelling proof of God that a tramp driving around in a Mercedes-Benz. How hard would that be?

    But there are those who claim to be in direct contact with God, He 'talks' to them. Are there any clues there? When science examines such people, usually after they've been caught butchering women, neurologists find malformed structures in the brain, or a tumour, or a shrink might reveal a difficult childhood. In any event, we seem to learn more about human psychology in these cases than we do about the existence of God.

    So science has to throw its hands up and say that there is no scientific evidence in favour of the existence of God and until it can utilize something other than photons to probe the question, it will have remove itself from the question altogether.

    Science can produce no evidence of God and therefore you can't use science to show that God exists.

    Actually, you just can't use science.

    Why hasn't God contacted you? I mean you represent Him, don't you? Why doesn't God endow you with knowledge of evolution, entropy, geology, physics? That way at least you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself and undermining God's cause into the bargain.

    You'd better hope He doen't exist because you'll be judged very harshly if He does.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭The Concrete Doctor


    (QUOTE:) "Everybody knows that God exists 'deep down'. Some accept Him ... while other people go into denial and/or reject Him.
    ... are you denying or rejecting Him?"

    There are over 1 billion Muslims in the world. There are a similar number of Hindus and there are nearly half a billion Buddists. Each have some very well educated, intelligent people who will present extremely well read arguments for their own religions. They will be able to reference books and learned ancestors to validate their beliefs.
    They can't all be right. Are they all wrong? The real question is, are any of the great religions correct?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sin City wrote: »
    Everybody knows evolution is real, most accept it, but a small minority with their heads in the sand reject this theory in favour of some magical fairy from Grimms Bible.
    'Evolution' is a weasel word ... with several meanings.
    If you are talking about 'Evolution' as genetic and phenotypic 'drift' driven by natural and sexual selection of pre-existing Complex Functional Specified Genetic Information (CFSGI) ... then it's real allright.
    ... but if you are talking about the generation of the CFSGI in the first place ... the only plausible source is creation by intelligence(s) unknown.
    Sin City wrote: »
    Do you have your head in the sand?
    You're the one at grave risk of getting sand in your eyes ... because they are wide shut ... and you seem to be stuck 'head first' in a pile of Evolutionist ... sand!!:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sin City wrote: »
    I see , so its al thatl black and white yeah.
    Satan has only one side, always evil
    Ever since he 'fell' that is the case.
    Sin City wrote: »
    Now, are angels created with free will? If they are surely they are the most perfect of all Gods creations, not man , so why does Satan bother with the likes of us, (I mean , most of our heads would turn for a pretty face, so tempting us isnt going to be that hard)
    The fate of all angels is now permanently sealed. The fallen angels are now demons ... and the heavenly host are not going to follow them in their folly.
    ... so Satan logically concentrates his efforts on the ones that are 'up for grabs' ... living people!!!

    Sin City wrote: »
    This is based on your years researching in the field of human behaviour and psychology which of course can be backed up by peer reveiwed studies, and not , ahem , what Christianitys PR books says right
    ... the peer review was carried out by ... ahem ... God!!!

    Sin City wrote: »
    How can you reject something that doesnt exist?
    Do you reject Oden, Sheva, and Papa Smurf ?
    ... here's the rub ... people do reject God.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Andrewf20 wrote: »
    Yes, exactly, and therefore God endorses evil to exist. It sounds like he knowingly was the architect of its creation.
    God has created free-willed beings ... some choose to do good ... others to do evil.
    God isn't responsible for either the good or the evil they do ...they are!!

    Andrewf20 wrote: »
    "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen..." How does this line make any sense? Invisible things by their very nature are not clearly seen.
    ... it doesn't make sense when you truncate it, as you have done. The explanation is in the next line ... the invisible things are understood by the things that are made, i.e. by the works of His Creation ... including the CFSGI in life and Human Beings.

    Andrewf20 wrote: »
    Deep down all humans may believe that some force created the universe, some may believe a deistic God / mind was at work, but as for your claim that you and everybody else knows the mind of a particular thiestic God - that is proposterous.
    They know that an intelligence of God-like proportions created the universe and all life therein ... and many deny that the God of the Bible was that intelligence.
    ... but this doesn't alter the fact that deep down people know that God exists.

    Andrewf20 wrote: »
    Even though I clearly said they tried to be receptive to God, like myself?
    'Must try harder' ... is all I can say to that!!!:):D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    JC, you are an amazing man,
    ... my wife tells me that too!!!:eek::D

    if indeed you are a man rather than a woman. I think male because you are a little bit arrogant, a male trait. No harm in that though. You know a little about a lot. I'd love to go for a pint with you.
    I know a lot about a lot ... and I'm a man.
    You don't believe in evolution, which is an absolute scientific fact.
    If you are talking about 'Evolution' as genetic and phenotypic 'drift' driven by natural and sexual selection of pre-existing Complex Functional Specified Genetic Information (CFSGI) ... then it's real allright.
    ... but if you are talking about the generation of the CFSGI in the first place ... the only plausible source is creation by intelligence(s) unknown.
    Take a simple example, the appendix in humans. Surely an excellent example of ongoing evolution. Its not required anymore, but it once was. By the way, if we were created perfectly, without any evolution, why was the appendix, which has no strategic function, put into our bodies? Of course there are many theories for its existence, but none are conclusive. It has evolved into a lymphoid tissue which stores lymphocites which fight infection. Notably it is far larger in herbivores such as hares, than it is in humans.
    Your evolutionary bias is showing here ... the Human Appendix has been, just as it is, since Humans were Created ... and it's prime function is the protection of the neo-natal child's digestive system.
    The appendix in the Hare is just an analagous design ... with no other relationship to the Human appendix ... just like a wheel on a car and a wheel on a trolley are a common design ... with no other relationship with each other.
    You use words like adaption or adaptation, which you appear to accept. If you accept adaption then you accept evolution, even at a basic level. Adaptations such as your beloved moths, or the pygmy sea horse, evolve over many generations by the reproductive success of those individuals with heritable traits that are best suited to their environments. This is evolution at work in our world. Natural selection over time.
    These creatures 'evolve' using pre-existing CFSGI.
    But JC, lets have a little challenge. You show me any experiment or even evidence, which proves creationism, even over a number of years and I'll show you one which proves evolution.
    Creation was a once off event ... that cannot be repeated ... but the CFSGI found in all life proves intelligent creation was what happened ... rather than blind evolution.
    By the way, not everybody accepts or knows that God exists. Sorry to burst that little bubble. I know you wish it were true but it's not.
    They all know ... but few accept that He exists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Masteroid wrote: »
    I'm just wondering, wouldn't an eternal being be fireproof?
    Satan is fireproof ... but he inhabits a fiery realm ... and himself and his demons materialise as smoky sulphur smelling entities.:D
    Masteroid wrote: »
    I mean, why did God create a fiery lake for Satan when a watery one is much more economically viable and equally ineffective against Satan? Imagine the fuelbill for an eternal fire.
    Satan's carbon footprint is only exceeded by his pride!!!:)
    Masteroid wrote: »
    I think a fiery lake was chosen as it would have more impact on the thinking of human beings than it would on eternal beings.
    ... both !!!:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 352 ✭✭Masteroid


    J C wrote: »
    God has created free-willed beings ... some choose to do good ... others to do evil.
    God isn't responsible for either the good or the evil they do ...they are!!

    Which is the same as saying that God created good people and evil people then left them to their own devices.

    "And in the red corner we have good and in the blue corner we have evil... seconds out, round one."

    (ding ding)

    Or, cowboys build houses, some choose to stay up and some choose to fall down. It's not the cowboy's fault, it's the house's fault for being affected by gravity.

    What is it about humans that God has lost control over?

    I mean, every photon, each electron and proton, every atom, molecule, every planet and its moons, all the stars and galaxies, even the centres of black holes, all of these exactly obey the laws set down by God.

    Where were humans when the briefing took place?

    Have you read the book of Job? You need the patience of Job to get through it but in it, God is the architect of the evil that befalls Job. But what is really hilarious about this book is the fact that it is Satan who tempts God and gets God to ask him to go and ruin Job, kill his family and afflict him with painful diseases.

    God even complains of being incited against Job for no reason even as He gives Satan orders to afflict Job with anything short of death, to bring mortal suffering to Job.

    If God is putty in Satan's hands then what chance have mere humans? And what kind of a hypocrite would God be if He judges us harshly for being tempted by Satan?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭Sin City


    J C wrote: »
    'Evolution' is a weasel word ... with several meanings.
    If you are talking about 'Evolution' as genetic and phenotypic 'drift' driven by natural and sexual selection of pre-existing Complex Functional Specified Genetic Information (CFSGI) ... then it's real allright.
    ... but if you are talking about the generation of the CFSGI in the first place ... the only plausible source is creation by intelligence(s) unknown.

    You're the one at grave risk of getting sand in your eyes ... because they are wide shut ... and you seem to be stuck 'head first' in a pile of Evolutionist ... sand!!:)

    How can life arise from a figment of our imagination?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭Sin City


    J C wrote: »
    Ever since he 'fell' that is the case.

    So his behaviour can and will never change?
    J C wrote: »
    The fate of all angels is now permanently sealed. The fallen angels are now demons ... and the heavenly host are not going to follow them in their folly.
    ... so Satan logically concentrates his efforts on the ones that are 'up for grabs' ... living people!!!

    How do you know the future behaviour of angels and demons?
    Now you never answered my question, do angels have free will?
    J C wrote: »
    ... the peer review was carried out by ... ahem ... God!!!


    ... here's the rub ... people do reject God.:)


    Again would you hold a peer reviewed journal by papa smurf in the same high regard, seeing as they both share the same reality

    Again, people may reject the idea of God but cant actually reject an imaginary friend


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 352 ✭✭Masteroid


    J C wrote: »
    Satan is fireproof ... but he inhabits a fiery realm ... and himself and his demons materialise as smoky sulphur smelling entities.

    In that case, you're after the wrong guy. I have succumbed to temptation many times in my life but never by anything that smelled of sulphur.

    The real culprit is at large while you are subjecting an innocent angel to an unacceptable level of harassment.

    But anyway, the fiery lake is currently vacant isn't it? Don't we have to wait for judgement day to find out who burns and who does not?

    And doesn't Satan walk the earth rather than inhabit a fiery realm sporting horns and brandishing a pitchfork?

    I'm glad to see that you are not taking this seriously. For a while there I thought you believed the nonsense you were posting. You're kind of like an undercover atheist aren't you?

    Well, although you may mean well, it is unfair of you to attack religion from within by deliberately misrepresenting it. In fact, it is as much an evil thing to do as you can get.

    What if they are right? How many souls will you divert from the Lord by misleading them?

    If they are right then at least a scientist can explain to God why he had no faith. An atheist will be able point out lots of evidence to show that God is a man-made concept designed to manipulate the masses and God would have to accept that that point of view is valid but you, you represent a real danger to yourself if you try to reduce God's soul-harvest by leading gullible people down a path to a false religion, or a cult.

    Be careful J C, you can't accept and reject God. :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 352 ✭✭Masteroid


    J C wrote: »
    ... the peer review was carried out by ... ahem ... God!!!

    A perfect example of what I mean... You consider yourself a 'peer' of God?

    Or are we to infer that the New Testament is the peer-reviewed article to which you allude? If so, then wasn't really you, was it? It was that guy you blinded as he made his way to Damascus.

    Credit where it's due, J C.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,682 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    I want to hear some other Christian views on this. Does any Christian here think some of JC's beliefs are so detached from reality as to be crazy?

    Give me some hope for humanity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 352 ✭✭Masteroid


    J C wrote: »
    Creation was a once off event ... that cannot be repeated ... but the CFSGI found in all life proves intelligent creation was what happened ... rather than blind evolution.

    And here you suggest that God cannot repeat the creation event. How does that work? Was it a one shot deal? He only had one lot of nothing to make everything with but he used up all the nothing?

    So, God cannot recreate the universe and He can't control humans... what makes you think He would be any better at designing CFSI?

    And how could we apply the term 'omnipotent' to such a God?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 352 ✭✭Masteroid


    Gumbi wrote: »
    I want to hear some other Christian views on this. Does any Christian here think some of JC's beliefs are so detached from reality as to be crazy?

    Give me some hope for humanity.

    Don't worry Gumbi, J C's views are as relevant to Christianity as human-behaviour is to global-warming.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭Lelantos


    Masteroid wrote: »

    Don't worry Gumbi, J C's views are as relevant to Christianity as human-behaviour is to global-warming.
    To give him his due, he's about as relevant as the pope on Twitter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Gumbi wrote: »
    I want to hear some other Christian views on this. Does any Christian here think some of JC's beliefs are so detached from reality as to be crazy?

    1 Corinthians 1:17-19

    17 For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with words of eloquent wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.
    18 For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written,“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.”



    Lk 6:20-23 And he lifted up his eyes on his disciples, and said, Blessed be ye poor: for yours is the kingdom of God.

    21 Blessed are ye that hunger now: for ye shall be filled. Blessed are ye that weep now: for ye shall laugh.

    22 Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.

    23 Rejoice ye in that day, and leap for joy: for, behold, your reward is great in heaven: for in the like manner did their fathers unto the prophets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Masteroid wrote: »
    And here you suggest that God cannot repeat the creation event. How does that work? Was it a one shot deal? He only had one lot of nothing to make everything with but he used up all the nothing?
    I said that Creation was a once off event ... which is a historical fact.
    God is omnipotent ... so He could create another Universe, if He wanted to ... and if He did so, in a different dimension, we would never know about it.
    Masteroid wrote: »
    So, God cannot recreate the universe and He can't control humans... what makes you think He would be any better at designing CFSI?
    ... God could create another Universe ... and for all we know He has.
    God could remove Human free will ... but He has chosen not to.
    ... and CFSGI is so sophisticated as to be approaching perfection ... and would be fully perfect ... had the 'fall' not happened.
    Masteroid wrote: »
    And how could we apply the term 'omnipotent' to such a God?
    ... it's an understatement!!!:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,873 ✭✭✭Lantus


    J C wrote: »
    God has created free-willed beings ... some choose to do good ... others to do evil.
    God isn't responsible for either the good or the evil they do ...they are!

    The idea that people are born evil is wrong. babies and children respond to the environment they grow up in. If you were to take a child from a western family in say the UK and give it to a tribe of head hunters then that child would grow up to be a head hunter. Is he evil? No, that is the environment he has grown up in, he knows no different. If you take a child from a tribe and were able to give it to a nazi family they would talk german and salute hitler. Is he evil? No, that what he knows, he reflects the people and society and culture around him.

    It is people that create good and evil through our society and our environments. Even how we treat our own children can affect them differently. There is no such thing as good or bad, there is only what is normal to us.

    The idea that we can lock men in metal cages (jail) and correct their behaviour is an example of our uncivilised behaviour and inability to understand it. Laws do not solve problems.

    This is not a problem of religion but one of all mankind. We are a stupid and uneducated and uncivilised species that still seeks to blame our problems on 'something' else because we have not yet developed the understanding of human behaviour and motivation to solve these problems.

    When we say "some people are good and some are evil" all we are really saying is that we do not understand why some people act in a certain way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Lantus wrote: »
    The idea that people are born evil is wrong. babies and children respond to the environment they grow up in. If you were to take a child from a western family in say the UK and give it to a tribe of head hunters then that child would grow up to be a head hunter. Is he evil? No, that is the environment he has grown up in, he knows no different. If you take a child from a tribe and were able to give it to a nazi family they would talk german and salute hitler. Is he evil? No, that what he knows, he reflects the people and society and culture around him.
    How do you explain the Germans who opposed Hitler and Nazism ... and in some cases, paid with their lives ... if the environment is so all-pervasive as you claim.
    Lantus wrote: »
    It is people that create good and evil through our society and our environments. Even how we treat our own children can affect them differently. There is no such thing as good or bad, there is only what is normal to us.
    There objectively is both good and evil ... and they can be freely and deliberately engaged in by Humans.
    Lantus wrote: »
    The idea that we can lock men in metal cages (jail) and correct their behaviour is an example of our uncivilised behaviour and inability to understand it. Laws do not solve problems.
    Rehabilitation is only one objective of imprisonment.
    Other objectives include the protection of society from dangerous criminals, the deterrance of others from criminal activity ... and the punishment of criminals for their crimes.

    Lantus wrote: »
    This is not a problem of religion but one of all mankind. We are a stupid and uneducated and uncivilised species that still seeks to blame our problems on 'something' else because we have not yet developed the understanding of human behaviour and motivation to solve these problems.

    When we say "some people are good and some are evil" all we are really saying is that we do not understand why some people act in a certain way.
    People's behaviour has the potential to be good or evil.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,256 ✭✭✭Andrewf20


    J C wrote: »
    God has created free-willed beings ... some choose to do good ... others to do evil.
    God isn't responsible for either the good or the evil they do ...they are!!

    It feels like im discussing a Lord of the rings film here. : D. If God is omniscient he would have predicted Lucifers fall from grace, and could have stopped Lucifers jump to the dark side, but he didnt.

    And the bible also says:Isaiah 45:7 (KJ edition): I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.

    So basically it appears that God condemns us for "evil" we create, despite him openly admitting to do doing evil himself, and shows he is responsible for at least some evil.
    J C wrote: »
    ... it doesn't make sense when you truncate it, as you have done. The explanation is in the next line ... the invisible things are understood by the things that are made, i.e. by the works of His Creation ... including the CFSGI in life and Human Beings.

    I read the whole line but it still doesnt make sense to me. "Invisible' doesn't = "clearly seen".
    J C wrote: »
    They know that an intelligence of God-like proportions created the universe and all life therein ... and many deny that the God of the Bible was that intelligence.
    ... but this doesn't alter the fact that deep down people know that God exists.

    You have not presented a tangible argument to back up your claim. All you are doing is repeating what you already said.
    J C wrote: »
    'Must try harder' ... is all I can say to that!!!:):D

    How? I can only be so receptive but if theres nothing coming through, then theres nothing coming though. Why cant God give out a helping hand from time to time to those who genuinely seek for answers. Instead there is nothing but silence. Is it really too much to ask?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,880 ✭✭✭Doc Farrell


    Gumbi wrote: »
    I want to hear some other Christian views on this. Does any Christian here think some of JC's beliefs are so detached from reality as to be crazy?

    Give me some hope for humanity.

    I suspect it's unwise to take the opinion of Any poster too seriously here, it's an anonymous forum, anybody can post anything, a place for venting mostly. I think that goes for 100% of posters, not just the ones we dont particularly agree with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,682 ✭✭✭Gumbi



    I suspect it's unwise to take the opinion of Any poster too seriously here, it's an anonymous forum, anybody can post anything, a place for venting mostly. I think that goes for 100% of posters, not just the ones we dont particularly agree with.
    I don't know - there are regulars here who seem to have genuinely crazy views. I can't see them being regulars if these aren't their beliefs. Of course, taking everything with a grain of salt is good advice - but not too much salt IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,880 ✭✭✭Doc Farrell


    To be blunt, when I have a question on theology I ask a theologian, for legal advice I ask a solicitor (and then double check!).
    Isn't for the first rule of journalism - check your sources?

    I read 'facts' in every thread in every forum which I don't agree with. I guess the choices are argue/agree/ignore. I tend to ignore, the lazy mans excuse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,247 ✭✭✭pauldla


    J C wrote: »
    They all know ... but few accept that He exists.

    Second time to ask, JC: how do you know what everyone knows deep down...?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 352 ✭✭Masteroid


    J C wrote: »
    1 Corinthians 1:17-19

    17 For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with words of eloquent wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.
    18 For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written,“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.”.

    So ultimately God wants us to be stupid and not notice anything. Was St. Paul wise and discerning as he invented the gospel according to Jesus, the one you are a slave to?

    And while we're on the subject, if Jesus is actually God then how could He have died on the cross? Surely being crucified is no more hardship for God than getting into the box is for a woman in the 'Saw the Lady In Half' trick.

    The other notable thing about Christianity is that it is a two-billion strong club of self-confessed evil people. You all accept that you were born evil and thusly you behave as if you were born evil. Accept you are evil and repent and you find favour with God regardless of how much evil you do.

    It kind of makes evil its own reward, doesn''t it?

    If we taught our children that they were born pure and good then the world would be a much better, and safer, place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭K_user


    In order for creationism to work, there must be a God. An overseer of the Universe, which is quite a big place to be omnipotent over...

    There are currently 7 billion people on this planet and we, as a species, are only capable of surviving in a tiny bubble. We need oxygen, water, warmth and food. Take us out of that comfort zone and we die. An entire Universe and we can only survive on less than a 1/4 of the Earths surface area and less than a mile over it. Seems like an awful waste of space, just for one species, created by an omnipotent being.

    Yet there are many millions of other organisms that survive in places here on Earth that we could never go, are still unable to go. Then take the air, the water, the rocks under our feet, into consideration. They have existed for millions of years, in a closed loop system. Like a glass ant farm. We are all tied together. We drink the same water today as the first beasts that waked the Earth. What we expel, others need to survive and vice versa. What is poison to us, others thrive in. Take away the poisonous component and the whole system falls apart. Complex doesn't even start to explain it.

    And this is just one planet.

    Ever since records have been kept, there have been Gods. People have prayed to lightening storms, to the waves of the sea. They have prayed to cows, to crocodiles, to cats, to faeries in the trees. Through all of this the human mind has expanded, learned and questioned. We no longer fear lightening, we understand it. We can predict it. We avoid it. We comprehend the origins of waves and that animals are not deities.

    On this one planet, how many Gods have there been documented? Currently there are approximately 21 major world religions. Each with believers claiming that theirs is the one true religion. But go back in time, how many thousands more could be added to that list? Unfortunately historians can track where religions came from through war and conflict. Which isn't a good argument for a peaceful and loving God.

    In fact Christianity, in all its current formats, comes from an extremely bloody past. People killing each other, by their millions, all for the peace and salvation of man in Gods name.

    What it comes down to is the fact that people need to believe in something. And religion fills that gap. In order for creationism to work, there needs to be a God. But we as a species can't make up our mind as to who or what God is. Interestingly we as a species don't need a God to function. We just need oxygen, water, warmth and food.

    People often see religion as a cause worth dying for, unfortunately, in this world, there are new causes around every corner.

    Creationism needs a God. Evolution however just needs time and space.

    They say that a broken clock is correct twice a day and its true. And all it takes is a single cell to do something new once every million years for Evolution to work. Just like a clock, eventually life gets it right. Even if it is only for a second. Now have a billion, billion, billion, billion, billion cells getting one thing right every million years and you have the makings of life as we know it. It just takes time and somewhere for it to happen.

    And unfortunately the proof is all around us, sorry, should I say in us. Our cells reproduce themselves continously to keep our bodies ticking over. Then one day, almost without warning, one messes up. Gets corrupted. And thats cancer. A single change to a closed system and the whole thing collapses. Well at least from our perspective, because as I said earlier something else will benefit from our component parts.

    Science doesn't claim to have all the answers, in fact it thrives on not having them. Religion however tells us that its all beyond us, its someone else's idea. An omnipotent being brought it all into being and will eventually tally us all up and bring it all to a close. A nice simple explanation for everything. But nothing in life, on this planet, or in this Universe is simple. Under every rock there is a new infinitely complex story. Even typing these words into a screen, that can be read by strangers anywhere in the world almost moments later - hell give me a satellite dish and enough time and people on other planets will be able to read them - is infinitely complex. From our mutual understanding of letters, to words, to my brain making my fingers type, to the molecules within those fingers, to the keyboard and so on so forth. Even thinking about it, really thinking about it, makes the brain hurt.

    To me Creationism is about taking the easy way out. If God exists, then its his/her/its fault and we can all head down the pub and let the angels sort it all out. While Evolution is about taking the time to think about what we are, where we come from, how we came into being and so on and so forth all the way back to the origins of the Universe - another closed system by the way. But its also about looking inward, beyond the cells, beyond the neutrons and electrons, right down to the topics of M theory and beyond.

    In my humble opinion the human race hasn't reached 7 billion, landed on the moon, created planes, satellites, TV and heart surgery, by hiding from the thunder Gods. We keep asking questions, we keep pushing beyond our capabilities, we keep adapting. We Evolve. We don't wait for an omnipotent being to tell us what to do, or how to live our lives. Not that we can make up our minds as to which omnipotent being to be listening to in the first place! :D

    *Rant over...sorry it took so long...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭K_user


    On that note, the Church and the Bible itself has evolved over the years. It has changed so much as to be unrecognisable from its own origins. What was a sin a couple of hundred years ago is now normal life. The church as adapted and evolved to suit how we live.

    Quoting a paragraph from a book that was put together a few hundred years ago, when a collection of men got together and picked out a number of texts from thousands of knows manuscripts, from various canon, none of which completely agree with one another, or have an accurate time line...well it just seems odd... :p


Advertisement